Translation: Should only victories be mentioned in history courses at primary level? Or should defeats also be shown?
Abstract
In this study titled “Should only victories be mentioned in history courses at primary level? Or
should defeats also be shown?”, the opinions of the pre-service teacher Mehmet Hulusi, Mehmed
Ali, Mehmed Kemal, Muvassad Zeki, Mehmed Niyazi and Hüseyin Avni Efendi on the written exam
on the relevant topic after the practice classes exams during the directorship of Satı Bey, and finally
the reviews of Satı Bey on the subject are included. In the relevant evaluations, some of the preservice teachers argue that only wins should be mentioned, while others state that both wins and
losses should be explained. Satı Bey states that these mentions should be held carefully by trying
not to violate the respect and affection towards the ancestors and past, and that the effect of the
losses should not outweigh the effect of wins.
Keywords
References
- Satı Bey.(1327/1910). Tahsili İbtidaiyye Derecesindeki Tarih Derslerinde Yalnız Galibiyetlerden mi Bahs Edilmeli? Yoksa Mağlubiyetlerde mi Gösterilmeli?, Tedrisat-ı İbtidaiyye Mecmuası, Nazariyat ve Malumat Kısmı, Numara 13-21, Sene 2, s. 69-77.
- Tedrisat-ı İbtidaiyye Mecmuası, “Îzah-ı Meslek”, Sene 1, Numara 1, 1325/1910, s.1-2.
- Türk, İ. C.(2009). II. Meşrutiyet Dönemi Eğitimcisi Satı Bey ve Coğrafya Öğretimi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı 40, Erzurum, s. 424-428.
- Ünal, U.-Seçkin B., T.(2011). Tedrîsât(-ı İbtidâiyye) Mecmuası, Türk Yurdu, Yıl 100, Sayı 282, s. 105-110.