Development and Validation of a Computer Education Curriculum Scale (CECS)

Year 2015, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 102 - 111, 30.08.2015

Kursat Arslan , Fatih Saltan

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.15.21.2.2

Abstract

Primary school curriculum in Turkish educational system has
recently been revised based upon the basic principles of
constructivism. During this process, the role of teachers and
students, the teaching and learning processes, and the classroom
environment have been redefined. This study has been designed to
develop a Computer Education Curriculum Scale (CECS) in order
to assess attitudes of primary school teachers towards the new
curriculum and to determine and compare opinions of teachers on
the implementation and effectiveness of the new curriculum. For
this purpose, a 29-item Likert-type Computer Education
Curriculum Scale was developed and administrated to 61 teachers
working at primary schools from various cities of Turkey, who
voluntarily participated in the study. And all participants serve in
public schools, and have at least three years of experience as
computer education and technology teacher. For data collection
process, an online form of instrument was developed and collected
data from participants by sharing it through online forms. As a
result of statistical analyses on the survey data, 5 subscales were
determined. These subscales are named as recognition of the new
curriculum, course structure changes, identification of the teaching
environment, application of the new curriculum, and role and
contribution of teachers. Cronbach’s alpha value of the whole
instrument is 0.75.

Keywords

Computer Education, curriculum, primary school, technology education

References

• Akbaba-Altun, S. (2004). Information Technology Classrooms and Elementary School Principals’ Roles: Turkish Experience. Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 9 (3), 255-270.
• Akbaba-Altun, S. (2006). Complexity of Integrating Computer Technologies into Education in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 9 (1), 176-187
• Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). Educational Technology in Turkey: Past, Present and Future. Education Media International, Vol. 39 (2), 165-174.
• Bukova-Güzel, E. & Aklan, H. (2005). Yeniden yapılandırılan ilkögretim programı pilot uygulamasının degerlendirilmesi [An evaluation of the pilot program of primary program reconfigured]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,5, 385-420.
• Caprio, M. W. (1994). Easing into constructivism, connecting meaningful learning with student experience. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 210-212.
• Coşkun, E. (2005). İlköğretim dördüncü ve beşinci sınıf öğretmen ve öğrencilerinin yeni Türkçe dersi öğretim programı’yla ilgili görüşleri üzerine nitel bir araştırma [Perceptions of elementary school teachers and students regarding new Turkish program: a qualitative study]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5 (2), 421- 476.
• Deryakulu, D. (2001). Yapıcı öğrenme [constructive learning]. Ankara: Eğitim Sen Yayınları.
• Duman, B. (2004). Öğrenme-öğretme kuramları ve süreç temelli öğretim [Learning and teaching theory and process-based teaching]. Ankara: Anı Pub.
• George, D. & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for Windows; Step by step. Allyn & Bacon, The United States of America.
• Gömleksiz M. N. (2005). Yeni ilköğretim programının uygulamadaki etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi [evaluation of effectiveness of new primary school curriculum]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5 (2), 339-384.
• Gömleksiz, M. N. ve Kan, A. Ü. (2006). Yeni sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programının eleştirel ve yaratıcı düşünme becerilerini kazandırmadaki etkililiğinin belirlenmesi (Diyarbakır ili örneği) [defining effectiveness of new curriculum of social studies in gaining critical and creative thinking skills]. 15. National Educational Scinece Conference. 13-15 September 2006, Muğla Univ., Muğla.
• Gözütok, F. D., Akgün, Ö. E. ve Karacaoğlu, Ö. C. (2005). İlköğretim programlarının öğretmen yeterlilikleri açısından değerlendirilmesi [evaluation of primary school curriculum in terms of teacher qualifications]. Eğitimde Yansımalar: VIII Yeni İlköğretim Programlarını Değerlendirme Sempozyumu bildirileri kitabı içinde (s.17- 40). Ankara: Sim Matbaası. 82 Eurasian Journal of Educational Research
• Güleryüz, H. (2001). Eğitim programlarının dili ve yaratici öğrenme [language of education programs and creative learning]. Ankara: PegemA Pub
• Gülpınar, M. A. (2005). Beyin/zihin temelli öğrenme ilkeleri ve eğitimde yapılandırmacı modeller [brain based learning principles and constructivist models in education]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5 (2), 271-306.
• Holloway, J. H. (1999). Caution: constructivism ahead. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 85-86.
• Hoşlgörür, V. (2002). Sınıf yönetiminde yapısalcı yaklaşım [constructivist approach in classroom management]. Journal of educational Research, 9, 73-78.
• Howe, K. R.& Berv, J. (2000). Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in Education: Opinions and Second Opinions on Constroversial Issues (pp.19-40). Chicago, İllinois:The University of Chicago Press.
• MEB. (1998). İlköğretim Okulları Seçmeli Bilgisayar Dersi 1-2-3-4-5 Öğretim Programı. [Elementary School 1-2-3-4-5 Elective Computer Education Courses Program.] Eylül 2492 Sayılı Tebliğler Dergisi.
• Özbay, Funda (2007). EKU University Web Page, Science of Education. http://www2.aku.edu.tr/~gocak/2007dersnot/egitimbilimleri/apa.pdf . Accessed 17 January 2010
• Özdemir, M. S. (2005). İlköğretim okullarındaki öğretmenlerin yeni ilköğretim programlarına (IV. Sınıflar) ilişkin görüşleri [perceptions of primary school teachers about new primary education curriculum]. XIV National Educational Scinece Conference. Proceeding book (s.573-581), Pamukkale Univ., Denizli.
• Özkan, B. (2001). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme ortamlarında özgün etkinlik ve materyal kullanımının etkililiği [effectiveness of using original activities and materials in constructivist learning environment].YUnpublished PhD Thesis, Hacettepe Univ., Ankara.
• Stevens, J., (1996). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, third ed. Lawrence Elbaum Associates, USA, pp. 363–428.
• Willis, B. G. (1999). Cognitive Interviewing A “how to” guide. http://appliedresearch. cancer.gov/areas /cognitive/interview.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2010