Üniversite Kampüslerinde Çevresel Sürdürülebilirliğin Teşvik Edilmesi: Türkiye’den Bulgular

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla Türkiye’deki iki devlet üniversitesinde öğrenim gören 16 lisans öğrencisinin çevreye dair tutumlarının gelişimini ve değişimini anlamak ve kampüs içi çevreci davranışlarını incelemektir. Bulgularımız katılımcıların çevreye dair tutumlarının oluşumunda bir dizi faktörün (ör., ilköğretimde çevreye duyarlı rol modellerin varlığı) etkili olduğunu vurgulamıştır. Mevcut çalışma ayrıca çöp kirliliğinin üniversite kampüslerinde önemli bir sorun olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Bu sorunla mücadele adına, çalışmadaki katılımcıların çoğu çöp kirliliğini azaltmak ve sürdürülebilir uygulamaları teşvik etmek için proaktif önlemler aldıklarını (ör., atık ayrıştırma) ifade etmiştir. Katılımcılar çöp kirliliğiyle mücadele etmenin yanı sıra, çevreci faaliyetlere (ör., ağaç dikme) aktif olarak katılmakta, çevre dostu ulaşım seçeneklerini (ör., bisiklete binme, servis kullanma) tercih etmekte, çevreci kuruluşları finansal olarak desteklemekte ve faaliyetlerine katılmakta ve enerji tasarrufu yapmaktadırlar. Çalışmaya katılanlar ayrıca kampüs içi çevreci davranışlarını teşvik eden (ör., kampüs ekosistemini koruma isteği) ve engelleyen (ör., zaman yetersizliği) çeşitli faktörleri belirtmiştir. Ayrıca, katılımcılarımız kampüs sürdürülebilirliği ile ilişkili tüm paydaşların (ör., rektörlük, çalışanlar, öğrenciler) kampüs içi çevreci davranışların etkinliğini arttırmada rol alması (ör., ödüllendirme ve cezalandırma için etkili önlemler kullanmak) gerektiğini belirtmiştir. Bu bulgularla mevcut çalışma kampüs sürdürülebilirliğine önemli teorik ve pratik katkılarda bulunmaktadır.

Keywords

• Kampüs sürdürülebilirliği
• çevreci davranışlar
• çevreye dair tutumlar
• çevreci davranışların teşvik edicileri
• çevreci davranışların engelleyicileri

Encouraging Environmental Sustainability in University Campuses: Evidence from Türkiye

Abstract

The primary aim of the current study is to comprehend the development and evolution of environmental attitudes and to examine on-campus pro-environmental engagement among 16 undergraduates from two public Turkish universities through semi-structured interviews. Our qualitative analysis highlighted that several factors (e.g., the existence of environmentally aware role models in elementary education) are responsible for the formation of respondents’ environmental attitudes. The current paper also points out that litter pollution is a major problem on university campuses. To combat this problem, most respondents in the study reported taking proactive measures (e.g., disposing of the waste properly) to reduce littering and promote sustainable practices. In addition to fighting against littering, they actively take part in pro-environmental activities (e.g., tree plantation), prefer ecologically friendly mobility options (e.g., biking, using shuttles), financially support ecological organizations and attending their activities, and conserve energy. They also reported several factors for motivating (e.g., the willingness to protect the campus ecosystem) and hindering (e.g., lack of time) their on-campus pro-environmental engagement. Furthermore, our respondents pointed out that all stakeholders (e.g., rectorate, employees, students) regarding campus sustainability should take part (e.g., using effective measures for rewarding and penalizing) in amplifying the effectiveness of on-campus pro-environmental behaviors. With these findings, the current paper made important theoretical and practical contributions to campus sustainability.

Keywords

• Campus sustainability
• pro-environmental behaviors
• environmental attitudes
• motivators of pro-environmental behaviors
• barriers to pro-environmental behaviors

References

1. Alcock, I., White, M. P., Pahl, S., Duarte-Davidson, R., & Fleming, L. E. (2020). Associations between pro-environmental behaviour and neighbourhood nature, nature visit frequency and nature appreciation: Evidence from a nationally representative survey in England. Environment International, 136, 105441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105441
2. Ardoin, N. M., & Bowers, A. W. (2020). Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educational Research Review, 31, 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100353
3. Baba-Nalikant, M., Syed-Mohamad, S. M., Husin, M. H., Abdullah, N. A., Mohamad Saleh, M. S., & Abdul Rahim, A. (2023). A zero-waste campus framework: Perceptions and practices of university campus community in Malaysia. Recycling, 8(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling8010021
4. Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839908725599
5. Blankenberg, A.-K., & Alhusen, H. (2019). On the determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A literature review and guide for the empirical economist. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3473702
6. Boğaziçi University (2023). Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Sürdürülebilirlik Raporu. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://www.boun.edu.tr/Assets/Documents/Dosyalar/2023_bogazici_universitesi_cevresel_surdurulebilirlik_raporu.pdf
7. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
8. Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2008). Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.003

9. Casaló, L. v., & Escario, J.-J. (2016). Intergenerational association of environmental concern: Evidence of parents’ and children’s concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.001
10. Cianconi, P., Betrò, S., & Janiri, L. (2020). The Impact of Climate Change on Mental Health: A Systematic Descriptive Review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074
11. Chao, C.-M., Yu, T.-K., & Yu, T.-Y. (2023). Understanding the factors influencing recycling behavior in college students: the role of interpersonal altruism and environmental concern. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(5), 969–985. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2020-0232
12. Cho, M. (2019). Campus sustainability: An integrated model of college students’ recycling behavior on campus. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(6), 1042–1060. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2018-0107
13. Collado, S., Evans, G. W., & Sorrel, M. A. (2017). The role of parents and best friends in children’s pro-environmentalism: Differences according to age and gender. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.007
14. Csutora, M., & Zsoka, A. (2013). Are green consumers happier consumers? Sustainable Consumption Transitions Series Issue, 3(24).
15. de Dominicis, S., Schultz, P. W., & Bonaiuto, M. (2017). Protecting the environment for self-interested reasons: Altruism is not the only pathway to sustainability. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01065
16. del Saz Salazar, S., & Pérez y Pérez, L. (2021). Exploring the differential effect of life satisfaction on low and high-cost pro-environmental behaviors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010277
17. Gibovic, D., & Bikfalvi, A. (2021). Incentives for plastic recycling: How to engage citizens in active collection. Empirical evidence from Spain. Recycling, 6(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6020029
18. Giguère, B., Lalonde, R. N., & Taylor, D. M. (2014). Drinking too much and feeling bad about it? how group identification moderates experiences of guilt and shame following norm transgression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(5), 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214521836
19. Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., Corral, V., Güntherf, H., Hanyu, K., Hine, D., Kaiser, F. G., Korpela, K., Lima, L. M., Mertig, A. G., Mira, R. G., Moser, G., Passafaro, P., Pinheiro, J. Q., Saini, S., . . . Uzzell, D. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
20. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346
21. Ferguson, M. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.010
22. Fransson, N., & Garling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0141
23. Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T., & Reese, G. (2018). A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125(2), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000090
24. Fu, L., Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., & Bai, Y. (2018). Pro-environmental awareness and behaviors on campus: Evidence from Tianjin, China. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/77953
25. Hamilton, E. M., & Rane, A. (2022). Speaking their language: Does environmental signage align to personal dimensions of environmentally responsible behavior in undergraduate residence halls? Sustainability, 14(4), 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042025
26. Helferich, M., Thøgersen, J., & Bergquist, M. (2023). Direct and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 80, 102680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102680
27. Helferty, A., & Clarke, A. (2009). Student‐led campus climate change initiatives in Canada. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370910972594
28. Huber, R. A., Anderson, B., & Bernauer, T. (2018). Can social norm interventions promote voluntary pro environmental action? Environmental Science & Policy, 89, 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.016
29. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
30. İstanbul Technical University (n.d.). Courses on Sustainability. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://sustainability.itu.edu.tr/get-involved/education/courses
31. İstanbul Technical University (2022). İstanbul Technical University Sustainability Report 2021. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://sustainability.itu.edu.tr/docs/librariesprovider76/default-document-library/istanbul-technical-university-2021-sustainability-report.pdf?Status=Temp&sfvrsn=c77859b5_6
32. Kam, C. C.-S., & Bond, M. H. (2009). Emotional reactions of anger and shame to the norm violation characterizing episodes of interpersonal harm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X324367
33. Kateman, A. (2020). Visualizing environmental problems: Can images make a change? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tilburg University.
34. Keat, L. K., Mohd Yaacob, N., & Hashim, N. R. (2016). Campus walkability in Malaysian public universities: A case-Study of Universiti Malaya. Planning Malaysia Journal, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v14.i5.196
35. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
36. Kothe, E. J., Ling, M., North, M., Klas, A., Mullan, B. A., & Novoradovskaya, L. (2019). Protection motivation theory and pro‐environmental behaviour: A systematic mapping review. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(4), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12271
37. Krasny, M. E., & Delia, J. (2015). Natural area stewardship as part of campus sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.019
38. Landmann, H. (2020). Emotions in the context of environmental protection: Theoretical considerations concerning emotion types, eliciting processes, and affect generalization. Umweltpsychologie, 24(2), 61-73.
39. Landmann, H., & Rohmann, A. (2020). Being moved by protest: Collective efficacy beliefs and injustice appraisals enhance collective action intentions for forest protection via positive and negative emotions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101491
40. Lange, F., & Dewitte, S. (2019). Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63(665501), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.009
41. Largo-Wight, E., Bian, H., & Lange, L. (2012). An empirical test of an expanded version of the theory of planned behavior in predicting recycling behavior on campus. American Journal of Health Education, 43(2), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2012.10599221
42. Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., & Pedersen, A. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206289729
43. Lee, C.-K., Olya, H., Ahmad, M. S., Kim, K. H., & Oh, M.-J. (2021). Sustainable intelligence, destination social responsibility, and pro-environmental behaviour of visitors: Evidence from an eco-tourism site. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.04.010
44. Levy, B. L. M., & Marans, R. W. (2012). Towards a campus culture of environmental sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(4), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371211262317
45. Liao, C., & Li, H. (2019). Environmental education, knowledge, and high school students’ intention toward separation of solid waste on campus. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091659
46. Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x
47. McMichael, A. J., & Lindgren, E. (2011). Climate change: present and future risks to health, and necessary responses. Journal of Internal Medicine, 270(5), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02415.x
48. Miao, L., & Wei, W. (2013). Consumers’ pro-environmental behavior and the underlying motivations: A comparison between household and hotel settings. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.04.008
49. Middle East Technical University. (n. d.). Code of ethics & Core values. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://www.metu.edu.tr/code-ethics-core-values
50. Middle East Technical University. (n.d.). Sustainability and Green Campus Efforts at METU. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://sustainablecampus.metu.edu.tr/en/sustainability-and-green-campus-efforts-metu
51. Mokrzecka, M., & Nowak, K. (2019). Green Design, Identity or Both? Factors Affecting Environmentally Responsible Behaviors in Student Residences (pp. 559–575). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15864-4_34
52. Moqbel, S., Abu-Zurayk, R., Bozeya, A., Alsisan, R., & al Bawab, A. (2020). Assessment of sustainable recycling at The University of Jordan. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(6), 1111–1129. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2019-0334
53. Netuveli, G., & Watts, P. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviours and attitudes are associated with health, wellbeing and life satisfaction in multiple occupancy households in the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Population and Environment, 41(3), 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-020-00337-7
54. Nguyen, H. V., Le, M. T. T., Pham, C. H., & Cox, S. S. (2022). Happiness and pro-environmental consumption behaviors. Journal of Economics and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-07-2021-0116
55. Nguyen-Van, P., Stenger, A., & Tiet, T. (2021). Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(12), e0260932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260932
56. Oyedepo, S. O., Anifowose, E. G., Obembe, E. O., & Khanmohamadi, S. (2021). Energy-saving strategies on university campus buildings: Covenant University as case study. In Energy Services Fundamentals and Financing (pp. 131–154). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820592-1.00006-3
57. Palomo-Vélez, G., & van Vugt, M. (2021). The evolutionary psychology of climate change behaviors: Insights and applications. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.03.006
58. Parkinson, B., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2005). Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. Psychology Press.
59. Pizmony-Levy, O. & Michel, J.O. (2018). Pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors in higher education: Investigating the role of formal and informal factors. Columbia/Academic Commons. https://doi.org/10.7916/D85M7J8N
60. Popp, R. K., & Mendelson, A. L. (2010). ‘X’-ing out enemies: Time magazine, visual discourse, and the war in Iraq. Journalism, 11(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884909355913
61. Qu, D., Shevchenko, T., Shams Esfandabadi, Z., & Ranjbari, M. (2023). College students’ attitude towards waste separation and recovery on campus. Sustainability, 15(2), 1620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021620
62. Ramkissoon, H., Weiler, B., & Smith, L. D. G. (2012). Place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour in national parks: the development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.602194
63. Reese, G., & Jacob, L. (2015). Principles of environmental justice and pro-environmental action: A two-step process model of moral anger and responsibility to act. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.011
64. Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1820
65. Rosa, C. D., Profice, C. C., & Collado, S. (2018). Nature experiences and adults’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01055
66. Rume, T., & Islam, S. M. D.-U. (2020). Environmental effects of COVID-19 pandemic and potential strategies of sustainability. Heliyon, 6(9), e04965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04965
67. Sarı, E., & Bükün, M. F. (2023). Predictors of life quality in university campuses: The role of campus attachment and university identification. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 11(28).
68. Sarı, E., Yücel, E., & Bükün, M. F. (in preparation). The role of emotions in responses to in-group norm violations: The case of university’s sensitivity to the natural environmental norm.
69. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.010
70. Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. v., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franěk, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275962
71. Selçuk Üniversitesi. (n. d.). Sürdürülebilirlik. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://selcuk.edu.tr/Birim/idari-birimler/surdurulebilirlik/2432/yonerge/50698
72. Soutter, A. R. B., Bates, T. C., & Mõttus, R. (2020). Big Five and HEXACO personality traits, proenvironmental attitudes, and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 913–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620903019
73. Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
74. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
75. Tam, K.-P., & Milfont, T. L. (2020). Towards cross-cultural environmental psychology: A state-of-the-art review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101474
76. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145
77. Tanner, T. (1980). Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1980.9941386
78. Thondhlana, G., & Hlatshwayo, T. N. (2018). Pro-Environmental behaviour in student residences at Rhodes University, South Africa. Sustainability, 10(8), 2746. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10082746
79. Tu, Q., Zhu, C., & McAvoy, D. C. (2015). Converting campus waste into renewable energy – A case study for the University of Cincinnati. Waste Management, 39, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.016
80. Tusyanah, T., Ismiyati, I., Suryanto, E. & Susilowati, N. (2023). Does green space influence students’ academic performance and pro-environmental behavior? an empirical study at a pro-environmental university. Journal of STEAM Education, 6(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.55290/steam.1149958
81. UI GreenMetric. (n. d.). UI GreenMetric World University Rankings: Background of the Ranking. Retrieved August 8, 2023, from https://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/about/welcome
82. van de Vyver, J., Abrams, D., Hopthrow, T., Purewal, K., de Moura, G. R., & Meleady, R. (2018). Motivating the selfish to stop idling: Self-interest cues can improve environmentally relevant driver behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.015
83. Yeşil Kampüs Topluluğu (n.d.). İlgili dersler. Retrieved August 10, 2023 from https://greencampus.metu.edu.tr/ilgili-dersler/
84. Yuriev, A., Boiral, O., Francoeur, V., & Paillé, P. (2018). Overcoming the barriers to pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.041
85. Yükseköğretim Kurulu (2023). Yükseköğretimde Yeni İstatistikler. Retrieved August 10, 2023 from https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2023/yuksekogretimde-yeni-istatistikler.aspx#:~:text=Yükseköğretim%20Kurulu%20Başkanlığı&text=2022%2D2023%20Öğretim%20Yılı%20Yükseköğretim,öğrenci%2C%20184.566%20öğretim%20elemanı%20bulunuyor.
86. Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1353/cye.2006.0031
87. Wilkinson, S., & Zalejska Jonsson, A. (2021). Student accommodation, environmental behaviour and lessons for property managers. Property Management, 39(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-09-2020-0055
88. Zamora-Polo, F., Sánchez-Martín, J., Corrales-Serrano, M., & Espejo-Antúnez, L. (2019). What do university students know about sustainable development goals? A realistic approach to the reception of this UN program amongst the youth population. Sustainability, 11(13), 3533. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133533
89. Zhang, X., & Zhong, Z.-J. (2020). Extending media system dependency theory to informational media use and environmentalism: A cross-national study. Telematics and Informatics, 50, 101378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101378