ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME BAĞLAMINDA PSİKOLOJİK RAHATLIK

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel öğrenme sürecinde psikolojik rahatlık algısının önemini alanyazın taramasına göre ortaya koymaktır. Sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajı sağlamak isteyen örgütler için örgütsel öğrenmenin olumlu etkisi her geçen gün daha fazla hissedilmektedir. Nitelikli kişilerarası ilişkilerin sonucunda etkileşim artabilir. Çalışmalar örgütlerde liderlik davranışlarıyla oluşan yoğun etkileşimin örgütsel öğrenmeyi sağlayarak yenilikçi davranışlar yoluyla sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajını sağlayabileceğini göstermektedir. Çalışmada öncelikle psikolojik rahatlık algısının dayandığı Hirschman’ın kaçma-konuşma-sadakat kuramı daha sonra Blau’nun sosyal mübadele kuramı ve Graen ve Uhl-Bien’in lider-üye etkileşim kuramı çerçevesinde psikolojik rahatlık algısının örgütsel öğrenme davranışını arttırabileceği açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır.

Keywords

• Örgütsel öğrenme,psikolojik rahatlık

References

1. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B.M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior, 10, 123-167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Anderson, N. R. ve West, M. A. (1996). The Team Climate Inventory; The Development of the TCI and Its Applications in Teambuilding for Innovativeness, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 53-66.
3. Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming Organizational Defences, Allyn and Bacon, Boston
4. Argyris, C. ve Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
5. Argyris, C. ve Schön, D. (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
6. Arslan, A. ve Yener, S.(2016). Okul Yöneticilerinin Güdüleyici Dili ve Öğretmen Örtük Bilgi Paylaşımı İlişkisinde İşgören Sesliliğinin Aracı Rolü ve Psikolojik Rahatlık Algısının Düzenleyici Rolü. 16. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Kongresi, 26-29 Mayıs 2016, İstanbul
7. Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45–68.
8. Brown, J. S. ve Duguid (2000) . Re-Engineering the Future: A Response to Bill Joy and the doom-and-gloom technofuturists. The Industry Standard, 2000.

9. Butler, J. K. (1999). Trust Expectations, Information Sharing, Climate of Trust, and Negotiation Effectiveness and Efficiency, Group and Organization Management, 24, 217–238.
10. Carmeli, A., Brueller, D. ve Dutton, J. E. (2009) . Learning Behaviours in the Workplace. The Role of High-quality Interpersonal Relationships and Psychological Safety.2009-26,81-89
11. Carmeli, A., ve Gittell, J .H. (2009). High-quality Relationships, Psychological Safety, and Learning from Failures in Work Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 709–729.
12. CIC (2003) . Modelo Intellectus: Medición y Gestión del Capital Intelectual. Centro de Investigación sobre la Sociedad del Conocimiento (CIC), Madrid.
13. De Sousa, F. C., Pellissier, R. ve Monteiro, I. P. (2012). Creativity, innovation and collaborative organisations. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 5(1), 2012
14. Dutton, J. ve Ragins, B. R. (Eds.) (2007). Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates. Reviewed in Administrative Science Quarterly, March 2008.
15. Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: group and organization influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32: 5–28.
16. Edmondson, A.C.(1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44,2. 350-384.
17. Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. In Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, Kramer RM, Cook KS (eds). Russell Sage Foundation: New York; 239–272.
18. Eggers, J. T. (2010). Psychological Safety Influences Relationship Behaviour.Erişim Tarihi 20 Şubat 2014, Sciencedirect veritabanı.
19. Ellerman, D., Denning S. ve Hanna, N. (2001). Active Learning and Development Assistance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 171- 179.
20. Graen, G. B., ve Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based Approach to Leadership: Development of the Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 years. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
21. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
22. Heaphy E. D., ve Dutton, J. E. (2008). Positive social interactions and the human body at work: linking organizations and physiology. Academy of Management Review, 33: 137–162.
23. Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
24. Higgins, M., Ishimaru, A., Holcombe, R. and Fowler, A. (2014). Examining Organizational Learning in Schools The Role of Psychological Safety, Experimentation and Leadership that reinforces Learning,ErişimTarihi 18 Ocak 2014, Harvard University veritabanı
25. James, L., Demaree, R., ve Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98.
26. Jashapara, A. (2003). Cognition, culture and competition; an empirical test of the learning organization. The Learning Organisation, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 31-50
27. Kahn, W. A. (1990) . Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 1990;33,4, 692-725,
28. Kahn, W. A. (2001). Holding environments at work. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37: 260–279.
29. Kessel, M., Kratzer, J., and Schultz,C. (2012). Psychological Safety,Knowledge Sharing and Creative Performance in Healthcare Teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 2, 2012, 147-157.
30. King, W.R. (2001). Strategies for creating a learning organisation. Information Systems Management, Vol.18 No. 1, 12-20.
31. Kozlowski, S. W. J., ve Bell, B. S. (2007). Team learning, development, and adaptation. In Work Group Learning: Understanding, Improving and Assessing how Groups Learn in Organizations, Sessa VI, London M (eds). Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ; 15–44.
32. Law, R., Dollard, M., Tuckey, M. R., ve Dormann, C. (2011). Psychological Safety Climate as a Lead Indıcator of Workplace Bullying and Harassment, Job Resources, Psychological Health and Employee Engagement. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43,2011,1782-1793.
33. Lopez-Nicholas, C. ve Merono-Cerdan, A. L. (2011). Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. International Journal of Information Management, 31 (2), 502-509.
34. Losada, M., ve Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 740–765. doi:10.1177/0002764203260208
35. Marquardt, M (1996). Building the learning organization. New York: McGraw-Hill
36. Murray, P. ve Donegan, K. (2003). Empirical Linkages between firm competencies and organisational learning. The Learning Organisation, Vol. 10 No.1, pp. 51-62
37. Nonaka, I. ve Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Rebelo, T. M. ve Gomes A. D. (2008). Organizational learning and the learning organization: Reviewing evolution for prospecting the future. The Learning Organization, 15 (4), 294 – 308.
39. Schein, H. E. (1993). How Can Organizations Learn Faster?. Sloan Management Review, 34, 85-92
40. Schepers, J., Jong, A.,Wetzels, M. ve Ruyter, K. (2007). Psychological Safety and Social Support in Gropuware Adoption. A Multi-level Assessment in education. Computers and Education, 51 (2008).757-775.
41. Senge. P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Century Business, London
42. Smith, E.A. (2001). The Role of Tacit and Explicit Knowledge in the Workplace, Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 311-321.
43. Smith, I. W. (2004). Continuing professional development and workplace learning 6: HRD and organisational learning. Library Management, Vol.25 No.1/2 , pp. 64-66
44. Staples, D. S. ve Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the Effects of Trust, Task Interdependence and Virtualness on Knowledge Sharing in Teams. Information System Journal, 18, 617–640.
45. Pirola-Merlo A, Mann L (2004). The Relationship between Individual Creativity and Team Creativity: Aggregating Across People and Time. J. Organ. Behav., 25: 236.
46. Trim, P. R. J. ve Lee, Y. (2004). Enhancing customer service and organizational learning through qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 7(4), 284-292.
47. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy Of Management Journal, 44, 996-1004.
48. Uzzi, B., ve Lancaster, R. (2003). Relational embeddedness and learning: the case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Science 49: 383–399.
49. Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M. and Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational Error Management Culture and its Impact on Performance: A Two-study Replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1228–1240.
50. Yener, S. (2015a). Özel Ortaöğretim okullarında paylaşılan liderlik ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik güvenlik algısının aracı rolü. Haliç Üniversitesi yayınlanmamış doktora tezi.2015.
51. Yener, S.(2015b). Psikolojik Rahatlık Algısı Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması, ODÜ Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1, 280-305.