A New Material in Dentistry: Giomers

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 1543 - 1548, 01.12.2017

Nurgül Demir

Öz

Especially with the developments in the treatment of the vital pulp, studies on restorative materials have focused on biocompatible materials. In recent years, giomers are produced by using the Pre-Reactive Glass PRG technology in which GISs are used as fillers on the basis of biocompatibility property of conventional glass ionomers. PRG particles included in the resin matrix of giomers are responsible for their physical and esthetic properties that are comparable to those of traditional composites while also providing remineralisation of the dental tissue exposed to fluoride. In addition to the restoration of permanent and primary teeth, there are different products for clinical applications such as coating of the cavity floor and covering of the pits and fissures. This review summarizes the physical and clinical properties of giomers which is a newcomer in dentistry

Anahtar Kelimeler

Giomer, PRG, clinical performance

Diş Hekimliğinde Yeni Bir Materyal: Giomerler

Öz

Vital pulpa tedavisindeki ilerlemelerle birlikte restoratif materyaller üzerindeki çalışmalar biyouyumlu materyaller üzerinde yoğunlaşmıştır. Son yıllarda geleneksel özelliğinden yola çıkılarak önceden reaksiyona girmiş cam doldurucu Pre-Reacted Glass fillerPRG teknolojisi ile üretilen giomerler geliştirilmiştir. Rezin matriks içine eklenen PRG partikülleri giomere geleneksel kompozitlerle kıyaslanabilecek fiziksel ve estetik özellikler kazandırırken, diş dokusunun remineralizasyonunu da sağlamaktadır. Giomerlerin daimi diş ve süt dişi restorasyonlarının yanı sıra kavite tabanının kaplanması, pit ve fissürlerin örtülmesi gibi farklı klinik uygulamalar için piyasaya sürülen preparatları da bulunmaktadır. Bu derleme diş hekimliği materyalleri arasına yeni katılan giomerlerin klinik ve fiziksel özelliklerini özetlemektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Giomer, PRG, klinik performans

Kaynakça

• Coutinho E, Cardoso MV, De Munck J, Neves AA, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lamb- rechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-fil- led resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1347-57.
• Burke FM, Ray NJ, McConnell RJ. Fluoride- containing restorative materials. Int Dent J. 2006;56:33-43.
• Kimyai S, Savadi-Oskoee S, Ajami AA, Sadr A, Asdagh S. Effect of three prophylaxis methods on surface roughness of giomer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e110-4.
• Ikemura K, Tay FR, Endo T, Pashley DH. A revi- ew of chemical-approach and ultramorpholo- gical studies on the development of fluoride-re- leasing dental adhesives comprising new pre- reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers. Dent Mater J. 2008;27:315-39.
• Okuyama K, Murata Y, Pereira PN, Miguez PA, Komatsu H, Sano H. Fluoride release and uptake by various dental materials after fluoride applica- tion. Am J Dent. 2006;19:123-7.
• Sunico MC, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer res- torations. Oper Dent. 2005;30:282-9.
• Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Vasquez O, Watson RE, Wil- son N. Self-etching primer and resin-based res- torative material: Two-year clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14:296-302.
• Gordan VV, Mjör IA. Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer. Oper Dent. 2002;27:543-8.
• Gordan VV, Shen C, Watson RE, Mjör IA. Four- year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material. Am J Dent. 2005;18:45-9.
• Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Watson RE, Garvan C, Mjor IA. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: Results at eight years. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:621- 7.
• Matis BA, Cochran MJ, Carlson TJ, Guba C, Eckert GJ. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:451-7.
• Abdel-Karim UM, El-Eraky M, Etman WM. Three- year clinical evaluation of two nano-hybrid giomer restorative composites. Tanta Dent J. 2014;11:213-22.
• Kurokawa H, Takamizawa T, Rikuta A, Tsubo- ta K, Miyazaki M. Three year clinical evaluati- on of posterior composite restorations placed with a single-step self-etch adhesive. J Oral Sci. 2015;57:101-8.
• Yap AU, Mok BY. Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material. Oper Dent. 2002;27:161-6.
• Tamilselvam S, Divyanand MJ, Neelakantan P. Bi- ocompatibility of a conventional glass ionomer, ceramic reinforced glass ionomer, giomer and resin composite to fibroblasts: In vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;37:403-6.
• Mohamed-Tahir MA, Tan HY, Woo AA, Yap AU. Effects of pH on the microhardness of resin-based restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2005;30:661- 6.
• Lazaridou D, Belli R, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Loh- bauer U. Dental materials for primary dentiti- on: Are they suitable for occlusal restorations? A two-body wear study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:165-72.
• Bansal R, Bansal T. A comparative evaluation of the amount of fluoride release ad re-release after recharging from aesthetic restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:ZC11- 4.
• Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Flu- oride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater. 2004;20:789- 95.
• Yap AU, Tham SY, Zhu LY, Lee HK. Short-term flu- oride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2002;27:259-65.
• Saku S, Kotake H, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Hotta M, Horiuchi S, Hamada K, Asaoka K, Tanaka E, Yamamato K. Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler partic- les. Dent Mater J. 2010;29:193-8.
• Journal of Clinical Sciences
• Kooi TJM, Tan QZ, Yap AU, Guo W, Tay KJ, Soh MS. Effects of food-simulating liquids on surfa- ce properties of giomer restoratives. Oper Dent. 2012;37:665-71.
• Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Siriporananon C, Ornprasert N, Mettasitthikorn W, Likhitpreeda S, Waewsanga S. The effect of different beverages on surface hardness of nanohybrid resin compo- site and giomer. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17:261– 5.
• Bani M, Öztaş N. Cam iyonomer içerikli farklı res- toratif materyallerin yüzey pürüzlülüklerinin de- ğerlendirilmesi. Acta Odontol Turc. 2013;30:13- 7.
• Tian F, Yap AU, Wang X, Gao X. Effect of sta- ining solutions on color of pre-reacted glass- ionomer containing composites. Dent Mater J. 2012;31:384-8.
• Tan BL, Yap AU, Ma HN, Chew J, Tan WJ. Ef- fect of beverages on color and translucency of new tooth-colored restoratives. Oper Dent. 2015;40:55-65.
• Tarasingh P, Reddy JS, Suhasini K, Hemachand- rika I. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of resin-modified glass ionomers, com- pomers and giomers-an invitro study. J Clin Di- agn Res. 2015;9:ZC85-7.
• Sulaiman E, Yeo YM, Chong YT. The flexural strengths of five commercially available tooth- coloured restorative materials. Annal Dent Univ Malaya. 2007;14:39-45.
• Yamazaki T, Schricker SR, Brantley WA, Culbert- son BM, Johnston W. Viscoelastic behavior and fracture toughness of six glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96:266-72.
• Yadav G, Rehani U, Rana V. A comparative evalu- ation of marginal leakage of different restorative materials in deciduous molars: An in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;5:101-7.