Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 161 - 170, 01.12.2017

Abstract

References

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., E., Kılıç Çakmak, Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (17. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademy.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L. and Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73.
  • Ersoy, Y. (2005). Matematik eğitimini yenileme yönünde ileri hareketler-i: teknoloji destekli matematik öğretimi. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 51-63.
  • Karasar, N. (2005) Bilimsel Araştirma Yöntemi (14. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Publication.
  • Kaya, Z., Kaya, O. N., & Emre, İ. (2013). Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi (TPAB) Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2355-2377.
  • Kırılmazkaya G. ve Kırbağ Zengin, F. (2015). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) özgüven algılarının incelenmesi. The Journal of Turk & Islam World Social Studies, 2 (5), 18-25.
  • Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 60-70.
  • Koehler M. J, Mishra, P., & Yahya, K (2007) Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: integrating content, pedagogy, and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.
  • Meriç, G. (2014). Determining science teacher candidates’ self-reliance levels with regard to their technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10 (2), 352-367.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.
  • Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
  • Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand; Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  • Şad, N., Açıkgül, K. ve Delican, K. (2015). Eğitim fakültesi son sinif öğrencilerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerine (TPAB) ilişkin yeterlilik algıları. The Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 8(2), 204-235.
  • Timur, B. ve Taşar, M. F. (2011). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi öz güven ölçeğinin (TPABÖGÖ) Türkçe’ ye uyarlanması. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (2), 839-856.
  • Turan, Z., Küçük, S. ve Gündoğdu, K. (2013). Öğretmen eğitiminde bilişim teknolojilerinin kullanımı: mevcut ve beklenen durum. Adnan Menderes University Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 1-9.

Examining Different Variables of TPACK level of Teachers Attending the FATIH Project Interactive Classroom Management Course

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 161 - 170, 01.12.2017

Abstract

“Pedagogical Content Knowledge” term came out by
combining “content knowledge” dimension that teachers need to have and
pedagogical knowledge dimension. Nowadays “technological pedagogical content
knowledge” term is created by adding “technology” dimension to “pedagogical
content knowledge”. Within the scope of this study, it is aimed to determine
TPACK level of teachers from different branches attending the FATIH Project
Interactive Classroom Management course and examine TPACK level of them in
terms of different variables. Study group of the research in which experimental
design is used consists of 25 teachers from different branches who attended the
FATIH Project Interactive Classroom Management course and work in a secondary
school in Ankara where the FATIH Project is conducted during 2015-2016 school
year. According to findings, it is concluded that training has an effect on
improvement of “Pedagogical Knowledge” and “Technological Pedagogical
Knowledge”. Despite the effect occurring on these two sub-dimensions, it is
determined that there is no significant effect of the training on TPACK
improvement of the teachers.

References

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., E., Kılıç Çakmak, Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (17. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademy.
  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L. and Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73.
  • Ersoy, Y. (2005). Matematik eğitimini yenileme yönünde ileri hareketler-i: teknoloji destekli matematik öğretimi. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 51-63.
  • Karasar, N. (2005) Bilimsel Araştirma Yöntemi (14. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Publication.
  • Kaya, Z., Kaya, O. N., & Emre, İ. (2013). Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi (TPAB) Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2355-2377.
  • Kırılmazkaya G. ve Kırbağ Zengin, F. (2015). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi (TPAB) özgüven algılarının incelenmesi. The Journal of Turk & Islam World Social Studies, 2 (5), 18-25.
  • Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 60-70.
  • Koehler M. J, Mishra, P., & Yahya, K (2007) Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: integrating content, pedagogy, and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.
  • Meriç, G. (2014). Determining science teacher candidates’ self-reliance levels with regard to their technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10 (2), 352-367.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.
  • Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
  • Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand; Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  • Şad, N., Açıkgül, K. ve Delican, K. (2015). Eğitim fakültesi son sinif öğrencilerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerine (TPAB) ilişkin yeterlilik algıları. The Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 8(2), 204-235.
  • Timur, B. ve Taşar, M. F. (2011). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi öz güven ölçeğinin (TPABÖGÖ) Türkçe’ ye uyarlanması. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (2), 839-856.
  • Turan, Z., Küçük, S. ve Gündoğdu, K. (2013). Öğretmen eğitiminde bilişim teknolojilerinin kullanımı: mevcut ve beklenen durum. Adnan Menderes University Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 1-9.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Mustafa Sarıtepeci

Hatice Durak This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2017
Acceptance Date November 30, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Sarıtepeci, M., & Durak, H. (2017). Examining Different Variables of TPACK level of Teachers Attending the FATIH Project Interactive Classroom Management Course. Participatory Educational Research, 4(2), 161-170.