Peer Review Process
Double-Blind Peer Review Process is a method applied for the publication of scientific publications with the highest quality. This method forms the basis of the objective evaluation of scientific studies and is preferred by many scientific journals. Peer reviews have a decisive role in Nosyon: International Journal of Society and Culture Studies’ broadcast quality. All studies sent to Nosyon: International Journal of Society and Culture Studies are evaluated by double-blinding according to the following stages: The author and referee identities of the studies are hidden in the double-blind method. In the double-blind method, the author and referees identities of the studies are hidden. For this reason, it is requested that authors delete their names when uploading their articles to the system.

Manuscript Evaluation
Studies submitted to Nosyon: International Journal of Society and Culture Studies are firstly evaluated by editors. For this reason, the manuscript that does not comply with the purpose and scope of the journal and contain scientifically critical errors and is weak in terms of language and narrative rules in Turkish and English have no original value and not meet the publication policies are rejected. The authors of the rejected works will be informed within one month at the latest submission date. The appropriate manuscript for the pre-evaluation is sent to a field editor for the field of study. In the initial manuscript evaluation, the manuscript is examined in terms of the article writing rules. Then the editor examines detailed the introduction and literature, methods, findings, results, evaluation and discussion sections in terms of originality with the scope of journal publication policies and its scope. As a result of this examination, the manuscripts which are not eligible will be returned within one month with the field editor evaluation report. Appropriate studies are taken to the referee process.

Referees Evaluation
As a result of the editor assessment, the manuscript that complies with publication policy and is sent according to spelling rules and after the pre-evolution of the editor (s)/editorial assistants are sent to the expert of the relevant subject in the evaluation of the referees. The institution(s) of the author (s) and referees cannot be the same, both of the two referees cannot be from the same institution, and there cannot be a supervisor-student relationship between the referee and the author(s). The referees are obliged to guarantee that they will not share any process and document about the manuscript they evaluate. The period taken to referees for the evaluation process is 15 days. The correction proposals from the referees or editors are compulsory to completed by the authors within 15 days. The referees may decide on the eligibility of a manuscript by reviewing the corrections of the study and may request correction more than once if necessary. The journal of editor (s)/Editorial Board decides whether the manuscript can be published or it is published in which the number of the journal. If two referees give a negative opinion, the article is not published and rejected. Referees evaluations are generally based on the originality of the studies, the method used, compliance with the rules of ethics, the consistent presentation of the findings and results, and the literature review. This review is done based on the following questions:
1. Is the title of the article correctly identified as limited and consistent with the text content?
2. Does the abstract reflect the work correctly and clearly?
3. Does the English summary correspond to the Turkish abstract?
4. Is the introductory part of the study well defined?
5. Are the theoretical information on the subject of the study adequately defined?
6. Is the review of domestic and foreign literature relevant to the subject of the study sufficient?
7. Is the method and application of the study correct and sufficient?
8. Is the purpose of the study adequately defined?
9. Are the findings of the study adequately explained?
10. Is the conclusion part of the study well defined?
11. Are the sources used in the study compatible and adequate?
12. Are the table shapes, graphics or pictures used in the study clearly, adequate and understandable?
13. Is the study written in a fluent and understandable language that complies with the grammar rules? (Is English enough?)
14. Is the structuring and expression of the study consistent and sufficient as a whole?
15. Is the contribution of the study to literature or practice sufficient?

Publishing Process
The author (s) cannot make any major changes (except for the suggestions of the editors/referees) on the completion of the referee evaluation process (section, paragraph, table, picture, adding graphics, adding the name of another author (s) to the article later. The journal of editor (s)/Editorial Board decides whether the manuscript can be published or it is published in which the number of the journal.