Araştırma Makalesi

BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE

Sayı: 69 18 Temmuz 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE

Öz

This study examines ethnocentrism and boycott tendencies among Muslim consumers, focusing on how the level of religious importance shapes these behaviors. Using a quantitative approach with a non-random sampling method, a survey was conducted with 347 respondents. Collected data cleaned with filtration such as religion and total 294 responses left to use in the analysis. The results reveal that both ethnocentric and boycott tendencies increase as the importance of religion grows. Notably, while both tendencies are stronger at higher levels of religiosity, boycott tendencies are significantly higher than ethnocentrism tendencies. However, while boycotts are not permanent, ethnocentrism is, and from this perspective the research offers important marketing implications: marketers should develop strategies by emphasizing corporate social responsibility, transparency, and moral foundations which are compatible with the moral and ethical values of religious consumers and try to transform boycott behavior toward foreign products into ethnocentrism toward intentionally using domestic products.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Abdelwahab, D., Jiménez, N., San-Martín, S., & Prodanova, J. (2020). Between love and boycott: a story of dual origin brands. Spanish journal of marketing-ESIC, 24(3), pp. 377-402.
  2. Abdullah, Z., Mohamed Anuar, M., & Mohd Noor, N. A. (2024). Consumer Boycott: The Effect of Religiosity and Consumer Attitudes. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, pp. 85-97.
  3. Abosag, I., & F. Farah, M. (2014). The influence of religiously motivated consumer boycotts on brand image, loyalty and product judgment. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), pp. 2262-2283.
  4. Al Ganideh, S. F., & Awudu, I. (2021). Arab-Muslim Americans’ personality riddle and consumer ethnocentrism. Journal of Global Marketing, 34(2), pp. 110-130.
  5. Al-Hyari, K., Alnsour, M., Al-Weshah, G., & Haffar, M. (2012). Religious beliefs and consumer behaviour: from loyalty to boycotts. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 3(2), pp. 155-174.
  6. Awaludin, A. A., & Al-Khaidar, M. A. (2023). Opinion leaders and boycott intentions: Factors influencing consumer behavior in support of Israel Boycott. Journal of Digital Marketing and Halal Industry, 5(2), pp. 243-264.
  7. Balabanis, G., & Siamagka, N. T. (2022). A meta-analysis of consumer ethnocentrism across 57 countries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(3), pp. 745-763.
  8. Das, M., & Mukherjee, D. (2020). Ethnic identity impact on consumers’ ethnocentric tendencies: the moderating role of acculturation and materialism. Management and Labour Studies, 45(1), pp. 31-53.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Tüketici Davranışı

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

7 Temmuz 2025

Yayımlanma Tarihi

18 Temmuz 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Şubat 2025

Kabul Tarihi

1 Mayıs 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Sayı: 69

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yıldırım, Y. O. (2025). BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 69, 341-351. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1631023
AMA
1.Yıldırım YO. BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. PAUSBED. 2025;(69):341-351. doi:10.30794/pausbed.1631023
Chicago
Yıldırım, Yusuf Ozan. 2025. “BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, sy 69: 341-51. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1631023.
EndNote
Yıldırım YO (01 Temmuz 2025) BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 69 341–351.
IEEE
[1]Y. O. Yıldırım, “BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE”, PAUSBED, sy 69, ss. 341–351, Tem. 2025, doi: 10.30794/pausbed.1631023.
ISNAD
Yıldırım, Yusuf Ozan. “BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 69 (01 Temmuz 2025): 341-351. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1631023.
JAMA
1.Yıldırım YO. BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. PAUSBED. 2025;:341–351.
MLA
Yıldırım, Yusuf Ozan. “BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, sy 69, Temmuz 2025, ss. 341-5, doi:10.30794/pausbed.1631023.
Vancouver
1.Yusuf Ozan Yıldırım. BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. PAUSBED. 01 Temmuz 2025;(69):341-5. doi:10.30794/pausbed.1631023

Cited By


download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiYnkucG5nIiwicGF0aCI6ImEyZjUvYWI0ZS8zZjQ0LzZhNDM3MWIyYzBiZDE0LjAyNjIzMzMyLnBuZyIsImV4cCI6MTc4MjgwODUxNSwibm9uY2UiOiIyNmYzZWIxZTEyZTBjNjdjZTI1OWI0ODdjYzFmYmUxNSJ9.2VF5ZYgyC7BIkKy9Ta-JdpGfwAHc5fhFuhz086x-jcQ Bu dergide yer alan çalışmalar Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.