The Evaluation of YouTubeTM Videos as an Option for Informing Patients on Postoperative Care Following Periodontal Plastic Surgery

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 113 - 122, 16.08.2024

Serap Karakış Akcan Büşra Terzioğlu

Öz

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and quality of YouTubeTM videos on postoperative care with a focus on periodontal soft tissue surgery.
Materials and Methods: A YouTubeTM search was performed using three keywords: "Post-op instructions gingival surgery”, “post-operative patient information gingival surgery”, and “What to do after gum surgery.” Video length, duration, total views, number of likes, dislikes, and comments were recorded. The interaction index, view rates, and video power index (VPI) were calculated. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) and Mod-DISCERN scales were used to assess the reliability and quality of the videos. Postoperative instructions were categorized for bleeding, medications, diet, daily activities, and oral hygiene, and an overall content usefulness score was also calculated.
Results: A total of 210 videos were evaluated and 32 videos were included in the study. While 29 of the videos were useful videos, 1 video had misleading video content. In addition, 2 videos were patient views. The mean GQS score of the videos was 3.53±0.94. According to the Mod-DISCERN score, 90.6% of the videos showed reliable sources and the purposes were clearly stated. The total content usefulness score was 3.22±1.68 for all videos, and the total Mod-Discern score was 2.87±1.09 and was higher for useful videos.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that videos on "postoperative care after periodontal plastic surgery" on YouTubeTM can be reliably useful. Content produced by non-professional users needs to be improved in terms of reliability and quality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Autografts, Plastic surgery, Postoperative period, Social media

Etik Beyan

The study did not require the approval of an Ethics board. It was conducted using a public website.

Periodontal Plastik Cerrahi Sonrası Postoperatif Bakım Konusunda Hastaların Bilgilendirilmesi için YouTubeTM Videolarının bir Seçenek Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, periodontal yumuşak doku cerrahisine odaklanarak postoperatif bakımla ilgili YouTubeTM videolarının güvenilirliğini ve kalitesini değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: YouTubeTM araması için üç anahtar kelime kullanıldı: "diş eti cerrahisi sonrası yapılması gerekenler", "postoperatif diş eti cerrahisi hasta bilgileri" ve "Dişeti cerrahisi sonrası ne yapılır". Video uzunluğu, süresi, toplam görüntülenme sayısı, beğenme sayısı, beğenmeme sayısı ve yorumlar kaydedildi. Etkileşim indeksi, görüntüleme oranları ve video güç indeksi (VPI) hesaplanmıştır. Videoların güvenilirliğini ve kalitesini değerlendirmek için Global Kalite Ölçeği (GQS) ve Mod-DISCERN ölçekleri kullanıldı. Ameliyat sonrası talimatlar kanama, ilaçlar, diyet, günlük aktiviteler ve ağız hijyeni için kategorize edildi ve genel kullanışlılık puanı da hesaplandı.
Bulgular: Toplam 210 video değerlendirildi ve 32 video çalışmaya dahil edildi. Videoların 29'u faydalı iken 1 video yanıltıcı video içeriğine sahipti. Ayrıca 2 video da hasta görüşüydü. Videoların ortalama GQS puanı 3.53±0.94 idi. Mod-DISCERN puanına göre videoların %90,6'sında güvenilir kaynaklar gösterilmiş ve amaçlar açıkça belirtilmiştir. Toplam içerik kullanışlılığı puanı tüm videolar için 3.22±1.68 ve toplam Mod-Discern puanı 2.87±1.09 idi ve kullanışlı videolar için daha yüksekti.
Sonuç: YouTubeTM'deki "periodontal plastik cerrahi sonrası postoperatif bakım" konulu videoların güvenilir bir şekilde faydalı olabileceği sonucuna varılabilir. Profesyonel olmayan kullanıcılar tarafından üretilen içeriklerin güvenilirlik ve kalite açısından iyileştirilmesi gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Otogreft, Plastik cerrahi, Postoperatif dönem, Sosyal medya

Etik Beyan

The study did not require the approval of an Ethics board. It was conducted using a public website.

Kaynakça

• Zucchelli G, Mounssif I. Periodontal plastic surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2015;68(1):333-68. doi: 10.1111/ prd.12059.
• Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, Rasperini G, Feinberg SE, Wang HL, Giannobile WV. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol. 2020;91(1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0350. Epub 2019 Oct 6.
• Pini Prato G, Di Gianfilippo R. Challenges and success in periodontal plastic surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 2023;50(12):1572-1581. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13869
• Miller PD. Root coverage grafting for regeneration and aesthetics. Periodontol 2000. 1993;1:118-127.
• Griffin TJ, Cheung WS, Zavras AI, Damoulis PD. Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 2006;77(12):2070-2079. doi:10.1902/jop.2006.050296
• Wessel JR, Tatakis DN. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J Periodontol. 2008;79(3):425-430. doi:10.1902/jop.2008.070325
• Buff LR, Bürklin T, Eickholz P, Mönting JS, Ratka- Krüger P. Does harvesting connective tissue grafts from the palate cause persistent sensory dysfunction? A pilot study. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(6):479-489.
• Mounssif I, Bentivogli V, Rendón A, et al. Patientreported outcome measures after periodontal surgery. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(12):7715-7724. doi:10.1007/ s00784-023-05362-y
• Jepsen K, Sculean A, Jepsen S. Complications and treatment errors related to regenerative periodontal surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2023;92(1):120-134. doi:10.1111/ prd.12504
• Palaiologou A, Kotsakis GA. Dentist-Patient Communication of Treatment Outcomes in Periodontal Practice: A Need for Dental Patient–Reported Outcomes. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020;20(2):101443. doi:10.1016/j. jebdp.2020.101443
• Patel AM, Richards PS, Wang HL, Inglehart MR. Surgical or non-surgical periodontal treatment: factors affecting patient decision making. J Periodontol. 2006;77(4):678-683. doi:10.1902/jop.2006.050206
• Blinder D, Rotenberg L, Peleg M, Taicher S. Patient compliance to instructions after oral surgical procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30(3):216-219. doi:10.1054/ijom.2000.0045
• Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis. 2016;22(3):202-208. doi:10.1111/odi.12434
• Kovalski LNS, Cardoso FB, D’Avila OP, et al. Is the YouTubeTM an useful source of information on oral leukoplakia? Oral Dis. 2019;25(8):1897-1905. doi:10.1111/odi.13161
• Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173- 194. doi:10.1177/1460458213512220
• Bizzi I, Ghezzi P, Paudyal P. Health information quality of websites on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(3):308-314. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12668
• Kaval ME, Sarsar F, Buduneli N, Güneri P. A sustainable, self-sufficient peer review algorithm for health-related YouTube videos: A proposal. Oral Dis. Published online March 13, 2023:odi.14555. doi:10.1111/ odi.14555
• Mohamed F, Shoufan A. Users’ experience with health-related content on YouTube: an exploratory study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):86. doi:10.1186/s12889- 023-17585-5
• de Oliveira Júnior AJ, Oliveira JM, Bretz YP, Mialhe FL. Online social networks for prevention and promotion of oral health: a systematic review. Can J Dent Hyg. 2023;57(2):83-97.
• Bengi VU, Saraç Atagün Ö, Ceylan Şen S, Özcan E, Paksoy T, Güler ÖŞ. How much information regarding gingival enlargement can we get from TikTok and YouTube? Spec Care Dentist. Published online January 4, 2024:scd.12957. doi:10.1111/scd.12957
• Rachmawati Y, Putri D, Hariyani N, Bahar A, Maharani D. Analysis of quality, usefulness, reliability, visibility, and popularity of videos about dental caries on YouTube: A cross-sectional analysis. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent. 2022;12(2):245. doi:10.4103/jispcd. JISPCD_246_21
• Saraç Atagün Ö, Ceylan Şen S, Paksoy T. Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information about dentin hypersensitivity. Int J Dental Hygiene. Published online August 25, 2023:idh.12723. doi:10.1111/idh.12723
• Sadry S, Meseli SE, Buyukbasaran E. Does the content quality of YouTube videos about aligners differ from the perspectives of dentists and orthodontists? APOS. 2023;13:215-222. doi:10.25259/APOS_14_2023
• Güler B, Özaltun B. Is YoutubeTM an accurate source of patient-information for awareness about periodontal diseases? d3000. 2021;9(1):23-35. doi:10.5195/ d3000.2021.134
• Ceylan Şen S, Paksoy T, Göller Bulut D, Ustaoğlu G. Does YouTube TM provide reliable information on oral candidiasis? Oral Dis. 2023;29(1):290-299. doi:10.1111/ odi.14338
• Meseli SE, Sadry S, Efe N. How reliable are YouTube videos on laser-assisted surgical treatment of the gummy smile? APOS. 2022;13:30-37. doi:10.25259/ APOS_155_2022
• Hamdan AA, Shaqman M, Abu Karaky A, Hassona Y, Bouchard P. Medical reliability of a video-sharing website: The gingival recession model. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23(2):175-183. doi:10.1111/eje.12417
• Di Spirito F, Giordano F, Di Palo MP, et al. Reliability and Accuracy of YouTube Peri-Implantitis Videos as an Educational Source for Patients in Population-Based Prevention Strategies. Healthcare. 2023;11(14):2094. doi:10.3390/healthcare11142094
• Ramadhani A, Zettira Z, Rachmawati YL, Hariyani N, Maharani DA. Quality and Reliability of Halitosis Videos on YouTube as a Source of Information. Dent J (Basel). 2021;9(10):120. doi:10.3390/dj9100120
• Yagci F. Evaluation of YouTube as an information source for denture care. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(4):623- 629. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.045
• Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82469. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0082469
• Lo AS, Esser MJ, Gordon KE. YouTube: a gauge of public perception and awareness surrounding epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;17(4):541-545. doi:10.1016/j. yebeh.2010.02.004
• Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FKL. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren’s syndrome? Oral Dis. 2016;22(3):196-201. doi:10.1111/ odi.12404
• Yalcin Ülker GM, Duygu G. Evaluation of YouTubeTM Videos as a Patient Education Source for Postoperative Care After Tooth Extraction Diş Çekimi Sonrası Postoperatif Bakım Için Hasta Eğitim Kaynağı Olarak YoutubeTM Videolarının Değerlendirilmesi. Aydın dental. 2015;9(3):89-102. doi:10.17932/IAU. DENTAL.2015.009/dental_v09i30010
• Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(9):1776-1783. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.004
• Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Isik BK. Are YouTube videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;121(6):661-664. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.022
• Bezner SK, Hodgman EI, Diesen DL, et al. Pediatric surgery on YouTubeTM: is the truth out there? J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(4):586-589. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.004
• Wainstein BK, Sterling-Levis K, Baker SA, Taitz J, Brydon M. Use of the Internet by parents of paediatric patients. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42(9):528-532. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00916.x
• Babayiğit O, Tastan Eroglu Z, Ozkan Sen D, Ucan Yarkac F. Potential Use of ChatGPT for Patient Information in Periodontology: A Descriptive Pilot Study. Cureus. Published online November 8, 2023. doi:10.7759/ cureus.48518
• Mueller SM, Hongler VNS, Jungo P, et al. Fiction, Falsehoods, and Few Facts: Cross-Sectional Study on the Content-Related Quality of Atopic Eczema-Related Videos on YouTube. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(4):e15599. doi:10.2196/15599
• Bakhishov H, Isler SC, Bozyel B, Yıldırım B, Tekindal MA, Ozdemir B. De-epithelialized gingival graft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions using the tunnel technique: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48(7):970-983. doi:10.1111/ jcpe.13452
• Zucchelli G, Mounssif I, Mazzotti C, et al. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative short- and long-term controlled randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(4):396-403. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12224