The Concept of Entrepreneurship As A Research Area In Business History: An Evaluation On Its Origins, Evolution and Its Effect On Culture and Values Abstract

Yıl 2020, , 357 - 376, 31.12.2020

Nurzahit Keskin

https://doi.org/10.31679/adamakademi.728397

Cited By: 1

Öz

There are some areas in the history of business which are overlooked by scientists

who claim that history is important or emphasize the importance of their professional

dependency. The purpose of this article is to consider the concept of entrepreneurship,

which is one of the most important examples of these research fields,

in a historical context. For this purpose, the chapter starts with a brief introduction

to the definition of entrepreneurship. Following the literature review in the

second chapter, the concept of entrepreneurship as a research area is examined in

the third chapter. In the fourth chapter, the origins and evolution of the historical development of entrepreneurship are discussed. In the fifth chapter, the effects of entrepreneurship on culture and values are analyzed. In the sixth chapter, a general evaluation is made and the study has been concluded.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurship, Business History, Entrepreneurship History, Enterprise Culture, Schumpeter, Alfred D. Chandler

İşletme Tarihi’nde Bir Araştırma Alanı Olarak Girişimcilik Kavramı: Kökenleri, Evrimi, Kültür ve Değerler Üzerindeki Etkisine Yönelik Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Tarihin önemli olduğunu öne süren ya da mesleki bağımlılıklarının önemini vurgulayan

bilim adamları tarafından işletme tarihinin gözden kaçırdığı bazı alanlar vardır.

Bu makalenin amacı, bu araştırma alanları içinde en önemli örneklerden birini teşkil

eden girişimcilik kavramını tarihsel bağlamda ele almaktır. Bu amaçla bölüm girişimciliğin

tanımına kısa bir giriş yaparak başlamaktadır. İkinci bölümde yapılan literatür

değerlendirmesine müteakip, üçüncü bölümde bir araştırma alanı olarak girişimcilik

kavramı incelenmiştir. Dördüncü bölümde girişimciliğin tarihsel gelişiminin kökenleri

ve evrimi ele alınmıştır. Beşinci bölümde girişimciliğin kültür ve değerler üzerindeki

etkileri analiz edilmiştir. Altıncı bölümde ise çalışma genel bir değerlendirme yapılarak

sonuçlandırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Girişimcilik, İşletme Tarihi, Girişimcilik Tarihi, Girişim Kültürü, Schumpeter, Alfred D. Chandler

Kaynakça

• Baron, A. R. (1998), “Cognitive Mechanisms in Entrepreneurship: Why and When Entrepreneurs Think Differently Other People”. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol: 13, Issue: 4, (s.275-294).
• Busenitz, L. W., Lau. C. M. (1997), “A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol: 20, (s.25-39).
• Cassis, Y., Minoglou, I. P. (2005), “Introduction”. Cassis, Y., Minoglou, I. P. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship in Theory and History, New York: Palgrave.
• Chandler, A. D. Jr. (1987), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.
• Jones, G., Madhwhani, R. D. (2008), “Entrepreneurship”. Jones, G., Zeitlin, J. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History, (s. 501-528), New York: Oxford University Press.
• Jones, G., Madhwhani, R. D. (2006), “Entrepreneurship and Business History: Renewing the Research Agenda”. Harward Business School Working Knowledge for Business Leaders Working Papers, Vol.07-007, (s.1-49).
• Jones, G., Zeitlin, J. (2008), “Introduction”. Jones, G. ve Zeitlin, J. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History, (s. 1-6), New York: Oxford University Press.
• Landström, H. (2002). “Pioneers in Entrepreneurship Research, New Frontiers of Entrepreneurship”. In New Frontiers of Entrepreneurship, Università Commerciale L. Bocconi, (s. 1-19).
• Landström, H., & Benner, M. (2010). “Entrepreneurship research: a history of scholarly migration”. In H. Landström, & F. Lohrke (Eds.), Historical Foundations of Entrepreneurship Research (s. 15-45). Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Lopez, G. A., Zozimo, R., Roman, S. E., Jack, L. S. (2016), “At the Crossroads. Management and Business History in Entrepreneurship Research”. Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business, Volume 2, Number 1, (s. 156-200).
• Ricketts, M. (2008), “Theories of Entrepreneurship: Historical Development and Critical Assessment”. Casson, M., Yeung, B., Basu, A., Wadeson, N. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship, (s. 33-58), ), New York: Oxford University Press.
• Galambos, L. (2007), “İşletme Tarihi’nin Kimliği ve Sınırları: Uzlaşma ve Yaratıcılık Hakkında Bir Makale”. Amatori, F. ve Jones, G. (Ed.), Dünya İşletme Tarihi, (s.23-44), İstanbul: Dost Kitabevi.
• Hayton, J. C., George, G. ve Zahra, S. A. (2002), “National Culture and Entrepreneurship: A Review of Behavioral Research”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol: 26, No:4, (s.33-52).
• Herrigel, G. (2008), “Corporate Governance”. Jones, G. ve Zeitlin, J. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History, (s. 470-497), New York: Oxford University Press. Hsu, D. H., Roberts, B. E ve Eesley, C. E. (2007), “ Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT”. Journal Of Research Policy, Vol:36, issue: 5, (s. 768-788).
• Hofstede, G., Bond, M. (1988), “The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol: 16, No: 4, (s. 5-21).
• Hofstede, G. (1984), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, (Abridged Edition), Newbury Park, London: Sage Publications.
• Makino, S., Neupert, K. E. (2000), “National culture, transaction costs, and the choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary”. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol:31, (s.705-713).
• Meyer, J. W. ve Rowan, B. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony”. American Journal Of Sociology, Vol:83, No: 2, (s.340-363).
• Mueller, L. S., Thomas, S. A. (2001), “Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness”. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol: 16, Issue 1, (s.51-75).
• Praag, C. M. V. (2005), “Introduction”, Successful Entrepreneurship Confronting Economic Theory with Empirical Practice, (s.3-11), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
• Ralston, D. A., Gustafson, D.J., Cheung, F., Terpstra, R. H. (1993), “Differences in managerial Values: A Study of US, Hong Kong and PRC Managers”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol: 24, No: 2, (s. 249-275).
• Reynolds, P. D., Camp, S. M., Bygrave, W. D., Autio, E., & Hay, M. (2001), “2001 Executive Report”. GEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Kansas MO.: Kauffman Foundation.
• Scott, W. R. (1975), “Organizational Structure”. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol:1, (s.1-20).
• Shane, S., Venkataraman, S. (2000), “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research”. Academy of Management of Review, Vol.25, No: 1, (s. 217-226).
• Swierczek, F.W., Quang, T. (2004), “Entrepreneurial Cultures in Asia: Business Policy or Cultural Imprevati”. Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol:12, No: 02, (s.127-145).
• Yasin, M. (1996), “Entrepreneurial Effectiveness and Achievement in Arab Culture”. Journal of Business Research, Vol: 35, No: 1, (s.69-77).