The Relationships Among Teachers’ Behaviours That Encourage Students’ Reading Engagement, Reading Enjoyment, Reading Self-Efficacy and Reading Success

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 98 - 110, 01.05.2022

Pakize Urfalı Dadandı İbrahim Dadandı

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.56.9.3

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Reading comprehension has a critical importance for almost every aspect of individuals’ life. The aim of this study is to reveal the relations among students’ perceptions of their Turkish language teachers’ behaviours that encourage reading engagement, levels of reading enjoyment, reading self-efficacy, and reading success within the frame of a model, using PISA 2018 Turkey data. The study is based on the correlational research model and the sample includes 6450 (F= 3247, M= 3203) students who completed the PISA 2018 Turkey questionnaire. The data obtained from the PISA 2018 database were analyzed using the structural equation model (SEM) and the sobel test. SEM analyses revealed that the hypothesized model well fits the data and all the regression paths in the model are statistically significant. According to the research findings, teachers’ behaviours that encourage students’ reading engagement (TBESRE), reading enjoyment, and reading self-efficacy have significant direct effects on reading achievement. In addition, TBESRE has significant indirect effects on reading achievement through reading enjoyment and reading self-efficacy, and that reading self-efficacy has a significant indirect effect on reading achievement through reading enjoyment. Considering the findings of this study, it is recommended that teachers implement practices to encourage students' participation in reading activities and develop educational interventions to improve reading enjoyment and reading self-efficacy.

Keywords

reading engagement, reading enjoyement, reading self-efficacy, reading success

References

• Aarnoutse, C., & van Leeuwe, J. (1998). Relation between reading comprehension, vocabulary, reading pleasure, and reading frequency. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(2), 143-166.
• Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., van der Werf, G., & Kuyper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 36-46. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont: Cengage Learning.
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
• Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs for adolescents (pp. 307-337). Greenwich: Information Age.
• Barber, A. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2020). How reading motivation and engagement enable reading achievement: Policy implications. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 27-34.
• Baron, P., & Corbin, L. (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 759-772.
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-46.
• Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.
• Cheema, J. R. (2018). Adolescents' enjoyment of reading as a predictor of reading achievement: New evidence from a cross‐country survey. Journal of Research in Reading, 41,149-162.
• Chen, F., Sakyi, A., & Cui, Y. (2021). Linking student, home, and school factors to reading achievement: the mediating role of reading self-efficacy. Educational Psychology, 1-20.
• Clark, C. & De Zoysa, S. (2012). Mapping the interrelationships of reading enjoyment, attitudes, behaviour and attainment. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496343.pdf
• Cox, K. E., & Guthrie, J. T. (2001). Motivational and cognitive contributions to students' amount of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 116-131.
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8-17.
• Ertem, H. Y. (2020). Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 248-264.
• Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-133). New York: Springer.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen N. E. (2009). How to desing and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New Yok: McGraw-Hill.
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
• Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162.
• Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 9-26. Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 237-250.
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Roles of motivation and engagement in reading comprehension assessment. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 187-213). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Hornstra, L., van der Veen, I., & Peetsma, T. (2016). Domain-specificity of motivation: A longitudinal study in upper primary school. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 167-178.
• Inda-Caro, M., Maulana, R., Fernández-García, C. M., Peña-Calvo, J. V., del Carmen Rodríguez-Menéndez, M., & Helms-Lorenz, M. (2019). Validating a model of effective teaching behaviour and student engagement: Perspectives from Spanish students. Learning Environments Research, 22(2), 229-251.
• Jennifer, J. M., & Ponniah, R. J. (2015). Pleasure reading cures readicide and facilitates academic reading. Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(4), 1-5.
• Juel, C., & Leavell, J. A. (1988). Retention and nonretention of at-risk readers in first grade and their subsequent reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(9), 571-580.
• Klassen, R. M. (2010). The confidence to manage learning: The self-efficacy for selfregulated learning of early adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 33, 19-30.
• Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262-273.
• Kusdemir, Y., & Bulut, P. (2018). The Relationship between Elementary School Students' Reading Comprehension and Reading Motivation. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(12), 97-110.
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs instudent engagement and learning intheclassroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119-137.
• Locher, F., & Pfost, M. (2020). The relation between time spent reading and reading comprehension throughout the life course. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 57-77.
• Maddux, J. E. (2002). Self-efficacy: The power of believing you can. In C. R. Sbyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 277-287). New York: Oxford University Press.
• McGeown, S. P., Johnston, R. S., Walker, J., Howatson, K., Stockburn, A., & Dufton, P. (2015). The relationship between young children’s enjoyment of learning to read, reading attitudes, confidence and attainment. Educational Research, 57(4), 389-402.
• Mislevy, R. J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56(2), 177-196.
• Newman, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newman (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp.11-40). New York: Teacher College Press.
• Okkinga, M., van Steensel, R., van Gelderen, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. (2018). Effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of low‐achieving adolescents. The importance of specific teacher skills. Journal of research in reading, 41(1), 20-41.
• Özbay, M., Bağcı, H., & Uyar, Y. (2008). Evaluation of the preservice Turkish teachers’ attitudes towards reading habit according to some variables. İnonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(15), 117-136.
• Pajares, F. (2006). Self-efficacy during childhood and adolescence: Implications for teachers and parents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescencents (pp. 339-367). Greenwich: Information Age.
• Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-32.
• Pecjak, S., Podlesek, A., & Pirc, T. (2011). Model of reading comprehension for 5th grade students. Studia Psychologica, 53(1), 53-67.
• Peura, P., Aro, T., Viholainen, H., Räikkönen, E., Usher, E. L., Sorvo, R., & Aro, M. (2019). Reading self-efficacy and reading fluency development among primary school children: Does specificity of self-efficacy matter?. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 67-78.
• Rogiers, A., Van Keer, H., & Merchie, E. (2020). The profile of the skilled reader: An investigation into the role of reading enjoyment and student characteristics. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101512.
• Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher–child relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 213-231.
• Samuels, S. J. & Kamil, M. L. (1998). Models of the reading process. In. P. L. Carrel, J. Devine & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 22-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-338.
• Schöber, C., Schütte, K., Köller, O., McElvany, N., & Gebauer, M. M. (2018). Reciprocal effects between self-efficacy and achievement in mathematics and reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 63, 1-11.
• Schunk, D. H., & Rice, M. J. (1993). Strategy fading and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and comprehension among students receiving remedial reading services. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 257-276.
• Schunk, D.H. , & Zimmerman, B.J. (1997). Developing self-efficacious readers and writers: The role of social and self-regulatory processes. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 34-50). Newark: International Reading Association.
• Sherab, K. (2013). Strategies for encouraging behavioural and cognitive engagement of pre-service student-teachers in Bhutan: An action research case study. Educational Action Research, 21(2), 164-184.
• Slot, E., Akkerman, S., & Wubbels, T. (2019). Adolescents’ interest experience in daily life in and across family and peer contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(1), 25-43. Sofyan, D., & Jayanti, F. G. (2019). The correlation between reading self-efficacy and reading comprehension. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 3(1), 1-13.
• Stutz, F., Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Relations among reading motivation, reading amount, and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 101-113.
• Taboada, A., Townsend, D., & Boynton, M. J. (2013). Mediating effects of reading engagement on the reading comprehension of early adolescent English language learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29(4), 309-332.
• Tavşancıl, E., Yıldırım, O., & Demir, S. B. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of learning strategies and reading enjoyment on PISA 2009 reading performance. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(82), 169-190.
• Toste, J. R., Didion, L., Peng, P., Filderman, M. J., & McClelland, A. M. (2020). A meta-analytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K–12 students. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 420-456.
• Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between US and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162-186.
• Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 59-68.
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.
• Wilkinson, K., Andries, V., Howarth, D., Bonsall, J., Sabeti, S., & McGeown, S. (2020). Reading during adolescence: Why adolescents choose (or do not choose) books. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64(2), 157-166.
• Zaccoletti, S., Altoè, G., & Mason, L. (2020). Enjoyment, anxiety and boredom, and their control-value antecedents as predictors of reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 79, 1-11.
• Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167-177.
• Zhao, W., Song, Y., Zhao, Q., & Zhang, R. (2019). The effect of teacher support on primary school students’ reading engagement: the mediating role of reading interest and chinese academic self-concept. Educational Psychology, 39(2), 236-253.