Research Article
PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2020, Volume 10, Issue 1, 79 - 94, 27.06.2020
https://doi.org/10.46893/talent.758416

Abstract

References

  • Akdeniz, H. ve Bangir Alpan, G. (2019, Ekim). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin yaratıcı problem çözme stil-lerinin analizi. VI. Ulusal Üstün Yeteneklilerin Eğitimi Kongresi’nde sunulmuş bildiri, İs-tanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Jour-nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 357–376.
  • Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work environment ınventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 231–253. doi: 10.1080/10400418909534321
  • Basadur, M., & Goldsby, M. (2016). Design-centered entrepreneurship. New York: Routledge.
  • Basadur, M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and ınnovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 21-32.
  • Basadur, M., Gelade, G., & Basadur, T. (2014). Creative problem-solving process styles, cognitive work demands, and organizational adaptability. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(1), 80–115. doi: 10.1177/0021886313508433
  • Basadur, M., Gelade, G., Basadur, T., & Perez, R. (2016). Improved reliability and research applica-tions of the Basadur creative problem solving profile (CPSP). Kindai Management Review, 4, 100-112.
  • Basadur, M., Graen, G., & Green, S. G. (1982). Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ide-ation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization. Organiza-tional Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 41–70. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(82)90233-1
  • Basadur, M., Graen, G., & Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Identifying individual differences in creative problem solving style. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(2), 111–131.
  • Beghetto, R. A. (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
  • Boulden, G. P. (2002). Thinking creatively. London: Dorling Kindersley.
  • Brophy, D. R. (1998). Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem-solv-ing efforts. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 123–150.
  • Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (3-321). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Čančer, V. (2012). Criteria weighting by using the 5Ws & H technique. Business Systems Research, 3(2), 41-48.
  • Carr, M., & Borkowski, J. G. (1987). Metamemory in gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(1), 40–44. doi: 10.1177/001698628703100109
  • Chien, C., & Hui, A. N. N. (2010). Creativity in early childhood education: Teacher’s perception in three Chinese societies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(2), 49-60.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum and Associ-ates.
  • Conklin, W., & Frei, S. (2007). Differentiating the curriculum for gifted learners. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
  • Cook, P. (1998). Best practice creativity. Hampshire: Gower.
  • Couger, J. D. (1995). Creative problem solving and opportunity finding. Danvers: Boyd & Fraser Pub Co.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Bos-ton, MA: Pearson.
  • Çetinkaya, Ç. (2013). The effect of gifted students’ creative problem solving program on creative thinking. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014), 3722-3726.
  • Çitil, M. ve Ataman, A. (2018). İlköğretim çağındaki üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin davranışsal özel-liklerinin eğitim ortamlarına yansıması ve ortaya çıkabilecek sorunlar. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 185-231.
  • Demirci, N. (2014). Sistematik yaratıcı problem çözme etkinliklerinin ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin ışık konusundaki kuramsal, deneysel ve günlük yaşam problemlerini çözmelerine etkisi (Yayınlanma-mış doktora tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Erkuş, A. (2016). Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme-I. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Fowler, F. J. (2009). Applied social research methods: Survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
  • Gurak-Ozdemir, S., Acar, S., Puccio, G., & Wright, C. (2019): Why do teachers connect better with some students than others? Exploring the influence of teachers’ creative-thinking prefer-ences. Gifted and Talented International, 34(1-2), 102-115.
  • Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
  • Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative problem solving: The basic course. Buffalo, NY: Center for Studies in Creativity.
  • Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (2004). Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of cre-ative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(2), 75–101.
  • Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (1994). Creative approaches to problem solving. Dubu-que, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
  • Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (2011). Creative approaches to problem solving: A frame-work for innovation and change (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • İslim, Ö. F. (2009). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri dersinin scamper(yönlendirilmiş beyin fırtınası) tekniğine göre işlenmesinin öğrencilerin yaratıcı problem çözme becerilerine ve akademik başarılarına etkisi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Karabey, B. (2010). İlköğretimdeki üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin yaratıcı problem çözmeye yönelik erişi düzeylerinin ve kritik düşünme becerilerinin belirlenmesi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir, Türkiye.
  • Karasar, N. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (34. bs.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Meadow, A., Parnes, S. J., & Reese, H. W. (1959). Influence of brainstorming instructions and prob-lem sequence on a creative problem-solving test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 413–416. doi:10.1037/h0043917
  • MEB (2019). Bilim ve sanat merkezleri yönergesi. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/www/mevzuat/icerik/608 adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., & Costanza, D. P. (1996). Pro-cess-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: I. problem construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 63-76.
  • O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised crea-tive product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 267–278. doi: 10.1080/10400418909534323
  • Olgun, E. (2012). A non-formal learnıng program for the contribution of creative problem solving skills: A case study (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Önol, M. (2013). Yaratıcı problem çözme etkinliklerinin bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve başarıya etkisi (Ya-yınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Balıkesir, Türkiye. Özkök, A. (2004). Disiplinlerarası yaklaşıma dayalı yaratıcı problem çözme öğretim programının yaratıcı problem çözme becerisine etkisi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilim-leri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Parnes, S. J., Noller, R. B., & Biondi, A. M. (1977). Guide to creative action. New York: Charles Scrib-ner’s Sons.
  • Peterson, C. M. (2006). Creative problem solving styles and learning strategies of management students: implications for teaching, learning, and work (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.
  • Puccio, G. J. (2017). From the dawn of humanity to the 21st century: Creativity as an enduring survival skill. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51, 330–334.
  • Runco, M. A., & Nemiro, J. (1994). Problem finding and problem solving: Problem finding, creativ-ity, and giftedness. Roeper Review, 16(4), 235-241.
  • Runco, M. A., Dow, G., & Smith, W. R. (2006). Information, experience, and divergent thinking: An empirical test. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 269–277.
  • Sak, U. (2009).Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları. Ankara: Maya Yayıncılık.
  • Sak, U. (2012). Üstün zekâlılar özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri (2. bs.). Ankara: Maya Yayıncılık.
  • Sak, U. (2016). Yaratıcılık gelişimi ve geliştirilmesi. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
  • Saranlı, A. G. (2017). Okul öncesi dönemdeki erken müdahale uygulamalarına farklı bir bakış: Üs-tün yetenekli çocuklar için erken zenginleştirme. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(190) 343-359.
  • Seelig, T. (2012). inGenius: A crash course on creativity. NY: Harpercollins.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2012). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim (22.bs.). Ankara: Pegem.
  • Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decision. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Snyder, A., Mitchell, J., Bossomaier, T., & Pallier, G. (2004). The Creativity quotient: An objective scoring of ıdeational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 415–420.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.
  • Tardif, T. Z., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). What do we know about creativity? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed), The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.429-440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tennant, M., McMullen, C., & Kaczynski, D. (2009). Teaching, learning and research in higher educa-tion: A critical approach. New York: Routledge.
  • Titus, P., & Koppitsch, S. (2018). Exploring business students' creative problem-solving prefer-ences. Journal of Education for Business, 93(5), 242-251.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Princeton, NJ: Personal Press.
  • Torrance, P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. USA: Prentice-Hall.
  • Treffinger, D. J. (2001). The importance of creative learning and problem solving. DImagiNings (Destination ImagiNation newsletter), 2(2), 10-12.
  • Treffinger, D. J. (2003). Talent development and creativity. Creative Learning Today, 12(4), 1-2.
  • Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2005). Creative problem solving: The history, development, and implications for gifted education and talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 342–353.
  • Treffinger, D. J., & Parnes, S. J. (1979). Creative problem solving for gifted and talented stu-dents. Roeper Review, 2(4), 31-32.
  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • VanGundy, A. B., Jr. (1988). Techniques of structured problem solving. New York: Van Nostrand Rein-hold.
  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity intel-ligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (189–212). England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wellman, J. (2014). Relationship between creative problem solving profiles and career choice. Honors pro-jects, 93. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/93
  • Yıldırım, A. (2014). Okul öncesinde yaratıcı problem çözme etkinliklerinin yaratıcılığa etkisi (5 yaş örneği) (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Yılmaz, M. (2019). Program görselleştirme aracıyla gerçekleştirilen dijital öyküleme etkinliklerinin yaratıcı problem çözme becerisi ve bilgisayara yönelik tutum üzerindeki etkisi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum, Türkiye.

Analysis of Gifted and Talented Students' Creative Problem Solving Styles

Year 2020, Volume 10, Issue 1, 79 - 94, 27.06.2020
https://doi.org/10.46893/talent.758416

Abstract

This study aimed at analyzing creative problem-solv-ing (CPS) styles of gifted and talented students. The study was conducted as a quantitative study. The study group of the research consisted of 151 students 77 girls (51%); 74 boys (49%) who were enrolled in sci-ence and art centers in Ankara in the 2019-2020 aca-demic year. Sixty-five (43%) of students were talented in academics, 44 (29%) talented in music, and 42 (28%) talented in the arts. Data for this study were collected using the "Creative Problem Solving Styles Inven-tory". Data were analyzed using χ2 (chi-square) test, Cramer's V coefficient and descriptive statistics. Find-ings of the study showed that gifted and talented stu-dents in the process of the CPS preferred conceptual-izer style, generator style, optimizer style, and imple-menter style respectively. No relation was found be-tween students' CPS styles and their gender. Students' CPS styles differed according to their talent areas (general-music-art).

References

  • Akdeniz, H. ve Bangir Alpan, G. (2019, Ekim). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin yaratıcı problem çözme stil-lerinin analizi. VI. Ulusal Üstün Yeteneklilerin Eğitimi Kongresi’nde sunulmuş bildiri, İs-tanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Jour-nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 357–376.
  • Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. D. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work environment ınventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 231–253. doi: 10.1080/10400418909534321
  • Basadur, M., & Goldsby, M. (2016). Design-centered entrepreneurship. New York: Routledge.
  • Basadur, M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and ınnovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 21-32.
  • Basadur, M., Gelade, G., & Basadur, T. (2014). Creative problem-solving process styles, cognitive work demands, and organizational adaptability. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(1), 80–115. doi: 10.1177/0021886313508433
  • Basadur, M., Gelade, G., Basadur, T., & Perez, R. (2016). Improved reliability and research applica-tions of the Basadur creative problem solving profile (CPSP). Kindai Management Review, 4, 100-112.
  • Basadur, M., Graen, G., & Green, S. G. (1982). Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ide-ation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization. Organiza-tional Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 41–70. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(82)90233-1
  • Basadur, M., Graen, G., & Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Identifying individual differences in creative problem solving style. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(2), 111–131.
  • Beghetto, R. A. (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
  • Boulden, G. P. (2002). Thinking creatively. London: Dorling Kindersley.
  • Brophy, D. R. (1998). Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem-solv-ing efforts. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 123–150.
  • Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (3-321). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Čančer, V. (2012). Criteria weighting by using the 5Ws & H technique. Business Systems Research, 3(2), 41-48.
  • Carr, M., & Borkowski, J. G. (1987). Metamemory in gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(1), 40–44. doi: 10.1177/001698628703100109
  • Chien, C., & Hui, A. N. N. (2010). Creativity in early childhood education: Teacher’s perception in three Chinese societies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(2), 49-60.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum and Associ-ates.
  • Conklin, W., & Frei, S. (2007). Differentiating the curriculum for gifted learners. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
  • Cook, P. (1998). Best practice creativity. Hampshire: Gower.
  • Couger, J. D. (1995). Creative problem solving and opportunity finding. Danvers: Boyd & Fraser Pub Co.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Bos-ton, MA: Pearson.
  • Çetinkaya, Ç. (2013). The effect of gifted students’ creative problem solving program on creative thinking. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014), 3722-3726.
  • Çitil, M. ve Ataman, A. (2018). İlköğretim çağındaki üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin davranışsal özel-liklerinin eğitim ortamlarına yansıması ve ortaya çıkabilecek sorunlar. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 185-231.
  • Demirci, N. (2014). Sistematik yaratıcı problem çözme etkinliklerinin ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin ışık konusundaki kuramsal, deneysel ve günlük yaşam problemlerini çözmelerine etkisi (Yayınlanma-mış doktora tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Erkuş, A. (2016). Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme-I. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Fowler, F. J. (2009). Applied social research methods: Survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
  • Gurak-Ozdemir, S., Acar, S., Puccio, G., & Wright, C. (2019): Why do teachers connect better with some students than others? Exploring the influence of teachers’ creative-thinking prefer-ences. Gifted and Talented International, 34(1-2), 102-115.
  • Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
  • Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative problem solving: The basic course. Buffalo, NY: Center for Studies in Creativity.
  • Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (2004). Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of cre-ative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(2), 75–101.
  • Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (1994). Creative approaches to problem solving. Dubu-que, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
  • Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (2011). Creative approaches to problem solving: A frame-work for innovation and change (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • İslim, Ö. F. (2009). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri dersinin scamper(yönlendirilmiş beyin fırtınası) tekniğine göre işlenmesinin öğrencilerin yaratıcı problem çözme becerilerine ve akademik başarılarına etkisi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Karabey, B. (2010). İlköğretimdeki üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin yaratıcı problem çözmeye yönelik erişi düzeylerinin ve kritik düşünme becerilerinin belirlenmesi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir, Türkiye.
  • Karasar, N. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (34. bs.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Meadow, A., Parnes, S. J., & Reese, H. W. (1959). Influence of brainstorming instructions and prob-lem sequence on a creative problem-solving test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 413–416. doi:10.1037/h0043917
  • MEB (2019). Bilim ve sanat merkezleri yönergesi. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/www/mevzuat/icerik/608 adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., & Costanza, D. P. (1996). Pro-cess-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: I. problem construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 63-76.
  • O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised crea-tive product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 267–278. doi: 10.1080/10400418909534323
  • Olgun, E. (2012). A non-formal learnıng program for the contribution of creative problem solving skills: A case study (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Önol, M. (2013). Yaratıcı problem çözme etkinliklerinin bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve başarıya etkisi (Ya-yınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Balıkesir, Türkiye. Özkök, A. (2004). Disiplinlerarası yaklaşıma dayalı yaratıcı problem çözme öğretim programının yaratıcı problem çözme becerisine etkisi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilim-leri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Parnes, S. J., Noller, R. B., & Biondi, A. M. (1977). Guide to creative action. New York: Charles Scrib-ner’s Sons.
  • Peterson, C. M. (2006). Creative problem solving styles and learning strategies of management students: implications for teaching, learning, and work (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.
  • Puccio, G. J. (2017). From the dawn of humanity to the 21st century: Creativity as an enduring survival skill. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51, 330–334.
  • Runco, M. A., & Nemiro, J. (1994). Problem finding and problem solving: Problem finding, creativ-ity, and giftedness. Roeper Review, 16(4), 235-241.
  • Runco, M. A., Dow, G., & Smith, W. R. (2006). Information, experience, and divergent thinking: An empirical test. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 269–277.
  • Sak, U. (2009).Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları. Ankara: Maya Yayıncılık.
  • Sak, U. (2012). Üstün zekâlılar özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri (2. bs.). Ankara: Maya Yayıncılık.
  • Sak, U. (2016). Yaratıcılık gelişimi ve geliştirilmesi. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
  • Saranlı, A. G. (2017). Okul öncesi dönemdeki erken müdahale uygulamalarına farklı bir bakış: Üs-tün yetenekli çocuklar için erken zenginleştirme. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(190) 343-359.
  • Seelig, T. (2012). inGenius: A crash course on creativity. NY: Harpercollins.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2012). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim (22.bs.). Ankara: Pegem.
  • Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decision. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Snyder, A., Mitchell, J., Bossomaier, T., & Pallier, G. (2004). The Creativity quotient: An objective scoring of ıdeational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 415–420.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.
  • Tardif, T. Z., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). What do we know about creativity? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed), The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives (pp.429-440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tennant, M., McMullen, C., & Kaczynski, D. (2009). Teaching, learning and research in higher educa-tion: A critical approach. New York: Routledge.
  • Titus, P., & Koppitsch, S. (2018). Exploring business students' creative problem-solving prefer-ences. Journal of Education for Business, 93(5), 242-251.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Princeton, NJ: Personal Press.
  • Torrance, P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. USA: Prentice-Hall.
  • Treffinger, D. J. (2001). The importance of creative learning and problem solving. DImagiNings (Destination ImagiNation newsletter), 2(2), 10-12.
  • Treffinger, D. J. (2003). Talent development and creativity. Creative Learning Today, 12(4), 1-2.
  • Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2005). Creative problem solving: The history, development, and implications for gifted education and talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 342–353.
  • Treffinger, D. J., & Parnes, S. J. (1979). Creative problem solving for gifted and talented stu-dents. Roeper Review, 2(4), 31-32.
  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • VanGundy, A. B., Jr. (1988). Techniques of structured problem solving. New York: Van Nostrand Rein-hold.
  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity intel-ligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (189–212). England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wellman, J. (2014). Relationship between creative problem solving profiles and career choice. Honors pro-jects, 93. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/93
  • Yıldırım, A. (2014). Okul öncesinde yaratıcı problem çözme etkinliklerinin yaratıcılığa etkisi (5 yaş örneği) (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Yılmaz, M. (2019). Program görselleştirme aracıyla gerçekleştirilen dijital öyküleme etkinliklerinin yaratıcı problem çözme becerisi ve bilgisayara yönelik tutum üzerindeki etkisi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum, Türkiye.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Education, Special
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Hasan AKDENİZ>
Gazi University, Educational Technology Department
0000-0001-8628-7273
Türkiye


Gülgün BANGİR ALPAN>
Gazi University, Educational Technology Department
0000-0003-4652-7652
Türkiye

Publication Date June 27, 2020
Application Date March 19, 2020
Acceptance Date May 17, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020, Volume 10, Issue 1

Cite

APA Akdeniz, H. & Bangir Alpan, G. (2020). Analysis of Gifted and Talented Students' Creative Problem Solving Styles . Talent , 10 (1) , 79-94 . DOI: 10.46893/talent.758416