Siber Zorbalık Olgusunun Psikolojik ve Davranışsal Etkileri ile Siber Zorbalığa Karşı Geliştirilen Savunma Mekanizmalarını Dijital Yerliler Üzerinden İncelemek

Abstract

Siber zorbalığa maruz kalan ya da tanık olan dijital yerlilerde çeşitli psikolojik ve davranışsal rahatsızlıklar oluşmaktadır. Yeni ve sosyal medyanın sahip olduğu karakteristik özellikleri zorbalık ve saldırganlık türlerine siber zorbalık olgusu ve kavramının eklenmesi ile sonuçlanmıştır. Siber zorbalık, yalan söyleme, kendini başkası olarak tanıtma, kimliğini gizleme, tehdit etme, alay etme, karalama, hakaret etme, dedikodu yapma, korkutma ve başkalarının resimlerini rızası olmadan sanal ortamda sergileme gibi olumsuz davranışlar şeklinde seyretmektedir. Siber zorbalığa maruz kalan bireylerde çaresizlik, öfke, üzüntü, endişe, yalnızlık, hayal kırıklığı gibi duyguları ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Çalışma, yeni ve sosyal medyada siber zorbalığa maruz kalan ya da tanık olan bireylerde ortaya çıkabilecek çeşitli psikolojik ve davranışsal etkiler ile siber zorbalığa maruz kalmamak için geliştirilen savunma mekanizmalarını dijital yerlilerde üzerinden incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada iletişim ve sosyal bilimlerin araştırma, yöntem ve tekniklerinden kantitatif (nicel) araştırma yöntemi olan survey (tarama) kullanılmaktadır. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre siber zorbalığa maruz kalan bireylerde; anksiyete ve depresyon akademik performansı düşmek ve okuldan kaçarak, devamsızlık yapmak; sürekli olarak o olayı düşünmeye başlamak, çok üzülme; çevresindeki her şeye olan ilgisini kaybetme; internetten uzaklaşma ve konsantrasyon bozukluğu yaşamak gibi psikolojik ve davranışsal rahatsızlıklar ortaya çıkmaktadır. Çalışmaya göre bireyler siber zorbalık olgusu ve siber zorbacılık hakkında ve siber zorbalığa maruz kalmamak için çeşitli savunma mekanizmaları bilgilerine sahiptir. Araştırmanın yeni ve sosyal medyada gerçekleşen siber zorbalık türlerini incelemesi ve siber zorbalığın psikolojik ve davranışsal etkileri açıklaması açısından önemli olduğunu düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

• Siber Zorbalık
• Sosyal Medya
• Siber Zorbalık Psikolojik ve Davranışsal Rahatsızlıkları
• Siber Zorbalık Savunma Mekanizmaları
• Dijital Yerliler

Examining The Psychological And Behavioral Effects Of Cyberbullying And Defense Mechanisms Developed Against Cyberbullying Through Digital Natives

Abstract

Various psychological and behavioral disorders occur in digital natives who are exposed to or witness cyberbullying. The characteristic features of new and social media have resulted in the addition of the concept and phenomenon of cyberbullying to the types of bullying and aggression. Cyberbullying progresses in the form of negative behaviors such as lying, introducing oneself as someone else, hiding one's identity, threatening, mocking, slandering, insulting, gossiping, intimidating and displaying other people's pictures in a virtual environment without their consent. Feelings such as helplessness, anger, sadness, anxiety, loneliness and disappointment may arise in individuals who are exposed to cyberbullying on new and social media. The study aims to examine the various psychological and behavioral effects that may occur in individuals who are exposed to or witness cyberbullying on digital natives and the defense mechanisms developed to avoid being exposed to cyberbullying. In the study, the quantitative research method of communication and social sciences, survey, is used. According to the findings of the study, individuals exposed to cyberbullying experience psychological and behavioral disorders such as anxiety and depression, decreased academic performance, skipping school and being absent; constantly thinking about the incident; feeling very sad; losing interest in everything around them; staying away from the internet and experiencing concentration problems. According to the study, individuals have knowledge about the phenomenon of cyberbullying and cyberbullying and various defense mechanisms to avoid being exposed to cyberbullying. It is thought that the study is important in terms of examining the types of cyberbullying that occur on new and social media and explaining the psychological and behavioral effects of cyberbullying.

Keywords

• Cyberbullying
• Social Media
• Cyberbullying Psychological and Behavioral Disorders
• Cyberbullying Defense Mechanisms
• Digital Natives

References

1. Akgül, G. (2020). Siber Zorbalığın Nedenleri Üzerine Kuramsal Açıklamalar. Gelişim Ve Psikoloji Dergisi, 1(2), 149-167.
2. Aksaray, S. (2011). Siber Zorbalık. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(2), s. 405-432.
3. Aktepe, E. (2013). Ergenlerde Siber Zorbalık ve Siber Mağduriyet. Yeni Symposium., 51(1), 31-36.
4. Anderson, T., & Sturm, B. (2007). Cyberbullying: From playground to computer. Young Adult Library Services, 5(2), s. 24-27.
5. Arıcak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N., & Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 11(3), s. 253-261.
6. Baş, T. (2010). Anket, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
7. Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2005). Cyber-harassment: A study of a new method for an old behavior. Journal of educational computing research, 32(3), s. 265-277.
8. Berson, M. J. (2000). The computer can't see you blush. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 36(4), s. 158-162.

9. Cassidy, W., Jackson, M., & Brown., K. N. (2009). Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? Students’ experiences with cyber-bullying. School psychology international, 30(4), s. 383-402.
10. Dehue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters' experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), s. 217-223.
11. Didden, R., Scholte, R. H., Korzilius, H., De Moor, J. M., Vermeulen, A., O’Reilly, M., . . . Lancioni, G. E. (2009). Cyberbullying among students with intellectual and developmental disability in special education settings. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 12(3), s. 146-151.
12. Dooley, J. J., Pyżalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(4), s. 182-188.
13. Erdur-Baker, Ö., & Kavşut, F. (2007). Akran zorbalığının yeni yüzü:Siber zorbalık. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 27, 31-42.
14. Haşıloğlu, S. B., Baran, T., & Aydın, O. (2015). Pazarlama Araştırmalarındaki Potansiyel Problemlere Yönelik Bir Araştırma: Kolayda Örnekleme ve Sıklık İfadeli Ölçek Maddeleri. Pamukkale İşletme Ve Bilişim Yönetimi Dergisi(1), 19-28.
15. Hay, C., Meldrum, R., & Mann, K. (2010). Traditional bullying, cyber bullying, and deviance: A general strain theory approach. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), s. 130-147.
16. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant behavior, 29(2), s. 129-156.
17. Huang, Y.-Y., & Chou, C. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in human behavior, 26(6), s. 1581-1590.
18. Juvonen, J., & Gross., E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School health, 78(9), 496-505.
19. Karaca, M., Mutlu, T., & Gencer, G. (2021). Siber Mağduriyet: Kavramsal Bir Çalışma. Anadolu Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1).
20. Li, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in human behavior, 23(4), s. 1777-1791.
21. Mason, K. L. (2008). Cyberbullying: A preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 323-348.
22. McKenna, K. Y., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of social issues, 58(1), s. 9-31.
23. Mesch, G. S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 12(4), s. 387-393.
24. Mishna, F., Saini, M., & Solomon, S. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(12), s. 1222-1228.
25. Mitchell, K. J., Ybarra, M., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). The relative importance of online victimization in understanding depression, delinquency, and substance use. Child maltreatment, 12(4), s. 314-324.
26. Obidi, E. M., & Ahaiwe., C. P. (2018). Cyber-Bullying: Assessment of its Awareness and Threats to Social Media Development. MPRA Paper 90581. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/90581 adresinden alındı
27. Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2018). Some problems with cyberbullying research. Current opinion in psychology, 19, s. 139-143.
28. Ortega, R., Elipe, P., Mora-Merchán, J. A., Calmaestra, J., & Vega, E. (2009). The emotional impact on victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying: A study of Spanish adolescents. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(4), s. 197-204.
29. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 4(2), 148-169.
30. Rivers, I., & Noret, N. (2010). I h8 u’: findings from a five‐year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), . 643-671.
31. Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, s. 147-154.
32. Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in human behavior, 29(1), . 26-32.
33. Smith, P. K. (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. (P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee, Dü) Psychology Press.
34. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 49(4), s. 376-385.
35. TÜİK. (2021). Çocuklarda Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, 2021. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Cocuklarda-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2021-41132 adresinden alındı
36. Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K. (2008). Defining cyberbullying: A qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(4), s. 499-503.
37. Varjas, K., Talley, J., Meyers, J., Parris, L., & Cutts, H. (2010). High school students’ perceptions of motivations for cyberbullying: An exploratory study. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 11(3), s. 269-273.
38. Wachs, S., & Wolf, K. D. (2011). Zusammenhänge zwischen cyberbullying und bullying-erste ergebnisse aus einer selbstberichtsstudie.". Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 60(9), s. 735-744.
39. Willard, N. E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Research press.
40. Yaman, E., & Peker, A. (2012). Ergenlerin Siber Zorbalık ve Siber mağduriyetine İlişkin algıları. gaziantep Universty Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 819-833.
41. Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in Internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent health, 41(6).
42. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors,and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), s. 1308-1316.
43. Ybarra, M., Diener-West, M., & Leaf., P. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in Internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent health, 41(6), s. 42-50.