The effects of socio-scientific STEM activities on 21st century skills of middle school students

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 25 - 52, 01.03.2022

İbrahim Benek , Behiye Akçay

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.27.9.2

Cited By: 11

Abstract

In this study, the effects of the STEM activities integrated with socio-scientific issues on students' 21st century skills were investigated. In this research, nested mixed design was used. The study group of this research consisted of 16 middle school students who studied in the seventh grade of a public school in an eastern province of Turkey. Socio-scientific STEM activities were applied to the study group for 24 weeks in the first and second semesters. Students followed the engineering design stages for STEM activities. In the research, 21st Century Skills Scale, Interview Form, Perception of 21st Century Skills Form, Field Notes, and Informal Interview Notes were used as data collection tools. SPSS was used to analyze the quantitative data of the research, and content and descriptive analysis methods were used to analyze the qualitative data. The study results showed that STEM activities integrated with socio-scientific issues had a positive effect on students' 21st century skills. Also, as a result of the examination of the opinions of the students, it was determined that the application developed the “creativity and innovation” skills of the students the most. Furthermore, students’ social and intercultural entrepreneurship, self-management, leadership and responsibility, critical thinking, problem solving, communication and cooperation, creativity and innovation skills were enhanced/developed at the end of the study.

Keywords

STEM, 21st-century skills, socio-scientific issues

References

• Akgunduz, D., Aydeniz, M., Cakmakci, G., Cavas, B., Corlu, M. S., Oner, T., & Ozdemir, S. (2015). A report on STEM Education in Turkey: A provisional agenda or a necessity? Istanbul: Aydin University Publication.
• Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socioscientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38, 67-90.
• Anjarsari, P., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Susanti, K. (2020). Developing technology and engineering literacy for Junior High School students through STEM-based science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 12107-12108.
• Aydin, E., & Karsli Baydere, F. (2019). 7th grade students’ views about STEM activities: Example of separation of mixtures. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 38(1), 35-52.
• Basham, J.D., & Marino, M.T. (2013). Understanding STEM education and supporting students through universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 8-15.
• Battelle For Kids. (2019). 21st century student outcomes & support systems. Retrieved from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf.
• Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
• Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
• Chapoo, S. (2019). Enhancement of 9th grader students’ 21st century skills through inquiry-based questions in integrated STEM activity. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2081(1), 30017-30018.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Cavas P. & Cavas B. (2018). STEM eğitiminde mühendislik uygulamaları. In D. Akyüz (Ed.), Okul öncesinden üniversiteye kuram ve uygulamada STEM eğitimi (113-131). Anı Yayıncılık. Ankara.
• Ciftci, M. (2018). Effects of developed STEM activities on differential creative levels of students in middle school pf students, differentials of STEM disciplinary and differences of STEM professions. (Unpublished master thesis). Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize.
• Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. Paper presented at the 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
• Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315.
• English, L. D., King, D., & Smeed, J. (2016). Advancing integrated STEM learning through engineering design: Sixth-grade students’ design and construction of earthquake resistant buildings. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 255–271.
• Farmer, C., Allen, D. T., Berland, L. K., Crawford, R. H., & Guerra, L. (2012). Engineer your world: An innovative approach to developing a high school engineering design course. Paper presented at 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Boston: Pearson.
• Hare, L. N. (2017). The perceptions of STEM from eighth-grade African-American girls in a high-minority middle school. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Gardner Webb University.
• Harris, R. L. (2018). Engaging urban students in engineering design to determine shifts in attitudes toward STEM. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). School of Education, University of Pittsburgh.
• Higde, E. (2018). Investigation the effect of the STEM activities prepared for 7th class students in terms of different variables. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Science Sciences Institute, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin.
• Householder, D. L., & Hailey, C. E. (2012). Incorporating engineering design challenges into STEM courses. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ncete_publications/166/.
• Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Hammer, D. ,& Carberry, A. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses. Washington D.C.: National Center for Engineering and Technology Education.
• Jolly, A. (2017). STEM by design. Strategies and activities for grade 4-8. New York: Routladge.
• Judson, E. (2014). Effects of transferring to STEM- focused charter and magnet schools on student achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 255- 266.
• Kang, M., Kim, B., Kim, B., & You, H. (2012). Developing an instrument to measure 21st century skills for elementary students. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 25(2), 133-148.
• Karakas, M. M. (2015). Investigation of the eight-grade secondary school students ' levels of 21st century skills in science education. (Unpublished master thesis). Osmangazi University, Eskişehir.
• Klop, T., & Severiens, S. (2007). An exploration of attitudes towards modern biotechnology: A study among Dutch secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 663-679.
• Kucukali, A., & Sercemeli, C. (2019). Children's privacy rights in social media and an implementation on “sharenting”: The case of Ataturk University. The Journal of International Social Research, 12(68), 1176-1186.
• Lacey, T. A., & Wright, B. (2009). Occupational employment projections to 2018. Monthly Labor Review, 132(11), 82-123
• Meadows, M. C. (2018). Gender differences in STEM sense of belonging for academically advanced middle school students. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
• Miles, M. B., & M. Huberman. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
• Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., Peters- Burton, E. E., & Guzey, S. S. (2016). The need for a STEM road map. In C.C. Johnson, E.E.
• Peters- Burton & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM road map a framework for integrated STEM education (3-12). New York: Routledge.
• Murat, A. (2018). Investigation of prospective science teachers 21st century skills competence perceptions and attitudes toward STEM. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Institute of Educational Science, Firat University, Elazig.
• National Academy of Engineering [NAE] & National Research Council [NRC] (2009). Engineering in K-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• National Research Council (NRC) (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• National Research Council (NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• P21 (2016). Our Vision and Mission. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/about-us/our-mission.
• Puig, B., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2011). Different music to the same score: Teaching about genes, environment and human performances. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socioscientific issues in the classroom (201-238). New York: Springer Dordect.
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
• Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socioscientific issues in the classroom (1-10). New York: Springer Dordect.
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Journal of Science Education, 88(1), 4-27.
• Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 353–376.
• Sanders, M. E. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
• Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik içerikli okul sonrası etkinlikler ve öğrenciler üzerindeki etkileri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(1), 297-322.
• T. C. Sanayi & Teknoloji Bakanlığı (SEGE) (2019). İllerin ve bölgelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik sıralaması araştırması SEGE-2017. Ankara.
• Tunkham, P., Donpudsa, S., & Dornbundit, P. (2016). Development of STEM activities in chemistry on “protein” to enhance 21st century learning skills for senior high school students. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 16(3), 217-234.
• Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116.
• Walker, A. K., & Zeidler, L. D. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387-1410.