Evaluation of the effect of anterior aesthetic restorations on the quality of life

Yıl 2020, , 132 - 139, 30.08.2020

Derya Surmelioglu , Halime Kolsuz , Sevim Atılan Yavuz , Zeynep Çifçi , Mehmet Durdu , Zeynep Güngörmüş

https://doi.org/10.30569/adiyamansaglik.661009

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of aesthetic restorations on the quality of life of the patients using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) scale.
Materials and Methods: Sixty patients who applied to the Restorative Dentistry Department of Gaziantep University Faculty of Dentistry with aesthetic complaints in the anterior region were included in the study. The OHIP-14 scale was administered to the aesthetically rehabilitated patients before, after immediately and 1, 6 months after the treatment and scores were obtained. Data were evaluated by two-way repeated analysis of variance and Friedmann, Willcoxon tests.
Results: As a result of evaluating the total scores of the whole OHIP-14 scale, a significant difference was found between the data obtained before treatment and immediately after treatment, at 1 month and 6 months (p<0.05). There was a significant difference between the data obtained after all treatment (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Anterior esthetic restorations, has provided a positive impact on people's quality of life in the long term.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aesthetic restorations;, OHIP-14;, Quality of life;

Anterior estetik restorasyonların yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı anterior bölgede yapılan estetik restorasyonların hastaların yaşam kalitesi üzerine olan etkisinin Ağız Sağlığı Etki Profili (Oral Health Impact Profile, OHIP-14) ölçeği ile değerlendirilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Gaziantep Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı kliniğine anterior bölgedeki estetik şikayetleri sebebi ile başvuran 60 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Estetik olarak rehabilite edilen hastalara OHIP-14 ölçeği tedaviden önce, tedaviden hemen sonra ve 1, 6 ay sonrası uygulanmış elde edilen skorlar çift tekrarlayan ölçümlü varyans analizi ve Friedmann, ikili karşılaştırma Willcoxon testi ile değerlendirilmiştir.
Bulgular: Tüm OHIP-14 ölçek toplam skorlarının değerlendirilmesi sonucu, tedavi öncesi elde edilen veriler ile tedaviden hemen sonra, 1. ay ve 6. ay sonra elde edilen veriler arasında anlamlı farklılık bulundu (p<0,05). Yine tüm tedavi sonrası elde edilen veriler arasında da anlamlı farklılık vardı (p<0,05).
Sonuç: Anterior estetik restorasyonlar uzun dönemde, kişilerin yaşam kalitesi üzerine pozitif yönde etki sağlamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Estetik restorasyon, OHIP-14, Yaşam kalitesi ölçeği

Kaynakça

• 1. Adwere-Boamah J, Curtis DA. A confirmatory factor analysis of a four-factor model of adolescent concerns revisited. Journal of youth and adolescence. 1993;22(3):297-312.
• 2. Robertson A, Norén JG. Subjective Aspects of Patients with Traumatized Teeth A 15-Year Follow-Up Study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1997;55(3):142-147.
• 3. Synnott A. Truth and goodness, mirrors and masks--Part I: A sociology of beauty and the face. The British Journal of Sociology. 1989;40(4):607-636.
• 4. Baldwin DC. Appearance and aesthetics in oral health. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 1980;8(5):244-256.
• 5. Marcenes W, Ryda U. Socio-psychological aspects of traumatic dental injuries. Traumatic Injuries to the Teeth. 2007.
• 6. Kuyken W. The World Health Organisation quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organisation. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1409-1409.
• 7. Ersu B, Canay Ş, Akman S. İmplant destekli overdenture ve konvansiyonel tam profitez kullanımının yaşam kalitesine etkisi. SÜ Dişhek Fak Derg. 2007;16(3):39-43.
• 8. Allen PF. Assessment of oral health related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life outcomes. 2003;1(1):40.
• 9. Nuttall N, Steele J, Pine C, White D, Pitts N. Adult dental health survey: The impact of oral health on people in the UK in 1998. British Dental Journal. 2001;190(3):121.
• 10. Cibirka RM, Razzoog M, Lang BR. Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1997;78(6):574-581.
• 11. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the oral health impact profile. Community dental health. 1994;11(1):3-11.
• 12. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short‐form oral health impact profile. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 1997;25(4):284-290.
• 13. Mumcu G, Inanc N, Ergun T, et al. Oral health related quality of life is affected by disease activity in Behçet's disease. Oral diseases. 2006;12(2):145-151.
• 14. Preciado A, Del Río J, Suárez-García M-J, Montero J, Lynch CD, Castillo-Oyagüe R. Differences in impact of patient and prosthetic characteristics on oral health-related quality of life among implant-retained overdenture wearers. Journal of Dentistry. 2012;40(10):857-865.
• 15. Alkhatib M, Holt R, Bedi R. Prevalence of self-assessed tooth discolouration in the United Kingdom. Journal of dentistry. 2004;32(7):561-566.
• 16. Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005;83:661-669.
• 17. Bäckman B, Holm AK. Amelogenesis imperfecta: prevalence and incidence in a northern Swedish county. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 1986;14(1):43-47.
• 18. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operatıve Dentıstry-Unıversıty of Washıngton-. 2004;29:481-508.
• 19. Macedo G, Raj V, Ritter AV, Swift Jr EJ. Longevity of anterior composite restorations. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2006;18(6):310-311.
• 20. Tuncer D. Direkt Estetik Restorasyonlar. Turkiye Klinikleri Restorative Dentistry-Special Topics. 2017;3(2):66-75.
• 21. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Augmentation of incisor width with bonded composite resin: another look. Quintessence International. 1990;21(8).
• 22. Wallander JL, Schmitt M, Koot HM. Quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: issues, instruments, and applications. Journal of clinical psychology. 2001;57(4):571-585.
• 23. Dolan TA. Identification of appropriate outcomes for an aging population. Special care in Dentistry. 1993;13(1):35-39.
• 24. Slade GD. Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill. 1997;3.