Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 1430 - 1449, 30.09.2025

Abstract

References

  • Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). Longman.
  • Azertürk, S. İ. (2011). Çin yazısının tarihçesi ve Çincede sözcük türetme yolları. Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 51(1), 89–106.
  • Boltz, W. G. (1994). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system. American Oriental Society.
  • Cantürk, İ. (2024). Çince-İngilizce iki dilli çocukların ses bilimsel farkındalığı: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. In A. M. Dündar (Ed.), APAM Çin çalışmaları-II (pp. 146–151). Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Chen, H. (2017). The phonetic learning impact of Hundred Family Surnames on Chinese language education. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 45(2), 102–118.
  • Chen, X., Li, H., & Wang, Y. (2013). The effectiveness of intensive character recognition instruction in Chinese language learning. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 10(2), 45–58.
  • Chen, Y. (2014). Rethinking mnemonic methods in teaching Chinese characters. Language Education in Asia, 5(1), 78–92.
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
  • Everson, M. E., & Shen, H. H. (Eds.). (2010). Research among learners of Chinese as a foreign language. National Foreign Language Resource Center.
  • Huang, P. (2003). Hànzì jiàoxué fǎ: Chinese character teaching method. Language and Culture Press.
  • Jiang, H. (2019). The role of listening-reading integration in L2 Chinese literacy development. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 8(2), 237–258.
  • Jiang, X., & Cohen, A. (2012). A critical review of research on strategies in learning Chinese as both a second and foreign language. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 9-43.
  • Krashen, S. D. (2009). Principles and practice in second language acquisition (Internet ed.). University of Southern California.
  • Lam, H. C. (2011). A critical analysis of the various ways of teaching Chinese characters. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 57–70.
  • Li, M. (1994). Cognitive approaches to Chinese language instruction. Journal of Chinese Studies, 18(1), 61–75.
  • Li, X. (2022). Thousand Character Classic and its role in contemporary Chinese language pedagogy. Asian Language Studies, 12(1), 45–60.
  • Liu, J., Wang, P., & Sun, Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence in Chinese character recognition: Enhancing student performance through machine learning. Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 56–78.
  • Liu, X., Zhao, R., & Tang, W. (2021). Gamification in Chinese character learning: A comparative study. Journal of Chinese Language Studies, 29(1), 45–67.
  • McGinnis, S. (1996). Teaching Chinese teachers: Theory and practice. In S. McGinnis (Ed.), Chinese pedagogy: An emerging field (pp. 1–22). Foreign Language Publications.
  • Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59.
  • Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In B. Harley & J. H. Hulstijn (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (Vol. 10, pp. 209–227). John Benjamins.
  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Shen, H. (2005). An investigation of Chinese-character learning strategies among non-native speakers of Chinese. System, 33(1), 49–68.
  • Si, X. (2001). Duì suí kèwén fēnsàn shìzì de kànfǎ. Kèchéng·Jiàocái·Jiàofǎ, 21(2), 1–5.
  • Su, T. (1991). Chinese characters and their structural components. Chinese Language Education Journal, 12(4), 44–53.
  • Sun, Y. (2018). Memory retention and visual recognition through classical texts: An analysis of Qianziwen. East Asian Studies Review, 29(3), 56–70.
  • Sun, Y. (2021). Contextual character learning: A study on Zi Zu Wen methodology. East Asian Linguistics, 25(1), 45–70.
  • Taft, M., & Chung, K. K. H. (1999). Using radicals in teaching Chinese characters to second language learners. Psychologia, 42(4), 243–251.
  • Wang, J. (2019). Phonetic and semantic radicals in Chinese character learning. Chinese Linguistics Review, 31(1), 25–40.
  • Wang, R. (2013). Analysis of the Chinese “character-based” teaching method. Research Journal, 21(3), 45–52.
  • Wang, Y., Zhang, J., & Li, X. (2018). The interaction of orthography, phonology, and semantics in Chinese character reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(9), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076810
  • Xu, L. (2015). A comparative study on traditional and modern approaches to Chinese character teaching. Chinese Language Teaching Journal, 27(1), 34–52.
  • Xu, L. & Li, X. (2020). Phonetic clues and Chinese character recognition: A study on xíngshēngzì. Chinese Pedagogy Review, 21(4), 98–115.
  • Zhang, M. (2019). Structural and phonetic associations in Mandarin literacy acquisition. Asian Linguistic Research, 16(1), 29–50.
  • Zhang, M. (2020). Repetitive character exposure and literacy development in Mandarin learners. Applied Chinese Linguistics, 14(2), 89–105.
  • Zhang, T. (1991). Hànzì jiàoxué fǎ. Language and Culture Press.
  • Zhang, W. (2018). From Three-Character Classic to modern literacy pedagogy: Traditional texts in contemporary Chinese primary education. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 15(2), 45–63.
  • Zhao, R. & Wang, M. (2021). Technology-enhanced learning in Chinese character acquisition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Language and Technology, 17(2), 78–95.

DIFFERENT APPROACHES AND METHODS IN TEACHING CHINESE CHARACTERS

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 1430 - 1449, 30.09.2025

Abstract

Although Chinese is one of the most spoken languages in the world, it is challenging to learn as a foreign language due to its character-based writing system. Teaching Chinese characters is one of the biggest challenges, especially for those learning it as a second language. This study aims to examine different approaches and methods on how Chinese characters can be taught more efficiently in teaching Chinese as a foreign language. In this context, character teaching will be discussed under two basic approaches: ‘character-oriented approaches’ and ‘meaning-oriented approaches.’ Character-oriented approaches assume that recognizing a large number of characters is a prerequisite for reading Chinese and argue that it is necessary to focus on character teaching. Meaning-oriented approaches assume that the purpose of character teaching is to teach reading, that students naturally learn to recognize characters while reading Chinese, and argue that meaningful reading should be emphasized from the beginning in teaching Chinese. In this study, both approaches will be examined in detail using the descriptive research method, and the positive aspects and criticisms of each approach will be discussed. The study aims to provide a helpful guide for Chinese language learners.

References

  • Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). Longman.
  • Azertürk, S. İ. (2011). Çin yazısının tarihçesi ve Çincede sözcük türetme yolları. Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 51(1), 89–106.
  • Boltz, W. G. (1994). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system. American Oriental Society.
  • Cantürk, İ. (2024). Çince-İngilizce iki dilli çocukların ses bilimsel farkındalığı: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. In A. M. Dündar (Ed.), APAM Çin çalışmaları-II (pp. 146–151). Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Chen, H. (2017). The phonetic learning impact of Hundred Family Surnames on Chinese language education. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 45(2), 102–118.
  • Chen, X., Li, H., & Wang, Y. (2013). The effectiveness of intensive character recognition instruction in Chinese language learning. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 10(2), 45–58.
  • Chen, Y. (2014). Rethinking mnemonic methods in teaching Chinese characters. Language Education in Asia, 5(1), 78–92.
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
  • Everson, M. E., & Shen, H. H. (Eds.). (2010). Research among learners of Chinese as a foreign language. National Foreign Language Resource Center.
  • Huang, P. (2003). Hànzì jiàoxué fǎ: Chinese character teaching method. Language and Culture Press.
  • Jiang, H. (2019). The role of listening-reading integration in L2 Chinese literacy development. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 8(2), 237–258.
  • Jiang, X., & Cohen, A. (2012). A critical review of research on strategies in learning Chinese as both a second and foreign language. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 9-43.
  • Krashen, S. D. (2009). Principles and practice in second language acquisition (Internet ed.). University of Southern California.
  • Lam, H. C. (2011). A critical analysis of the various ways of teaching Chinese characters. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 57–70.
  • Li, M. (1994). Cognitive approaches to Chinese language instruction. Journal of Chinese Studies, 18(1), 61–75.
  • Li, X. (2022). Thousand Character Classic and its role in contemporary Chinese language pedagogy. Asian Language Studies, 12(1), 45–60.
  • Liu, J., Wang, P., & Sun, Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence in Chinese character recognition: Enhancing student performance through machine learning. Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 56–78.
  • Liu, X., Zhao, R., & Tang, W. (2021). Gamification in Chinese character learning: A comparative study. Journal of Chinese Language Studies, 29(1), 45–67.
  • McGinnis, S. (1996). Teaching Chinese teachers: Theory and practice. In S. McGinnis (Ed.), Chinese pedagogy: An emerging field (pp. 1–22). Foreign Language Publications.
  • Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59.
  • Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In B. Harley & J. H. Hulstijn (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (Vol. 10, pp. 209–227). John Benjamins.
  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Shen, H. (2005). An investigation of Chinese-character learning strategies among non-native speakers of Chinese. System, 33(1), 49–68.
  • Si, X. (2001). Duì suí kèwén fēnsàn shìzì de kànfǎ. Kèchéng·Jiàocái·Jiàofǎ, 21(2), 1–5.
  • Su, T. (1991). Chinese characters and their structural components. Chinese Language Education Journal, 12(4), 44–53.
  • Sun, Y. (2018). Memory retention and visual recognition through classical texts: An analysis of Qianziwen. East Asian Studies Review, 29(3), 56–70.
  • Sun, Y. (2021). Contextual character learning: A study on Zi Zu Wen methodology. East Asian Linguistics, 25(1), 45–70.
  • Taft, M., & Chung, K. K. H. (1999). Using radicals in teaching Chinese characters to second language learners. Psychologia, 42(4), 243–251.
  • Wang, J. (2019). Phonetic and semantic radicals in Chinese character learning. Chinese Linguistics Review, 31(1), 25–40.
  • Wang, R. (2013). Analysis of the Chinese “character-based” teaching method. Research Journal, 21(3), 45–52.
  • Wang, Y., Zhang, J., & Li, X. (2018). The interaction of orthography, phonology, and semantics in Chinese character reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(9), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076810
  • Xu, L. (2015). A comparative study on traditional and modern approaches to Chinese character teaching. Chinese Language Teaching Journal, 27(1), 34–52.
  • Xu, L. & Li, X. (2020). Phonetic clues and Chinese character recognition: A study on xíngshēngzì. Chinese Pedagogy Review, 21(4), 98–115.
  • Zhang, M. (2019). Structural and phonetic associations in Mandarin literacy acquisition. Asian Linguistic Research, 16(1), 29–50.
  • Zhang, M. (2020). Repetitive character exposure and literacy development in Mandarin learners. Applied Chinese Linguistics, 14(2), 89–105.
  • Zhang, T. (1991). Hànzì jiàoxué fǎ. Language and Culture Press.
  • Zhang, W. (2018). From Three-Character Classic to modern literacy pedagogy: Traditional texts in contemporary Chinese primary education. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 15(2), 45–63.
  • Zhao, R. & Wang, M. (2021). Technology-enhanced learning in Chinese character acquisition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Language and Technology, 17(2), 78–95.

ÇİNCE İM ÖĞRETİMİNDE FARKLI YAKLAŞIM VE YÖNTEMLER

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 1430 - 1449, 30.09.2025

Abstract

Çince, dünya çapında en çok konuşulan dillerden biri olmasına rağmen, im temelli yazı sistemi nedeniyle yabancı dil olarak öğrenilmesi zorlayıcıdır. Özellikle ikinci dil olarak öğrenenler için Çince imlerin öğretimi en büyük zorluklardan biridir. Bu çalışma, Çincenin yabancı dil olarak öğretiminde imlerin nasıl daha verimli öğretilebileceğine dair farklı yaklaşımları ele alarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda im öğretimi yaklaşımları ‘im odaklı yaklaşımlar’ ve ‘anlam odaklı yaklaşımlar’ olmak üzere iki temel yaklaşım altında ele alınacaktır. İm odaklı yaklaşımlar, çok sayıda im tanımayı Çince okuyabilmenin ön koşulu olduğunu varsayarak im öğretimine odaklanmak gerektiğini savunur. Anlam odaklı yaklaşımlar ise im öğretiminin amacının okumayı öğretmek olduğunu, öğrencilerin Çince okurken doğal olarak imleri tanımayı öğrendiklerini varsayar ve Çince öğretiminde başlangıçtan itibaren anlamlı okumaya önem verilmesi gerektiğini savunur. Çalışmada im öğretiminde kullanılan her iki yaklaşımın kullanımı da betimsel araştırma yöntemiyle ayrıntılı şekilde incelenerek yaklaşımların olumlu yönleri ve eleştirilen noktaları ele alınacaktır. Çalışma, Çince öğrenenler için yardımcı bir rehber oluşturmayı amaçlamaktadır.

References

  • Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). Longman.
  • Azertürk, S. İ. (2011). Çin yazısının tarihçesi ve Çincede sözcük türetme yolları. Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 51(1), 89–106.
  • Boltz, W. G. (1994). The origin and early development of the Chinese writing system. American Oriental Society.
  • Cantürk, İ. (2024). Çince-İngilizce iki dilli çocukların ses bilimsel farkındalığı: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. In A. M. Dündar (Ed.), APAM Çin çalışmaları-II (pp. 146–151). Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Chen, H. (2017). The phonetic learning impact of Hundred Family Surnames on Chinese language education. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 45(2), 102–118.
  • Chen, X., Li, H., & Wang, Y. (2013). The effectiveness of intensive character recognition instruction in Chinese language learning. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 10(2), 45–58.
  • Chen, Y. (2014). Rethinking mnemonic methods in teaching Chinese characters. Language Education in Asia, 5(1), 78–92.
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
  • Everson, M. E., & Shen, H. H. (Eds.). (2010). Research among learners of Chinese as a foreign language. National Foreign Language Resource Center.
  • Huang, P. (2003). Hànzì jiàoxué fǎ: Chinese character teaching method. Language and Culture Press.
  • Jiang, H. (2019). The role of listening-reading integration in L2 Chinese literacy development. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 8(2), 237–258.
  • Jiang, X., & Cohen, A. (2012). A critical review of research on strategies in learning Chinese as both a second and foreign language. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 9-43.
  • Krashen, S. D. (2009). Principles and practice in second language acquisition (Internet ed.). University of Southern California.
  • Lam, H. C. (2011). A critical analysis of the various ways of teaching Chinese characters. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 57–70.
  • Li, M. (1994). Cognitive approaches to Chinese language instruction. Journal of Chinese Studies, 18(1), 61–75.
  • Li, X. (2022). Thousand Character Classic and its role in contemporary Chinese language pedagogy. Asian Language Studies, 12(1), 45–60.
  • Liu, J., Wang, P., & Sun, Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence in Chinese character recognition: Enhancing student performance through machine learning. Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 56–78.
  • Liu, X., Zhao, R., & Tang, W. (2021). Gamification in Chinese character learning: A comparative study. Journal of Chinese Language Studies, 29(1), 45–67.
  • McGinnis, S. (1996). Teaching Chinese teachers: Theory and practice. In S. McGinnis (Ed.), Chinese pedagogy: An emerging field (pp. 1–22). Foreign Language Publications.
  • Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59.
  • Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In B. Harley & J. H. Hulstijn (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (Vol. 10, pp. 209–227). John Benjamins.
  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Shen, H. (2005). An investigation of Chinese-character learning strategies among non-native speakers of Chinese. System, 33(1), 49–68.
  • Si, X. (2001). Duì suí kèwén fēnsàn shìzì de kànfǎ. Kèchéng·Jiàocái·Jiàofǎ, 21(2), 1–5.
  • Su, T. (1991). Chinese characters and their structural components. Chinese Language Education Journal, 12(4), 44–53.
  • Sun, Y. (2018). Memory retention and visual recognition through classical texts: An analysis of Qianziwen. East Asian Studies Review, 29(3), 56–70.
  • Sun, Y. (2021). Contextual character learning: A study on Zi Zu Wen methodology. East Asian Linguistics, 25(1), 45–70.
  • Taft, M., & Chung, K. K. H. (1999). Using radicals in teaching Chinese characters to second language learners. Psychologia, 42(4), 243–251.
  • Wang, J. (2019). Phonetic and semantic radicals in Chinese character learning. Chinese Linguistics Review, 31(1), 25–40.
  • Wang, R. (2013). Analysis of the Chinese “character-based” teaching method. Research Journal, 21(3), 45–52.
  • Wang, Y., Zhang, J., & Li, X. (2018). The interaction of orthography, phonology, and semantics in Chinese character reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(9), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076810
  • Xu, L. (2015). A comparative study on traditional and modern approaches to Chinese character teaching. Chinese Language Teaching Journal, 27(1), 34–52.
  • Xu, L. & Li, X. (2020). Phonetic clues and Chinese character recognition: A study on xíngshēngzì. Chinese Pedagogy Review, 21(4), 98–115.
  • Zhang, M. (2019). Structural and phonetic associations in Mandarin literacy acquisition. Asian Linguistic Research, 16(1), 29–50.
  • Zhang, M. (2020). Repetitive character exposure and literacy development in Mandarin learners. Applied Chinese Linguistics, 14(2), 89–105.
  • Zhang, T. (1991). Hànzì jiàoxué fǎ. Language and Culture Press.
  • Zhang, W. (2018). From Three-Character Classic to modern literacy pedagogy: Traditional texts in contemporary Chinese primary education. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 15(2), 45–63.
  • Zhao, R. & Wang, M. (2021). Technology-enhanced learning in Chinese character acquisition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Language and Technology, 17(2), 78–95.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Chinese Language, Literature and Culture
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Tuğba Akgür 0000-0003-3593-8181

Early Pub Date September 28, 2025
Publication Date September 30, 2025
Submission Date May 12, 2025
Acceptance Date September 22, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Akgür, T. (2025). ÇİNCE İM ÖĞRETİMİNDE FARKLI YAKLAŞIM VE YÖNTEMLER. Uluslararası Dil Edebiyat Ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(3), 1430-1449.

* It is important for our referees to enter their fields of expertise in detail in terms of assigning referees in the process.

* The articles sent to our journal can only be withdrawn by giving reasons during the preliminary evaluation process. It is not possible to withdraw the articles that have started the evaluation process. Thank you for your understanding and we wish you good work.