Tattoo In Self-Presentation: A Mixed Methods Study To Explanation Of The Meaning And Motivation Of Tattoo In Self-Presentation

Year 2023, Issue: 12, 321 - 350, 29.08.2023

Ekin Karakuyu , Ayşen Temel Enginli

https://doi.org/10.47994/usbad.1315074

Abstract

Individuals grow up as a part of the family environment in which they were born and develop as a result of the reflections of social conditions. All aspects that individuals attribute material or spiritual value and define themselves explain the concept of self. Selfpresentation means that individuals bring certain regulations to their own behaviors during interactions. These regulations are realized consciously or unconsciously in every environment where mutual interaction is provided. In this context, tattoos are accepted as a form of communication that enable individuals to express themselves. In this study,
mixed research method was used. In the quantitative part of the study, 112 participants answered the Ideal and Real Self Concept Scale. In the qualitative part of the study, 18 participants with at least one tattoo, who were selected through purposive sampling, answered the interview questions. One of the findings of this study is that there is a significant difference between the ideal and real selves of individuals. Another finding is related to the reasons and motivations for tattooing. These are explained with the codes Personal Factors, Carrying Meaning, Means of Expression, Perception of Looking Good, Extensions and Redefinition of the Self, Aesthetics, Personal Meanings, Remembering/Unforgetting, No Regret/Satisfaction and Making oneself Happy.

Keywords

Self, Self-Presentation, Tattoo

Benlik Sunumunda Dövme: Benlik Sunumunda Dövmenin Anlamının ve Motivasyonunun Açıklanmasına Yönelik Bir Karma Yöntem Araştırması

Abstract

Bireyler doğduğu aile ortamının bir parçası olarak büyümekte ve toplumsal koşulların yansımaları sonucunda gelişim göstermektedir. Bireylerin maddi ya da manevi değer yükledikleri ve kendilerini tanımladıkları tüm yönleri benlik kavramını açıklamaktadır. Benlik sunumu, kişilerin etkileşimler sırasında kendi davranışlarına belirli düzenlemeler getirmesi anlamına gelmektedir. Bu düzenlemeler, bilinçli olarak ya da bilinçsiz bir şekilde karşılıklı etkileşimin sağlandığı her ortamda gerçekleşmektedir. Bu bağlamda dövme, bireylerin kendini ifade etmesini sağlayan bir iletişim biçimi olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada karma araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın nicel kısmında 112 katılımcı İdeal ve Gerçek Benlik Kavramı Ölçeğini yanıtlamıştır. Nitel kısmında ise amaçlı örneklemle belirlenen ve en az bir dövmesi olan 18 katılımcı görüşme sorularını yanıtlamıştır. Bu çalışmanın en önemli sonucu kişilerin ideal ve gerçek benlikleri arasında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğunun açıklanmasıdır. Bir diğer bulgu ise kişilerin dövme yaptırma sebeplerinin ve motivasyonlarının neler olduğuna ilişkindir. Bunlar; Kişisel Faktörler, Anlam Taşıma, İfade Etme Aracı, İyi Görünme Algısı, Benliğin Uzantıları ve Yeniden Tanımlanması, Estetik, Kişisel
Anlamlar, Hatırlama/Unutmama, Pişmanlık Duymama/Memnuniyet ve Kendini Mutlu Kılma kodlarıyla açıklanmaktadır.

Keywords

Benlik, Benlik Sunumu, Dövme

References

• Armstrong, M. L. (1991). Career‐Oriented Women with Tattoos. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship 23(4), 215-220.
• Atkinson, M. (2003). Tattooed: The Sociogenesis of a Body Art. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
• Baldwin, J. D. (2002). George Herbert Mead: A Unifying Theory for Sociology. Kendall / Hunt Publishing. Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A Self-Presentational View of Social Phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 3.
• Baumeister, R. F. & Tice, D. M. (1984). Role of Self-Presentation and Choice in Cognitive Dissonance Under Forced Compliance: Necessary or Sufficient Causes? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(1), 5-13.
• Baumeister, R. F. & Hutton, D. G. (1987). Self-Presentation Theory: Self- Construction and Audience Pleasing. Brian Mullen & George R. Goethals (Ed.). Theories of Group Behavior içinde (s. 71-87). New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The Interface Between Intrapsychic and Interpersonal Processes: Cognition, Emotion, and Self as Adaptations to Other People. John M. Darley & Joel Cooper (Ed.), Attribution and Social Interaction: The Legacy of Edward E. Jones içinde (s.201-223). Washington: American Psychological Association.
• Baumeister, R. F. (Ed.). (1999). The Self in Social Psychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press. Baumeister, R. F. & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Social Psychology and Human Nature. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
• Beebe, S. A., Beebe, S. J. & Redmond, M. V. (2020). Interpersonal Communication: Relating to Others (Ninth Edition). Boston: Pearson.
• Benson, S. (2000). Inscriptions of The Self: Reflections on Tattooing and Piercing in Contemporary Euro-America. Jane Caplan (Ed.), Written on The Body: The Tattoo in European and American History içinde (s. 234–254). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Blanchard, M. (1991). Post–Bourgeois Tattoo: Reflections on Skin Writing in Late Capitalist Societies. Visual Anthropology Review 7(2), 11-21.
• Chaffee, J. (2016). The Philosopher's Way: A Text with Readings: Thinking Critically about Profound Ideas (Fifth Edition). Pearson.
• Creswell, J. W. (2021). Karma Yöntem Araştırmalarına Giriş (Çev). Mustafa Sözbilir. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Çerikan, F. U. & Alanko, M. R. (2016). “Dövme”nin Çeşitli Dillerdeki Etimolojisi ve Kısa Tarihçesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 25(1), 166-193.
• DeMello, M. (2000). Bodies of Inscription: A Cultural History of the Modern Tattoo Community. Duke University Press: Durham & London.
• Doss, K. & Ebesu Hubbard, A. S. (2009). The Communicative Value of Tattoos: The Role of Public Self-Consciousness on Tattoo Visibility. Communication Research Reports 26(1), 62-74.
• Ellis, J. (2008). Tattooing The World: Pacific Designs in Print & Skin. Columbia University Press: California. Ellis, J. (2012). How to Read a Tattoo, and Other Perilous Quests. Robert Arp (Ed.), Tattoos Philosophy for Everyone: I Ink, Therefore I Am içinde (s. 14-26). Wiley- Blackwell: Chichester.
• Erdem, S. (2020). Yapısal Sembolik Etkileşimcilik ve Kimlik Teorisi. Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Dergisi 12(1), 50-65.
• Fahlander, F. (2015). The Skin I Live In: The Materiality of Body Imagery. Alison Klevnäs & Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson (Ed.), Own and be Owned: Archaeological Approaches to the Concept of Possession içinde (s. 49-72). Stockholm: Postdoctoral Archaeological Group.
• Fisher, J. A. (2002). Tattooing The Body, Marking Culture. Body & Society 8(4), 91- 107.
• Forbes, G. B. (2001). College Students with Tattoos and Piercings: Motives, Family Experiences, Personality Factors, and Perception by Others. Psychological Reports 89(3), 774-786.
• Gardner, W. L. & Avolio, B. J. (1998). The Charismatic Relationship: A Dramaturgical Perspective. Academy of Management Review 23(1), 32-58.
• Gökulu, G. (2019). Sembolik Etkileşimci Teorinin Gündelik Yaşam Sosyolojisine Katkıları. Ekev Akademi Dergisi 80, 173-190.
• Gustafson, M. (2000). The Tattoo in the Later Roman Empire and Beyond. Jane Caplan (Ed.), Written On The Body: The Tattoo in European and American History içinde (s. 17-31). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Gürüz, D. & Eğinli, A. T. (2019). Kişilerarası İletişim: Bilgiler-Etkiler-Engeller. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. Inckle, K. (2008). Tattoos. Victoria Pitts-Taylor (Ed.), Cultural Encyclopedia of The Body içinde (s.479-489). London: Greenwood Press.
• James, W. (1950). The Principles of Psychology. Dover Publications.
• Jones, C. P. (2000). Stigma and Tattoo. Jane Caplan (Ed.). Written On The Body: The Tattoo in European and American History içinde (s. 1-16). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Kapıkıran, N. A. (2004). İdeal ve Gerçek Benlik Kavramı Ölçeğinin Güvenirliği. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 16(16), 14-25.
• Kosut, M. (2000). Tattoo Narratives: The Intersection of The Body, Self‐Identity and Society. Visual Studies 15(1), 79-100.
• Leary, M. R. & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model. Psychological Bulletin 107(1), 34-47.
• Leary, M. R. & Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal Functions of The Self-Esteem Motive. In Efficacy, Agency, and Self-Esteem, 123-144.
• Leary, M. R. & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The Nature and Function of Self-Esteem: Sociometer Theory. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 32, 1-62.
• Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (2012). The Self as an Organizing Construct in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Mark R. Leary & June P. Tangney (Ed.), Handbook of Self and Identity (Second Edititon) içinde (s.1-18). New York / London: Guilford Press.
• Leary, M. R. (2019). Self-Presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Routledge. Markus, H. & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible Selves. American Psychologist 41(9), 954- 969.
• Martin, C. W. (2013). Tattoos as Narratives: Skin and Self. The Public Journal of Semiotics 4(2), 2-46.
• Mead, G. H. (1972). Mind, Self, and Society. (Ed. Charles W. Morris). Chicago / London: University of Chicago Press.
• Morva, O. (2017). Chicago Sosyoloji Okulu’nun Etnografik Mirasını Yeniden Okumak: Dijital Etnografi Çağında Sembolik Etkileşimcilik. Moment Dergi 4(1), 135-154.
• Mun, J. M., Janigo, K. A. & Johnson, K. K. (2012). Tattoo and The Self. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 30(2), 134-148.
• Punch, K. F. (2020). Sosyal Araştırmalara Giriş: Nicel ve Nitel Yaklaşımlar. Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi.
• Raimy, V. C. (1948). Self Reference in Counseling Interviews. Journal of Consulting Psychology 12(3), 153-163.
• Rhodewalt, F. (1998). Self-Presentation and the Phenomenal Self: The “Carryover Effect” Revisited. John M. Darley & Joel Cooper (Ed.), Attribution and Social Interaction: The Legacy of Edward E. Jones içinde (s.373-398). Washington: American Psychological Association.
• Rogers, C. (1961). On Becoming A Person: A Therapists View of Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving The Self. New York: Basic Books.
• Sanders, C. R. (1988). Marks of Mischief: Becoming and Being Tattooed. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 16(4), 395-432.
• Sanders, C. & Vail, D. A. (2008). Customizing The Body: The Art and Culture of Tattooing (Revised and Expanded Edition). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Saputra, F. A., Prasetyo, B. D. & Mu’adi, S. (2016). Phenomenological Study of Tattoo as the Symbol of the Owners’ Self Identity in Jember. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies 4(1), 7-11.
• Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
• Schlenker, B. R. & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social Anxiety and Self-Presentation: A Conceptualization Model. Psychological Bulletin 92(3), 641.
• Schlenker, B. R. & Weigold, M. F. (1992). Interpersonal Processes Involving Impression Regulation and Management. Annual Review of Psychology 43(1), 133-168.
• Schlenker, B. R. (2012). Self-Presentation. Mark R. Leary & June P. Tangney (Ed.), Handbook of Self and Identity (Second Edition) içinde (s. 542-570). New York / London: The Guilford Press.
• Schneider, D. J. (1981). Tactical Self-Presentations: Toward a Broader Conception. James T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research içinde (s. 23-40). New York / London: Academic Press.
• Strübel, J. & Jones, D. (2017). Painted Bodies: Representing the Self and Reclaiming the Body Through Tattoos. The Journal of Popular Culture 50(6), 1230-1253.
• Swami, V. (2011). Marked for Life? A Prospective Study of Tattoos on Appearance Anxiety and Dissatisfaction, Perceptions of Uniqueness, and Self-Esteem. Body Image, 8(3), 237-244. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.04.005
• Sweetman, P. (1999). Anchoring the (Postmodern) Self? Body Modification, Fashion and Identity. Body & Society 5(2-3), 51-76.
• Taliaferro, C. & Odden, M. (2012). Tattoos and The Tattooing Arts in Perspective: An Overview and Some Preliminary Observations. Robert Arp (Ed.), Tattoos Philosophy for Everyone: I Ink, Therefore I Am içinde (s. 3-13). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Tiggemann, M. & Golder, F. (2006). Tattooing: An Expression of Uniqueness in The Appearance Domain. Body Image 3(4), 309-315.
• Tiggemann, M. & Hopkins, L. A. (2011). Tattoos and Piercings: Bodily Expressions of Uniqueness?. Body Image 8(3), 245-250.
• Yağar, F. & Dökme, S. (2018). Niteliksel Araştırmaların Planlanması: Araştırma Soruları, Örneklem Seçimi, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik. Gazi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 3(3), 1-9.
• Waugh, R. F. (2001). Measuring Ideal and Real Self-Concept on the Same Scale, Based on a Multifaceted, Hierarchical Model of self-concept. Educational and Psychological Measurement 61(1), 85-101.
• Wright, J. L. (2006). The Philosopher’s “I”: Autobiography and the Search for the Self. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Wohlrab, S., Stahl, J. & Kappeler, P. M. (2007). Modifying the Body: Motivations for Getting Tattooed and Pierced. Body Image 4(1), 87-95.