Sporda Fiziksel, Fizyolojik ve Psikolojik Ölçümlerde Güncel Yaklaşımlar

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma, spor bilimlerinde kullanılan fiziksel, fizyolojik ve psikolojik ölçüm yöntemlerini geleneksel ve modern yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde ele alan narratif bir derlemedir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırma kapsamında, 2015–2025 yılları arasında yayımlanan ulusal ve uluslararası çalışmalar sistematik bir tarama yaklaşımıyla incelenmiştir. Literatür taraması PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar ve TR Dizin veri tabanlarında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Toplamda 40 makale içerik analizi yöntemiyle değerlendirilmiş; bulgular, kullanılan ölçüm türlerine göre üç ana tema altında (fiziksel, fizyolojik, psikolojik) kategorize edilmiştir. Analiz sürecinde çalışmaların yöntemsel özellikleri, kullanılan ölçüm araçları, veri toplama sıklığı, geçerlik-güvenirlik düzeyleri ve uygulama alanları sistematik biçimde incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Geleneksel ölçüm yöntemlerinin düşük maliyet, kolay uygulanabilirlik ve saha uyumu açısından avantajlı olsa da sınırlı parametre çeşitliliği ve ölçüm hassasiyeti nedeniyle yetersiz kalabildiği görülmüştür. Buna karşın modern teknolojiler -örneğin kuvvet platformları, biyoelektrik empedans analiz sistemleri, ivmeölçer tabanlı mobil uygulamalar, EEG cihazları ve sanal gerçeklik temelli testler- daha kapsamlı, nesnel ve anlık geri bildirimler sunarak bireyselleştirilmiş antrenman planlaması, sakatlık risk analizi ve psikolojik performans takibinde önemli katkılar sağlamaktadır. Ancak bu sistemlerin yüksek maliyet, teknik uzmanlık gereksinimi ve erişim kısıtlılığı gibi sınırlılıkları bulunmaktadır. Sonuç: Güncel literatür, en etkili yaklaşımın geleneksel testlerin pratikliğini modern teknolojilerin sunduğu veri derinliğiyle birleştiren hibrit modeller olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bütünleşik yapı sayesinde sporcularda fiziksel, fizyolojik ve psikolojik performansın çok boyutlu, güvenilir ve sürdürülebilir biçimde değerlendirilmesi mümkün hale gelmektedir.

Keywords

• Fiziksel
• Fizyolojik
• Psikolojik
• Performans
• Ölçüm

Current Approaches to Physical, Physiological and Psychological Measurements in Sports

Abstract

Aim: This study is a narrative review that examines the physical, physiological, and psychological measurement methods used in sports sciences within the framework of traditional and modern approaches Method: Within the scope of the research, national and international studies published between 2015 and 2025 were reviewed using a systematic search approach. The literature search was conducted across the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and TR Dizin databases. A total of 40 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed using the content analysis method. The results were categorized under three main themes based on the type of measurement used: physical, physiological, and psychological. During the analysis process, the methodological characteristics of the studies, measurement tools employed, data collection frequency, validity and reliability levels, and application domains were systematically examined. Results: It has been observed that, although traditional measurement methods offer advantages in terms of low cost, ease of application, and field adaptability, they may be inadequate due to limited parameter diversity and measurement precision. In contrast, modern technologies—such as force platforms, bioelectrical impedance analysis systems, accelerometer-based mobile applications, EEG devices, and virtual reality-based tests- provide more comprehensive, objective, and real-time feedback, thereby contributing significantly to individualized training planning, injury risk assessment, and psychological performance monitoring. However, these systems also present certain limitations, including high costs, technical expertise requirements, and limited accessibility. Conclusion: Current literature suggests that the most effective approach involves developing hybrid models that integrate the practicality of traditional tests with the data depth offered by modern technologies. Such an integrated framework enables the multidimensional, reliable, and sustainable assessment of physical, physiological, and psychological performance in athletes.

Keywords

• physically
• physiological
• psychological
• performance
• measurement

References

1. Aktaş, Y., & Gökhan, I. (2019). Investigation of body composition of footballers by bioelectrical impedance method. Journal of Educational Issues, 5(2), 118–127.
2. Alvurdu, S. (2023, September 29). Motor becerilerin değerlendirilmesinde teknoloji kullanımı: Mobil uygulamalar. 11. Uluslararası Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenliği Kongresi. https://besok2023.dpu.edu.tr/tr/index/sayfa/14058/motor-becerilerin-degerlendirilmesinde-teknoloji -kullanimi-mobil-uygulamalar.
3. Ayán-Pérez, C., Cancela-Carral, J. M., Lago-Ballesteros, J., & Martínez-Lemos, I. (2017). Reliability of sargent jump test in 4-to 5-year-old children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 124(1), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512516676174
4. Balsalobre-Fernández, C., Glaister, M., & Lockey, R. A. (2015). The validity and reliability of an iPhone app for measuring vertical jump performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(15), 1574–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.996184
5. Balsalobre-Fernández, C., Glaister, M., & Lockey, R. A. (2015). The validity and reliability of an iPhone app for measuring vertical jump performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(15), 1574-1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.996184
6. Balsalobre-Fernández, C., Marchante, D., Muñoz-López, M., & Jiménez, S. L. (2018). Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone app for the measurement of barbell velocity and 1RM on the bench press exercise. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(1), 64–70.
7. Bartol, K., Bojanić, D., Petković, T., & Pribanić, T. (2021). A review of body measurement using 3D scanning. IEEE Access, 9, 67281–67301. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3076595
8. Borges, N., Reaburn, P., Driller, M., & Argus, C. (2016). Age-related changes in performance and recovery kinetics in masters athletes: A narrative review. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 24(1), 149–157.

9. Bourne, M. N., Opar, D. A., Williams, M. D., et al. (2015). Eccentric knee-flexor strength and hamstring injury risk in rugby union: A prospective study. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 43, 2663–2670.
10. Brigatto, F. A., Braz, T. V., Zanini, T. C. da C., Germano, M. D., Aoki, M. S., Schoenfeld, B. J., Marchetti, P. H., & Lopes, C. R. (2019). Effect of resistance training frequency on neuromuscular performance and muscle morphology after 8 weeks in trained men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(8), 2104–2116. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002563
11. Bromilow, L., Stanton, R., & Humphries, B. (2020). A structured e-investigation into the prevalence and acceptance of smartphone applications by exercise professionals. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 34(5), 1330–1339.
12. Buecker, S., Luhmann, M., Haehner, P., Bühler, J. L., Dapp, L. C., Luciano, E. C., & Orth, U. (2023). The development of subjective well-being across the life span: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 149(7–8), 418.
13. Caba, U., & Pekel, A. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerin genel öz yeterlilik düzeyleri ile sporcu kimlik algısı arasındaki ilişki (Vakıf Üniversitesi Örneği). Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(55), 475-482.
14. Castañeda-Babarro, A. (2021). The Wingate Anaerobic Test: A narrative review of the protocol variables that affect the results obtained. Applied Sciences, 11(16), 7417. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167417
15. Collings, T. J., Lima, Y. L., Dutaillis, B., & Bourne, M. N. (2024). Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of VALD ForceDecks’ strength, balance, and movement assessment tests. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2024.00144
16. Çakır, Z., Ceyhan, M. A., Gönen, M., & Erbaş, Ü. (2023). Yapay zeka teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler ile eğitim ve spor bilimlerinde paradigma değişimi. Dede Korkut Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 56–71.
17. Dereceli, Ç., Toros, T., & Yıldız, R. (2019). Futbol hakemlerinin durumluluk kaygı ve genel öz yeterlik düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(2), 64–74.
18. Desmyttere, G., Gaudet, S., & Begon, M. (2019). Test-retest reliability of a hip strength assessment system in varsity soccer players. Physical Therapy in Sport, 37, 138–143.
19. Düking, P., Born, D. P., & Sperlich, B. (2016). The SpeedCourt: Reliability, usefulness, and validity of a new method to determine change-of-direction speed. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 11(1), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2015-0174
20. Edwards, S. D., Edwards, D. J., & Highley, J. A. (2015). Evaluation of HeartMath training programme for improving personal resilience and psychophysiological coherence. African Journal for Physical Health Education, Recreation and Dance, 21(3.2), 996-1008.
21. Eler, N. (2018). Farklı sporlarda antropometrik ve fiziksel uygunluk parametrelerinin incelenmesi. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(3), 32–46.
22. Eroğlu, S. Y., & Eroğlu, E. (2019). Üniversite spor takımlarında oynayan öğrencilerin anksiyete ve spora özgü başarı motivasyonu düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Türkiye Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 88–96.
23. Fernández-Cuevas, I., Marins, J. C. B., Lastras, J. A., Carmona, P. M. G., Cano, S. P., García-Concepción, M. Á., & Sillero-Quintana, M. (2015). Classification of factors influencing the use of infrared thermography in humans: A review. Infrared Physics & Technology, 71, 28–55.
24. Ghosh, I., Ramamurthy, S. R., Chakma, A., & Roy, N. (2023). Sports analytics review: Artificial intelligence applications, emerging technologies, and algorithmic perspective. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 13(5), e1496.
25. Giles, D., Draper, N., & Neil, W. (2016). Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor to measure RR intervals at rest. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 116(3), 563-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-015-3303-9
26. Goudman, L., Jansen, J., Billot, M., Vets, N., De Smedt, A., Roulaud, M., ... & Moens, M. (2022). Virtual reality applications in chronic pain management: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Serious Games, 10(2), e34402.
27. Grgic, J., Lazinica, B., Schoenfeld, B. J., et al. (2020). Test–retest reliability of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength assessment: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 6, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00260-z
28. Harris, D. J., Wilson, M. R., & Vine, S. J. (2018). A systematic review of commercial cognitive training devices: Implications for use in sport. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 312023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00709
29. Hassan, A. K. (2025). Fitlight training and its ınfluence on visual-motor reactions and dribbling speed in female basketball players: Prospective evaluation study. JMIR Serious Games, 13, e70519. https://doi.org/10.2196/70519
30. Heissel, A., Heinen, D., Brokmeier, L. L., Skarabis, N., Kangas, M., Vancampfort, D., ... & Schuch, F. (2023). Exercise as medicine for depressive symptoms? A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 57(16), 1049–1057.
31. HumanTrak Movement Analysis System. (2025). Vald tactical. https://valdtactical.com/humantrak/. Erişim tarihi: 27.05.2025
32. Jaeger, J. (2018). Digit symbol substitution test: The case for sensitivity over specificity in neuropsychological testing. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 38(5), 513–519.
33. Jamnick, N. A., Pettitt, R. W., Granata, C., Pyne, D. B., & Bishop, D. J. (2020). An examination and critique of current methods to determine exercise intensity. Sports Medicine, 50(10), 1729-1756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01322-8
34. Luo, S., Soh, K. G., Zhao, Y., Soh, K. L., Sun, H., et al. (2023). Effect of core training on athletic and skill performance of basketball players: A systematic review. Plos One, 18(6), e0287379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287379
35. Manríquez, A. B., Torres, F. Q., & Soto, J. (2019). Hacia una enseñanza sistémica de los deportes de equipo. EmásF, Revista Digital de Educación Física, 10(58), 5–7.
36. Martín-Rodríguez, A., Gostian-Ropotin, L. A., Beltrán-Velasco, A. I., Belando-Pedreño, N., Simón, J. A., López-Mora, C., ... & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2024). Sporting mind: The interplay of physical activity and psychological health. Sports, 12(1), 37.
37. Maskeliunas, R., Damasevicius, R., Martisius, I., & Vasiljevas, M. (2016). Consumer-grade EEG devices: are they usable for control tasks?. PeerJ, 4, e1746. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1746
38. McGuigan, M. (2017). Monitoring training and performance in athletes. Human Kinetics.
39. Muntaner-Mas, A., Martinez-Nicolas, A., Lavie, C. J., Blair, S. N., Ross, R., Arena, R., & Ortega, F. B. (2019). A systematic review of fitness apps and their potential clinical and sports utility for objective and remote assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness. Sports Medicine, 49(4), 587–600.
40. Nara, K., Kumar, P., Rathee, R., & Kumar, J. (2022). The compatibility of running-based anaerobic sprint test and Wingate anaerobic test: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 26(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2022.0208
41. Opar, D. A., Williams, M. D., Timmins, R. G., Hickey, J., Duhig, S. J., & Shield, A. J. (2015). Eccentric hamstring strength and hamstring injury risk in Australian footballers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47(4), 857–865.
42. Önal, A., Yıldız, N. O., & Özsoy, A. (2024). Sporcu dikkat ölçeği geliştirme ve doğrulama çalışması. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports, 13(3), 321–333.
43. Peart, D. J., Balsalobre-Fernández, C., & Shaw, M. P. (2019). Use of mobile applications to collect data in sport, health, and exercise science: A narrative review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(4), 1167–1177.
44. Redondo-Flórez, L., Ramos-Campo, D. J., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2022). Relationship between physical fitness and academic performance in university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214750
45. Rizzo, A., & Koenig, S. T. (2017). Is clinical virtual reality ready for primetime?. Neuropsychology, 31(8), 877. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/neu0000405
46. Romero-Franco, N., Jimenez-Reyes, P., Castano-Zambudio, A., et al. (2017). Sprint performance and mechanical outputs computed with an iPhone app: Comparison with existing reference methods. European Journal of Sport Science, 17(4), 386–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1249031
47. Sharp, A. P., Cronin, J. B., & Neville, J. (2019). Using smartphones for jump diagnostics: A brief review of the validity and reliability of the My Jump app. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 41(5), 96–107.
48. Sousa, F., Soares, A. C. B., Fontes, F. L. D. L., Oliveira, G. C., Arruda, L. S. N. D. S., & Borges, J. W. P. (2025). Use of eye tracking in instrument construction and/or validity studies: Scoping Review. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 16(2), 88-114. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1569440
49. Timmins, R. G., Bourne, M. N., Shield, A. J., Williams, M. D., Lorenzen, C., & Opar, D. A. (2015). Short biceps femoris fascicles and eccentric knee flexor weakness increase the risk of hamstring injury in elite football (soccer): A prospective cohort study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(24), 1524-1535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095362
50. Topalović, I., Janković, M., & Popović, D. B. (2015). Validation of the acquisition system Smarting for EMG recordings with electrode array. Proceedings of 2nd Ic ETRAN, 08-11.
51. Tortop, H. S., & Kestanlıoğlu, T. K. (2018). Dikkat ve konsantrasyon yeteneği geliştirme öz yeterlik ölçeği. Üstün Zekalılar Eğitimi ve Yaratıcılık Dergisi, 5(1), 70–85. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jgedc/issue/38678/441512
52. Trabzon Üniversitesi. (2025). SpeedCourt – Hız, çeviklik & koordinasyon testleri. Sporda performans değerlendirme ve yetenek seçimi uygulama ve araştırma merkezi. https://performansmerkezi.trabzon.edu.tr/S/5110/speedcourt-hiz-ceviklik-and-koordinasyon-testleri? Erişim tarihi: 27.05.2025
53. Tuğtekin, U. (2019). Çoklu ortamla öğrenmede konu dışı işlemleri azaltma ilkelerinin artırılmış gerçeklik ve sanal gerçeklik ortamlarında bilişsel yük ve başarıya etkisi. Doctoral dissertation. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
54. Vald Tactical. (2025). HumanTrak movement analysis system. https://valdtactical.com/humantrak/. Erişim tarihi: 27.05.2025
55. Weakley, J., Black, G., McLaren, S., Scantlebury, S., Suchomel, T. J., McMahon, E., ... & Read, D. B. (2024). Testing and profiling athletes: Recommendations for test selection, implementation, and maximizing information. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 46(2), 159–179.
56. Weakley, J., Mann, B., Banyard, H., McLaren, S., Scott, T., & Garcia-Ramos, A. (2021). Velocity-based training: From theory to application. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 43(2), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000560
57. Wiewelhove, T., Schneider, C., Schmidt, A., Döweling, A., Meyer, T., Kellmann, M., ... & Ferrauti, A. (2018). Active recovery after high-intensity interval-training does not attenuate training adaptation. Frontiers in Physiology, 9, 362190.
58. Yıldız, E., & Çetin, Z. (2018). Sporun psiko-motor gelişim ve sosyal gelişime etkisi. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, 5(2), 54–66.