Research Article

Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments

Volume: 9 Number: 5 September 1, 2022
EN

Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments

Abstract

The current study, aimed to examine the development of flexibility and strategy use through instructional sequence encouraging the preservice middle school mathematics teachers’ geometric thinking and problem-solving performance on dynamic geometry environment. Mixed-method research design was used in the study. The study was conducted with 46 preservice middle school mathematics teachers selected by criterion sampling strategy. The data were collected through the tests including open-ended and multiple-choice questions. In the quantitative part of the study, it was attempted to identify whether the tasks affect problem solving skills and geometric thinking. The said individuals participated in six-week instructional sequence designed by the tasks of geometric constructions performed by GeoGebra. For the qualitative part, document analysis technique was used in order to illustrate the ways of this effect in detail and illustrate the development of flexibility and strategy use. It was observed that tasks by DGE improved the preservice middle school mathematics teachers’ scores of problem-solving and geometric thinking. Also, they solved the problems by representing the properties of higher thinking levels than the levels they had before participating in the instructional sequence enacted by GeoGebra. It is believed that this could encourage the improvement of their flexibility and strategy use.

Keywords

dynamic geometry environment, geometric thinking, flexibility, problem solving, strategy use.

References

  1. Baroody, A. J. (2003). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker. The Development of Arithmetic Concepts and Skills: Constructing Adaptive Expertise (pp.1-33). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. Baroody, A.J., & Dowker, A. (Eds.) (2003). The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Recent research and theory. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  3. Blite, A. W., Van der Burg, E., & Klein, A. S. (2001). Students' flexibility in solving two-digit addition and subtraction problems: Instruction effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 627-638.
  4. Cai, J. (2003). Singaporean students’ mathematical thinking ın problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34 (5). 719-737.
  5. Cangelosi, J.S. (1996). Teaching mathematics in secondary and middle school: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  6. Carlson, M. P., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cycle nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 45–75.
  7. de Bock, D., Verschaffel, L., and Janssens, D. (1998). The predominance of the linear model in secondary school students' solutions of word problems involving length and area of similar plane figures. Educational Studies in Mathetmatics, 35, 65–83.
  8. Demetriou, A. (2004). Mind intelligence and development: A cognitive, differential, and developmental theory of intelligence. In A. Dementriou & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.), Developmental change: Theories, models and measurement (pp. 21-73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  9. De Villiers, M. D. (2003). Rethinking Proof: with the geometer’s sketchpad. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
  10. Elchuck, L. M. (1992). The effects of software type, mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, locus of control, independent time of ınvestigation, and van Hiele level on geometric conjecturing ability. Unpublished doctoral disssertation. Pennsylvia State University, USA.
APA
Uygun, T. (2022). Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments. Participatory Educational Research, 9(5), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.110.9.5
AMA
1.Uygun T. Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments. PER. 2022;9(5):183-203. doi:10.17275/per.22.110.9.5
Chicago
Uygun, Tuğba. 2022. “Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments”. Participatory Educational Research 9 (5): 183-203. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.110.9.5.
EndNote
Uygun T (September 1, 2022) Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments. Participatory Educational Research 9 5 183–203.
IEEE
[1]T. Uygun, “Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments”, PER, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 183–203, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.17275/per.22.110.9.5.
ISNAD
Uygun, Tuğba. “Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments”. Participatory Educational Research 9/5 (September 1, 2022): 183-203. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.110.9.5.
JAMA
1.Uygun T. Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments. PER. 2022;9:183–203.
MLA
Uygun, Tuğba. “Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 5, Sept. 2022, pp. 183-0, doi:10.17275/per.22.110.9.5.
Vancouver
1.Tuğba Uygun. Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Development of Flexibility and Strategy Use by Geometric Thinking in Dynamic Geometry Environments. PER. 2022 Sep. 1;9(5):183-20. doi:10.17275/per.22.110.9.5