EN
TR
Comparasion of Scent Quality of Organic and Conventional Oil-Bearing Rose (Rosa Damascena Mill.)
Abstract
Oil-bearing rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) is the most important species, producing a highvalue
aromatic oil, which is used in the fragrance and cosmetic industries. The organic oil-bearing
rose cultivation has become more important in the recent years. In Göller region of Turkey, 110 kg
organic rose oil was produced from organic farming areas in 2009. The aim of this study was to
determine the main scent differences between organic and conventional rose oils produced from Baş-
Koop in Başmakçı/Afyonkarahisar. Rose oils produced by hydro-distillation were analyzed by
GC/MS for essential oil composition. In the conventional production, the composition of the first
distillation oil was 25.63% citronellol, 12.07% geraniol, 5.82% nerol and 35.06% paraffins, and the
composition of the second distillation oil was 37.05% citronellol, 30.62% geraniol, 14.92% nerol and
0.67% paraffins. In the organic production, the composition of the first distillation oil was 20.47%
citronellol, 9.32% geraniol, 4.60% nerol and 48.33% paraffins, and the composition of the second
distillation oil was 37.48% citronellol, 30.50% geraniol, 15.54% nerol and 2.80% paraffins. The
results of this study showed that the rose oil composition was different in the first distillation oils, but
was similar in the second distillation oils between organic and conventional rose oils. Organic rose
oils contained less amount of methyl eugenol which has mutagenic and allergic reactions.
Keywords
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
September 1, 2010
Submission Date
September 1, 2010
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2010 Volume: 5 Number: 2
APA
Baydar, H., & Göktürk Baydar, N. (2010). Organik ve Konvensiyonel Gül (Rosa damascena Mill.) Yağlarının Koku Kalitesinin Karşılaştırılması. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 9-14. https://izlik.org/JA42MA38ZG
AMA
1.Baydar H, Göktürk Baydar N. Organik ve Konvensiyonel Gül (Rosa damascena Mill.) Yağlarının Koku Kalitesinin Karşılaştırılması. ISUBU JAF. 2010;5(2):9-14. https://izlik.org/JA42MA38ZG
Chicago
Baydar, Hasan, and Nilgün Göktürk Baydar. 2010. “Organik Ve Konvensiyonel Gül (Rosa Damascena Mill.) Yağlarının Koku Kalitesinin Karşılaştırılması”. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 5 (2): 9-14. https://izlik.org/JA42MA38ZG.
EndNote
Baydar H, Göktürk Baydar N (September 1, 2010) Organik ve Konvensiyonel Gül (Rosa damascena Mill.) Yağlarının Koku Kalitesinin Karşılaştırılması. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 5 2 9–14.
IEEE
[1]H. Baydar and N. Göktürk Baydar, “Organik ve Konvensiyonel Gül (Rosa damascena Mill.) Yağlarının Koku Kalitesinin Karşılaştırılması”, ISUBU JAF, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 9–14, Sept. 2010, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA42MA38ZG
ISNAD
Baydar, Hasan - Göktürk Baydar, Nilgün. “Organik Ve Konvensiyonel Gül (Rosa Damascena Mill.) Yağlarının Koku Kalitesinin Karşılaştırılması”. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 5/2 (September 1, 2010): 9-14. https://izlik.org/JA42MA38ZG.
JAMA
1.Baydar H, Göktürk Baydar N. Organik ve Konvensiyonel Gül (Rosa damascena Mill.) Yağlarının Koku Kalitesinin Karşılaştırılması. ISUBU JAF. 2010;5:9–14.
MLA
Baydar, Hasan, and Nilgün Göktürk Baydar. “Organik Ve Konvensiyonel Gül (Rosa Damascena Mill.) Yağlarının Koku Kalitesinin Karşılaştırılması”. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 2, Sept. 2010, pp. 9-14, https://izlik.org/JA42MA38ZG.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Baydar, Nilgün Göktürk Baydar. Organik ve Konvensiyonel Gül (Rosa damascena Mill.) Yağlarının Koku Kalitesinin Karşılaştırılması. ISUBU JAF [Internet]. 2010 Sep. 1;5(2):9-14. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA42MA38ZG