Use of Wearable Technological Sports Products and Investigation of Usage Perceptions of Athletes

Öz

The aim of this research is to obtain information about the use of wearable technological (WT) sports products by athletes and to reveal their perceptions of use. For this purpose, two parts digital questionnaire was used. In the first part of the form, questions related to age, gender, WT sports product used, duration of use of WT sports product and the information source about the product were obtained were included. In the second part of the form, WT Sporting Goods Usage Perception Scale was used, which the Turkish adaptation, validity and reliability studies were carried out by Yüce et al. (2020). The sample of the study consisted of 737 people who participated voluntarily in the study and used WT sports products. Within the scope of the data obtained, it was determined that 42.1% of the individuals participating in the research were female and 57.9% were male. In addition, the participants mostly (60.2%) use smart watches and wristbands, more than half of the participants (57.0%) use 1-3 years, and the source of information about the technological device is mostly (61.3%) both social environment and Internet has been determined. Apart from all these, according to the data obtained, it has been determined that the athletes' perceptions of WT sports products use do not differ depending on gender and information source, but differ according to the duration of use.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sports
• wearable technology
• wearable technological sports products

Sporcuların Giyilebilir Teknolojik Spor Ürünleri Kullanımları ve Kullanım Algılarının İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, sporcuların giyilebilir teknolojik (GT) spor ürünleri kullanımlarına ilişkin bilgileri elde etmek ve kullanım algılarını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu amaçla 2 bölümden oluşan dijital anket formu kullanılmıştır. Formun birinci bölümünde yaş, cinsiyet, kullanılan GT spor ürünü, GT spor ürününü kullanım süresi ve ürüne yönelik bilginin edinildiği kaynak ile ilişkili sorular yer almıştır. Formun ikinci bölümünde Yüce ve ark. (2020) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlaması, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarının yapıldığı GT Spor Ürünleri Kullanım Algısı Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini GT spor ürünü kullanan ve çalışmaya gönüllü olarak katılan 737 kişi oluşturmuştur. Elde edilen veriler kapsamında araştırmaya katılan bireylerin %42,1’inin kadın, %57,9’unun erkek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca katılımcıların çoğunlukla (%60,2) akıllı saat ve bileklik kullandığı, katılımcıların yarısından fazlasının (%57,0) kullanım süresinin 1-3 yıl olduğu ve teknolojik cihaz ile ilgili bilgi kaynağının çoğunlukla (%61,3) hem sosyal çevre hem de İnternet olduğu belirlenmiştir. Tüm bunların dışında elde edilen verilere göre sporcuların GT spor ürünleri kullanım algıları cinsiyet ve bilgi kaynağına bağlı olarak bir farklılık göstermez iken kullanım süresine göre farklılık gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Spor
• giyilebilir teknoloji
• giyilebilir teknolojik spor ürünleri

Kaynakça

1. Bayoumy, K., Gaber, M., Elshafeey, A., Mhaimeed, O., Dineen, E. H., Marvel, F., … Elshazly, M. B. (2021). Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: Where we are and how to move forward. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18(8), 581-599. Referans2 CCS Insight (2015). https://www.ccsinsight.com/press/company-news/2332-wearables-market-to-be-worth-25- billion-by-2019-reveals-ccs-insight/
2. Dehghani, M. ve Dangelico, R. M. (2017). Smart wearable technologies: Current status and market orientation through apatent analysis. 2017 IEEE International Conference, 1570-1575.
3. Dehghani, M., Kim, K.J., Dangelico, R.M. (2018). Will smartwatches last? Factors contributing to intention to keep using smart wearable technology. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 480-490.
4. Ericsson consumerlab (2016). Wearable Technology and the Internet of Things: Consumer views on wearables beyond health and wellness
5. Fang, Y. M. ve Chang, C. C. (2016). Users’ psychological perception and perceived readability of wearable devices for elderly people. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(3), 225-232.
6. Fotopoulou, A. ve O’Riordan, K. (2017). Training to self-care: Fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 54-68.
7. Gupta, A., Dhiman, N., Yousaf, A. ve Arora, N. (2021). Social comparison and continuance intention of smart fitness wearables: An extended expectation confirmation theory perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(13), 1341-1354.
8. Kaewkannate, K. ve Kim, S. (2016). A comparison of wearable fitness devices. BMC public health, 16(1), 1-16.

9. Kalantari, M. (2017). Consumers’ adoption of wearable technologies: Literature review, synthesis, and future research agenda. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 12(3), 274-307.
10. Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C. ve Gupta S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decision support systems, 43(1), 111-126.
11. Kim, K. J. ve Shin, D. H. (2015). An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Research, 25(4), 527-541.
12. Lee, H. ve Leonas, K. K. (2021). Millennials’ intention to use self-checkout technology in different fashion retail formats: perceived benefits and risks. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 39(4), 264-280.
13. Li, M., Sun, M. ve Wang, L. (2021). Application Analysis Of Smart Wearable Devices in Students’ Physical Activity Under the Background Of Big Data. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1757, No. 1). IOP Publishing.
14. Liu, M. T., Chu, R., Wong, I. A., Zúñiga, M. A., Meng, Y ve Pang, C. (2012). Exploring the relationship among affective loyalty, perceived benefits, attitude, and intention to use co‐branded products. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 24(4), 561-582.
15. Lunney, A., Cunningham, N. R. ve Eastin, M. S. (2016). Werable fitness technology: A structural investigation into acceptance and perceived fitness outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 114-120.
16. R & M (2021). Wearable Technology Market: Wearable Injectors Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Type (On-body, Off-body), by Technology (Spring-based, Motor-driven), by Application (Oncology, Autoimmune Diseases), by End Use, and Segment Forecasts, 2021-2028.
17. Raman, P. ve Aashish, K. (2021). Gym users: An enabler in creating an acceptance of sports and fitness wearable devices in India. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship. Raskovic, D., Martin, T. ve Jovanov, E., (2004). Medical monitoring applications for wearable computing. Comput. J, 47(4), 495-504.
18. Sarkar, S. ve Chakrabarti, D. (2021). The Perception and Acceptance of Wearable Fitness Devices Among People and Designing Interventions for Prolonged Use. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 94-101). Springer, Cham.
19. Song, J., Kim, J. ve Cho, K. (2018). Understanding users’ continuance intentions to use smart-connected sports products. Sport Management Review, 21(5), 477-490.
20. Tahar, A., Riyadh, H. A., Sofyani, H. ve Purnomo, W. E. (2020). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(9), 537-547.
21. Yüce, A., Aydoğdu, V., Katırcı, H. ve Gökce Yüce S. (2020). GT spor ürünleri kullanım algısı ölçeği: bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması, Spormetre The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 18(4), 113-124.