DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Kadir Gezici; Hayrullah Ağaçcıoğlu; Erdal Kesgin

doi:10.17482/uumfd.1005013

TR EN

DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz

Futbol sahalarının dış etkilere açık olması, yağış-sıcaklık gibi çevresel faktörlerden etkilenmesine sebep olmaktadır. Yılın büyük kısmında müsabakalara ev sahipliği yapması, ulusal-uluslararası birçok organizasyona ve amatör düzeye kadar geniş çaplı kullanımı olması sebebiyle bu mühendislik yapısının drenaj özellikleri dikkatli bir şekilde incelenmelidir. Futbol sahalarının zemini, doğal çim yüzeyli ve sentetik(suni) çim yüzeyli olmak üzere iki tür olarak inşa edilebilir. Özellikle son yıllarda geliştirilen, kalitesi daha da arttırılan 3.Nesil sentetik çim futbol sahalarının kullanım sıklığı artmıştır. Bu çalışmada suni çim futbol sahalarının doğal olanlara göre avantaj ve dezavantajları incelenmiş ve bu iki sistem drenaj özellikleri açısından karşılaştırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

1. Adams, W. A. (1986) Practical aspects of sports field drainage, Soil Use Manage, 2 (2): 51–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1986 .tb00679.x.
2. Adkison, J.W., Requa, R.K. ve Garrick, J.G. (1974) Injury rates in high school football: a comparison of synthetic surfaces and grass fields. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 99, 131-136. PMID:4825706.
3. Aoki, H., Kohno, T., Fujiya, H., Kato, H., Yatabe, K., Morikawa, T. ve Seki, J. (2010) Incidence of injury among adolescent soccer players: a comparative study of artificial and natural grass turfs. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 20(1), 1-7. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181c967cd
4. Backx, F. J., Beijer, H. J., Bol, E. ve Erich, W. B. (1991) Injuries in high-risk persons and high-risk sports: a longitudinal study of 1818 school children, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 19(2), 124-130. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900206
5. Baker, S. W. (2003) Construction methods for public sector and professional sports pitches: A review, In I International Conference on Turfgrass Management and Science for Sports Fields, 661, 27-37. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.661.1
6. Baker, S. W. (1989) Soil physical conditions of the root zone layer and the performance of winter games’ pitches, Soil Use Manage, 5 (3), 116–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.1989.tb00771.x.
7. Bartlett, M.D., James, I.T., Ford, M. ve Jennings-Temple, M. (2009) Testing natural turf sports surfaces: the value of performance quality standards, Proc. IMechE. Part P: J. Sports Eng. and Tech, 223(1), 21- 29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1243/17543371JSET24
8. Bjørneboe, J., Bah, R. ve Andersen, T.E. (2010) Risk of injury on thirdgeneration artificial turf in Norwegian professional football, Brit. J. Sports Med., 44(11), 794-798. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.073783

9. Bocca, B., Forte, G., Petrucci, F., Cosntantini, S. ve Izzo, P. (2009) Metals contained and leached from rubber granulates used in synthetic turf areas, Sci. Total Environ., 407(7), 2183-2190. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.12.026
10. Burgers, R., van der Heide, I. E. ve Zeng, X. (2014) A study on improving the comfort of artificial grass in sports, University of twente, 4-5. doi : 10.13140/RG.2.1.3969.2963
11. Burillo, P., Gallardo, L., Felipe, J. L. ve Gallardo, A. M. (2012), Mechanical assessment of artificial turf football pitches: the consequences of no quality certification, Scientific Research and Essays, 7(28), 2457-2465. doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE11.1454
12. Canaway, P. M. (1994). Maximising the performance of sports turf, Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Univ. of Liverpool.
13. Canaway, P. M., Bell, M. J., Holmes, G. ve Baker, S. W. (1990) Standards for the playing quality of natural turf for association football, Natural and artificial playing fields: characteristics and safety features, 1073, 29-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1520/STP25347S
14. Cheng, H., Hu, Y. ve Reinhard, M. (2014), Environmental and health impacts of artificial turf: a review, Environmental science & technology, 48(4), 2114-2129. doi: 10.1021/es4044193
15. Claudio, L. (2008) Synthetic turf: health Debate Takes root, National Institute of Environmental Healty Sciences, 116(3), 116-122. doi: 10.1289/ehp.116-a116
16. Collignon, H., Sultan, N. ve Santander, C. (2011) The sports market. In Major trends and challenges in an industry full of passion, AT Kearney.
17. Dixon, S., Fleming, P., James, I. ve Carre, M., (2015) The science and engineering of sport surfaces, New York: Routledge. ISBN 9781138633605
18. Dragoo, J. L., Braun, H.J. (2010) The effect of playing surface on injury rate: a review of the current literature, Sports Medicine, 40(11), 981-990. doi: 10.2165/11535910-000000000-00000
19. Edwards, A. M., Mann, M. E., Marfell-Jones, M. J., Rankin, D. M., Noakes, T. D. ve Shillington, D. P. (2007) Influence of moderate dehydration on soccer performance: physiological responses to 45 min of outdoor match-play and the immediate subsequent performance of sport-specific and mental concentration tests, British journal of sports medicine, 41(6), 385-391. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.033860
20. Ekstrand, J., Timpka, T., ve Hagglund, M. (2006) Risk of injury in elite football played on artificial turf versus natural grass: a prospective two-cohort study, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40 (12), 975-980. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.027623
21. Engebretsen, L., Kase, T. (1987) Soccer injuries and artificial turf, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 107(26), 2215-2217. Norwegian. PMID: 3672453.
22. FIFA, (2005). FIFA quality concept for artificial turf guide (pp. 1–43). Zurich: FIFA
23. FIFA, (2007). FIFA U-17 Championship Peru 2005. Turf Roots 1:8-10
24. FIFA, (2009a). FIFA Quality Concept for Football Turf. Handbook of Requirements, Fédération Internationale de Football Association, Zurich.
25. FIFA, (2009b). FIFA Quality Concept for Football Turf. Handbook of Test Methods, Fédération Internationale de Football Association, Zurich.
26. FIFA, (2015). FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf. Handbook of Requirements, Fédération Internationale de Football Association, Zurich.
27. FIFA, (2021a). FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf. Member Association Handbook, Fédération Internationale de Football Association, Zurich.
28. Fleming, P.R., Forrester, S.E. ve McLaren, N.J. (2015) Understanding the effects of decompaction maintenance on the infill state and play performance of third-generation artificial grass pitches, Proceedings Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Sports Enginerring and Technology, 229(3), 169–182. doi: 10.1177/1754337114566480
29. Fleming, P. (2011) Artificial turf systems for sport surfaces: current knowledge and research needs, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 225(2), 43-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337111401688
30. Fleming, P. R., Watts, C. ve Forrester, S. (2020) A new model of third generation artificial turf degradation, maintenance interventions and benefits, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 1754337120961602, 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337120961602
31. Fleming, P., Ferrandino, M. ve Forrester, S. (2016) Artificial Turf Field–A New Build Case Study, Procedia engineering, 147, 836-841. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.294
32. Foster, J.B. (2007) Newer artificial turf appears safer for soccer players, BioMechanics, 14, 9–10.
33. Fuller, C.W., Clarke, L. ve Molloy, M.G. (2010) Risk of injury associated with rugby union played on artificial turf, J. Sports Sci, 28(5), 563-570. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640411003629681
34. Fuller, C. W., Dick, R. W., Corlette, J., ve Schmalz, R. (2007) Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players. Part 1: match injuries, British journal of sports medicine, 41, i20-i26. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.037267
35. Gezici, K. (2021). Spor Sahalarında Kullanılan Drenaj Sistemlerinin İncelenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
36. Gezici, K., Kesgin, E. ve Agaccioglu, H. (2021) Hydrological Assessment of Experimental Behaviors for Different Drainage Methods in Sports Fields, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 147(9), 04021034. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001597
37. STF, (2017). Guidelines for Synthetic Turf Base Systems, Synthetic Turf Council (STF).
38. Hagel, B.E., Fick, G.H. ve Meeuwisse, W.H. (2003) Injury risk in men’s Canada West University football, American Journal of Epidemiology, 157(9), 825-33. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg050
39. James, I.T. (2015) Surface classification, function, construction and maintenance. In: Dixon S, Fleming PR, Carre MJ, et al. (eds) The science and engineering of sport surfaces. London: Taylor and Francis, 2015, pp.9–25. ISBN 9781138633605
40. James, I. T. Hann, M. J. ve Godwin, R. J. (2007b) Design and operational considerations for the use of mole ploughing in the drainage of sports pitches, Biosystems Engineering, 97(1), 99-107, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.02.003
41. James, I. T., Blackburn, D. W. K. ve Godwin, R. J. (2007a) Mole drainage as an alternative to sand slitting in natural turf sports surfaces on clays, Soil Use Manage, 23 (1), 28–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00061.x
42. Junge, A., Langevoort, G., Pipe, A., Peytavin, A., Wong, F., Mountjoy, M., ... ve Dvorak, J. (2006). Injuries in team sport tournaments during the 2004 Olympic Games. The American journal of sports medicine, 34(4), 565-576. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281807
43. Kesgin, E. (2021). Investigation of Effective Drainage Methods in Sports Field Under Various Rainfall Conditions, Doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, University of Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul.
44. Kesgin, E., Dogan, A. ve Agaccioglu, H. (2018) Rainfall simulator for investigating sports field drainage processes, Measurement, 125 (Sep): 360–370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.001
45. Kesgin, E., Gezici, K. ve Ağaçcıoğlu, H., (2020b) Hydrological evaluation of sports field drainage, ISPEP 9th International Conferance on Engineering & Natural Sciences, Ankara, Turkey, 182-191.
46. Kesgin, E., Agaccioglu, H. ve Dogan, A. (2020a) Experimental and numerical investigation of drainage mechanisms at sports fields under simulated rainfall, Journal of Hydrolgy, 580 (Jan), 124251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124251
47. Kolitzus, H. J. (2007) Artificial turf surfaces for soccer, What owners of soccer pitches should know about artificial turf. IST Switzerland, United States Sport s Surfacing Laboratory USSL, 1-29.
48. Kowalik, T., Rajda, W. (2014) Physical properties, permeability and retentiveness of silt loam and its composites with sand for constructing carrying layer of a football field, J. Ecol. Eng, 15 (4): 37–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993.1125456
49. Lanzetti, R. M., Ciompi, A., Lupariello, D., Guzzini, M., De Carli, A., ve Ferretti, A. (2017) Safety of third‐generation artificial turf in male elite professional soccer players in Italian major league. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 27(4), 435-439. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12654
50. Levy, I.M., Skovron, M.L. ve Agel, J. (1990) Living with artificial grass: a knowledge update. Part 1: basic science, Am J Sports Med,18, 406-412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659001800413
51. Magni, S., Volterrani, M. ve Miele, S. (2003) Soccer pitches performances as affected by construction method, sand type and turfgrass mixture, 1st Int. Conf. on Turfgrass Management and Science for Sports Fields, 661, 281–285. Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Horticultural Science. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.661.35
52. McAuliffe, K. W. (2014) Optimising the performance of major multi-use stadia playing surfaces, XXIX Int. Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (IHC2014), Leuven, Belgium, 1–8. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1122.1
53. McGregor, S. J., Nicholas, C. W., Lakomy, H. K. A. ve Williams, C. (1999) The influence of intermittent high-intensity shuttle running and fluid ingestion on the performance of a soccer skill, Journal of sports sciences, 17(11), 895-903. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/026404199365452
54. McNitt, A.S., Petrunak, D.M. ve Serensits, T.J. (2007) Temperature amelioration of synthetic turf surfaces through irrigation, II International Conference on Turfgrass Science and Management for Sports Fields, 783:573-582. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.783.59
55. O'Leary, F., Acampora, N., Hand, F. ve O'Donovan, J. (2020) Association of artificial turf and concussion in competitive contact sports: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 6(1), e000695. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000695
56. Petrass, L. A., Twomey, D. M., Harvey, J. T., Otago, L. ve LeRossignol, P. (2015) Comparison of surface temperatures of different synthetic turf systems and natural grass: Have advances in synthetic turf technology made a difference, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 229(1), 10-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337114553692
57. Powell, J.W., Schootman, M. A. (1992) Multivariate risk analysis of selected playing surfaces in the National Football League, 1980 to 1989: an epidemiologic study of knee injuries, Am J Sports Med, 20(6), 686-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659202000609
58. Renström, P., Peterson, L. ve Edberg, B. (1977) Valhalla artificial pitch at Gothenburg 1975–1977, a two-year evaluation. Sweden: Naturvårdsverket.
59. SAPCA, (2010). The SAPCA Code of Practice for the Design, Construction and Improvement of Natural Sports Turf, UK: SAPCA.
60. SAPCA, (2009). The SAPCA code of practice for the construction and maintenance of synthetic turf sports pitches. 3rd ed. Kenilworth, UK: SAPCA ((Sports and Play Construction Association).
61. Serensits, T. J., McNitt, A. S. ve Petrunak, D. M. (2011) Human health issues on synthetic turf in the USA, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 225(3), 139-146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337111398407
62. Sharma, P., Fleming, P., Forrester, S. ve Gunn, J. (2016) Maintenance of artificial turf–putting research into practice, Procedia engineering, 147, 830-835. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.298
63. Simpson, M. R., Fleming, P. R., ve Frost, M. W. (2013) Briefing: Sustainable drainage for sports pitch developments, In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, 166(4), 211-215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.12.00056
64. Sport England, (2011). Natural turf for sport: Design guidance note. London: English Sports Council.
65. Stanitski, C.L., McMaster, J.H. ve Ferquson, R.J. (1974) Synthetic turf and grass: a comparative study, J Sports Med,2,22-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354657400200103
66. State Government Victoria, (2011). Artificial Grass for Sport, Sport and Recreation Victoria Department of Planning and Community Development, Melbourne, Victoria.
67. Steffen, K., Andersen, T.E. ve Bahr. R. (2007) Risk of injury on artificial turf and natural grass in young female football players, Brit J Sport Med, 41, i33-37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2007.036665
68. Sterzing, T. (2013) Injury occurrence and footwear performance on artificial soccer turf, Science and Football VII, 9-14.
69. Stevenson, M., Anderson, B. (1981) The effects of playing surfaces on injuries in college intramural touch football, J Nat Intramural-Recreational Sports Assoc, 5(3), 59-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/nirsa.5.3.59
70. Stiles, V. H., James, I. T., Dixon, S. J. ve Guisasola, I. N. (2009) Natural turf surfaces, Sports Medicine, 39(1), 65-84. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200939010-00005
71. Taylor, D. H., Blake, G. R. (1979) Sand content of sand-soil-peat mixtures for turfgrass, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43(2), 394–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300020032x
72. Taylor, D. H., Nelson, S. D. ve Williams, C. F. (1993) Sub-root zone layering effects on water retention in sports turf soil profiles, Agronomy Journal, 85(3), 626–630. doi: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030020x
73. Theobald, P., Whitelegg, L., Nokes, L. D. ve D. Jones, M. (2010) The predicted risk of head injury from fall-related impacts on to third-generation artificial turf and grass soccer surfaces: a comparative biomechanical analysis. Sports biomechanics, 9(1), 29-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141003690245
74. Torg, J.S., Quedenfeld, T.C. ve Landau, S. (1974) The shoe-surface interface and its relationship to football knee injuries, The Journal of sports medicine, 2(5), 261-269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354657400200502
75. UEFA, (2005). FIFA quality concept: Handbook of test methods and requirements for artificial turf football surfaces. Nyon, Switzerland:UEFA
76. Waddington, D. V., Carrow, R. N. ve Shearman, R. C. (1992) Turfgrass. Agronomy, (32), XXI-805. ISBN: 0891181083
77. Waldén, M., Krosshaug, T., Bjørneboe, J., Andersen, T. E., Faul, O. ve Hägglund, M. (2015) Three distinct mechanisms predominate in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in male professional football players: a systematic video analysis of 39 cases, British journal of sports medicine, 49(22), 1452-1460. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094573:
78. Williams, S., Hume, P. A. ve Kara, S. (2011) A review of football injuries on third and fourth generation artificial turfs compared with natural turf, Sports Medicine, 41(11), 903-923. doi: 10.2165/11593190-000000000-00000
79. Winterbottom, W. (1985) Artificial grass surfaces for association football. Report and recommendations. London: Sport Council

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

İnşaat Mühendisliği

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Kadir Gezici ^*
0000-0001-6349-8262
Türkiye

Hayrullah Ağaçcıoğlu
0000-0002-1860-9848
Türkiye

Erdal Kesgin
0000-0002-9441-5359
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Ekim 2021

Kabul Tarihi

21 Ocak 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1005013

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA32DN42DN

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Gezici, K., Ağaçcıoğlu, H., & Kesgin, E. (2022). DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 487-502. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1005013

AMA

1.Gezici K, Ağaçcıoğlu H, Kesgin E. DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. UUJFE. 2022;27(1):487-502. doi:10.17482/uumfd.1005013

Chicago

Gezici, Kadir, Hayrullah Ağaçcıoğlu, ve Erdal Kesgin. 2022. “DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 27 (1): 487-502. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1005013.

EndNote

Gezici K, Ağaçcıoğlu H, Kesgin E (01 Nisan 2022) DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 27 1 487–502.

IEEE

[1]K. Gezici, H. Ağaçcıoğlu, ve E. Kesgin, “DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, UUJFE, c. 27, sy 1, ss. 487–502, Nis. 2022, doi: 10.17482/uumfd.1005013.

ISNAD

Gezici, Kadir - Ağaçcıoğlu, Hayrullah - Kesgin, Erdal. “DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 27/1 (01 Nisan 2022): 487-502. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1005013.

JAMA

1.Gezici K, Ağaçcıoğlu H, Kesgin E. DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. UUJFE. 2022;27:487–502.

MLA

Gezici, Kadir, vd. “DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 27, sy 1, Nisan 2022, ss. 487-02, doi:10.17482/uumfd.1005013.

Vancouver

1.Kadir Gezici, Hayrullah Ağaçcıoğlu, Erdal Kesgin. DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. UUJFE. 01 Nisan 2022;27(1):487-502. doi:10.17482/uumfd.1005013

Cited By

Assessing Drainage Performance of Turfgrass Rootzone in Sports Fields

Journal of Advanced Research in Natural and Applied Sciences

https://doi.org/10.28979/jarnas.1530185

Spatiotemporal variability of football pitch surface properties under meteorological influences: A case study of Kasımpaşa Stadium

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2025.104076

DOĞAL VE SENTETİK ÇİM ZEMİNLİ FUTBOL SAHALARININ DRENAJ TASARIMLARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Comparison of Natural and Artificial Turf Football Fields in terms of Drainage Properties

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Assessing Drainage Performance of Turfgrass Rootzone in Sports Fields

Spatiotemporal variability of football pitch surface properties under meteorological influences: A case study of Kasımpaşa Stadium