Araştırma-Sorgulamaya Dayalı Öğretime Yönelik Akademik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi (2000-2020)

Tolga Saka; Tufan İnaltekin

doi:10.26466/opus.865502

EN TR

Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Studies Regarding Inquiry-Based Teaching (2000- 2020)

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of academic studies in the last two decades on inquiry-based teaching (IBT) in the Web of Science (WoS) database. For this purpose, 264 ASDÖ studies indexed in the WoS database were examined in terms of their bibliometric properties and the network map was created using the VOSviewer program. ASDÖ studies were analyzed according to documents, sources, authors, institutions and countries in terms of citation, bibliographic matching, co-citation, co-authorship and coexistence structures. The results showed that "inquiry-based learn-ing", "motivation" and "science education" were the most used keywords. It has shown that the most cited study on ASDÖ is "Spronken-Smith and Walker (2010)", the most active journal is "Interna-tional Journal of Science Education", and the journal with the highest number of citations is "Studies in Higher Education". It was also seen that the studies were mostly published in the UK and USA. It has also been revealed that the studies have intensified in Turkey, Finland and Germany after 2013. It is thought that this study will serve as a guide for new researchers who will work on ASDÖ to identify trends in the field and to compare existing research on the subject.

Keywords

Inquiry-based teaching , bibliometric analysis , VOSviewer

Araştırma-Sorgulamaya Dayalı Öğretime Yönelik Akademik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi (2000-2020)

Öz

Bu çalışma, Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında yer alan araştırma sorgulamaya dayalı öğretim (ASDÖ) yaklaşımına yönelik son yirmi yıldaki akademik çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizini yapmayı amaçla-maktadır. Bu amaçla WoS veri tabanında indekslenen 264 ASDÖ çalışması bibliyometrik özellikleri açısın-dan incelenmiş ve VOSviewer programı kullanılarak ağ haritası ortaya çıkarılmıştır. ASDÖ çalışmaları, atıf, bibliyografik eşleştirme, ortak atıf, ortak yazarlılık ve birlikte bulunma yapıları bakımından doküman-lar, kaynaklar, yazarlar, kurumlar ve ülkelere göre analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, “inquiry based learning (sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme)”, “motivation (motivasyon)” ve “science education (fen bilimleri eğitimi)” terimlerinin en çok kullanılan anahtar kelimeler olduğunu göstermiştir. ASDÖ’ye ilişkin en çok atıf alan çalışmanın “Spronken-Smith ve Walker (2010)”, en aktif kaynağın “International Journal of Science Education” ve atıf sayısı en yüksek kaynağın ise “Studies in Higher Education” olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca çalışmaların çoğunlukla İngiltere ve ABD'de yayınlandığı da görülmüştür. Yine çalışmaların 2013 yılın-dan sonra Türkiye, Finlandiya ve Almanya’da yoğunluk kazandığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışmanın, ASDÖ konusunda çalışacak yeni araştırmacılar için, alandaki eğilimleri belirlemek ve konuyla ilgili mevcut araştırmaları karşılaştırmak için bir rehber olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Araştırma-sorguma temelli öğretim , bibliyometrik analiz , VOSviewer

References

Açıkgöz, D. (2019). Fen alanı öğretmenlerinin araştırma sorgulamaya dayalı öğretime yönelik tutumlarının bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisan tezi). Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Amasya Üniversitesi, Amasya.
Akcanca, N. (2020). Teacher candidates' Perspectives about Applied'Basic Science in Primary Education' course. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(2), 7-24. Doi:10.29329/epasr.2020.251.1
Akerson, V. L., Hanson, D. L. and Cullen, T. A. (2007). The influence of guided inquiry and explicit instruction on K–6 teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), 751–772. Doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9065-4
Alkış Küçükaydın, M. (2017). Araştırma sorgulamaya dayalı öğretim yaklaşımı bağlamında sınıf öğretmenlerinin fen konularındaki pedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Amasya üniversitesi, Amasya.
Almuntasheri, S., Gillies, R. M. and Wright, T. (2016). The effectiveness of a guided inquirybased, teachers' professional development programme on Saudi students' understanding of density. Science Education International, 27(1), 16–39.
Ann Haefner, L. and Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers' developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1653–1674. Doi:10.1080/0950069042000230709
Arslan, A., Ogan Bekiroğlu, F., Süzük, E. ve Gürel, C. (2014). Fizik laboratuvar derslerinin araştırma-sorgulama açısından incelenmesi ve öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerinin belirlenmesi. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 11(2), 3–37. Doi: 10.12973/tused.10107a
Atila, M. E. ve Sözbilir, M. (2016). Fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programındaki yapılandırmacılığa dayalı öğelerin öğretmenler tarafından uygulanışı: Nitel bir çalışma. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 1418–1457. Doi:10.17556/jef.45868
Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265–278. Doi: 10.1007/s10972-006-9008-5
Basista, B., Tomlin, J., Pennington, K. and Pugh, D. (2001). Inquıry-based ıntegrated scıence and mathematıcs professıonal development program. Education, 121(3), 615–624.

Bjork, S., Offer, A. and Söderberg, G. (2014). Time series citation data: The Nobel prize in economics. Scientometrics, 98(1), 185–196. Doi:10.1007/s11192-013-0989-5.
Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J. and Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937–1959. Doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.886347
Cancino, C., Merigo, J. M., Coronado, F., Dessouky, Y. and Dessouky, M. (2017). Forty years of computers and industrial engineering: A bibliometric analysis. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 113, 614–629. Doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.033
Chabalengula, V. M. and Mumba, F. (2012). Inquiry based science education: A scenario on Zambia’s high school science curriculum. Science Education International, 23(4), 307–327.
Chan, Y. Y. (2007). Teaching queuing theory with an inquiry-based learning approach: A case for applying webquest in a course in simulation and analysis. Proceedings of FIE’o7: 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pages F3C-(1-6).
Chen, X., Yu, G., Cheng, G. and Hao, T. (2019). Research topics, author profiles, and collaboration networks in the top‑ranked journal on educational technology over the past 40 years: a bibliometric analysis. J. Comput. Educ, 6(4), 563–585. Doi:10.1007/s40692-019-00149-1
Christensen, L.B., Johnson, R.B. and Turner, L. (2014). Research methods, design and analysis (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Chu, S., Chow, K., Tse, S. K. and Kuhlthau, C. C. (2008). Grade four students’ development of research skills through inquiry-based learning projects. School Libraries Worldwide, 14(1), 10–37.
Çelik, K. (2012). Canlılarda üreme, büyüme ve gelişme ünitesinin araştırmaya dayalı öğrenme yöntemi ile işlenmesinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına, bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve fen ve teknolojik dersine yönelik tutumlarına etkisi. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Degenhart, H. S. (2007). Relationship of ınquiry based learning elements on changes ın middle school students' science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) beliefs and interests (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A and M University, USA.
DiPasquale, D. M., Mason, C. L. and Kolkhorst, F. W. (2003). Exercise in inquiry: Critical thinking in an inquiry-based exercise physiology laboratory course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 32(6), 388–393.
Duran, M. (2015). Araştırmaya dayalı öğrenme yaklaşımına dayalı etkinliklerin öğrencilerin sorgulayıcı öğrenme becerileri üzerine etkisi. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 32, 399–420.
Duru, M., K., Demir, S., Önen, F. ve Benzer, E. (2011). Sorgulamaya dayalı laboratuvar uygulamalarının öğretmen adaylarının laboratuvar algısına tutumuna ve bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 33, 25–44.
Eduan, W. and Yuanqun, J. (2019). Patterns of the China-Africa research collaborations from 2006 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis. Higher Education, 77(6), 979–994. Doi:10. 1007/s10734-018-0314-6.
Eaton, J. P., Ward, J. C., Kumar, A. and Reingen, P. H. (1999). Structural analysis of co-author relationships and author productivity in selected outlets for consumer behavior research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(1), 39–59.
Fleissner, S., Chan, Y. Y., Yuen, T. H. and Ng, V. (2006, May). WebQuest markup language (WQML) for sharable inquiry-based learning. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (p. 383–392). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D. and Mastrogiacomo, L. (2015). Influence of omitted citations on the bibliometric statistics of the major manufacturing journals. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1083–1122. Doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1583-9
Freire, R. R. and Veríssimo, J. M. C. (2020). Mappıng co-creaton and co-destruction n toursm: a bibliographic coupling analysis. Anatolia, 31(4), 1-11. Doi: 10.1080/13032917.2020.1855594.
Gürlen, E., Özdiyar, Ö. ve Şen, Z. (2019). Social network analysis of academic studies on gifted people. Education and Science, 44(197), 185-208. Doi: 10.15390/EB.2018.7735.
Hairida. (2016). The effectiveness using inquiry based natural science module with authentic assessment to improve the critical thinking and inquiry skills of junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 209–215.
Hernández-Torrano, D. and Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 1–17. Doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625.
Hou, J., Yang, X. and Chen, C. (2018). Emerging trends and new developments in information science: A document co-citation analysis (2009–2016). Scientometrics, 115(2), 869–892. Doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2695-9.
Ireland, J., Watters, J. J., Brownlee, J. L. and Lupton, M. (2014). Approaches to inquiry teaching: Elementary teacher's perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1733–1750. Doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.877618
Kahn, P. and O’Rourke, K. (2005). Handbook of enquiry and problem based learning, 1–25. http://www.nuigalway.ie/celt/pblbook/. Erişim 20.10.2020.
Kapanadze, M., Bolte, C., Schneider, V. and Slovinsky, E. (2015). Enhancing science teachers’continuous professional development in the field of inquiry based science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(2), 254–266.
Kaya, G. ve Yılmaz, S. (2016). Açık sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenmenin öğrencilerin başarısına ve bilimsel süreç becerilerinin gelişimine etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(2), 300–318. DOI:10.16986/HUJE.2016016811
Kayacan, K. (2014). Öz düzenleme faaliyetleri ile zenginleştirilmiş araştırma sorgulamaya dayalı öğretim stratejisinin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının kuvvet ve hareket konusunu kavramsal anlamalarına ve akademik öz yeterliliklerine etkisi. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Kasemodel, M. G. C., Makishi, F., Souza, R. C. and Silva, V. L. (2016). Following the trail of crumbs: a bibliometric study on consumer behavior in the Food Science and Technology field. International Journal of Food Studies, 5(1), 73–83. Doi:10.7455/ijfs/5.1.2016.a7
Kim, J. and McMillan, S. J. (2008). Evaluation of internet advertising research: A bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 99–112.
Kowalczyk l. D. (2003). An analysis of K-5 teachers’ beliefs regarding the uses of direct instruction, the discovery method and the ınquiry method in elementary science education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Lam, J., Feng, C., Treen, E. R. and Ferreira, C. (2020). The Journal of Wine Research: A 30-year bibliographic analysis. Journal of Wine Research, 31(3), 176–193. Doi: 10.1080/09571264.2020.1816535.
Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P. and Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1021–1043. Doi:10.1002/tea.20037
Laengle, S., Merigó, J. M., Miranda, J., Slowinski, R., Bomze, I., Borgonovo, E., and Teunter, R. (2017). Forty years of the European journal of operational research: A bibliometric overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3), 803–816. Doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.027
Li, J., Antonenko, P. D. and Wang, J. (2019). Trends and issues in multimedia learning research in 1996–2016: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Research Review, 28,100282. Doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2019. 100282.
Lim, B. (2001). Guidelines for designing ınquiry-based learning on the web: Online pro fessional development of educators. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University.
Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S. and Bonner, J. J. (2006). Overcoming a learning bottleneck: Inquiry professional development for secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 185–216. Doi:10.1007/s10972-005-9002-3
Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517–534. Doi:10.1080/09500690121307
Martí-Parreño, J., Méndez-Ibáñez, E. and Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2016). The use of gamifcation in education: A bibliometric and text mining analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 663–676. Doi:10.1111/jcal.12161
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2013). Talim ve terbiye kurulu başkanlığı ilköğretim kurumları (ilkokul ve ortaokul) fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara: MEB Yayınları.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J. and Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. Doi:10.1002/tea.20347
Murphy, C., Kilfeather, P. and Murphy, C. (2007). An exploration of issues surrounding teaching the nature of science to pre-service primary school teachers. Irish Educational Studies, 26(1), 27–38.
Nam, J., Seung, E. and Go, M. (2013). The effect of a collaborative Mentoring program on beginning science teachers’ inquiry-based Teaching practice. International journal of science Education, 35(5), 815–836. Doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.584329
Ören Şaşmaz, F. ve Sarı, K., (2017). Fen eğitiminde yeni yönelimler: araştırmaya dayalı öğrenme konusunda yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin analizi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 11(2), 333–364. Doi:10.17522/balikesirnef.373412
Özdilek, Z. and Bulunuz N. (2009). The effectiveness of a guided inquiry teaching methodology on pre service teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(2), 24–42.
Pan, W., Jian, L. and Liu, T. (2019). Grey system theory trends from 1991 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis and visualization. Scientometrics, 121, 1407–1434. Doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03256-z.
Parrish, J. C. (2017). K-12 Teacher professional growth for nature of science and scientific inquiry: promoting reflection through exemplars. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle Tennessee State University, ABD.
Robertson, J., Pitt, L. and Ferreira, C. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the public sector: A bibliographic analysis. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 72, 1-15. Doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100862
Rethinam, V. and Lynch, S. J. (2011). A multilevel analysis of a guided inquiry curriculum unit on motion and force for a diverse student population. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Conference, Washington.
Saka, T. (2018). 5. Sınıf Fizik Konularının Öğretimine Yönelik Rehberli Araştırma Sorgulamaya Dayalı Öğretmen Kılavuz Materyali Geliştirilmesi ve Değerlendirilmesi. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Trabzon üniversitesi.
Saka, T., Akcanca, N., Kala Aydın, N. ve Sungur Alhan, S. (2018). The Effects of the inquiry based teaching on prospective teachers’ planning and practice processes. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 180-204. Doi:10.17522/balikesirnef.437735
Sarı, U., and Güven, G. B. (2013). The effect of interactive whiteboard supported inquiry-based learning on achievement and motivation in physics and views of prospective teachers toward the instruction. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 110–143. Doi:10.12973/nefmed204
Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T.-Y. and Lee, Y.-H. (2007). A meta analysis of national research: effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436–1460. Doi:10.1002/tea.20212
Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Ali, M., Doronin, D. and Hussain, S. T. (2019). Prosumption: Bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes, 49(3), 1020–1045. Doi:10.1108/K-12-2018-0696
Shih, J. L., Chuang, C. W. and Hwang, G.J. (2010). An inquiry- based mobile learning Approach to Enhancing social science learning effectiveness. Educational Technology and Society, 13(4), 50–62.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. Doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406
Smith, L. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83–106.
Soprano, K. and Yang, L. L. (2013). Inquiring into my science teaching through action research: A case study on one pre-service teacher’s inquiry-based science teaching and self-efficacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1351–1368. Doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9380-x
Springer. (2017). Title, abstract and keywords. https://www.springer.com/gp/authorseditors/authorandreviewertutorials/writing-a-journal-manuscript/title-abstract-andkeywords/10285522 .Erişim 25.11.2020.
Staer, H., Goodrum, D., and Hackling, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 219–228.
Şimşek, P. ve Kabapınar, F. (2010). The effects of inquiry-based learning on elementary students’ conceptual understanding of matter, scientific process skills and science attitudes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1190–1194.
Trujillo, C. M. and Long, T. M. (2018). Document co-citation analysis to enhance transdisciplinary research. Science Advances, 4(1),1-9. e1701130–e1701130. Doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701130
Usta, Z. S. (2015). Fizik öğretmenleri için hazırlanan sorgulama temelli öğretime yönelik bir hizmet-içi eğitim programının etkililiği. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
Van Eck, N. and Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: ‘VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter, 7(3), 50–54.
Van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau and D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice. Berlin: Springer.
Van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. In J. Glaser, A. Scharnhorst and W. Glanzel (Eds.), Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science. Special Issue of Scientometrics. Doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7.
Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R. and Berg, J. (2010). A Comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416. Doi:10.1002/asi.21421
Van-Uum, M. S., Verhoeff, R. P. and Peeters, M. (2016). Inquiry-based science education: Towards a pedagogical framework for primary school teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 450–469. Doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1147660
Waltman, L., and van Eck, N. J. (2009). A taxonomy of bibliometric performance indicators based on the property of consistency. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics.
Varma, T., Volkmann, M. and Hanuscin, D. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ perceptions of their understanding of inquiry and inquiry-based science pedagogy: Influence of an elementary science education methods course and a science field experience. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 1–22.
Vlassi, M. and Karaliota, A. (2013, October). The comparison between guided inquiry and traditional teaching method. A case study for the teaching of the structure of matter to 8th grade Greek students. 3rd World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership, Belgium.
Wee, B., Shepardson, D., Fast, J. and Harbor, J. (2007). Teaching and learning about inquiry: Insights and challenges in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 63–89. Doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9031-6
White, H. D. and McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.
Wilke R. R and Straits W. J. (2005). Practical Advice for teaching ınquiry-based science process skills in the biological sciences. The American Biology Teacher, 67(9), 534–540. Doi:10.2307/4451905
Wu, H. K. and Hsieh, C. E. (2006). Developing sixth graders’ inquiry skills to construct explanations in inquiry‐based learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1289–1313. Doi:10.1080/09500690600621035
Yetisir, M. I. (2016). Guided inquiry-based physics teaching: An analysis of prospective teachers' academic achievements and views about the method. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 49(1), 159–182. Doi:10.1501/Egifak_0000001379
Yıldız, M. (2013). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri (4. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Yu, D. and Shi, S. (2015). Researching the development of Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzyset: Using a citation network analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 32, 189–198. Doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.03.027
Zhao, X. (2017). A scientometric review of global BIM research: Analysis and visualization. Automation in Construction 80, 37–47. Doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.002.
Zeng, R. and Chini, A. A. (2017). Review of research on embodied energy of buildings using bibliometric analysis. Energy Build, 155, 172–184. Doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.025

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Other Fields of Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Tolga Saka ^*
0000-0002-0042-0836
Türkiye

Tufan İnaltekin
0000-0002-3843-7393
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 1, 2021

Submission Date

January 20, 2021

Acceptance Date

March 5, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 18 Number: 40

DOI

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.865502

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA85YM85NX

APA

Saka, T., & İnaltekin, T. (2021). Araştırma-Sorgulamaya Dayalı Öğretime Yönelik Akademik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi (2000-2020). OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(40), 2408-24491. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.865502

Cited By

Çocuklar için Felsefenin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1338643

Kimya Eğitiminde Sorgulamaya Dayalı Öğrenmenin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Milli Eğitim Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1242967