Research Article

BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE

Number: 69 July 18, 2025
TR EN

BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE

Abstract

This study examines ethnocentrism and boycott tendencies among Muslim consumers, focusing on how the level of religious importance shapes these behaviors. Using a quantitative approach with a non-random sampling method, a survey was conducted with 347 respondents. Collected data cleaned with filtration such as religion and total 294 responses left to use in the analysis. The results reveal that both ethnocentric and boycott tendencies increase as the importance of religion grows. Notably, while both tendencies are stronger at higher levels of religiosity, boycott tendencies are significantly higher than ethnocentrism tendencies. However, while boycotts are not permanent, ethnocentrism is, and from this perspective the research offers important marketing implications: marketers should develop strategies by emphasizing corporate social responsibility, transparency, and moral foundations which are compatible with the moral and ethical values of religious consumers and try to transform boycott behavior toward foreign products into ethnocentrism toward intentionally using domestic products.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdelwahab, D., Jiménez, N., San-Martín, S., & Prodanova, J. (2020). Between love and boycott: a story of dual origin brands. Spanish journal of marketing-ESIC, 24(3), pp. 377-402.
  2. Abdullah, Z., Mohamed Anuar, M., & Mohd Noor, N. A. (2024). Consumer Boycott: The Effect of Religiosity and Consumer Attitudes. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, pp. 85-97.
  3. Abosag, I., & F. Farah, M. (2014). The influence of religiously motivated consumer boycotts on brand image, loyalty and product judgment. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), pp. 2262-2283.
  4. Al Ganideh, S. F., & Awudu, I. (2021). Arab-Muslim Americans’ personality riddle and consumer ethnocentrism. Journal of Global Marketing, 34(2), pp. 110-130.
  5. Al-Hyari, K., Alnsour, M., Al-Weshah, G., & Haffar, M. (2012). Religious beliefs and consumer behaviour: from loyalty to boycotts. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 3(2), pp. 155-174.
  6. Awaludin, A. A., & Al-Khaidar, M. A. (2023). Opinion leaders and boycott intentions: Factors influencing consumer behavior in support of Israel Boycott. Journal of Digital Marketing and Halal Industry, 5(2), pp. 243-264.
  7. Balabanis, G., & Siamagka, N. T. (2022). A meta-analysis of consumer ethnocentrism across 57 countries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(3), pp. 745-763.
  8. Das, M., & Mukherjee, D. (2020). Ethnic identity impact on consumers’ ethnocentric tendencies: the moderating role of acculturation and materialism. Management and Labour Studies, 45(1), pp. 31-53.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Consumer Behaviour

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

July 7, 2025

Publication Date

July 18, 2025

Submission Date

February 1, 2025

Acceptance Date

May 1, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Number: 69

APA
Yıldırım, Y. O. (2025). BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 69, 341-351. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1631023
AMA
1.Yıldırım YO. BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. PAUSBED. 2025;(69):341-351. doi:10.30794/pausbed.1631023
Chicago
Yıldırım, Yusuf Ozan. 2025. “BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, nos. 69: 341-51. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1631023.
EndNote
Yıldırım YO (July 1, 2025) BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 69 341–351.
IEEE
[1]Y. O. Yıldırım, “BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE”, PAUSBED, no. 69, pp. 341–351, July 2025, doi: 10.30794/pausbed.1631023.
ISNAD
Yıldırım, Yusuf Ozan. “BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 69 (July 1, 2025): 341-351. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1631023.
JAMA
1.Yıldırım YO. BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. PAUSBED. 2025;:341–351.
MLA
Yıldırım, Yusuf Ozan. “BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 69, July 2025, pp. 341-5, doi:10.30794/pausbed.1631023.
Vancouver
1.Yusuf Ozan Yıldırım. BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. PAUSBED. 2025 Jul. 1;(69):341-5. doi:10.30794/pausbed.1631023
by-nc-nd.eu.svg  The articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.