Multidisipliner Ekipte Yer Alan Meslek Gruplarının Çocuk İstismar ve İhmaline İlişkin Görüş ve Tutumları

Öz

AMAÇ: Bu çalışma, multidisipliner ekipte yer alan meslek gruplarının çocuk istismar ve ihmali ÇİVİ konusunda görüş ve tutumlarını değerlendirmek amacıyla tanımlayıcı olarak yapılmıştır. YÖNTEMLER: Araştırmanın örneklemini Kayseri Kocasinan ve Melikgazi ilçelerindeki Adliye, Emniyet, Milli Eğitim, Sağlık ve Sosyal Hizmetler Müdürlüğü’nde çalışan 362 kişi oluşturmuştur. Veriler, tanıtıcı özellikler anket formu ve ÇİVİ’ye İlişkin Öyküleri İçeren Anket Formu ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde; tanımlayıcı istatistikler, Kruskal Wallis Varyans Analizi, MannWhitney U ve bu testlerin post-hoc testleri kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın yapılabilmesi için etik kurul, ilgili kurumlar ve katılımcılardan sözlü ve yazılı izin alınmıştır. BULGULAR: Multidisipliner ekipteki profesyoneller arasında ÇİVİ konusunda en az öğretmenlerin %18,5 , en fazla sosyal hizmet uzmanlarının %93,3 eğitim aldıkları belirlenmiştir. ÇİVİ ölçeğinde meslek grupları arasında, duygusal istismar alt ölçeğinde istatistiksel olarak önemli bir fark bulunmazken, fiziksel, cinsel, fiziksel olmayan istismar ve ihmal alt ölçekleri puan ortalamalarında gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli bir fark bulunmuştur p

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çocuk
• istismar ve ihmal
• multidisipliner ekip

Opinions and Attitudes of Occupational Groups Located in Multidisciplinary Team Related to Child Abuse and Neglect

Öz

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted descriptively to evaluate opinions and attitudes of occupational groups located in the multidisciplinary team about child abuse and neglect CAN . METHODS: The sample of study consisted of 362 people who work in administration of justice, police department, directorate of national education, directorate of health and social services that located in town Kocasinan and Melikgazi, Kayseri. The data were collected using a descriptive charac teristics questionnaire form and questionnaire form including narrations about CAN. The descriptive statistics, Kruskal Wallis, Mann-Whitney U and post-hoc tests were used for analyzing data. This study has been allowed to be done from Ethical Committee, the permission of the institutions and participants as oral and verbal. RESULTS: It was determined that teachers had received training at least 18.5% , social workers had received training 93.3% most between professionals in multidisciplinary team about CAN. Between occupational groups in CAN scale, while there was no difference statistically in emotional abuse subscales, there was a statistically significant difference between groups scores the mean scores of physical, sexual, non-physical abuse and neglect subscale p

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Child
• abuse and neglect
• multidisciplinary team

Kaynakça

1. WHO, Global status report on violence prevention 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/status_report/2014/report/report/en/. cited: 05 February 2015
2. Social Services and Child Protection Agency, Hallo 183 Consultation Line for Family, Women, Child, and Diabled. 2012 Activity Report [in Turkish], Available from: http://www. kadininstatusu.gov.tr/tr/html/19454/ALO-183-AILE-KADINCOCUK-VE-OZURLU-DANISMA-HATTI-FAALIYET-RAPORU. cited: 02 March 2013 .
3. WHO, Violence Prevention the Evidence 2009. Available from: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/ violence/4th_milestones_meeting/publications/en/ cited: 12 September 2013 .
4. Lalayants M, Epstein I. Evaluating multidisciplinary child abuse and neglect teams: a research agenda. Child Welfare 2005; 84 4 :433-58.
5. Morrison T, Partnership and collaboration: rhetoric and reality. Child Abuse Negl 1996;20 2 :127-40.
6. Naish J, Carter YH, Gray RW, Stevens T, Tissier JM, Gantley MM. Brief encounters of aggression and violence in primary care: a team approach to coping strategies. Fam Pract 2002;19 5 :504-10.
7. Thun-Hohenstein L. Interdisciplinary child protection team work in a hospital setting. Eur J Pediatr 2006;165 6 :402-7.
8. Child Protection Law. Available from: http://www.mevzuat. gov.tr/Metin.Aspx?MevzuatKod=1.5.5395&MevzuatIliski=0&so urceXmlSearch=. cited: 01 October 2013 .

9. Yağmur F, Balcı E. A Questionnaire to find out the level of knowledge of the primary health care workers in the city cen- ter and towns of Kayseri province on child abuse and neglect. Adli Bilimler Dergisi 2009;8 2 :7-11.
10. Lazenbatt A, Freeman R. Recognizing and reporting child physical abuse: a survey of primary healthcare professionals. J Adv Nurs 2006;56 3 :227-36.
11. Arıkan D, Yaman S, Çelebioğlu A. Knowledge of nurses on child neglect and abuse. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences 2000;3 2 :30-5.
12. Başbakkal Z, Baysan L. Evaluation of knowledge levels and ideas of polices about child abuse and neglect [in Turk- ish]. Çocuk Forumu Dergisi 2004;2:65-70.
13. O’Toole R, Webster SW, Lucal B, O’toole AW. Overreporting and underreporting of child abuse: Teachers’ use of professional discretion. Child Abuse Negl 2005;29 11 :1281-96.
14. Kelley SJ. Responsibility and management strategies in child sexual abuse: A comparison of child protective workers, nurses, and police officers. Child Welfare 1990;69 1 :43- 51.
15. McDaniel M. In the eye of the beholder: the role of reporters in bringing families to the attention of child protective services. Child Youth Serv Rev 2006;28 3 :306-24.
16. Kara Ö, Çalışkan D, Suskan E. Comparison of the levels of knowledge and approaches in relation with child abuse and neglect in residents of pediatrics, pediatricians and practitioners working in the province of Ankara. Türk Ped Arş 2014;49 1 :57-65.
17. Kocaer Ü. Awareness levels of physicians and nurses on child abuse and neglect Unpublished Thesis [in Turkish]. Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, 2006.
18. Akçay Ş. Research on determining knowledge, experience, and behaviors of last term medical faculty students working in pediatry departments or trauma and emergency surgery units of Medical Faculties of Istanbul University, on child neglect and abuse Unpublished thesis [in Turkish]. Family Medicine Department, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, 2008.
19. Gölge ZB, Hamzaoğlu N, Türk B. Assesment of medical staff awareness about child abuse and neglect. J Foren Med 2012;26 2 :86-96.
20. Goebbels A, Nicholson J, Walsh K, De Vries H. Teachers’ reporting of suspected child abuse and neglect: Behaviour and determinants. Health Educ Res 2008;23 6 :941-51.
21. Feng JY, Fetzer S, Chen YW, Yeh L, Huang MC. Multidisciplinary collaboration reporting child abuse: A grounded theory study. Int J Nurs Stud 2010;47:1483-90.
22. Kürklü A. Awareness levels of teachers on child abuse and neglect Unpublished thesis [in Turkish]. Department of Pediatric Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, 2011.
23. Zeytinoğlu S. Ideas of workers of health, social services, law and teaching about child abuse and neglect problem in Turkey. Abstract Book of 1st National Congress on Protecting Children from Maltreatment [in Turkish]. Ankara: Gözde Repro Ofset, 1991:63-170.
24. Uysal A, Ferah E. Evaluation of ideas and attitudes of Law Faculty students on child abuse and neglect. 4th Kapadokya Forensic Sciences Congress, 29 November-2 December 2007, Avanos, Turkey.
25. Bozbeyoğlu AÇ, Koyuncu E, Sezgin AU, Kardam F, Sungur A. Understanding the Incest Problem in Turkey [in Turkish]. Ankara: Damla Press, Advertising & Publication Ltd, 2009.
26. Uysal A, Özsoy A. Ideas and attitudes of teachers on short stories including child abuse and neglect subjects [in Turkish]. Çocuk Forumu 2003;1 6 :34-40.
27. Collier AF, McClure FH, Collier J, Otto C, Polloi A. Culture-specific views of child maltreatment and parenting styles in a pacific-island community. Child Abuse Negl 1999;23 3 :229-44.
28. Davey RI, Hıll J. Study of the variability of training and beliefs among professionals who interview children to investigate suspected sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl 1995;19 8 :933-42.
29. Finkelhor D, Ormrod R, Turner H, Hamby S. School, police, and medical authority involvement with children who have experienced victimization. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165 1 :9-15.
30. Segal UA, Iwa Y. Perceptions of child abuse: A comparison of three professional groups in Japan. Child Soc 2004;18 1 :16-29.
31. Pala B. Knowledge and awareness levels of future’s teachers on child abuse and neglect Unpublished thesis [in Turkish]. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir Osmangaizi University, Eskisehir, 2011.
32. Sağır M. Ideas and awareness levels of preschool teachers and form tutors on child abuse and neglect Kayseri exemplar Unpublished thesis [in Turkish]. Division of Educational Administration, Supervisin, Planning and Economics, Department of Educatinoal Sciences, Institute of Educational Sciences, Erciyes University, Kayseri, 2013.
33. Turkish Statistics Institute, Research on Family Struc- ture 2006, Avaliable from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Kitap. do?metod=KitapDetay&KT_ID=11&KITAP_ID=16. cited: 21 December 2013 .
34. Research on Child Abuse and Domestic Violence in Tur- key. Available from: http://atud.org.tr/kutuphane/unisefrapor. pdf, cited: 21 December 2013 .
35. 2014 research final report on evaluation of social and eco- nomic support services, Ministry of Family and Social Policy, Republic of Turkey. Available from: http://cocukhizmetleri. aile.gov.tr/data/54ad4cd6369dc5dac028bda2/sed-nihai%20 rapor-sonhali27-aralik2014.pdf. cited: 02 January 2015 .
36. Akman M. Strength of primary care in Turkey. Türk Aile Hek Derg 2014;18 2 :70-8.
37. Surveillance report on violation of child rights. Available from: http://www.gocvakfi.org.tr/tr/raporlar/63-2013-cocuk- hak-ihlalleri-izleme-raporu.html. cited: 02 August 2014 .
38. Sözduyar H. Evaluation of ideas of teachers working in ele- mentary or secondary education on child abuse Unpublished thesis [in Turkish]. Institute of Social Sciences, Ege University, İzmir, 1989.