The Relationship Between Attachment and Conscious Awarness and the Reasons for Armanent in People Applying for Gun License

Öz

Introduction: The reasons for armament and the relations of mental pathologies are important for reducing individual armament. In our study, the relationship between attachment styles and mindfulness with gun license reasons was investigated. Method: 207 people who applied for a gun license and were eligible for a gun license were included in the study. The mindfulness scale and the experiences in close relationships inventory II were applied to the participants. Results: 50 (24.2%) of the participants want to get their gun license for hobby, 55 (26.6%) for professional, 77 (37.2%) for security and 25 (12%, 1) wants to get a gun license because the gun is inherited from the family. While there was a moderately large (effect size=0.49) significant difference between the groups in the mindfulness scale (p=0.018), no significant difference was found between the groups in the avoidant sub-dimension, anxious sub-dimension, and total score of the experiences in close relationships inventory (avoidant p=0.348; anxious p=0.29; total p=0.788). The level of mindfulness was found to be significantly lower in participants who applied for a gun license for security (p=0.011; p=0.019; p=0.029). Conclusion: Investigate the reasons for armament is important in order to reduce individual armament. In our study, conscious awareness was found to be lower in the participants who applied for security purposes in gun license applications. Psychological pathologies that may be the reason for armament should be well known by clinicians.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• shotguns
• mindfulness
• attachment

Silah Ruhsatı Almak için Başvuranlarda Bireysel Silahlanma Nedenleri ile Bağlanma Stilleri ve Bilinçli Farkındalık Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Giriş: Bireysel silahlanmanın azaltılmasında silahlanma nedenleri ve ruhsal patolojilerin ilişkileri önemlidir. Çalışmamızda silah ruhsatı için başvuran kişilerin silah ruhsatı alma nedenleriyle bağlanma stilleri ve bilinçli farkındalıklarının ilişkisi araştırılmıştır Yöntem: Çalışmaya silah ruhsatı başvurusunda bulunan ve silah ruhsatı almaya uygun olan 207 kişi dahil edilmiştir. Kişilere rutin klinik incelemelerin yanı sıra sosyodemografik veri formu, bilinçli farkındalık ölçeği ve yakın ilişkilerde yaşantılar envanteri II uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Katılımcıların 50’si (%24,2) silah ruhsatını kişisel hobi için, 55’i (%26,6) meslek gereği, 77’si (%37,2) bireysel güvenliğini sağlamak amaçlı almak istediğini belirtirken, 25’i (%12,1) silah aileden kaldığı için silah ruhsatı almak istemektedir. Bilinçli farkındalık ölçeğinde gruplar arasında orta büyüklükte (etki büyüklüğü=0,49) anlamlı farklılık saptanırken (p=0,018), yakın ilişkilerde yaşantılar envanterinin kaçıngan alt boyutu, kaygılı alt boyutu ve toplam puanında gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılık saptanmamıştır (kaçıngan p=0,348; kaygılı p=0,29; toplam p=0,788). Bireysel güvenlik amaçlı silah ruhsatı başvurusunda bulunan kişilerde bilinçli farkındalık düzeyleri anlamlı şekilde düşük bulunmuştur (p=0,011; p=0,019; p=0,029) Sonuç: Bireysel silahlanmanın azaltılması için silahlanma nedenlerinin araştırılması önemlidir. Çalışmamızda silah ruhsatı başvurularında güvenlik amacıyla başvuran kişilerde bilinçli farkındalık daha düşük bulunmuştur. Silahlanma nedeni olabilecek ruhsal patolojilerin klinisyenler tarafından iyi bilinmesi gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ateşli silahlar
• bağlanma
• bilinçli farkındalık

Kaynakça

1. Nansel TR, Overpeck M, Pilla RS, Ruan WJ, Simons-Morton B, Scheidt P. Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Jama. 2001;285(16):2094-100.
2. Orhan G, Yeter ÖB. Individual Armament as an Internal Security Threat: An Assessment of Turkey’s Position with Policy Alternatives [in Turkish]. ASSAM International Refereed Journal. 130-43.
3. Torun F, Torun SD, Yıldırım EA. Depression, anger, alexithymia and personality traits in applicants for gun license [in Turkish]. Evaluation. 2011;68(73.14):14-9.
4. Nacar EH, Gökkaya F. A Review Article on Attachment and Maternal Attachment [in Turkish]. Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology. 2019;1(1):50- 6.
5. Kesebir S, Kavzoğlu SÖ, Üstündağ MF. Attachment and psychopathology [in Turkish]. Current Approaches in Psychiatry. 2011;3(2):321-42.
6. Sümer N, Ünal S, Selçuk E, Kaya B, Polat R, Çekem B. Attachment and Psychopathology: The Relationship of Attachment Dimensions with Depression, Panic Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder [in Turkish]. Turkish Journal of Psychology. 2009;24(63).
7. Deniz M. The Relationships Between Attachment Styles with Child Abuses and Guilt-Shame in Adolescence [in Turkish]. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2006(22).
8. Xu M, Liu B, Gu R, Yang S, Wang H, Zhu X. Self-awareness buffers the consequences of negative feedback: Evidence from an ERP study. International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology. 2021; 164:9-16.

9. Lane MA, Cunningham SD, Ellen JM. The intention of adolescents to carry a knife or a gun: a study of low-income African-American adolescents. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. 2004;34(1):72-8.
10. DeSimone ME. Gun violence prevention and treatment: A challenge for NPs and NP educators. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 2022;34(1):3-4.
11. Batıgün AD, Büyükşahin A. Alexithymia: Psychological Symptoms and Attachment Styles [in Turkish]. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2008;11(3).
12. Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of personality social psychology. 2003;84(4):822.
13. Özyeşil Z, Arslan C, Kesici Ş, Deniz ME. Alexityhmia: Psychological Symptoms and Attachment Styles [in Turkish]. Education and Science. 2011;36(160).
14. Green SB, Salkind NJ, Green SB. Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. seventh edition ed. new jersey: Pearson Education; 2005.
15. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological bulletin. 1992;112(1):155-9.
16. Uysal C, Atli A, Kır ZM, Bulut M, Korkmaz M, Güneş M, Sivri S, Bulut K, Gören S. Evaluation of Applications to Dicle University Hospitals Health Board for Gun License: A Retrospective Study [in Turkish]. Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2013;28(2):97-107.
17. Atlı A, Bulut M, Uysal C, Kaya M, Karababa F, Güneş M, Beşaltı S, Bez Y, Sır A. Applications for Gun License Report: Sample of Şanlıurfa [in Turkish]. Mustafa Kemal University Medical Journal. 2012;3(12):28-38.
18. Özdeş T, Oral G, Cantürk N, Kumral B, Erkol ZZ. The sociodemographic characteristics and psychiatric profiles of the accused persons who committed crime by means of firearms [in Turkish]. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry. 2014.
19. Yasuntimur A, Öğünç Gİ. Individual Armament And Violence: The Current Status Of Firearm Violence [in Turkish]. Journal of Security Sciences. 2022;11(1):167- 200.
20. Warner TD, Thrash CR. A matter of degree? Fear, anxiety, and protective gun ownership in the United States. Social Science Quarterly. 2020;101(1):285-308.
21. Buttrick N. Protective Gun Ownership as a Coping Mechanism. Perspectives on psychological science: a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. 2020;15(4):835-55.
22. Özkan ZA. Types Of Doctor’s Reports And Their Issuance [in Turkish]. Yaşar Law Rewiev.3(1):4-54.
23. Melamed Y, Bauer A, Kalian M, Rosca P, Mester R. Assessing the risk of violent behavior before issuing a license to carry a handgun. The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 2011;39(4):543-8.
24. Deniz ME, Erus SM, Büyükcebeci A. Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence [in Turkish]. Turkish Psychological Counseling Guidance Journal. 2017;7(47):17-31.
25. Aktepe İ, Tolan Ö. Mindfulness: A Current Review. Current Approaches in Psychiatry [in Turkish]. 2020;12(4):534-61.
26. Lomas T, Medina JC, Ivtzan I, Rupprecht S, Eiroa-Orosa FJ. The impact of mindfulness on the wellbeing and performance of educators: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Teaching Teacher Education. 2017; 61:132-41.
27. Baer RA, Smith GT, Allen KB. Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment. 2004;11(3):191-206.
28. Mitchell R, Roberts R, Bartsch D, Sullivan T. Changes in mindfulness facets in a dialectical behaviour therapy skills training group program for borderline personality disorder. Journal of clinical psychology. 2019;75(6):958-69.
29. Carmona i Farrés C, Elices M, Soler J, Domínguez-Clavé E, Pomarol-Clotet E, Salvador R, Pascual JC. Effects of mindfulness training on borderline personality disorder: Impulsivity versus emotional dysregulation. Mindfulness. 2019;10(7):1243-54.
30. Shapiro SL, Brown KW, Biegel GM. Teaching self-care to caregivers: Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on the mental health of therapists in training. Training education in professional psychology. 2007;1(2):105.
31. Tüzün O, Sayar K. Attachment theory and psychopathology [in Turkish]. The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences. 2006;19(1):24-39.
32. Morsünbül Ü, Çok F. Attachment and related variables [in Turkish]. Current Approaches in Psychiatry. 2011;3(3):553-70.