İŞ BİLİŞ ENVANTERİ ÖLÇEĞİ: BİR ÖLÇEK UYARLAMASI ÇALIŞMASI

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Nimon ve Zigarmi (2014) tarafından geliştirilen İş Biliş Envanterini Türkçeye uyarlamak ve bu ölçeğin uyarlanmış Türkçe versiyonunun psikometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmada İş Biliş Envanterinin birinci, ikinci ve üçüncü seviye yapısı incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmada kullanılan örneklem, farklı sektörlerde çalışan 150 katılımcıdan oluşmaktadır. Toplanan veriler, uyarlanan ölçeğin psikometrik özelliklerini incelemek için yapısal eşitlik modellemesi yoluyla doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, geçerlilik ve güvenirlik analizleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, bu çalışmada üç boyut ve 12 faktörden oluşan İş Biliş Envanterinin Türkçe versiyonu doğrulanmıştır. Buna ek olarak araştırma bulguları, ölçeğin birincil ve üçüncül düzey yapılarının uygun uyum iyiliği değerlerine sahip olduğunu ampirik olarak göstermiştir. Sonuç olarak İş Biliş Envanteri ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğu saptanmıştır.

Keywords

• İş Biliş Envanteri
• Ölçek Uyarlama
• Geçerlilik
• Güvenilirlik
• Örgütsel Deneyim

WORK COGNITION INVENTORY SCALE: A SCALE ADAPTATION STUDY

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the Work Cognition Inventory developed by Nimon and Zigarmi (2014) to Turkish and to investigate the psychometric properties of the adapted Turkish version of this scale. In this context, first, second, and third order construct of the Work Cognition Inventory were examined in the current study. The sample used in this study consisted of 150 participants working in different sectors. The gathered data were analyzed through structural equation modeling by using confirmatory factor analysis, validity, and reliability analyses to examine the psychometric properties of the adapted scale. Based on the results, the Turkish version of the Work Cognition Inventory, which consists of three dimensions and 12 factors, was confirmed in this study. Additionally, our empirical results also showed that first and third order construct of the scale have appropriate goodness of fit values. As a result, we concluded that Turkish version of the Work Cognition Inventory is a valid and reliable scale.

Keywords

• Work Cognition Inventory
• Scale Adaptation
• Validity
• Reliability
• Organizational Experience

References

1. Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J. C., Gunsel, A. (2011). “Antecedents and results of emotional capability in software development project teams”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 957-973.
2. Allan, B. A. (2017). “Task significance and meaningful work: A longitudinal study”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 174-182.
3. Ambrose, M. L., and Arnaud, A. (2005). “Distributive and procedural justice: Construct distinctiveness, construct interdependence, and overall justice”. The handbook of organizational justice, 59-84.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). “Self-efficacy: The exercise of control”. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.
5. Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., Shantz, A., Soane, E. (2017). “The mismanaged soul: Existential labor and the erosion of meaningful work”. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 416-430.
6. Brueller, D., Carmeli, A. (2011). “Linking capacities of high‐quality relationships to team learning and performance in service organizations”. Human Resource Management, 50(4), 455-477.
7. Cannon‐Bowers, J. A., Salas, E. (2001). “Reflections on shared cognition”. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22(2), 195-202.
8. Carter, M. Z., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., Mossholder, K. W. (2013). “Transformational leadership, relationship quality, and employee performance during continuous incremental organizational change”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(7), 942-958.

9. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., Ng, K. Y. (2001). “Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research”. Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 425.
10. Curry, J. P., Wakefield, D. S., Price, J. L., Mueller, C. W. (1986). “On the causal ordering of job satisfaction organizational commitment”. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 847–858.
11. Dibble, R., Gibson, C. (2013). “Collaboration for the common good: An examination of challenges and adjustment processes in multicultural collaborations”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(6), 764-790.
12. Dodd, N. G., Ganster, D. C. (1996). “The interactive effects of variety, autonomy, and feedback on attitudes and performance”. Journal of organizational behavior, 17(4), 329-347.
13. Eva, N., Meacham, H., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., Tham, T. L. (2019). “Is coworker feedback more important than supervisor feedback for increasing innovative behavior?”. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 383-396.
14. Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
15. Gittell, J. H., Douglass, A. (2012). “Relational bureaucracy: Structuring reciprocal relationships into roles”. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 709-733.
16. Guillén, L., Kunze, F. (2019). “When age does not harm innovative behavior and perceptions of competence: Testing interdepartmental collaboration as a social buffer”. Human Resource Management, 58(3), 301-316.
17. Hackman, J. R., Oldham, G. R. (1975). “Development of the job diagnostic survey”. Journal of Applied psychology, 60(2), 159.
18. Janssen, O., Lam, C. K., Huang, X. (2010). “Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The moderating roles of distributive justice and positive affect”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 787-809.
19. Joo, B. K., Zigarmi, D., Nimon, K., and Shuck, B. (2017). “Work cognition and psychological well-being: The role of cognitive engagement as a partial mediator”. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 53(4), 446-469.
20. Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Dysvik, A. (2017). “Constructive supervisor feedback is not sufficient: Immediacy and frequency is essential”. Human Resource Management, 56(3), 519-531.
21. Lavner, J. A., Clark, M. A. (2017). “Workload and marital satisfaction over time: Testing lagged spillover and crossover effects during the newlywed years”. Journal of vocational behavior, 101, 67-76.
22. Li, H., Li, F., Chen, T. (2018). “A motivational–Cognitive model of creativity and the role of autonomy”. Journal of Business Research, 92, 179-188.
23. Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D., Steger, M. F. (2019). “Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 374-389.
24. Morgeson, F. P., Humphrey, S. E. (2006). “The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work”. Journal of applied psychology, 91(6), 1321.
25. Nimon, K., Zigarmi, D., Houson, D., Witt, D., Diehl, J. (2011). “The work cognition inventory: Initial evidence of construct validity”. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(1), 7-35.
26. Nimon, K., and Zigarmi, D. (2015). “The Work Cognition Inventory: Initial evidence of construct validity for the revised form”. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(1), 117-136.
27. Posthuma, R. A., Maertz Jr, C. P., Dworkin, J. B. (2007). “Procedural justice's relationship with turnover: Explaining past inconsistent findings”. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(4), 381-398.
28. Pratt, M. G., Ashforth, B. E. (2003). “Fostering meaningfulness in working and in work”. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, and R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 309–327). San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
29. Shalley, C.E., Gibson, L.L. (2004). “What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity”. The Leadership Quarterly, 33-53.
30. Sims Jr, H. P., Szilagyi, A. D., Keller, R. T. (1976). “The measurement of job characteristics”. Academy of Management journal, 19(2), 195-212.
31. Tesluk, P. E., Jacobs, R. R. (1998). “Toward an integrated model of work experience”. Personnel psychology, 51(2), 321-355.
32. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association.
33. Van Steenbergen, E. F., Kluwer, E. S., Karney, B. R. (2011). “Workload and the trajectory of marital satisfaction in newlyweds: Job satisfaction, gender, and parental status as moderators”. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(3), 345.
34. Volmer, J., Spurk, D., Niessen, C. (2012). “Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement”. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456-465.
35. Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J. E., Debebe, G. (2003). “Interpersonal sensemaking and the meaning of work”. Research in organizational behavior, 25, 93-135.
36. Zaniboni, S., Truxillo, D. M., Fraccaroli, F. (2013). “Differential effects of task variety and skill variety on burnout and turnover intentions for older and younger workers”. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(3), 306-317.
37. Zigarmi, D., Nimon, K., Houson, D., Witt, D., Diehl, J. (2009). “Beyond engagement: Toward a framework and operational definition for employee work passion”. Human Resource Development Review, 8(3), 300-326.
38. Zigarmi, D. R. E. A., Roberts, T. P. (2012). “Leader values as predictors of employee affect and work passion intentions”. Journal of Modern Economy and Management, 1(1), 1-28.