Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

BOYKOT EĞİLİMİ VE ETNOSENTRİZM EĞİLİMİ: DİNİ ÖNEM DEĞERİ AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 69, 341 - 351, 18.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1631023

Öz

Bu çalışmada Müslüman tüketiciler arasındaki etnosentrizm ve boykot eğilimleri incelenmekte ve dini önem düzeyinin bu davranışları nasıl şekillendirdiği üzerinde durulmaktadır. Nicel yaklaşım belirlenen çalışmada 347 katılımcıya tesadüfi olmayan örnekleme yöntemi ile anket uygulanmıştır. Toplanan veriler din gibi filtrelerle temizlenerek elde kalan toplam 294 veri ile analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, dinin önemi arttıkça hem etnosentrik hem de boykot eğilimlerinin arttığını ortaya koymaktadır. Dikkat çekici olan, her iki eğilimin de yüksek dindarlık düzeylerinde daha güçlü olmasıyla birlikte, boykot eğilimlerinin etnosentrizm eğilimlerine göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksek olmasıdır. Ancak boykotlar kalıcı olmasa da etnosentrizm kalıcıdır ve bu bakış açısından çalışma önemli pazarlama çıkarımları sunmaktadır: pazarlamacılar, dindar tüketicilerin ahlaki ve etik değerleriyle uyumlu kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk, şeffaflık ve ahlaki temelleri vurgulayan stratejiler geliştirmeli ve yabancı ürünlere yönelik boykot davranışını, yerli ürünleri kasıtlı olarak kullanmaya yönelik tüketici etnosentrizmi haline dönüştürmeye çalışmalıdır.

Kaynakça

  • Abdelwahab, D., Jiménez, N., San-Martín, S., & Prodanova, J. (2020). Between love and boycott: a story of dual origin brands. Spanish journal of marketing-ESIC, 24(3), pp. 377-402.
  • Abdullah, Z., Mohamed Anuar, M., & Mohd Noor, N. A. (2024). Consumer Boycott: The Effect of Religiosity and Consumer Attitudes. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, pp. 85-97.
  • Abosag, I., & F. Farah, M. (2014). The influence of religiously motivated consumer boycotts on brand image, loyalty and product judgment. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), pp. 2262-2283.
  • Al Ganideh, S. F., & Awudu, I. (2021). Arab-Muslim Americans’ personality riddle and consumer ethnocentrism. Journal of Global Marketing, 34(2), pp. 110-130.
  • Al-Hyari, K., Alnsour, M., Al-Weshah, G., & Haffar, M. (2012). Religious beliefs and consumer behaviour: from loyalty to boycotts. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 3(2), pp. 155-174.
  • Awaludin, A. A., & Al-Khaidar, M. A. (2023). Opinion leaders and boycott intentions: Factors influencing consumer behavior in support of Israel Boycott. Journal of Digital Marketing and Halal Industry, 5(2), pp. 243-264.
  • Balabanis, G., & Siamagka, N. T. (2022). A meta-analysis of consumer ethnocentrism across 57 countries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(3), pp. 745-763.
  • Das, M., & Mukherjee, D. (2020). Ethnic identity impact on consumers’ ethnocentric tendencies: the moderating role of acculturation and materialism. Management and Labour Studies, 45(1), pp. 31-53.
  • Deb, M., & Roy Chaudhuri, H. (2012). Assessing the ethnocentric tendencies of different age‐cohorts in an emerging market. Journal of Indian Business Research, 4(4), pp. 244-268.
  • Deb, M., & Sinha, G. (2016). Impact of culture on religiosity, cosmopolitanism and ethnocentrism. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(1), pp. 56-72.
  • Dekhil, F., Jridi, H., & Farhat, H. (2017). Effect of religiosity on the decision to participate in a boycott: The moderating effect of brand loyalty–the case of Coca-Cola. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(2), pp. 309-328. Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E. S., & Çinko, M. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS’le Veri Analizi. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. UK: Sage: Newcastle Tyne.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Haque, A., Rahman, S., & Haque, M. (2011). Religiosity, ethnocentrism and corporate image towards the perception of young Muslim consumers: Structural equation modeling approach. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(1), pp. 98-108.
  • Kim, T. K. (2015). T test as a parametric statistic. Korean journal of anesthesiology, 68(6), pp. 540-546.
  • Klein, J. G., John, A., & Smith, N. C. (2001). Exploring motivations for participation in a consumer boycott. Center for Marketing Working Paper, No. 01-701, pp. 1-22.
  • Kusmayadi, S. (2024). The Power of Belief: How Ethnocentrism, Religion, and Brand Importance Shape Boycott Behavior and Brand Perceptions in Indonesia. Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED), 6(3), pp. 741-755.
  • Lee, R., Lee, K. T., & Li, J. (2017). A memory theory perspective of consumer ethnocentrism and animosity. European Journal of Marketing, 51(7/8), pp. 1266-1285.
  • Leonidou, C. N., Gruber, V., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2022). Consumers’ environmental sustainability beliefs and activism: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of International Marketing, 30(4), pp. 78-104.
  • Lestari, P., & Jazil, T. (2024). The Role of Religiosity, Consumer Animosity, and Ethnocentrism in Explaining the Boycott Motivation. Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 5(1), pp. 134-152.
  • Ouellet, J. F. (2007). Consumer racism and its effects on domestic cross-ethnic product purchase: An empirical test in the United States, Canada, and France. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), pp. 113-128.
  • Prince, M., Yaprak, A. N., & Palihawadana, D. (2019). The moral bases of consumer ethnocentrism and consumer cosmopolitanism as purchase dispositions. ournal of Consumer Marketing, 36(3), pp. 429-438.
  • Roswinanto, W., & Suwanda, S. N. (2021). Religious boycott in Indonesia: investigation of antecedents and the effect of religiosity dimensions. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(1), pp. 174-195.
  • Sari, D. K., & Games, D. (2024). Investigating young consumer’s boycott behavior in an emerging market. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), p. 2362444.
  • Sari, D. K., Mizerski, D., & Liu, F. (2017). Boycotting foreign products: a study of Indonesian Muslim consumers. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(1), pp. 16-34.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2018). Using multivariate statistics. 7th edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Thompson, B. (2007). Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools, 44(5), pp. 423-432.
  • Ulker‐Demirel, E., Yuruk‐Kayapinar, P., & Kayapinar, O. (2020). The role of consumer ethnocentrism on boycott behaviour: What if a domestic business behaves egregiously? Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 38(4), pp. 1-15.
  • VanVoorhis, C. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 3(2), pp. 43-50.
  • Wilkins, S., Butt, M. M., Shams, F., & Pérez, A. (2019). The acceptance of halal food in non-Muslim countries: Effects of religious identity, national identification, consumer ethnocentrism and consumer cosmopolitanism. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(4), pp. 1308-1331.
  • Yener, D. (2023). The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation. Econharran, 7(12), pp. 1-13.

BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 69, 341 - 351, 18.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1631023

Öz

This study examines ethnocentrism and boycott tendencies among Muslim consumers, focusing on how the level of religious importance shapes these behaviors. Using a quantitative approach with a non-random sampling method, a survey was conducted with 347 respondents. Collected data cleaned with filtration such as religion and total 294 responses left to use in the analysis. The results reveal that both ethnocentric and boycott tendencies increase as the importance of religion grows. Notably, while both tendencies are stronger at higher levels of religiosity, boycott tendencies are significantly higher than ethnocentrism tendencies. However, while boycotts are not permanent, ethnocentrism is, and from this perspective the research offers important marketing implications: marketers should develop strategies by emphasizing corporate social responsibility, transparency, and moral foundations which are compatible with the moral and ethical values of religious consumers and try to transform boycott behavior toward foreign products into ethnocentrism toward intentionally using domestic products.

Kaynakça

  • Abdelwahab, D., Jiménez, N., San-Martín, S., & Prodanova, J. (2020). Between love and boycott: a story of dual origin brands. Spanish journal of marketing-ESIC, 24(3), pp. 377-402.
  • Abdullah, Z., Mohamed Anuar, M., & Mohd Noor, N. A. (2024). Consumer Boycott: The Effect of Religiosity and Consumer Attitudes. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, pp. 85-97.
  • Abosag, I., & F. Farah, M. (2014). The influence of religiously motivated consumer boycotts on brand image, loyalty and product judgment. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), pp. 2262-2283.
  • Al Ganideh, S. F., & Awudu, I. (2021). Arab-Muslim Americans’ personality riddle and consumer ethnocentrism. Journal of Global Marketing, 34(2), pp. 110-130.
  • Al-Hyari, K., Alnsour, M., Al-Weshah, G., & Haffar, M. (2012). Religious beliefs and consumer behaviour: from loyalty to boycotts. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 3(2), pp. 155-174.
  • Awaludin, A. A., & Al-Khaidar, M. A. (2023). Opinion leaders and boycott intentions: Factors influencing consumer behavior in support of Israel Boycott. Journal of Digital Marketing and Halal Industry, 5(2), pp. 243-264.
  • Balabanis, G., & Siamagka, N. T. (2022). A meta-analysis of consumer ethnocentrism across 57 countries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(3), pp. 745-763.
  • Das, M., & Mukherjee, D. (2020). Ethnic identity impact on consumers’ ethnocentric tendencies: the moderating role of acculturation and materialism. Management and Labour Studies, 45(1), pp. 31-53.
  • Deb, M., & Roy Chaudhuri, H. (2012). Assessing the ethnocentric tendencies of different age‐cohorts in an emerging market. Journal of Indian Business Research, 4(4), pp. 244-268.
  • Deb, M., & Sinha, G. (2016). Impact of culture on religiosity, cosmopolitanism and ethnocentrism. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(1), pp. 56-72.
  • Dekhil, F., Jridi, H., & Farhat, H. (2017). Effect of religiosity on the decision to participate in a boycott: The moderating effect of brand loyalty–the case of Coca-Cola. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(2), pp. 309-328. Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E. S., & Çinko, M. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS’le Veri Analizi. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. UK: Sage: Newcastle Tyne.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Haque, A., Rahman, S., & Haque, M. (2011). Religiosity, ethnocentrism and corporate image towards the perception of young Muslim consumers: Structural equation modeling approach. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(1), pp. 98-108.
  • Kim, T. K. (2015). T test as a parametric statistic. Korean journal of anesthesiology, 68(6), pp. 540-546.
  • Klein, J. G., John, A., & Smith, N. C. (2001). Exploring motivations for participation in a consumer boycott. Center for Marketing Working Paper, No. 01-701, pp. 1-22.
  • Kusmayadi, S. (2024). The Power of Belief: How Ethnocentrism, Religion, and Brand Importance Shape Boycott Behavior and Brand Perceptions in Indonesia. Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED), 6(3), pp. 741-755.
  • Lee, R., Lee, K. T., & Li, J. (2017). A memory theory perspective of consumer ethnocentrism and animosity. European Journal of Marketing, 51(7/8), pp. 1266-1285.
  • Leonidou, C. N., Gruber, V., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2022). Consumers’ environmental sustainability beliefs and activism: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of International Marketing, 30(4), pp. 78-104.
  • Lestari, P., & Jazil, T. (2024). The Role of Religiosity, Consumer Animosity, and Ethnocentrism in Explaining the Boycott Motivation. Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 5(1), pp. 134-152.
  • Ouellet, J. F. (2007). Consumer racism and its effects on domestic cross-ethnic product purchase: An empirical test in the United States, Canada, and France. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), pp. 113-128.
  • Prince, M., Yaprak, A. N., & Palihawadana, D. (2019). The moral bases of consumer ethnocentrism and consumer cosmopolitanism as purchase dispositions. ournal of Consumer Marketing, 36(3), pp. 429-438.
  • Roswinanto, W., & Suwanda, S. N. (2021). Religious boycott in Indonesia: investigation of antecedents and the effect of religiosity dimensions. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(1), pp. 174-195.
  • Sari, D. K., & Games, D. (2024). Investigating young consumer’s boycott behavior in an emerging market. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), p. 2362444.
  • Sari, D. K., Mizerski, D., & Liu, F. (2017). Boycotting foreign products: a study of Indonesian Muslim consumers. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(1), pp. 16-34.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2018). Using multivariate statistics. 7th edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Thompson, B. (2007). Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools, 44(5), pp. 423-432.
  • Ulker‐Demirel, E., Yuruk‐Kayapinar, P., & Kayapinar, O. (2020). The role of consumer ethnocentrism on boycott behaviour: What if a domestic business behaves egregiously? Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 38(4), pp. 1-15.
  • VanVoorhis, C. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 3(2), pp. 43-50.
  • Wilkins, S., Butt, M. M., Shams, F., & Pérez, A. (2019). The acceptance of halal food in non-Muslim countries: Effects of religious identity, national identification, consumer ethnocentrism and consumer cosmopolitanism. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(4), pp. 1308-1331.
  • Yener, D. (2023). The Effect of Country of Origin and Brand Origin on Consumer Boycotts: The Mediating Effect of Product Evaluation. Econharran, 7(12), pp. 1-13.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Tüketici Davranışı
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Yusuf Ozan Yıldırım 0000-0002-0346-2660

Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Şubat 2025
Kabul Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2025
Erken Görünüm Tarihi 7 Temmuz 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 18 Temmuz 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 69

Kaynak Göster

APA Yıldırım, Y. O. (2025). BOYCOTT TENDENCY VS ETHNOCENTRISM TENDENCY: COMPARISON OF BOTH IN TERMS OF RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE VALUE. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(69), 341-351. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1631023


by-nc-nd.eu.svg  Bu dergide yer alan çalışmalar Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.