The Strategic Position of the Middle East in the European Union Security Strategy

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 609 - 640, 12.03.2021

Furkan Halit Yolcu

https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.887190

Öz

This study examines the strategic position of the Middle East in the EU defense and security policy, which underwent architectural changes geographically and
geopolitically after the Cold War. This research tries to categorize the EU's relations with the Middle Eastern countries at the institutional level. In addition, the position of Middle Eastern countries in the EU defense policy has been tried to be determined by geographical location, security documents, foreign aid, defense trade,
technology transfer (defense industry collaborations), and defense and EU energy security/dependency parameters. While evaluating the strategic and economic
partnerships of the EU countries in the Middle East, it will be tried to determine which Middle Eastern states are included in the security atmosphere of the EU and
which are excluded.

Anahtar Kelimeler

European Union Defense & Security Policy, EU-Middle East Affairs, Trans-atlantic Pact, NATO

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GÜVENLİK STRATEJİSİNDE ORTADOĞU’NUN YERİ VE ÖNEMİ

Öz

Bu çalışma Soğuk Savaş sonrasında coğrafi ve jeopolitik açıdan mimari değişiklikler geçiren AB savunma ve güvenlik politikasında, Ortadoğu’nun stratejik konumunu incelemektedir. Araştırmada AB’nin kurumsal düzeyde Ortadoğu ülkeleriyle kurduğu ilişkileri kategorize etmeye çalışmaktadır. Bununla birlikte Ortadoğu ülkelerinin AB savunma politikasında nasıl bir noktada olduğu coğrafi konum, güvenlik dokümanlarında yer alma, dış yardımlar, savunma ticareti, teknoloji transferi (savunma sanayii işbirlikleri), savunma ve AB enerji güvenliği/bağımlılığı parametreleri ile belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bölge devletlerinin bu parametrelerden hangilerine aynı anda sahip olduğu ve bu benzerliklerin ne gibi sonuçlara yol açtığı da ortaya çıkarılmaya çalışılacaktır. AB ülkelerinin Ortadoğu’da stratejik ve ekonomik ortaklıkları ayrı değerlendirilirken AB’nin güvenlik atmosferine hangi Ortadoğulu devletlerin dâhil edilip hangilerinin dışarıda bırakıldığı tespit edilmeye çalışılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Avrupa Birliği, AB Savunma & Güvenlik Politikası, AB-Ortadoğu İlişkileri, Trans-Atlantik Pakt, NATO

Kaynakça

• Becher, Klaus. EU defence policy: Evolution, prospects and implications. BeginSadat Centre for Strategic Studies, Bar-Ilan Univ., 2001.
• Blainey, Geoffrey. Causes of war. Simon and Schuster, 1988.
• Büyükbaş, Hakkı. “Avrupa Güvenlik Stratejisi Belgesi ve Türkiye”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt 61, Sayı 1, (2006): 38-66.
• Choi, Mihwa. “Contesting Imaginaires in Death Rituals during the Northern Song Dynasty.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chicago, 2008.
• Cicioğlu, Filiz, and Yeşim Bayram. "Avrupa Birliği’nin Değerleri Çerçevesinde Ortadoğu Politikasını Anlamlandırmak: Mısır, Suriye ve Irak Örneği." International Journal of Political Science and Urban Studies 7.2 (2019): 327-360.
• Cornish, Paul. "European security: the end of architecture and the new NATO." International Affairs 72, no 4 (1996): 751-769.
• Deighton, Anne. "The European security and defence policy." JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40.4 (2002): 719-741.
• Hampton, Mary N. "NATO at the Creation: US Foreign Policy, West Germany and the Wilsonian Impulse." Security Studies 4, no 3 (1995): 610-656.
• Hartley, Keith. "The future of European defence policy: An economic perspective." Defence and Peace Economics 14, no 2 (2003): 107-115.
• HCP69. The OCCAR Convention. Defence Committee, House of Commons, The Stationery Office, London, December (1999).
• Jones, Seth G. "The rise of a European defence." Political Science Quarterly 121, no2 (2006): 241-267.
• Juvan, Jelena ve Janja Vuga. "Civilian Entities in EU Missions: A Comparison of the Slovenian, Italian, Belgian and Danish Approaches." Managing Crises, Making Peace. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2015. 196-215.
• Kelly, John D. “Seeing Red: Mao Fetishism, Pax Americana, and the Moral Economy of War.” İçinde Anthropology and Global Counterinsurgency, editörler John D. Kelly, Beatrice Jauregui, Sean T. Mitchell ve Jeremy Walton, 67–83. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
• Kossinets, Gueorgi ve Duncan J. Watts. “Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network.” American Journal of Sociology 115 (2009): 405–50. Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 28, 2010. doi:10.1086/599247.
• Laipson, Ellen. "Europe's Role in the Middle East: Enduring Ties, Emerging Opportunities." The Middle East Journal 44, no 1 (1990): 7-17.
• Mearsheimer, John J. "Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War." International security 15, no 1 (1990): 5-56.
• Menon, Anand. "From independence to cooperation: France, NATO and European security." International Affairs 71, no 1 (1995): 19-34.
• Pollan, Michael. The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. 2. Baskı. New York: Penguin, 2006.
• Risse-Kappen, Thomas. "Collective identity in a democratic community." Içinde Domestic Politics and Norm Diffusion in International Relations: Ideas do not float freely, Thomas Risse,78-113. Routledge, 2016.
• Simon, Luis. Geopolitical Change, Grand Strategy and European Security: The EUNATO Conundrum. Springer, 2013.
• Solana, Javier. "A Secure Europe in a Better World. European Security Strategy." içinde Civilian perspective or security strategy? European development policy confronting new challenges in foreign and security policy, Klaus Schilder ve Tobias Hauschild, 52-28. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2004.
• Ülger, İrfan Kaya. Avrupa Birliğinde Siyasal Bütünleşme (Ortak Dış Politika ve Güvenlik Politikasının Oluşumu). Cilt 186, Gündoğan yayınları, 2002.
• Van Evera, Stephen. "Primed for peace: Europe after the Cold War." International security 15, no 3 (1990): 7-57.
• Van Staden, Alfred, et al. "Towards a European strategic concept." Clingendail Institute (2000).
• Ward, Geoffrey C. ve Ken Burns. The War: An Intimate History, 1941–1945. New York: Knopf, 2007.
• Weinstein, Joshua I. “The Market in Plato’s Republic.” Classical Philology 104, no 2 (2009): 439–58.
• Yolcu, Furkan Halit . “Military Balance and Alliances in the Middle East: A Process Tracing between the WWI and the New World Order (1918-2010).” Selcuk University Journal Of Faculty Of Letters 43, no 1, (2020): 467-496.
• Yolcu, Furkan Halit. "Iran's Involvement with Syrian Civil War: Background, Reasons and Alternatives." Bilgi Dergi 18, Sayı 2 (2016): 35-64.
• Yolcu, Furkan Halit. "The Democratizer Army Paradox: The Role of the Algerian Army in Impeded Democratization." Journal of Asian and African Studies 54, no 7 (2019): 1033-1047.
• Yolcu, Furkan Halit. "The Persian Gulf Dilemma: United in the West, Divided in the Gulf." Insight Turkey 22, no 2 (2020): 221-228.
• Zelikow, Philip. "The masque of institutions." Survival 38, no 1 (1996): 6-18.