İnşa mı Keşif mi? Konstrüktivizm Çerçevesinde Gerçeklik ve Bilgi Tartışmaları - Olgusallık Argümanı-

Öz

Bu çalışma, gerçeklik ve bilginin inşa mı yoksa keşif mi olduğu sorusunu konstrüktivist ve realist düşünce çerçevesinde ele almaktadır. İlk bölümde konstrüktivizmin kavramsal temeli sunularak, epistemolojik ve ontolojik boyutları ile sosyal, radikal ve biyolojik konstrüktivizm gibi farklı türleri açıklanmaktadır. Konstrüktivizmin ontoloji, epistemoloji, sosyoloji ve psikoloji gibi disiplinlerdeki etkisi tartışılırken, realizm – anti-realizm eksenindeki konumu vurgulanmaktadır. İkinci bölümde ise Paul Boghossian, Markus Gabriel ve John Searle gibi çağdaş realist filozofların mutlak veya “global” konstrüktivizme yönelttikleri temel bir eleştiri olarak “olgusallık argümanı” incelenmektedir. Bu argümana göre, en radikal konstrüktivist teoriler bile kendi tutarlılıklarını sağlayabilmek için asgari düzeyde bir realist önkabulü zorunlu olarak varsaymak durumundadır. Yani her türlü bilgi ve gerçeklik teorisi, insanın kavramsal ve dilsel çerçevelerinden bağımsız belirli olguların varlığını ön koşul olarak kabul etmeden kendi iddiasını sürdüremez. Boghossian’ın olgu konstrüktivizmine yönelik eleştirisi, Gabriel’in ontolojik realizmi ve Searle’ün harici realizmi üzerinden yapılan açıklamalarda, mutlak olgu inşacılığının kendi kendisiyle çeliştiği gösterilmektedir. Nihai olarak “olgusallık argümanı”, herhangi bir bilgi veya gerçeklik teorisinin kendi anlamlılığını koruyabilmesi için asgari düzeyde realist bir ontolojik zemini varsaymak zorunda olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gerçekçilik
• Konstrüktivizm
• Markus Gabriel
• Paul Boghossian
• John Searle
• Olgusallık Argümanı

Construction or Discovery? Debates on Reality and Knowledge within the Constructivist Framework – The Argument from Facticity –

Abstract

This study explores the long-standing philosophical question of whether reality and knowledge are constructed or discovered, analyzing the issue through the lens of constructivist and realist thought. It first outlines the conceptual framework of constructivism, distinguishing between its epistemological and ontological dimensions as well as its various strands, such as social, radical, and biological constructivism. The discussion situates constructivism within realism–anti-realism debates, emphasizing its influence across disciplines like sociology, psychology, and epistemology. In its second part, the article examines the “argument from facticity,” a realist counter-argument developed by philosophers such as Paul Boghossian, Markus Gabriel, and John Searle, which challenges radical or global forms of constructivism. According to this argument, even the most comprehensive constructivist theories presuppose a minimal realist foundation: certain facts must exist independently of human conceptual or linguistic frameworks for any theory, including constructivism itself, to hold coherence. The analysis shows that denying all objective facts results in performative contradictions, as constructivist claims rely on factual presuppositions about their own validity. Through Boghossian’s critique of fact-constructivism, Gabriel’s ontological realism, and Searle’s external realism, the study demonstrates that a minimal commitment to factuality is unavoidable. Ultimately, the “argument from facticity” reveals that any coherent theory of knowledge and reality must presuppose at least a minimal realist ontology to avoid self-refutation.

Keywords

• Constructivism
• Realism
• Markus Gabriel
• Paul Boghossian
• John Searle
• Argument from Facticity

References

1. Alan, S. ve J. Bricmont. Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals’ abuse of science. Picador Press, 1998.
2. Asche, A. “Introduction: Beyond pedestals“ in Beyond pedestals. Temple University Press, 1988.
3. Barnes, B., D. Bloor ve J. Henry. Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. University of Chicago Press, 1996.
4. Bahçi, İ. Çağdaş felsefede yeni realizm tartışmaları: Markus Gabriel’in anlam alanları ontolojisi. Ketebe Yayınları, 2021.
5. Berger, P. L. ve T. Luckmann. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin, 1991.
6. Bloor, D. Knowledge and social imagery. University of Chicago Press, 1991.
7. Brock, M. (Ed.). Realism and anti-realism. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2007.
8. Burr, V. An introduction to social constructivism. Routledge, 2006.

9. Dewar, A. M.“The social construction of gender in a physical education programme." Doktora Tezi, University of British Columbia, 1986.
10. Eder, K. The social construction of nature. Sage, 1996.
11. Emery, G. N. Facts of life: The social construction of vital statistics. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1993.
12. Foerster, H. von ve E. von Glasersfeld. Key works in radical constructivism. Sense Publishers, 2009.
13. Gabriel, M. Die Erkenntnis der Welt: Eine Einführung in die Erkenntnistheorie. Verlag Karl Alber, 2013.
14. Gabriel, M. Ich ist nicht Gehirn – Philosophie des Geistes für das 21. Jahrhundert. Ullstein Verlag, 2015.
15. Gabriel, M. Warum es die Welt nicht gibt. Ullstein, 2015.
16. Gabriel, M.“Neutraler Realismus" in Neutraler Realismus, Editör: T. Buchheim, 15-21. Verlag Karl Alber, 2016.
17. Gabriel, M. Sinn der Religion. In Geschichte und Gott: XV. Kongress für Theologie. Veröffentlichungen der Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft für Theologie, 2016.
18. Gabriel, M. Sinn und Existenz: Eine realistische Ontologie. Suhrkamp, 2016.
19. Gabriel, M. Der Sinn des Denkens. Ullstein, 2018.
20. Gabriel, M. “Metaphysik oder Ontologie?," Perspektiven der Philosophie 42, (2016): 87-89.
21. Golan, D. Inventing Shaka: Using history in the construction of Zulu nationalism. Westview Press, 1994.
22. Goodman, N. Ways of worldmaking. Hackett, 1978.
23. Goodman, N. “Notes on the well-made world" in Starmaking: Realism, anti-realism, and irrealism, Editör: P. McCormick, 99-108. MIT Press, 1996.
24. Hacking, I. The social construction of what? Harvard University Press, 1999.
25. Harré, R. The social construction of emotions. Blackwell, 1986.
26. Kinsman, G. W. The social construction of homosexual culture. University of Toronto, 1983.
27. Kyria, M. (Ed.). Metaepistemology: Realism and anti-realism. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
28. Latour, B. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Sage, 1979.
29. Latour, B. “Ramses II est-il mort de la tuberculose?," La Recherche 307, (1998): 84-85.
30. Lorber, J. Gender and the social construction of illness. Sage, 1991.
31. Luke, C. Constructing the child viewer: A history of the American discourse on television and children. Praeger, 1990.
32. MacKenzie, D. Statistics in Britain 1865–1930: The social construction of scientific knowledge. Edinburgh University Press, 1981.
33. Mallon, R. “Naturalistic approaches to social construction," in The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2019 ed.).
34. Maturana, H. R. Biology of cognition. University of Illinois, 1970.
35. Maturana, H. R. Biologie der Realität. Suhrkamp, 2000.
36. Maturana, H. R. ve F. J. Varela. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala, 1992.
37. McHale, B. Constructing postmodernism. Routledge, 1992.
38. Meillassoux, Q. After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. Continuum, 2008.
39. Moussa, H. “The social construction of women refugees: A journey of discontinuities and continuities." Doktora Tezi, University of Toronto, 1992.
40. Nagel, T. The last word. Oxford University Press, 1197.
41. Pörksen, B. The certainty of uncertainty: Dialogues introducing constructivism. Andrews UK, 2004.
42. Pörksen, B. (Ed.). Schlüsselwerke des Konstruktivismus. Springer, 2015.
43. Putnam, H. The threefold cord: Mind, body, and world. Columbia University Press, 1999.
44. Putnam, H. Realism with a human face. Harvard University Press, 1990.
45. Quine, W. V. Naturalized epistemology. Oxford University Press, 2000.
46. Rorty, R. Truth and progress (Philosophical papers, Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press, 1998.
47. Rorty, R. Philosophy and social hope. Penguin, 1999.
48. Searle, J. The construction of social reality. Penguin, 1996.
49. Sider, T. “Ontological realism" in Metametaphysics, Editörler: D. Chalmers, D. Manley ve R. Wassermann, 384-423. Oxford University Press, 2009.
50. Sider, T. Writing the book of the world. Oxford University Press, 2011.
51. Sokal, A. ve J. Bricmont. Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals’ abuse of science. Picador Press, 1998.
52. Schmidt, S. J. “Sprache, Kultur und Wirklichkeitskonstruktion" in Die Wirklichkeit des Konstruktivismus: Zur Auseinandersetzung um ein neues Paradigma, Editör: H. R. Fischer, 112-132. Carl-Auer-Systeme, 1995.
53. Schantz, R. ve M. Seidel. (Eds.). The problem of relativism in the sociology of (scientific) knowledge. Ontos, 2012. Stengers, I. Spekulativer Konstruktivismus. Merve Verlag, 2008.
54. Woodmansee, M. The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature. Duke University Press, 1994.