Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Üzerine Yapılan Araştırmalar: Sistematik Derleme

Hatice Çetin; Aleyna Koç

doi:10.32960/uead.1698505

EN TR

Research on Proportional Reasoning: A Systematic Review

Abstract

The aim of this study is to systematically review research conducted on proportional reasoning skills between 2007 and 2024. Proportional reasoning is a critical competency in mathematics education, serving as the foundation for many advanced mathematical skills. A total of 88 studies obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus databases were analyzed. These studies were examined in terms of their publication year, the journals they appeared in, their objectives, methodologies, sample levels, data collection tools, and findings. The results indicate that research on proportional reasoning has increased in recent years, with a particular focus on middle school students. Additionally, the most commonly employed methods were found to be experimental and correlational studies. The majority of studies showed that the approaches used to develop proportional reasoning skills had positive effects. Future research could focus on conducting more comprehensive and long-term studies that examine the variables used in studies exploring the relationship between proportional reasoning and other mathematical skills. Furthermore, greater attention could be given to the conditions under which effective approaches and methods are applied and how they are implemented in practice.

Keywords

Proportional reasoning , mathematics education , systematic review

Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Üzerine Yapılan Araştırmalar: Sistematik Derleme

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2007-2024 yılları arasında orantısal akıl yürütme becerileri üzerine yapılan araştırmaların sistematik bir şekilde incelenmesidir. Orantısal akıl yürütme, matematik eğitiminde önemli bir rol oynayan ve birçok ileri düzey matematiksel becerinin temeli olan bir yetkinliktir. Çalışmada Web of Science ve Scopus veri tabanlarından elde edilen 88 araştırma incelenmiştir. Bu araştırmalar, yıllara, yayınlandıkları dergilere, amaçlarına, yöntemlerine, sınıf düzeylerine, veri toplama araçlarına, veri analiz yöntemlerine ve elde edilen sonuçlara göre analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, orantısal akıl yürütme üzerine yapılan çalışmaların son yıllarda arttığını ve en çok ortaokul düzeyindeki öğrencilere odaklandığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, en yaygın kullanılan yöntemlerin deneysel ve ilişkisel tarama çalışmaları olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmaların çoğunluğu, orantısal akıl yürütme becerilerinin geliştirilmesinde kullanılan yaklaşımların olumlu etkiler gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Orantısal akıl yürütmenin, öğrencilerin diğer matematiksel becerileriyle olan bağlantısını inceleyen araştırmalarda kullanılan değişkenlere odaklanarak daha kapsamlı ve uzun süreli çalışmalar yürütülebilir. Etkili olduğu belirlenen yaklaşım ve yöntemlerin hangi koşullarda ve nasıl uygulandığı daha derinlemesine ele alınabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Orantısal akıl yürütme , matematik eğitimi , sistematik derleme

Kaynakça

Abrahamson, D., Gutiérrez, J., Charoenying, T., Negrete, A., & Bumbacher, E. (2012). Fostering hooks and shifts: tutorial tactics for guided mathematical discovery. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 17(1-2), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-012-9192-7
Abreu-Mendoza, R. A., Coulanges, L., Ali, K., Powell, A. B., & Rosenberg-Lee, M. (2020). Children’s discrete proportional reasoning is related to inhibitory control and enhanced by priming continuous representations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 199, 104931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104931
Abreu-Mendoza, R. A., Coulanges, L., Ali, K., Powell, A. B., & Rosenberg-Lee, M. (2021). From non-symbolic to symbolic proportions and back: a cuisenaire rod proportional reasoning intervention enhances continuous proportional reasoning skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 633077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633077
Açıkgül, K. (2021). Developing a two-tier proportional reasoning skill test: validity and reliability studies. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.909316
Alfieri, L., Higashi, R., Shoop, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Case studies of a robot-based game to shape interests and hone proportional reasoning skills. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0017-9
Arıcan, M. (2019). A diagnostic assessment to middle school students’ proportional reasoning. Turkish Journal of Education, 8(4), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.522839
Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., & Cohen-Eliyahu, N. (2014). Outcome feedback during collaborative learning: Contingencies between feedback and dyad composition. Learning and Instruction, 34, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.003
Ayan Civak, R., Işıksal Bostan, M., & Yemen Karpuzcu, S. (2021). Erken orantısal akıl yürütmeye yönelik öğrenme rotasının geliştirilmesi: bir tasarı araştırması. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 433-461. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.949263
Ayan, R., & Işıksal Bostan, M. (2018). Middle school students’ reasoning in nonlinear proportional problems in geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 503-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9777-z
Ayan, R., & Işıksal Bostan, M. (2019). Middle school students’ proportional reasoning in real life contexts in the domain of geometry and measurement. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1468042

Ayan-Civak, R., Işıksal-Bostan, M., & Yemen-Karpuzcu, S. (2023). From informal to formal understandings: Analysing the development of proportional reasoning and its retention. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(7), 1704-1726. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2160384
Bakker, A., Groenveld, D., Wijers, M., Akkerman, S. F., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2014). Proportional reasoning in the laboratory: An intervention study in vocational education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9393-y
Basu, D., & Nguyen, H. B. (2021). Eating healthy: understanding added sugar through proportional reasoning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12821. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312821
Batanero, C., Hernández-Solís, L. A., & Gea, M. M. (2023). Analysing costa rican and spanish students’ comparisons of probabilities and ratios. Statistics Education Research Journal, 22(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i3.659
Baykul, Y. (2022). İlkokulda matematik öğretimi. 11. baskı, Pegem Akademi.
Begolli, K. N., Booth, J. L., Holmes, C. A., & Newcombe, N. S. (2020). How many apples make a quarter? The challenge of discrete proportional formats. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 192, 104774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104774
Begolli, K. N., Dai, T., McGinn, K. M., & Booth, J. L. (2021). Could probability be out of proportion? Self-explanation and example-based practice help students with lower proportional reasoning skills learn probability. Instructional Science, 49(4), 441-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09550-9
Ben-Chaim, D., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Benedetto, C., & Miller, J. (1998). Proportional reasoning among 7th grade students with different curricular experiences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(3), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003235712092
Bentley, B., & Yates, G. C. R. (2017). Facilitating proportional reasoning through worked examples: Two classroom-based experiments. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1297213. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1297213
Burfitt, J. (2021). Using partial knowledge to inform the creation of learning progressions. Australian Journal of Education, 65(3), 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441211037409
Burgos, M., & Godino, J. D. (2019a). Emergencia de razonamiento proto-algebraico en tareas de proporcionalidad en estudiantes de primaria. Educación Matemática, 31(3), 117-150. https://doi.org/10.24844/EM3103.05
Burgos, M., & Godino, J. D. (2019b). Trabajando juntos situaciones introductorias de razonamiento proporcional en primaria. Análisis de una experiencia de enseñanza centrada en el profesor, en el estudiante y en el contenido. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 33(63), 389-410. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v33n63a19
Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1
Callingham, R., & Siemon, D. (2021). Connecting multiplicative thinking and mathematical reasoning in the middle years. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 61, 100837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100837
Canoğulları, A., & Erbaş, A. K. (2024). Students’ use of dragging modalities in solving proportional problems supported with interactive simulations: A multiple case study with sixth and seventh-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2312943
Carney, M. B., Smith, E., Hughes, G. R., Brendefur, J. L., & Crawford, A. (2016). Influence of proportional number relationships on item accessibility and students’ strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(4), 503-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0177-z
Carney, M., Paulding, K., & Champion, J. (2022). Efficient Assessment of Students’ Proportional Reasoning. Applied Measurement in Education, 35(1), 46-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2022.2034825
Che, M., Wiegert, E., & Threlkeld, K. (2012). Problem solving strategies of girls and boys in single-sex mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies In Mathematics, 79(2), 311-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9346-x
Chernyak, N., Turnbull, V., Gordon, R., Harris, P. L., & Cordes, S. (2020). Counting promotes proportional moral evaluation in preschool-aged children. Cognitive Development, 56, 100969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100969
Ching, B. H.-H., & Kong, K. H. C. (2022). Development of children’s informal understanding of division through sharing: Contributions of reasoning demands and problem situations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 59, 228-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.12.013
Clark, F. B., & Kamii, C. (2024). Identification of Multiplicative Thinking in Children in Grades 1-5.
Cortina, J. L., Visnovska, J., & Zuniga, C. (2014). Unit fractions in the context of proportionality: Supporting students’ reasoning about the inverse order relationship. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(1), 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0112-5
Çelik, A., & Özdemir, E. Y. (2011). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin orantısal akıl yürütme becerileri ile oran-orantı problemi kurma becerileri arasındaki ilişki. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 30.
Çetin, H., & Ertekin, E. (2011). The Relationship Between Eighth Grade Primary School Students’ Proportional Reasoning Skills And Success In Solving Equations. International Journal of Instruction.
Çetiner, S. (2022). Kavram Karikatürlerinin 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Becerilerine Etkisi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi].
De Keersmaeker, K., Vanluydt, E., Onghena, P., & Van Dooren, W. (2023). The relation between proportional vocabulary and proportional reasoning abilities in young children. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00767-5
Demi̇r, Ü. (2019). Ortaokul 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Süreçlerinin Bilişsel Açıdan İncelenmesi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Bayburt Üniversitesi.
Dominguez, H., LopezLeiva, C. A., & Khisty, L. L. (2014). Relational engagement: Proportional reasoning with bilingual Latino/a students. Educational Studies In Mathematics, 85(1), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9501-7
Dooren, W. V., Bock, D. D., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). From addition to multiplication … and back: the development of students’ additive and multiplicative reasoning skills. Cognition and Instruction, 28(3), 360-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.488306
Dooren, W. V., & Vamvakoussi, X. (2018). Proportional reasoning. Educational Practices Series. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/file:///C:/Users/lenovo/Downloads/educational-practices-30-v9.pdf
Educational Studies in Mathematics (2025). Impact IF 2024-2025, h-indeks, SJR ve diğer metrikler. Resurchify. Erişim tarihi — 12 Ağustos 2025, https://www.resurchify.com/impact/details/25961
Ergene, Ö., & Karaboğaz, Y. (2024). The effect of the flipped classroom model on students proportional reasoning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 1. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202425424
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of pubmed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2011). De la estructura aditiva a la multiplicativa: Efecto de dos variables en el desarrollo del razonamiento proporcional. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037011794390111
Fernandez, C., & Llinares, S. (2012). Implicative relations between strategies used in solving proportional and non-proportional problems. Revista Latnoamerıcana De Investıgacıon En Matematıca Educatıva-Relıme, 15(1), 9-33.
Fernández, C., Llinares, S., Dooren, W. V., Bock, D. D., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Effect of number structure and nature of quantıtıes on secondary school students’ proportıonal reasonıng. Studıa Psychologıca.
Fielding-Wells, J., Dole, S., & Makar, K. (2014). Inquiry pedagogy to promote emerging proportional reasoning in primary students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(1), 47-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0111-6
Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 3-17.
Gea, M. M., Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C., & Álvarez-Arroyo, R. (2023). Relating students’ proportional reasoning level and their understanding of fair games. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 663-682. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp663-682
Gouet, C., Carvajal, S., Halberda, J., & Peña, M. (2020). Training nonsymbolic proportional reasoning in children and its effects on their symbolic math abilities. Cognition, 197, 104154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104154
Gürler Karakoca, A. (2019). Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Becerilerinin Gelişiminin Varsayıma Dayalı Öğrenme Rotası Kapsamında İncelenmesi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi].
Hackenberg, A. J., Aydeniz-Temizer, F., & Borowski, R. S. (2023). Middle school students at three stages of units coordination learn to make same speeds. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 72, 101085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101085
Haddaway, N. R., Woodcock, P., Macura, B., & Collins, A. (2015). Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conservation Biology, 29(6), 1596-1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12541
Haja, S., & Clarke, D. (2011). Middle school students’ responses to two-tier tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0004-5
Ham, L., & Gunderson, E. A. (2019). Utilizing analogical reasoning to aid children’s proportional reasoning understanding. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 5(2), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v5i2.193
Hamamouche, K., & Cordes, S. (2023). Winning or losing: Children’s proportional reasoning across motivational contexts. Cognitive Development, 68, 101390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101390
Hejnová, E., Eisenmann, P., Cihlář, J., & Přibyl, J. (2018). Relations between scientific reasoning, culture of problem solving and pupil’s school performance. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 11(2), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2018.110203
Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C., & Gea, M. M. (2023). Costa Rican students’ proportional reasoning and comparing probabilities in spinners. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(12), em2373. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13869
Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2013). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess middle-years students’ proportional reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(4), 523-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0083-6
Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2016). Promoting middle school students’ proportional reasoning skills through an ongoing professional development programme for teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 193-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9694-7
Hino, K., & Kato, H. (2019). Teaching whole-number multiplication to promote children’s proportional reasoning: A practice-based perspective from Japan. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 51(1, SI), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0993-6
Howe, C., Luthman, S., Ruthven, K., Mercer, N., Hofmann, R., Ilie, S., & Guardia, P. (2015). Rational number and proportional reasoning in early secondary school: Towards principled improvement in mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1019914
Howe, C., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2011). Rational number and proportional reasoning: using intensive quantities to promote achievement in mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(2), 391-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9249-9
Hurst, M. A., & Cordes, S. (2019). Talking about proportion: Fraction labels impact numerical interference in non‐symbolic proportional reasoning. Developmental Science, 22(4), e12790. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12790
Hurst, M. A., & Levine, S. C. (2022). Children’s understanding of most is dependent on context. Cognition, 225, 105149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105149
Hurst, M. A., Wong, A., Gordon, R., Alam, A., & Cordes, S. (2022). Children’s gesture use provides insight into proportional reasoning strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 214, 105277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105277
Im, S., & Jitendra, A. K. (2020). Analysis of proportional reasoning and misconceptions among students with mathematical learning disabilities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100753
Işıksal Bostan, M., Yemen Karpuzcu, S., & Ayan Ci̇vak, R. (2020). Orantısal akıl yürütmenin gelişimine yönelik varsayıma dayalı öğrenme rotasının geliştirilmesi. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2020063485
Jitendra, A. K., Harwell, M. R., Karl, S. R., Im, S., & Slater, S. C. (2021). Investigating the generalizability of schema-based ınstruction focused on proportional reasoning: a multi-state study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 89(4), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1751580
Jitendra, A. K., Star, J. R., Dupuis, D. N., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Effectiveness of schema-based ınstruction for ımproving seventh-grade students’ proportional reasoning: a randomized experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(2), 114-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.725804
Kahraman, H., Kul, E., & Aydoğdu İskenderoglu, T. (2018). Strategies 7th and 8th graders employ for quantitative proportional reasoning problems. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.333046
Kaplan, A., & Ozturk, M. (2012). The effect of computer based instruction method on instruction of ratio-proportion and development of proportional reasoning. Energy Education Science And Technology Part B-Social And Educational Studies, 4(3), 1663-1672.
Karaçam, Z. (2013). Sistematik derleme metodolojisi: Sistematik derleme hazırlamak için bir rehber. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 6(1), 26-33.
Karaboğaz, Y. (2023). Ters Yüz Öğrenme Modeli İle Gerçekleştirilen Bir Öğretim Süreci: Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Becerisinin İncelenmesi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi].
Karlı, M. G., & Yıldız, E. (2022). Incorrect strategies developed by seventh- grade students to solve proportional reasoning problems. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 22(29). https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.29.5
Khasawneh, A. A., Al-Barakat, A. A., & Almahmoud, S. A. (2022). The effect of error analysis-based learning on proportional reasoning ability of seventh-grade students. Frontiers in Education, 7, 899288. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.899288
Langrall, C. W., & Swafford, J. (2000). Three balloons for two dollars: Developing proportional reasoning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(4), 254-261.
Liu, C.-J., & Shen, M.-H. (2011). The influence of different representations on solving concentration problems at elementary school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 621-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9293-4
Lundberg, A. L. V. (2022). Encountering proportional reasoning during a single algebra lesson: a microgenetic analysis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(1), em0673. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11571
Lundberg, Anna. L. V., & Kilhamn, C. (2018). Transposition of knowledge: encountering proportionality in an algebra task. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 559-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9781-3
Magalhães Teixeira, P. J. (2021). Mobilizando o raciocínio proporcional na resolução de questões percentuais via uso de funções lineares. Perspectivas em Diálogo: revista de educação e sociedade, 8(17), 506-527. https://doi.org/10.55028/pdres.v8i17.12578
Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 1-8. sınıflar).
Modestou, M., & Gagatsis, A. (2007). Students’ improper proportional reasoning: A result of the epistemological obstacle of “linearity”. Educational Psychology, 27(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601061462
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM Publications.
Ng, R., Heyman, G. D., & Barner, D. (2011). Collaboration promotes proportional reasoning about resource distribution in young children. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1230-1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024923
Nunokawa, K. (2012). Multi-relation strategy in students’ use of a representation for proportionalreasoning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.842a
Obersteiner, A., Bernhard, M., & Reiss, K. (2015). Primary school children’s strategies in solving contingency table problems: The role of intuition and inhibition. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 47(5), 825-836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0681-8
Öz, E. (2020). Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Becerilerinin İncelenmesi [Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi].
Öztürk, M. (2020). The relationship between self-regulation and proportional reasoning: the mediating role of reflective thinking towards problem solving. TED Eğitim ve Bilim https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8480
Pakmak, G. S. (2014). 6. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Niceliksel ve Niteliksel Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Problemlerinin Çözümündeki Anlayışlarının İncelenmesi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi].
Proulx, J. (2023). Relative proportional reasoning: transition from additive to multiplicative thinking through qualitative and quantitative enmeshments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(2), 353-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10373-y
Resnick, I., Newcombe, N., & Goldwater, M. (2023). Reasoning about fraction and decimal magnitudes, reasoning proportionally, and mathematics achievement in Australia and the United States. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 9(1), 222-239. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.8249
Ricart, M., & Estrada, A. (2022). Combinatorial and proportional task: looking for ıntuitive strategies in primary education. Mathematics, 10(8), 1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081340
Riehl, S. M., & Steinthorsdottir, O. B. (2019). Missing-value proportion problems: The effects of number structure characteristics. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2017.1375361
Sari, Y. M., Fiangga, S., Milla, Y. I. E., & Puspaningtyas, N. D. (2023). Exploring students’ proportional reasoning in solving guided-unguided area conservation problem: A case of Indonesian students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp375-394
Scheibling-Sève, C., Gvozdic, K., Pasquinelli, E., & Sander, E. (2022). Enhancing cognitive flexibility through a training based on multiple categorization: Developing proportional reasoning in primary school. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(3), 443-472. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.7661
Schwarz, B. B., & Linchevski, L. (2007). The role of task design and argumentation in cognitive development during peer interaction: The case of proportional reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 510-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.009
Shin, J., Lee, S. J., & Steffe, L. P. (2020). Problem solving activities of two middle school students with distinct levels of units coordination. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59, 100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100793
Steinthorsdottir, O. B., & Sriraman, B. (2009). Icelandic 5th-grade girls’ developmental trajectories in proportional reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(1), 6-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217536
Stemn, B. S. (2008). Building middle school students’ understanding of proportional reasoning through mathematical investigation. Education 3-13, 36(4), 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270801959734
Supply, A.-S., Vanluydt, E., Van Dooren, W., & Onghena, P. (2023). Out of proportion or out of context? Comparing 8- to 9-year-olds’ proportional reasoning abilities across fair-sharing, mixtures, and probability contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(3), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10212-5
Tall, D., & Razali, M. R. (1993). Diagnosing Students’ Difficulties In Learning Mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 24(2), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739930240206
Taylor, A., & Jones, G. (2009). Proportional Reasoning Ability and Concepts of Scale: Surface area to volume relationships in science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1231-1247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802017545
Ter Vrugte, J., De Jong, T., Vandercruysse, S., Wouters, P., Van Oostendorp, H., & Elen, J. (2017). Computer game-based mathematics education: Embedded faded worked examples facilitate knowledge acquisition. Learning and Instruction, 50, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.007
Ter Vrugte, J., De Jong, T., Wouters, P., Vandercruysse, S., Elen, J., & Van Oostendorp, H. (2015). When a game supports prevocational math education but integrated reflection does not. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(5), 462-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12104
Thurn, C., Nussbaumer, D., Schumacher, R., & Stern, E. (2022). The Role of Prior Knowledge and Intelligence in Gaining from a Training on Proportional Reasoning. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10020031
Tjoe, H., & De La Torre, J. (2014). On recognizing proportionality: Does the ability to solve missing value proportional problems presuppose the conception of proportional reasoning? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.09.002
Tomaz, V. S., & David, M. M. (2015). How students’ everyday situations modify classroom mathematical activity: the case of water consumption. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(4), 455-496. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.4.0455
Uçar, R. (2022). Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Üzerine Sistematik Derleme Çalışması [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi].
Uçar, Z., & Bozkuş, F. (2016). İlkokul ve ortaokul öğrencilerinin orantısal durumları orantısal olmayan durumlardan ayırt edebilme becerileri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 281-299.
Vanluydt, E., De Keyser, L., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2023). Stimulating early proportional reasoning: An intervention study in second graders. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00696-3
Vanluydt, E., Degrande, T., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Early stages of proportional reasoning: A cross-sectional study with 5- to 9-year-olds. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(3), 529-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00434-8
Vanluydt, E., Supply, A.-S., Verschaffel, L., & Van, W. (2021). The importance of specific mathematical language for early proportional reasoning. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.12.003
Vanluydt, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2022a). The early development of proportional reasoning: A longitudinal study of 5- to 8-year-olds. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1343-1358. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000734
Vanluydt, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2022b). The role of relational preference in word-problem solving in 6-to 7-year-olds. Educational Studies In Mathematics, 110(3), 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10139-9
Vanluydt, E., Wijns, N., Torbeyns, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2021). Early childhood mathematical development: The association between patterning and proportional reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10017-w
Verdú, F. (2012). Característıcas Del Desarrollo Del Razonamıento Proporcıonal En La Educacıón Prımarıa Y Secundarıa. enseñanza de las ciencias, 30(1), 129-142.
Warshauer, H. K. (2015). Productive struggle in middle school mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(4), 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9286-3
Wilkie, K. J. (2016). Students’ use of variables and multiple representations in generalizing functional relationships prior to secondary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(3), 333-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9703-x
Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Matematik Eğitimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Hatice Çetin ^*
0000-0003-0686-8049
Türkiye

Aleyna Koç
0000-0002-2337-9629
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

30 Ekim 2025

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ekim 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

13 Mayıs 2025

Kabul Tarihi

25 Ekim 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32960/uead.1698505

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA35LF79ER

APA

Çetin, H., & Koç, A. (2025). Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Üzerine Yapılan Araştırmalar: Sistematik Derleme. Ulusal Eğitim Akademisi Dergisi, 9(2), 210-231. https://doi.org/10.32960/uead.1698505

Research on Proportional Reasoning: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Keywords

Orantısal Akıl Yürütme Üzerine Yapılan Araştırmalar: Sistematik Derleme

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster