Electroshock Weapons: Safety Tool or Source of Danger? (Two Case Reports)

Öz

Introduction and Purpose: Electroshock weapons have gained significant popularity among law enforcement agencies and civilians in recent years, though they have also sparked controversy due to potential misuse. These devices are portable instruments designed to temporarily incapacitate a target by delivering a high-voltage, low-amperage electric current. Common types include Tasers, stun guns, and stun batons. This study presents two cases in which individuals sought medical attention due to injuries inflicted by electroshock weapons, with the goal of preparing forensic reports. Cases: The first case involved an individual presenting with blunt traumatic lesions on the occipital region of the head and the second finger of the right hand, in addition to skin injuries associated with the use of an electroshock weapon on the left arm and left leg. In the second case, lesions were observed on the right ear auricula and lateral right eye as a result of blunt traumatic impact, although no lesion attributable to the electroshock weapon itself was documented. Discussion and Conclusion: The use of low-quality or untested electroshock weapons can lead to unintended harm, including both electrical effects and blunt traumatic injuries. Careful monitoring is essential, particularly for individuals at heightened risk. Injured individuals should undergo thorough examination for dart/probe penetrations, skin burns, and blunt traumatic injuries, with detailed documentation of any typical skin lesions observed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Forensic medicine
• Electroshock
• Weapons
• TASER Injuries

Elektroşok Silahları: Güvenlik Aracı mı, Tehlike Kaynağı mı? (İki Olgu Sunumu)

Öz

Giriş ve Amaç: Elektroşok silahları, son yıllarda hem güvenlik güçleri hem de sivil bireyler arasında popülerlik kazanmış ancak beraberinde tartışmalara yol açmıştır. Bu silahlar, yüksek voltajlı düşük amperli elektrik akımıyla, hedefi geçici olarak etkisiz hale getirmeyi amaçlayan taşınabilir cihazlardır. Taser, şok cihazı ve şok copu gibi çeşitleri bulunur. Bu çalışmada elektroşok silahı ile yaralanma öyküsü olup haklarında adli rapor düzenlenen 2 olgu sunulmuştur. Olgular: 1. olguda; kafa oksipital bölgede ve sağ el 2. parmakta künt travmatik etkiye bağlı lezyonlar ile sol kol ve sol bacakta elektroşok silahına bağlı cilt yaralanmaları mevcutken, 2. olguda sağ kulak kepçesinde ve sağ göz kenarında künt travmatik etkiye bağlı lezyonlar görülmüş, elektroşok tabancasına bağlı lezyon kaydedilmemiştir. Tartışma ve Sonuç: Elektroşok silahlarının kalitesiz olması veya test edilmemiş olması beklenenden fazla zarara yol açabilir. Elektrik etkisinin yanı sıra künt travmatik yaralanmalar da oluşabilir. Özellikle risk grubundaki kişilerin takibi önemlidir. Yaralananlar dart/prob penetrasyonu, cilt yanıkları ve künt travmatik yaralanmalar açısından taranmalı, tipik olabilecek cilt lezyonları kaydedilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Adli tıp
• Elektroşok
• silah
• TASER yaralanmaları

Kaynakça

1. Talapins S, Agafonovs E. Theoretical and practical aspects of use of electroshock weapon. Border security and management. 2020;3(8):35-44
2. Paulter N, Jenkins D, Ichikawa N. Electroshock weapon measurements: instrumentation requirements and limitations. Journal of Biomedical Systems & Emerging Technologies. 2017;4(1):1000113
3. Robinson MN, Brooks CG, Renshaw GD. Electric Shock Devices and Their Effects on the Human Body. Med Sci Law. Ekim 1990;30(4):285-300
4. Dermengiu D, Hostiuc S, Curcă GC. Electroshock weapons: physiologic and pathologic effects. Rom J Leg Med. 2008;16(3):187-93
5. Kroll MW, Brave MA, Pratt HMO, Witte KK, Kunz SN, Luceri RM. Benefits, risks, and myths of TASER® handheld electrical weapons. Human Factors and Mechanical Engineering for Defense and Safety. 2019;3:1-13
6. Ho JD, Miner JR, Lakireddy DR, Bultman LL, Heegaard WG. Cardiovascular and Physiologic Effects of Conducted Electrical Weapon Discharge in Resting Adults. Academic Emergency Medicine. Haziran 2006;13(6):589-95
7. Ho J, Dawes D, Miner J, Kunz S, Nelson R, Sweeney J. Conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task as a function of probe spread. Forensic science, medicine, and pathology. 2012;8:358-66
8. Kroll MW, Adamec J, Wetli CV, Williams HE. Fatal traumatic brain injury with electrical weapon falls. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2016;43:12-9

9. Bozeman WP, Hauda II WE, Heck JJ, Graham Jr DD, Martin BP, Winslow JE. Safety and injury profile of conducted electrical weapons used by law enforcement officers against criminal suspects. Annals of emergency medicine. 2009;53(4):480-9
10. Vilke GM, Bozeman WP, Chan TC. Emergency department evaluation after conducted energy weapon use: review of the literature for the clinician. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2011;40(5):598-604
11. TCK Yaralanma Rehberi. Available at: https://www.atk.gov.tr/tckyaralama24-06-19.pdf. (cited: 14 March 2024)
12. Multerer S, Berkenbosch JW, Das B, Johnsrude C. Atrial fibrillation after taser exposure in a previously healthy adolescent. Pediatric emergency care. 2009;25(12):851-3
13. Williams HE, Reinhard D, Oriola TB. Fatal officer involved shootings following the use of TASER conducted energy weapons. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles. Aralık 2022;95(4):713-33
14. Russell C. Excited Delirium Syndrome. Australian Prison Reform Journal. 2022;(2):3
15. McGuinness T, Lipsedge M. ‘Excited Delirium’, acute behavioural disturbance, death and diagnosis. Psychological medicine. 2022;52(9):1601-11
16. TPD Basın Açıklaması: Elektrikli Kontrol Tabancaları - Türkiye Psikiyatri Derneği (TPD). Available at: https://psikiyatri.org.tr/basin/446/tpd-basin-aciklamasi-elektrikli-kontrol-tabancalari. (cited: 14 March 2024)
17. T.C. Anayasa Mahkemesi. Available at: https://kararlarbilgibankasi.anayasa.gov.tr/BB/2015/10942. (cited: 14 March 2024)