Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Teachers Fostering Social Integration: Arts-based Approach for Refugee Inclusion

Year 2024, Volume: 22 Issue: 2, 1438 - 1472, 30.08.2024
https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1441568

Abstract

Migration in contemporary societies is a complex global process shaped by the interplay of political, economic, and sociocultural factors. Refugee and migrant movements lead to demographic, cultural, and socio-spatial transformations in host societies. This study, using an arts-based action research approach, examined attitudes towards refugees and aimed to better understand the impact of migration on these dynamics. Twenty-six participants, aged 19 to 43, of whom 92% were teachers and 7.7% were teacher candidates, participated in an online drama workshop focusing on refugee issues. The workshop, using techniques such as word association, sentence completion, ranking, and reflection, facilitated empathy. Data collected using various artistic methods, including drawing, frozen images, role-playing, and drama, were analyzed using content analysis. The findings clearly demonstrated how the drama workshop enhanced participants’ empathy and altruistic attitudes towards refugees. Participants became aware of the negative impacts of forced migration, such as prejudice, poverty, and dispossession. The research highlights that participants recognized the social dimensions of migration affecting various aspects of individuals' lives. It underscores the crucial role of teachers in promoting social integration, understanding, reducing prejudice, and combating discrimination against refugees. By advocating for social cohesion, teachers can contribute to peaceful coexistence between refugee populations and host communities.

References

  • Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2. b.). London: Sage.
  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Butler, J. & Athanasiou, A. (2013). Dispossession: The performative in the political. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Castles, S. & Miller, M. M. (2003). The age of migration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2014). Theories of migration. S. Castles, H. de Haas, & M. J. Miller (Ed.), Theories of migration içinde (s. 1-26). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Castles, S., de Haas, H. & Miller, M. J. (2020). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (6. b.). London: Red Globe.
  • Catterall, M. & Ibbotson, P. (2000). Using projective techniques in education research. British Education Research Journal, 26(2), 245- 256. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920050000971
  • Cenevre Sözleşmesi. (1951). Mültecilerin Hukuki Durumu Hakkında Sözleşme. https://www.multeci.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1951-Cenevre-Sozlesmesi-1.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(6), 563–582.
  • Chatty, D. (2010). Displacement and dispossession in the modern Middle East. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
  • Ciarniene, R. & Kumpikaite, K. (2011). International labour migration: Students viewpoint. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22(5), 527-533.
  • Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019005002
  • Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed methods research designs. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5. b.) içinde (s. 200-230). Sage.
  • Cunningham-Parmeter, K. (2011). Alian language: Immigration metaphors and the jurisprudence of otherness. Fordham Law Review, 75(4), 1545-1598.
  • Dany, L, Urdapilleta, I., & Lo Monaco, G. (2015). Free associations and social representations: some reflections on rank-frequency and importance-frequency methods. Quality & Quantity, 49, 489–507.
  • Das, G. (2018). A review on projective techniques applied on social science research. International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management, 5(3), 10-14.
  • Dedeoğlu, S. (2018). Tarımsal üretimde göçmen işçiler: Yoksulluk nöbetinden yoksulların rekabetine. Çalışma ve Toplum, 1(56), 37-67.
  • Dolby, N. (2012). Rethinking multicultural education for the next generation (1. b.). New York: Routledge.
  • Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107- 115.
  • Er, A. R. & Bayındır, N. (2015). İlkokula giden mülteci çocuklara yönelik sınıf öğretmenlerinin pedagojik yaklaşımları. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(4), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.20860/ijoses.08223
  • Flick, U. (2018). Doing triangulation and mixed methods: Qualitative research kit book 8 (1. b.). London: Sage.
  • Gabrielatos, C. & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding. A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK Press, 1996-2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5-38.
  • Goldin, I., Cameron, G. & Balarajan, M. (2011). Exceptional people: How migration shaped our world and will define our future. Princeton: Princeton University.
  • Greenslade, R. (2005). Seeking scapegoats: The coverage of asylum in the UK Press. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.
  • Hanson-Easey, S. & Augoustinos, M. (2010). Out of Africa: Accounting for refugee policy and the language of causal attribution. Discourse & Society, 21(3), 295–323.
  • Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on ımmigration discourse. NY: Basingstoke.
  • Hart, C. (2011). Force-interactive patterns in immigration discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic approach to CDA. Discourse & Society 22(3), 269-286.
  • Howarth, A. & Ibrahim, Y. (2014). The non-human interest story: De-personalizing the migrant. New Racisms: Forms of Un/belonging in Britain Today, [Conference proceedings]. Sussex University. www.brunel.academia.edu/AnitaHowarth sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Jean, G. & Grumberg, J. C. (2016). Çabuksığınlar. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Jokela, T. & Huhmarniemi, M. (2018). Art-based action research in the development work of arts and art education. G. Coutts, E. Härkönen, M. Huhmarniemi, & T. Jokela (Ed.), The lure of lapland: A handbook for artic art and design içinde (s. 9–23). University of Lapland.
  • Kainth, G. S. (2009). Push and pull factors of migration: A case of brick kiln industry of Punjah state. Asia-Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 82-116.
  • KhosraviNik, M. (2010). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(1), 1-28.
  • Knowles, G. J. & Cole, A. L. (2008). Handbook of arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Koser, K. (2016). International migration: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University.
  • Kosmatka-Kos, M. (2017). Refugees and migrants in art integration processes of refugees and migrants through art practices. (Master’s Thesis). Available from Repositório Aberto da Universidade do Porto.
  • Krishnakumar, P. & Indumathi, T. (2014). Pull and push factors of migration. Sona Global Management Review, 8(4), 8-12.
  • Leavy, P. (2021). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. (3. b.). New York: The Guilford.
  • Makovsky, A. (2019). Turkey’s Refugee Dilemma: Tiptoeing Toward Integration. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/turkeys-refugee-dilemma/ sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Markham, A. (2017, February 28). Reflexivity: Some techniques for interpretive researchers. https://annettemarkham.com/2017/02/reflexivity-for-interpretive-researchers/ sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Martin, S. F., Weerasinghe, S., & Taylor, A. (2014). Humanitarian crises and migration: Causes, consequences and responses. New York: Routledge.
  • Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Mujagić, M. (2018). Dangerous waters metaphor in news discourse on refugee crisis. Metaphorik.de, 28, 99-132.
  • Murray, E. L. (1986). Imaginative thinking and human existence. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University.
  • Musolff, A. (2016). Cross-cultural variation in deliberate metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(2), 205–224.
  • Navarro-Gambín, P. & Jansen, K. (2024). Migrant agricultural workers in search of a dignified life: Labour conditions as a source of vulnerability in Spain. Sociologia Ruralis, 64(1), 126-148.
  • O'Neill, M., Isaloo, S. S. & Gusciute, E. (2010). Asylum, migration and community. Bristol: The Policy. University of Bristol. https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/asylum-migration-and-community sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. London: Pinter.
  • Ökten-Sipahioğlu, B. (2024). Göç ve doğal afet ilişkisi: Deprem göçü. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 15(1), [Deprem Özel Sayısı], 292-313.
  • Özbek, Ö. Y. & Taneri, P. O. (2022). İlkokullar için akran zorbalığı önleme modülünün tanıtımı. ÇAKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(1), 55-87.
  • Parker, S. (2015). Unwanted invaders: The representation of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK and Australian print media. eSharp, 23(Myth and Nation), 1-21.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189-1208.
  • Polat, S. & Rengi, Ö. (2014). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin kültürel farklılık algıları ve kültürlerarası duyarlılıkları. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken Journal of World of Turks, 6(3), 135-156.
  • Richmond, A. H. (1988). Sociological theories of international migration. Current Sociology, 36(2), 7-25.
  • Richmond, A. H. (1994). Global apartheid: Refugees, racism and the new world order. Oxford: Oxford University.
  • Sağlam, H. İ. & İlksen-Kanbur, N. (2017). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin mülteci öğrencilere yönelik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 7(2), 310-323.
  • Santa Ana, O. (2002). Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary american public discourse. Austin: University of Texas.
  • Taneri, P. O. (2022). Kapsayıcı eğitim uygulamaları: Çeşitlilikleri ve farklılıkları kucaklayan kapsayıcı çemberi genişletme. Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
  • Triandafyllidou, A. (2018). Globalisation and migration. A. Triandafyllidou (Ed.), Handbook on migration and globalisation içinde (s. 1-13). Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar.
  • Uğur, N. (2024). Kapsayıcı eğitim ve mülteci çocukların eğitimi. P. O. Taneri (Ed.), Kuramdan uygulamaya kapsayıcı eğitim içinde (s. 197-230). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • UNHCR. (2024a). Resettlement, complementary pathways and family reunification. Global Appeal 2024. https://reporting.unhcr.org/global-appeal-2024/outcome-and-enabling-areas/resettlement-complementary-pathways-and-family#:~:text=Over%202.4%20million%20refugees%20will, operations%20have%20projected%20resettlement%20needs sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • UNHCR. (2024b). Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Turkey. https://www.unhcr.org/tr/en/refugees-and-asylum-seekers-in-turkey sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (1998). Recommendations on Statistics of International Migration, Revision. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/ seriesm_58rev1e.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Usaklı, H. (2018). Drama based social emotional learning. Global Research in Higher Education, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22158/grhe.v1n1p1
  • Üzar-Özçetin, Y. S., Çelik, S., & Özenç-Ira, G. (2022). The relationships among psychological resilience, intercultural sensitivity and empathetic tendency among teachers of Syrian refugee children in Turkey. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(2), e410-e419. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13215
  • Warren, C. A. (2018). Empathy, teacher dispositions, and preparation for culturally responsive pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 603-615.
  • Will, V., Eadie, D., & Macaskill, S. (1996). Projective and enabling techniques explored. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14, 38–43.

Sosyal Bütünleşmeyi Teşvik Eden Öğretmenler: Mültecilerin Dâhil Edilmesi için Sanat Temelli Yaklaşım

Year 2024, Volume: 22 Issue: 2, 1438 - 1472, 30.08.2024
https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1441568

Abstract

Çağdaş toplumlarda göç, karmaşık bir küresel süreç olup siyasi, ekonomik ve sosyokültürel faktörlerin etkileşimi sonucu şekillenir. Mülteci ve göçmen hareketlilikleri, ev sahibi toplumlarda demografik, kültürel ve sosyo-mekânsal dönüşümlere yol açar. Bu çalışmada, sanat temelli eylem araştırması yöntemiyle mültecilere yönelik tutumlar incelenerek, göçün bu dinamikler üzerindeki etkileri daha iyi anlaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Yaşları 19 ile 43 arasında değişen, %92'si öğretmen ve %7,7'si öğretmen adayı olan yirmi altı katılımcı, mülteci sorunlarına odaklanan çevrim içi bir drama atölyesine katılmıştır. Kelime ilişkilendirme, cümle tamamlama, sıralama ve yansıtıcı tekniklerin kullanıldığı atölye empati kurmayı kolaylaştırmıştır. Çeşitli sanatsal yöntemler kullanılarak toplanan veriler içerik analiziyle değerlendirilmiştir. Bu analiz, verilerdeki örüntüleri, temaları ve anlamları belirginleştirmiştir. Bulgular, drama atölyesinin katılımcıların mültecilere yönelik empati ve özgeci tutumlarını nasıl geliştirdiğini açıkça göstermektedir. Katılımcılar zorunlu göçün önyargı, yoksulluk ve mülksüzleştirme gibi olumsuz etkilerinin farkına varmıştır. Araştırma, katılımcıların göçün bireylerin yaşamlarının çeşitli yönlerini etkileyen sosyal boyutlarının farkında olduklarını vurgulamaktadır. Öğretmenlerin sosyal bütünleşme, anlayış, önyargıların azaltılması ve mültecilere yönelik ayrımcılıkla mücadeleyi teşvik etmedeki hayati rolünün altını çizmektedir. Öğretmenler, sosyal uyumu savunarak mülteci nüfus ile ev sahibi toplumlar arasında barış içinde bir arada yaşamaya katkıda bulunabilirler.

Ethical Statement

Araştırmada veri toplama araçlarının kullanılması için XX Üniversitesi Etik Kurulundan YY referans numarasıyla etik onay alınmıştır.

Thanks

Araştırmaya katılan tüm öğretmen ve öğretmen adaylarına teşekkür ederiz.

References

  • Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2. b.). London: Sage.
  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Butler, J. & Athanasiou, A. (2013). Dispossession: The performative in the political. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Castles, S. & Miller, M. M. (2003). The age of migration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2014). Theories of migration. S. Castles, H. de Haas, & M. J. Miller (Ed.), Theories of migration içinde (s. 1-26). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Castles, S., de Haas, H. & Miller, M. J. (2020). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (6. b.). London: Red Globe.
  • Catterall, M. & Ibbotson, P. (2000). Using projective techniques in education research. British Education Research Journal, 26(2), 245- 256. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920050000971
  • Cenevre Sözleşmesi. (1951). Mültecilerin Hukuki Durumu Hakkında Sözleşme. https://www.multeci.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1951-Cenevre-Sozlesmesi-1.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(6), 563–582.
  • Chatty, D. (2010). Displacement and dispossession in the modern Middle East. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
  • Ciarniene, R. & Kumpikaite, K. (2011). International labour migration: Students viewpoint. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22(5), 527-533.
  • Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019005002
  • Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed methods research designs. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5. b.) içinde (s. 200-230). Sage.
  • Cunningham-Parmeter, K. (2011). Alian language: Immigration metaphors and the jurisprudence of otherness. Fordham Law Review, 75(4), 1545-1598.
  • Dany, L, Urdapilleta, I., & Lo Monaco, G. (2015). Free associations and social representations: some reflections on rank-frequency and importance-frequency methods. Quality & Quantity, 49, 489–507.
  • Das, G. (2018). A review on projective techniques applied on social science research. International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management, 5(3), 10-14.
  • Dedeoğlu, S. (2018). Tarımsal üretimde göçmen işçiler: Yoksulluk nöbetinden yoksulların rekabetine. Çalışma ve Toplum, 1(56), 37-67.
  • Dolby, N. (2012). Rethinking multicultural education for the next generation (1. b.). New York: Routledge.
  • Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107- 115.
  • Er, A. R. & Bayındır, N. (2015). İlkokula giden mülteci çocuklara yönelik sınıf öğretmenlerinin pedagojik yaklaşımları. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(4), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.20860/ijoses.08223
  • Flick, U. (2018). Doing triangulation and mixed methods: Qualitative research kit book 8 (1. b.). London: Sage.
  • Gabrielatos, C. & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding. A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK Press, 1996-2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5-38.
  • Goldin, I., Cameron, G. & Balarajan, M. (2011). Exceptional people: How migration shaped our world and will define our future. Princeton: Princeton University.
  • Greenslade, R. (2005). Seeking scapegoats: The coverage of asylum in the UK Press. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.
  • Hanson-Easey, S. & Augoustinos, M. (2010). Out of Africa: Accounting for refugee policy and the language of causal attribution. Discourse & Society, 21(3), 295–323.
  • Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on ımmigration discourse. NY: Basingstoke.
  • Hart, C. (2011). Force-interactive patterns in immigration discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic approach to CDA. Discourse & Society 22(3), 269-286.
  • Howarth, A. & Ibrahim, Y. (2014). The non-human interest story: De-personalizing the migrant. New Racisms: Forms of Un/belonging in Britain Today, [Conference proceedings]. Sussex University. www.brunel.academia.edu/AnitaHowarth sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Jean, G. & Grumberg, J. C. (2016). Çabuksığınlar. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Jokela, T. & Huhmarniemi, M. (2018). Art-based action research in the development work of arts and art education. G. Coutts, E. Härkönen, M. Huhmarniemi, & T. Jokela (Ed.), The lure of lapland: A handbook for artic art and design içinde (s. 9–23). University of Lapland.
  • Kainth, G. S. (2009). Push and pull factors of migration: A case of brick kiln industry of Punjah state. Asia-Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 82-116.
  • KhosraviNik, M. (2010). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(1), 1-28.
  • Knowles, G. J. & Cole, A. L. (2008). Handbook of arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Koser, K. (2016). International migration: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University.
  • Kosmatka-Kos, M. (2017). Refugees and migrants in art integration processes of refugees and migrants through art practices. (Master’s Thesis). Available from Repositório Aberto da Universidade do Porto.
  • Krishnakumar, P. & Indumathi, T. (2014). Pull and push factors of migration. Sona Global Management Review, 8(4), 8-12.
  • Leavy, P. (2021). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. (3. b.). New York: The Guilford.
  • Makovsky, A. (2019). Turkey’s Refugee Dilemma: Tiptoeing Toward Integration. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/turkeys-refugee-dilemma/ sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Markham, A. (2017, February 28). Reflexivity: Some techniques for interpretive researchers. https://annettemarkham.com/2017/02/reflexivity-for-interpretive-researchers/ sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Martin, S. F., Weerasinghe, S., & Taylor, A. (2014). Humanitarian crises and migration: Causes, consequences and responses. New York: Routledge.
  • Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Mujagić, M. (2018). Dangerous waters metaphor in news discourse on refugee crisis. Metaphorik.de, 28, 99-132.
  • Murray, E. L. (1986). Imaginative thinking and human existence. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University.
  • Musolff, A. (2016). Cross-cultural variation in deliberate metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(2), 205–224.
  • Navarro-Gambín, P. & Jansen, K. (2024). Migrant agricultural workers in search of a dignified life: Labour conditions as a source of vulnerability in Spain. Sociologia Ruralis, 64(1), 126-148.
  • O'Neill, M., Isaloo, S. S. & Gusciute, E. (2010). Asylum, migration and community. Bristol: The Policy. University of Bristol. https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/asylum-migration-and-community sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. London: Pinter.
  • Ökten-Sipahioğlu, B. (2024). Göç ve doğal afet ilişkisi: Deprem göçü. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 15(1), [Deprem Özel Sayısı], 292-313.
  • Özbek, Ö. Y. & Taneri, P. O. (2022). İlkokullar için akran zorbalığı önleme modülünün tanıtımı. ÇAKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(1), 55-87.
  • Parker, S. (2015). Unwanted invaders: The representation of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK and Australian print media. eSharp, 23(Myth and Nation), 1-21.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189-1208.
  • Polat, S. & Rengi, Ö. (2014). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin kültürel farklılık algıları ve kültürlerarası duyarlılıkları. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken Journal of World of Turks, 6(3), 135-156.
  • Richmond, A. H. (1988). Sociological theories of international migration. Current Sociology, 36(2), 7-25.
  • Richmond, A. H. (1994). Global apartheid: Refugees, racism and the new world order. Oxford: Oxford University.
  • Sağlam, H. İ. & İlksen-Kanbur, N. (2017). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin mülteci öğrencilere yönelik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 7(2), 310-323.
  • Santa Ana, O. (2002). Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary american public discourse. Austin: University of Texas.
  • Taneri, P. O. (2022). Kapsayıcı eğitim uygulamaları: Çeşitlilikleri ve farklılıkları kucaklayan kapsayıcı çemberi genişletme. Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
  • Triandafyllidou, A. (2018). Globalisation and migration. A. Triandafyllidou (Ed.), Handbook on migration and globalisation içinde (s. 1-13). Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar.
  • Uğur, N. (2024). Kapsayıcı eğitim ve mülteci çocukların eğitimi. P. O. Taneri (Ed.), Kuramdan uygulamaya kapsayıcı eğitim içinde (s. 197-230). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • UNHCR. (2024a). Resettlement, complementary pathways and family reunification. Global Appeal 2024. https://reporting.unhcr.org/global-appeal-2024/outcome-and-enabling-areas/resettlement-complementary-pathways-and-family#:~:text=Over%202.4%20million%20refugees%20will, operations%20have%20projected%20resettlement%20needs sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • UNHCR. (2024b). Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Turkey. https://www.unhcr.org/tr/en/refugees-and-asylum-seekers-in-turkey sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (1998). Recommendations on Statistics of International Migration, Revision. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/ seriesm_58rev1e.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Usaklı, H. (2018). Drama based social emotional learning. Global Research in Higher Education, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22158/grhe.v1n1p1
  • Üzar-Özçetin, Y. S., Çelik, S., & Özenç-Ira, G. (2022). The relationships among psychological resilience, intercultural sensitivity and empathetic tendency among teachers of Syrian refugee children in Turkey. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(2), e410-e419. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13215
  • Warren, C. A. (2018). Empathy, teacher dispositions, and preparation for culturally responsive pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 603-615.
  • Will, V., Eadie, D., & Macaskill, S. (1996). Projective and enabling techniques explored. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14, 38–43.
There are 66 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Multicultural Education, Inclusive Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Pervin Oya Taneri 0000-0003-3482-3868

Özlem Yeşim Özbek 0000-0002-4222-4040

Early Pub Date August 28, 2024
Publication Date August 30, 2024
Submission Date February 22, 2024
Acceptance Date June 20, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 22 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Taneri, P. O., & Özbek, Ö. . Y. (2024). Sosyal Bütünleşmeyi Teşvik Eden Öğretmenler: Mültecilerin Dâhil Edilmesi için Sanat Temelli Yaklaşım. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(2), 1438-1472. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1441568

The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences is published by Gazi University.