Development and Validation of the Trust in Higher Education Scale (THES): A Mixed-Methods Approach
Abstract
Keywords
trust in higher education, students, scale development, mixed method
References
- Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2017). Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust. Information and Management, 54(4), 479-490.
- Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(4), 310-323.
- Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992). The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 18-34.
- Barlow, M., & Robertson, H. J. (1994). Class warfare. Key Porter.
- Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76-88.
- Bird, S. J. (2013). Public trust and institutions of higher learning: implications for professional responsibility. In L. Engwall & P. Scott (Eds.), Trust in universities (pp. 25-39). Portland Press Limited.
- Blašková, M., Tumová, D., Blaško, R., & Majchrzak-Lepczyk, J. (2021). Spirals of sustainable academic motivation, creativity, and trust of higher education staff. Sustainability, 13(13), 7057.
- Bormann, I., & Thies, B. (2019). Trust and trusting practices during transition to higher education: Introducing a framework of habitual trust. Educational Research, 61(2), 161-180.
- Boronski, T., & Hassan, N. (2015). Sociology of education. Sage.
- Burić, I., Slišković, A., & Macuka, I. (2018). A mixed-method approach to the assessment of teachers’ emotions: Development and validation of the Teacher Emotion Questionnaire. Educational Psychology, 38(3), 325-349.
