Zygomatic Implants on Youtube: Analyzing the Content and Usefulness of Videos

Yıl 2024, , 141 - 148, 26.01.2024

Tuğçe Çevik Sönmez , Esra Mavi

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1355305

Öz

Aim: This research intended to assess the quality of information acquired from YouTube videos concerning the zygomatic implant.
Material and Method: 'Zygomatic implant' was selected as the search term for YouTube videos. The first 200 videos were reviewed. After exceptions, the rest of them (n=57) were evaluated regarding the content's usefulness according to 8 titles by two researchers. The videos were classified as poor (0), moderate (1), and excellent (2) based on the content score. All videos were grouped according to upload sources (healthcare professionals, health companies, or others) and types (patient experience, educational, or scientifically incorrect). Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, and Pearson's tests were performed for data analysis (p<0.05).
Results: The mean usefulness score of the included videos was 0.77. When the video demographic data were compared with the usefulness score, the number of views of excellent and moderate videos was higher than poor videos (p=0.017 p=0.033, respectively), the number of likes for moderate videos was significantly higher than poor videos (p=0.005). There was a statistically significant difference between video type and usefulness score (p<0.05).The most informed topics were indications and advantages, contraindications were never mentioned.
Conclusion: YouTube videos on zygomatic implants were the limited source for patient education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Internet, Patient education, Social media, Video, YouTube, Zygomatic implant

Youtube'da Zigomatik İmplantlar: Videoların İçeriğini ve Kullanışlılığını Analiz Etme

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırma, zigomatik implant ile ilgili YouTube videolarından elde edilen bilgilerin kalitesini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: YouTube videoları için arama terimi olarak 'zigomatik implant' seçildi. İlk 200 video incelendi. İstisnalar dışında geri kalanlar (n=57) iki araştırmacı tarafından 8 başlığa göre içeriğin kullanışlılığı açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Videolar içerik puanına göre zayıf (0), orta (1) ve mükemmel (2) olarak sınıflandırıldı. Tüm videolar, yükleme kaynaklarına (sağlık uzmanları, sağlık şirketleri veya diğerleri) ve türlerine (hasta deneyimi, eğitimsel veya bilimsel olarak yanlış) göre gruplandırıldı. Verilerin analizinde Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Ki-kare ve Pearson testleri uygulandı (p<0,05).
Bulgular: Dahil edilen videoların ortalama kullanışlılık puanı 0,77 idi. Video demografik verileri kullanışlılık puanıyla karşılaştırıldığında, mükemmel ve orta dereceli videoların izlenme sayısının kötü videolardan daha yüksek olduğu (sırasıyla p=0,017 p=0,033), orta dereceli videoların beğeni sayısının kötü videolardan anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğu görüldü. (p=0,005). Video türü ile kullanışlılık puanı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark vardı (p<0,05). En çok bilgi verilen konular endikasyonlar ve avantajlardı, kontrendikasyonlardan hiç bahsedilmedi.
Sonuç: Zigomatik implantlarla ilgili YouTube videoları hasta eğitimi için sınırlı kaynaktı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İnternet, Hasta eğitimi, Sosyal medya, Video, Youtube, Zigomatik implant

Kaynakça

• Referans1. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015;21:173-94.
• Referans2. Özdal Zincir Ö, Bozkurt AP, Gaş S. Potential Patient Education of YouTube Videos Related to Wisdom Tooth Surgical Removal. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:e481-4.
• Referans3. Kurian N, Varghese KG, Daniel S, Varghese VS, Kaur T, Verma R. Are YouTube videos on complete arch fixed implantsupported prostheses useful for patient education? J Prosthet Dent 2022;S0022-3913:00138-X.
• Referans4. Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube TM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2018;23:e463-8.
• Referans5. Aparicio C, López-Píriz R, Peñarrocha M. Preoperative Evaluation and Treatment Planning. Zygomatic Implant Critical Zone (ZICZ) Location. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2021;29:185-202.
• Referans6. Rosenstein J, Dym H. Zygomatic Implants: A Solution for the Atrophic Maxilla: 2021 Update. Dent Clin North Am 2021;65:229- 39.
• Referans7. Block MS, Haggerty CJ, Fisher GR. Nongrafting implant options for restoration of the edentulous maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:872-81.
• Referans8. Hinze M, Vrielinck L, Thalmair T, Wachtel H, Bolz W. Zygomatic implant placement in conjunction with sinus bone grafting: the “extended sinus elevation technique.” a case-cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:e376-85.
• Referans9. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Survival and Complications of Zygomatic Implants: An Updated Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:1949-64.
• Referans10. Brånemark PI, Gröndahl K, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Petruson B, Svensson B et al. Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: technique and long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2004;38:70-85.
• Referans11. Alterman M, Fleissig Y, Casap N. Zygomatic Implants: Placement Considerations in Implant-Supported Maxillary Prosthesis. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2021;29:173- 83.
• Referans12. Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Lownie JF, Blackbeard GA. Surgical modifications to the Brånemark zygomaticus protocol in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:232-7.
• Referans13. Ishak MI, Abdul Kadir MR. Treatment options for severely atrophic maxillae. Biomechanics in dentistry: evaluation of different surgical approaches to treat atrophic maxilla patients. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
• Referans14. Paksoy T, Gaş S. Quality and Content of YouTubeTM Videos Related to Sinus Lift Surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology 2021;33: 48-52.
• Referans15. Menziletoğlu D, Güler AY, Işık BK. Gömülü Yirmi Yaş Dişi İle İlgili Youtube Videoları Hastalar İçin Yararlı Mı?: Kesitsel Bir Çalışma. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Dergisi 2022;4:12-6.
• Referans16. Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. YouTube™ as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod 2017;44:90-6.
• Referans17. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patientinformation source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2016;49:1194-200.
• Referans18. Özkan E, Acar AH. YouTube™ as a Source of Information for Patients Regarding Dental Implant Failure: A Content Analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2022;33:2100-3.
• Referans19. Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:1776-83.
• Referans20. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren’s syndrome?. Oral Dis 2016;22:196-201.
• Referans21. Yağcı F. Sabit Protetik Restorasyonlar İçin Bilgi Kaynağı Olarak Youtube’un Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Health Sciences/ Erciyes Üniversitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi 2021;30:191-9.
• Referans22. Ramezanzade S, Yates J, Tuminelli FJ, Keyhan SO, Yousefi P, Lopez-Lopez J. Zygomatic implants placed in atrophic maxilla: an overview of current systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;43:1.
• Referans23. Atilla AO, Öztürk T. Evaluation of YouTube internet platform that can be used as information source for upper jaw expansion procedure with video analysis. Selcuk Dental Journal 2020;7:494-9.