Dijital Okuryazarlık, Çevrim İçi Öğrenme ve Akademik İsteklilik Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 1012 - 1036, 28.12.2021

Yener Akman

https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.982846

Cited By: 10

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı üniversite öğrencilerinin görüşlerine göre dijital okuryazarlık, çevrim içi öğrenme ve akademik isteklilik arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. Çalışmanın örneklemini 2020-2021 öğretim yılında Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi’nde öğrenim gören 322 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Çalışma verileri “Dijital Okuryazarlık Ölçeği”, “Çevrim içi Öğrenme Tutum Ölçeği” ve “Akademik İsteklilik Ölçeği” aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Verilerin çözümlenmesinde betimsel analizler, Pearson Momentler korelasyon analizi, çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi ve yol analizi uygulanmıştır. Bulgulara göre öğrencilerin dijital okuryazarlık algıları çevrim içi öğrenmeye yönelik tutumlarının ve akademik istekliliklerinin anlamlı bir yordayıcısıdır. Ayrıca öğrencilerin çevrim içi öğrenmeye yönelik tutumları da akademik isteklilikleri üzerinde anlamlı bir etki oluşturmuştur. Bunun yanında öğrencilerin dijital okuryazarlık algıları ile akademik isteklilikleri arasında çevrim içi öğrenmeye yönelik tutumun aracılık rolü oynadığı saptanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda öğrencilerin dijital okuryazarlık ve çevrim içi öğrenmeye yönelik tutumlarının öğrencilerin akademik isteklilikleri üzerinde etki gösteren önemli birer değişken oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Bulgular doğrultusunda üniversitelerde çevrim içi öğrenme ortamlarının yaygınlaştırılmasına, öğrencilerin ve öğretim elemanlarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin artırılmasına ve öğretim elemanlarının teknoloji tabanlı ders içeriği hazırlama ve sunumu konusunda yeterliliklerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik tedbirlerin alınması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital Okuryazarlık, Çevrim İçi Öğrenme, Akademik İsteklilik, Üniversite Öğrencisi

Investigation of the Relationship Between Digital Literacy, Online Learning, and Academic Aspiration

Öz

The aim of the study is to examine the relationships between digital literacy, online learning and academic aspirations according to the views of university students. The sample of the study consisted of 322 students studying at Süleyman Demirel University in the 2020-2021 academic year. Data were collected through “Digital Literacy Scale”, “Online Learning Attitude Scale” and “Academic Aspiration Scale”. Descriptive analyses, Pearson Moments correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and path analysis were used to analyze the data. According to the findings, students' digital literacy perceptions are a significant predictor of their attitudes towards online learning and their academic aspirations. In addition, students' attitudes towards online learning also had a significant effect on their academic aspirations. Moreover, it was determined that the attitude towards online learning played a mediating role between students' digital literacy and their academic aspirations. As a result of the study, it has been determined that students' attitudes towards digital literacy and online learning are an important factor in their academic aspirations. In line with the findings, it is suggested to expand online learning environments in universities, to increase the digital literacy levels of students and lecturers, and to improve the competence of lecturers in preparing and presenting technology-based course content.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Literacy, Online Learning, Academic Aspiration, University Student

Kaynakça

• Abu-Hilal, M. M. (2010). A structural model of attitudes towards school subjects, academic aspiration and achievement. Educational Psychology, 20(1), 75-84.
• Ahmed, S. T. & Roche, T. (2021). Making the connection: Examining the relationship between undergraduate students’ digital literacy and academic success in an English medium instruction (EMI) university. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4601-4620.
• Akçapınar, G. & Uz-Bilgin, Ç. (2020). Öğrenme analitiklerine dayalı oyunlaştırılmış gösterge paneli kullanımının öğrencilerin çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamındaki bağlılıklarına etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 28(4), 1892-1901.
• Aldhafeeri, F. M. & Khan, B. H. (2016). Teachers’ and students’ views on E-Learning readiness in Kuwait’s secondary public schools. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(2), 202-235. doi: 10.1177/0047239516646747
• Arastaman, G. & Özdemir, M. (2019). Lise öğrencilerinin görüşlerine göre akademik isteklilik, akademik benlik yeterliği ve kültürel sermaye arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim ve Bilim, 44(197), 105-119.
• Arbaugh, J. (2010). Sage, guide, both, or even more? An examination of instructor activity in online MBA courses. Communication Education, 55(3), 1234-1244.
• Aviram, A. & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2006). Towards a theory of digital literacy: three scenarios for the next steps. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 9(1), 1-11.
• Baron, R. J. (2019). Digital literacy. R. Hobbs & P. Mihailidis (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media literacy içinde (s. 1-6). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0053
• Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Ed.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices içinde (s. 17-32). New York: Peter Lang.
• Baygeldi, M., Öztürk G. & Dikkartın-Övez, F. T. (2021). Pandemi sürecinde eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin çevrimiçi öğrenme hazır bulunuşluk ve e-öğrenme ortamlarına yönelik motivasyon düzeyleri. Turkish Studies, 16(1), 285-311.
• Bower, M. (2019). Technology-mediated learning theory. British Journal Education Technology, 50, 1035-1048.
• Boxer, P., Goldstein, S. E., DeLorenzo, T., Savoy, S. & Mercado, I. (2011). Educational aspiration-expectation discrepancies: Relation to socioeconomic and academic risk-related factors. Journal of Adolescence, 34(4), 609-617.
• Buchholz, B. A., DeHart, J. & Moorman, G. (2020). Digital citizenship during a global pandemic: moving beyond digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64(1), 11-17.
• Carliner, S. (2004). An overview of online learning. Armherst, MA: Human Resource Development Press.
• Chen, S. X. & Lam, B. C. P. (2010). Where there’s a will, there’s a way: The mediating effect of academic aspiration between beliefs and academic outcomes. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 11(1), 53-72.
• Chen, M. R. A., Hwang, G. J. & Chang, Y. Y. (2019). A reflective thinking-promoting approach to enhancing graduate students’ flipped learning engagement, participation behaviors, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2288-2307.
• Chien, T. C. (2012). Computer self-efficacy and factors influencing e-learning effectiveness. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 670-686.
• Cho, V., Cheng, T. & Lai, W. (2009). The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers & Education, 53(2), 216-227.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (4. b.). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Díaz-Noguera, M. D., Toledo-Morales, P. & Hervás-Gómez, C. (2017). Augmented reality applications attitude scale (ARAAS): Diagnosing the attitudes of future teachers. The New Educational Review, 50(4), 215-226.
• Drent, M. & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187-199.
• Dubow, E. F., Boxer, P. & Huesmann, L. R. (2009). Long-term effects of parents’ education on children’s educational and occupational success: mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55, 224-249.
• Duran, E. & Özen, N. E. (2018). Türkçe derslerinde dijital okuryazarlık. Türkiye Eğitim Dergisi, 3(2), 31-46.
• Ergün, E. & Kurnaz, F. B. (2019). E-öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenme stilleri ve akademik başarı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 12(2), 532-549.
• Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publication.
• Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Gorard, S., See, B. H. & Davies, P. (2012). The impact of attitudes and aspirations on educational attainment and participation. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
• Hamutoğlu, N. B., Canan-Güngören, Ö., Kaya-Uyanık, G. & Gür-Erdoğan, G. (2017). Dijital okuryazarlık ölçeği: Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 18(1), 408-429.
• Hatlevik, O. E. & Christophersen, K. (2013). Digital competency at beginning of upper secondary school: identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computer and Education, 6(3), 240-247.
• Helsper, E. (2008). Digital inclusion: An analysis of social disadvantage and the information society. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
• Helsper, E. J. & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696-713.
• Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Counting and Clinical Psychology, 65(4), 599-610.
• House, R. (2012). The inappropriateness of ICT in early childhood: Arguments from philosophy, pedagogy, and developmental research. S. Suggate & E. Reese (Ed.), Contemporary debates in childhood education and development içinde (s. 105-120). New York: Routledge.
• Jung, E. & Zhang, Y. (2016). Parental involvement, children's aspirations, and achievement in new immigrant families. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(4), 333-350.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2014). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kapil, Y. & Roy, A. (2014). A critical evaluation of generation Z at workplaces. International Journal of Social Relevance & Concern, 2(1), 10-14.
• Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89-106.
• Khattab, N. (2015). Students’ aspirations, expectations and school achievement: What really matters? British Educational Research Journal, 41(5), 731-748.
• Khurana, C. (2016). Exploring the role of multimedia in enhancing social presence in an asynchronous online course. (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10291826).
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
• Kul, S. (2020). Dijital okuryazarlık ve diğer değişkenlerle internet bağımlılığı ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri ve Bilgisayar Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 28-41.
• Lumadi, M. W. (2013). E-Learning’s impact on the academic performance of student-teachers: A curriculum lens. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 695-703.
• Lung-Guang, N. (2019). Decision-making determinants of students participating in MOOCs: Merging the theory of planned behavior and self-regulated learning model. Computers & Education, 134, 50-62.
• Maden, S., Maden, A. & Banaz, E. (2018). Ortaokul 5. sınıf Türkçe ders kitaplarının dijital okuryazarlık bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(55), 685-698.
• Martin, A. & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249-267.
• Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the "digital society". C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Ed.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices içinde (s. 151-176). New York: Peter Lang.
• Martin, A. & Madigan, D. (2006). Digital literacies for learning. London: Facet Publishing.
• McGuinnes, C. & Fulton, C. (2019). Digital literacy in higher education: A case study of student engagement with e-tutorials using blended learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 18, 1-28.
• Mello, Z. R. (2008). Gender variation in developmental trajectories of educational and occupational expectations and attainment from adolescence to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1069-1080.
• Miller, A. (2015). On paper, in person, and online: A multi-literacies framework for university teaching. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 9(2), 19-31.
• Mohammadyari, S. & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11-25.
• Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59, 1065-1078.
• Okumuş, M. & Atilgan, S. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık becerileri ile dijital mahremiyet kaygısı arasındaki ilişki. TRT Akademi, 6(12), 342-363.
• Otani, M. (2019). Relationships between parental involvement and adolescents’ academic achievement and aspiration. International Journal of Educational Research, 94, 168-182.
• Park, H., Lawson, D. & Williams, H. E. (2012). Relations between technology, parent education, self-confidence, and academic aspiration of hispanic immigrant students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 255-265.
• Plucker, J. A. (1996). Constract validity evidence for the student aspiration survey. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12(3), 161-170.
• Polat, H. & Boydak-Ozan, M. (2018). Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında gerçekleştirilen sınıf yönetimi stratejilerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarı ve tutumlarına etkisi. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences, 13(11), 1093-1112.
• Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G. & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for onlinelearning behavior. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91-97.
• Puška, E., Ejubović, A., Đalić, D. & Puška, A. (2021). Examination of influence of e-learning on academic success on the example of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1977-1994.
• Satrio, A. (2011). Kendala Dan Penerapan E-Learning. Journal Information, 10, 1-16.
• Shahudul, S. M., Karim, A. H. M. Z. & Mustari, S. (2015). Social capital and educational aspiration of students: does family social capital affect more compared to school social capital? International Education Studies, 8(12), 255-260.
• Shopova, T. (2014). Digital literacy of students and its ımprovement at the university. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(2), 26-32.
• Singh, V. & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306.
• Slicker, E. K., Patton, M. & Fuller, D. K. (2004). Parenting dimensions and adolescent sexual initiation: using self-esteem, academic aspiration, and substance use as mediators. Journal of Youth Studies, 7(3), 295-314.
• Stordy, P. (2015). Taxonomy of literacies. Journal of Documentation, 71(3), 456-476.
• Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.
• Talan, T. & Aktürk, C. (2021). Orta Öğretim öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık ve bilgi güvenliği farkındalığı seviyelerinin incelenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(1), 158-180.
• Tang, C. M. & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 54-65.
• Tawafak, R., Romli, A., Malik, S. & Shakir, M. (2020). IT Governance impact on academic performance development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(18), 73-85.
• Tepe, T. & Çelik, T. (2021, Nisan). Farklı web 2.0 araçları kullanımının sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık ve bit kullanım yeterlilikleri üzerine etkisi. International Symposium on Current Developments in Science, Technology and Social Sciences’da sunulmuş sözlü bildiri. Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Gaziantep.
• Turan, S. & Karasu-Avcı, E. (2018). 2018 Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretim Programı'nın dijital vatandaşlık bağlamında incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 1(1), 28-38.
• Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J. & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in workvalues: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117-1142.
• Usta, İ., Uysal, Ö. & Okur, M. R. (2016). Çevrim içi öğrenme tutum ölçeği: geliştirilmesi, geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(43), 2215-2222.
• van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A. & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577-588.
• Voogt, J. & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 299-332.
• Walkey, F. H., McClure, J., Meyer, L. H. & Weir, K. F. (2013). Low expectations equal no expectations: Aspirations, motivation, and achievement in secondary school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 306-315.
• Wilde, N. & Hsu, A. (2019). The influence of general self-efficacy on the interpretation of vicarious experience information within online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-20.
• Wong, Y. C., Ho, K. M., Chen, H., Gu, D. & Zeng, Q. (2015). Digital divide challenges of children in low-income families: The case of Shanghai. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 33(1), 53-71.
• Worell, L. (1959). Level of aspiration and academic success. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 47-54.
• Yakubu, M. N. & Dasuki, S. I. (2019). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning technologies among higher education students in Nigeria: A structural equation modeling approach. Information Development, 35(3), 492-502.
• Yavuzalp, N. & Özdemir, Y. (2020). Öz-düzenlemeli çevrimiçi öğrenme ölçeğini Türkçe'ye uyarlama çalışması. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 10(3), 269-278.
• Yelland, N. (2006). New technologies and young children: Technology in early childhood education. Teacher Learning Network, 13(3), 10-13.
• Yıldız, E. (2020). Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin topluluk hissine etki eden faktörlerin incelenmesi. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(1), 180-205.
• Yılmaz, Y. & Yalın, H. İ. (2019). Çevrimiçi ders süreçlerinde farklı konumlandırılan benzeşimlerin öğrencinin akademik başarısına ve kalıcılığına etkisi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(2), 443-462.
• Yustika, G. P. & Iswati, S. (2020). Digital literacy in formal online education: A short review. Dinamika Pendidikan, 15(1), 66-76.