Investigation of Pre-Service Teachers' Opinions on Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Formative Assessment: An Example of Online Multiple-Choice Exam

Year 2020, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 1 - 8, 29.06.2020

Fatma Gizem Karaoğlan Yılmaz Ahmet Berk Ustun Ramazan Yılmaz

Abstract

The interest in using online formative assessment activities has gradually increased in both traditional teaching and distance education processes. Research emphasizes the importance of using online formative assessment in learning processes. Due to this fact, it is essential to uncover pre-service teachers’ thoughts about online formative assessment activities in a critical manner. Because they will decide whether to employ these activities in the educational field in a few years. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore pre-service teachers’ opinions about the advantages and disadvantages of online formative assessment. The research was conducted on 35 pre-service teachers enrolled in Computer I course during an academic term. They participated in online formative assessment activities every week within the scope of the research. An online formative assessment system based on multiple-choice exams and providing immediate feedback was developed. Data were collected through using a semi-structured interview method and content analysis was conducted to analyze the data. The advantages and disadvantages of using online formative assessment activities that provide immediate feedback in the form of a multiple-choice exam were revealed according to pre-service teachers’ opinions as a result of this study. Various practical and constructive suggestions were offered for the design, development and implementation of online formative assessment in accordance with the results obtained from the research.

Keywords

Online formative assessment, feedback, immediate feedback, multiple choice exam, pre-service teachers, online education, online learning

References

• Annabi, C. A., & Wilkins, S. (2016). The use of MOOCs in transnational higher education for accreditation of prior learning, programme delivery, and professional development. International Journal of Educational Management, 30, 959-975.
• Baleni, Z. G. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 228-236.
• Crossouard, B. (2008). Developing alternative models of doctoral supervision with online formative assessment. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(1), 51-67.
• Duckor, B. (2014). Formative assessment in seven good moves. Educational Leadership, 71(6), 28-32.
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (1), 3-31.
• Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333-2351.
• Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(3), 365-379.
• Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F. G., Olpak, Y. Z., & Yılmaz, R. (2018). The effect of the metacognitive support via pedagogical agent on self-regulation skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(2), 159-180.
• Lubinescu, E. S., Ratcliff, J. L., & Gaffney, M. A. (2001). Two continuums collide: Accreditation and assessment. New directions for higher education, 2001(113), 5-21.
• Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2).
• Olson, B. L., & McDonald, J. L. (2004). Influence of online formative assessment upon student learning in biomedical science courses. Journal of Dental Education, 68(6), 656-659.
• Saks, K., & Leijen, Ä. (2014). Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the e-learning context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 190-198.
• Santamaría Lancho, M., Hernández, M., Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua, Á., Luzón Encabo, J. M., & de Jorge-Botana, G. (2018). Using semantic technologies for formative assessment and scoring in large courses and MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, (12), 1-10.
• Sezer, B., Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2017). Comparison of online and traditional face-to-face in-service training practices: an experimental study. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(1), 264-288.
• Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large‐scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21-34.
• Tsai, Y. H., Lin, C. H., Hong, J. C., & Tai, K. H. (2018). The effects of metacognition on online learning interest and continuance to learn with MOOCs. Computers & Education, 121, 18-29.
• Ustun, A. B., & Tracey, M. W. (2019). An effective way of designing blended learning: A three phase design-based research approach. Education and Information Technologies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09999-9.
• Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 356-373.
• Yilmaz, R. (2017). Problems experienced in evaluating success and performance in distance education: a case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 39-51.