Evaluation of the Organization of the Turkic States in the Light of Integration Theories

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 323 - 344, 30.06.2025

Seyit Ali Avcu

https://doi.org/10.31679/adamakademi.1645742

Öz

Five Turkic Republics—Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Türkiye, and Uzbekistan—gained independence after the Soviet Union's dissolution. Discussions of a Turkic Union, akin to the EU, led to the establishment of the Cooperation Council of Turkic Speaking States (Turkic Council) in 2009, renamed the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) in 2021. Its primary goal is to enhance cooperation among Turkic states. Founding members—Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Türkiye—were joined by Uzbekistan in 2019. This article examines the OTS's current status and future through integration theories, primarily developed from the EU experience, such as Federalism, Functionalism, Neofunctionalism, Intergovernmentalism, Constructivism, and Liberal Intergovernmentalism. The study argues that the OTS aligns with regionalism, a state-led process creating formal regional institutions among at least three states, rather than regionalization, which involves increased interaction between adjacent states. The Turkic Union is a top-down process, better explained by Intergovernmentalism and Constructivism, as it is an intergovernmental organization rooted in cultural, historical, and religious ties. However, economic interdependence among members remains limited, with significant ties only between Türkiye and Azerbaijan in energy and transportation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organization of Turkic States , Integration theories , Regionalism , Regionalization

Entegrasyon Teorileri Işığında Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı'nın Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Beş Türk Cumhuriyeti—Azerbaycan, Kazakistan, Kırgızistan, Türkiye ve Özbekistan—Sovyetler Birliği'nin dağılmasının ardından bağımsızlık kazandı. AB'ye benzer bir Türk Birliği tartışmaları, 2009 yılında Türk Konseyi'nin kurulmasına yol açtı ve 2021'de Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı (TDT) olarak yeniden adlandırıldı. Temel amacı, Türk devletleri arasındaki işbirliğini artırmaktır. Kurucu üyeler—Azerbaycan, Kazakistan, Kırgızistan ve Türkiye—2019'da Özbekistan ile birleşti. Bu makale, TDT'nin mevcut durumu ve geleceğini, çoğunlukla AB deneyiminden geliştirilen entegrasyon teorileriyle incelemektedir; bunlar arasında Federalizm, Fonksiyonalizm, Neofonksiyonalizm, Hükümetler Arasıcılık, İnşacılık ve Liberal Hükümetler Arasıcılık bulunmaktadır. Çalışma, TDT'nin bölgeselleşme yerine, en az üç devlet arasında resmi bölgesel kurumlar oluşturan devlet odaklı bir süreç olan bölgeselcilikle uyumlu olduğunu savunmaktadır. Türk Birliği, kültürel, tarihi ve dini bağlara dayalı, hükümetler arası bir organizasyon olduğu için en iyi şekilde Hükümetler Arasıcılık ve İnşacılıkla açıklanır. Ancak, üyeler arasındaki ekonomik karşılıklı bağımlılık sınırlıdır ve enerji ve taşımacılık alanlarında yalnızca Türkiye ve Azerbaycan arasında önemli bağlar vardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı , Entegrasyon teorileri , Bölgeselcilik , Bölgeselleşme

Kaynakça

• Ab Rahman, A. H., Wan Ahmad, W. I., Ali, N., Ismail, D., & Adam, F. (2015). Modernization of Turkey under Kamal Ataturk. Asian Social Science, 11(4), 202–205. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n4p202
• Acharya, A. (2016). Regionalism beyond EU-centrism. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 109–130). Oxford University Press.
• Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003003003
• Akçali, P. (2003). Nation-state building in Central Asia: A lost case? Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 2(3), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1163/156915003322986334
• Akçora, Y. (1976). Üç Tarz-ı Siyaset. Türk Tarih Kurumu. http://aton.ttu.edu/pdf/uc_tarzi_siyaset.pdf
• A preferential trade agreement between Azerbaijan and Turkey has entered into force. (2021, March 1). Azerbaijan and World Trade Organization. https://wto.az/en/article/a-preferential-trade-agreement-between-azerbaijan-and-turkey-has-entered-into-force/80
• Aydin, E. (2007). The tension between secularism and democracy in Turkey: Early origins, current legacy. European View, 6(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-007-0017-3
• Aydın, M. (2005). Türkiye’nin Orta Asya ve Kafkaslar politikası. In M. Aydın (Ed.), Küresel politikada Orta Asya (Avrasya Üçlemesi I) (pp. 1–22). Nobel Yayınları.
• Azerbaijan’s January-November oil exports via BTC pipeline down 2.9%. (2024, December 18). Commersant. https://commersant.ge/en/news/finance/georgias-international-investment-position-worsened-by-3556-million-compared-to-the-previous-quarter-nbg
• Balassa, B. (2013). The theory of economic integration. Routledge.
• Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2016a). Introduction: Framework of the handbook and conceptual clarifications. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 3–15). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199682300.013.1
• Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2016b). The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199682300.001.0001
• Djanibekova, N. (2020, February 6). Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan border crises complicated by mutual distrust.
• Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/kyrgyzstan-kazakhstan-border-crises-complicated-by-mutual-distrust
• Erkan Aydın, M., & Liu, Y. (2024). Organization of Turkic States: Diverse motivations for a common aim. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 33(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2024.33.1363769
• Fawcett, L. (2012). The history and concept of regionalism (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2193746). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2193746
• Fehlings, S., & Karrar, H. H. (2022). Informal markets and trade in Central Asia and the Caucasus. In Informal markets and trade in Central Asia and the Caucasus (pp. 130–140). Routledge.
• File:Turkeli.png. (n.d.). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved February 23, 2025, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Turkeli.png
• Haas, E. B. (1958). The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces, 1950–1957. Stanford University Press.
• Haas, E. B. (1964). Beyond the nation-state: Functionalism and international organization. Stanford University Press.
• Hettne, B., Inotai, A., & Sunkel, O. (Eds.). (1999). Globalism and the new regionalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Heywood, A. (2011). Global politics. Palgrave Macmillan. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=TsQI0AEACAAJ
• Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe.
• Daedalus, 95(3), 862–915. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20027004
• Hurrell, A. (1995). Regionalism in theoretical perspective. In Regionalism in world politics: Regional organization and international order (pp. 37–73). Cornell University Press.
• Kaminski, B., & Mitra, S. (2012). Borderless bazaars and regional integration in Central Asia: Emerging patterns of trade and cross-border cooperation. World Bank Publications.
• Kazakhstan to scale up BTC pipeline oil exports thirteenfold. (n.d.). Caspian News. Retrieved January 1, 2025, from https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/kazakhstan-to-scale-up-btc-pipeline-oil-exports-thirteenfold-2024-11-27-0/
• Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
• Kocatepe, Ö. F. (2024). Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı politik ve askerî iş birliği. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Kudaibergenov, Z. (2022). Orta Asya Birleşik Enerji Sistemi’ndeki elektrik kesinti sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Avrasya Araştırma Enstitüsü. https://www.eurasian-research.org/publication/orta-asya-birlesik-enerji-sistemindeki-elektrik-kesinti-sorunlari-ve-cozum-onerileri/?lang=tr
• Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan to reopen Kara-Suu border crossing after 14-year closure. (2024, September 7). Kun.uz. https://kun.uz/en/news/2024/09/07/kyrgyzstan-and-uzbekistan-to-reopen-kara-suu-border-crossing-after-14-year-closure
• Lindberg, L. N. (1970). Political integration as a multidimensional phenomenon requiring multivariate measurement. International Organization, 24(4), 648–731. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:intorg:v:24:y:1970:i:04:p:648-731_01
• Luo, H. (2024, July 20). China-Europe Railway Express opens new southern route via Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway, cuts transit time. iChongqing. https://www.ichongqing.info/2024/07/20/china-europe-railway-express-opens-new-southern-route-via-baku-tbilisi-kars-railway-cuts-transit-time/
• Mitrany, D. (1943). A working peace system: An argument for the functional development of international organization. The Royal Institute of International Affairs; Oxford University Press.
• Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the Single European Act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community. International Organization, 45(1), 19–56. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706695
• Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Cornell University Press. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008341999&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
• Najibullah, F., & Eraliev, S. (2017). ‘It changes lives’: Families welcome reopening of Kyrgyz, Uzbek border posts. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. https://www.rferl.org/a/kyrgyzstan-uzbekistan-reopening-border-crossings-mirziyoev/28735887.html
• Nye, J. S. (1968). International regionalism: Readings. Little, Brown. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=67NCAAAAIAAJ
• Omuraliev, K. (2024, November 11). Empowering Turkic world: Highlights from 11th summit of Organization of Turkic States | Opinion. Daily Sabah. https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/op-ed/empowering-turkic-world-highlights-from-11th-summit-of-organization-of-turkic-states
• OTS member states have no negative stance toward Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. (2025, May 2). Apa.az. https://en.apa.az/foreign-policy/ots-member-states-have-no-negative-stance-toward-turkish-republic-of-northern-cyprus-binali-yildirim-466639
• Salihi, E., & Mehmetcik, H. (2025). Institutionalization of relationship and voting cohesion: A case study of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) at the UN General Assembly. Bilig, 112, Article 112. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.7668
• Smeets, S., & Beach, D. (2020). Intergovernmentalism and its implications – New institutional leadership in major EU reforms. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(8), 1137–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1699940
• Sorbello, P. (2025, April 18). Central Asia opens diplomatic rift with Türkiye over Cyprus. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2025/04/central-asia-opens-diplomatic-rift-with-turkiye-over-cyprus/
• Söderbaum, F. (2016). Old, new, and comparative regionalism: The history and scholarly development of the field. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 16–37). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199682300.013.2
• TANAP considers expansion to supply more gas to European markets. (2024, October 6). Pipeline Technology Journal. https://www.pipeline-journal.net/news/tanap-considers-expansion-supply-more-gas-european-markets
• Taninchev, S. B. (2015). Intergovernmental organizations, interaction, and member state interest convergence. International Interactions, 41(1), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2014.932784
• Tavares, R., & Schulz, M. (2006). Measuring the impact of regional organisations on peace building. In Assessment and measurement of regional integration. Routledge.
• The history. (2023, December 24). Assembly of Turkic-Speaking States. https://aots.ilerimun.com/study-guide/the-history
• Ulu Türk Kağanlığını kuramasak bile kuvvetli bir Türk birliği yapmalıyız. (2012, January). Hürriyet. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/19669519.asp
• Ünsal, H. (1989). Secularism and Atatürk's policy of secularism. Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi, 5(15), 595–606. https://atamdergi.gov.tr/ozet/322/eng
• Vahapzade, B. (1991). Azerbaycan—Türkiye. https://www.siirparki.com/bvahapzade6.html
• Yesevi, Ç. G. (2022). Examining the Organization of Turkic States: A teacher and norm-creator. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 27(1), Article 1. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/perception/issue/71446/1149277
• Zhambekov, N. (2015). Central Asian Union and the obstacles to integration in Central Asia. The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13116-central-asian-union-and-the-obstacles-to-integration-in-central-asia.html?tmpl=component&print=1
• Zuenko, I. (2020). Integration in post-Soviet Central Asia: Shadow-economy practices and the cross-Eurasian flow of commodities. In Shadow exchanges along the new Silk Roads (pp. 120–140). Cambridge University Press.