FORSTERIAN MODEL OF CHARACTERIZATION AND NON-HUMAN CHARACTERS IN NARRATIVE FICTION: IRIS MURDOCH’S MISTER MARS AND FRANZ KAFKA’S GREGOR SAMSA
Abstract
In Aspects of
the Novel, Edward Morgan Forster introduces the critical concepts of flat
and round to describe the nature of different types of fictional characters.
According to Forster’s theoretical categorization, flat characters are constructed
and exist in their fictional realm around a single feature or quality. As this
is the key criterion, Forster argues that flat characters can easily be
recognized and remembered by the reader. Flat characters remain mostly the same
through circumstances. In other words, flat characters never surprise the
reader. Contrary to the nature of flat characters, round characters operate in
an opposite direction to their counterparts. Round characters never remain the
same throughout events, and it is not easy to recognize them since they do not
exist under the dominance of a single trait. In addition to these, round
characters are those who surprise the reader. Although Forster’s categorisation
of fictional characters has functioned well in most of the cases, some
characters are not easily analysed under this formula. Franz Kafka’s Gregor
Samsa, for example, seems neither a round nor a flat character. Throughout his
story, he remains the same. At the same time, he surprises the reader, which is
not expected from him since he is mostly the same character in the text.
Samsa’s turning into an insect further complicates the definition of his
roundness or flatness. Another example is Iris Murdoch’s Mister Mars. Mister
Mars is an animal. But at the same time he is a movie star, a celebrity. He has
a pivotal role for the protagonist of the text. Therefore, the aim of this
study is first to introduce the theoretical background of the nature of
fictional characters and then to display some difficulties present particularly
in Forster’s classification through the characterisation of two non-human
examples.
Keywords
References
- ARISTOTLE (2007). “Poetics”. The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. ed. David H. Richter. New York: St. Martin’s. 59-81.
- BARRY, Peter (1995). Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Manchester: Manchester UP.
- BARTHES, Roland (1974). S/Z. trans. Richard Miller. New York: Blackwell.
- BLOCKER, H. Gene (1974). “The Truth about Fictional Entities”. The Philosophical Quarterly XXIV (94): 27-36.
- CHATMAN, Seymour (1993). Reading Narrative Fiction. New York: Macmillan.
- CRITTENDEN, Charles (1966). “Fictional Existence”. American Philosophical Quarterly III (4): 317-321.
- EDER, JENS and JANNIDIS, FOTIS et al. (2010). “Characters in Fictional Worlds: An Introduction”. Characters in Fictional Worlds: Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film and Other Media. eds. Jens Eder, Fotis Jannidis and Ralf Schneider. New York: de Gruyter.
- FISHELOV, David (1990). “Types of Character, Characteristics of Types”. Style XXIV (3): 422-439.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
June 22, 2017
Submission Date
February 16, 2017
Acceptance Date
April 10, 2017
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Number: 37
Cited By
Aspects of Characterisation in James Hadley Chase's Crime Fiction: Multiple Perspectives
English Studies
https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2021.1911106Intercultural Crisis Communication: Intercultural Speaker as Crisis Sojourner in a Fictional Disaster Narrative
Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.21497/sefad.1684049