Evaluatıon of Translucency Parameter of Different Thickness of two CAD/CAM Materials

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 115 - 122, 18.05.2022

Mohamed Amar Hwidi , Mine Betül Üçtaşlı

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1059137

Öz

ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the optical properties of 4 different thicknesses of two different lithium disilicate glass ceramic and resin nano ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials with the value of the translucency parameter. Material and Methods: A total of 80 disks, specimens were prepared from high translucency (HT) A1 color lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max® CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Lihtenstein) and resin nano-ceramic (CERASMART™ CAD, GC, Tokyo, Japonya) CAD/CAM blocks at 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2 mm thicknesses (n=10) (14x12 mm2). The surfaces of the test samples were grinded with 600, 800 and 1200 grain silicon carbide abrasives under water cooling. After ultrasonic cleaning, the thicknesses of the test samples were checked with a digital caliper. Crystallization and glazing process was performed on the outer surfaces of the lithium disilicate glass ceramic samples, and the outer surfaces of the resin nano-ceramic samples were polished by polishing paste with the help of silicon discs. After glazins and polishing process were completed, the thicknesses of the samples were rechecked and the color measurements of the test samples were performed with a clinical spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade® V). All samples were evaluated on white and black backgrounds for the determination of the translucency parameter (TP) according to the CIE L*a*b* system. The spectrophotometer was calibrated before each measurement. Measurements were repeated 3 times for each sample and the average of the measurements was calculated. Results: There were a statistically significant difference in TP measurement between different thicknesses in all variables (p<0.05). A statistically significant difference was found in TP measurement between different materials in all variables (p<0.05). Conclusion: All test samples were significantly affected by the thickness. TP values were decreased when the thickness of the test specimens were increased. The tested resin-nano-ceramic (CERASMART) samples exhibited higher TP values than the lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic samples in the same thickness groups.

Anahtar Kelimeler

CAD/CAM glass ceramic, CAD/CAM rezin-ceramic, Spektrofotometre, Translucency Parameter

İki Farklı CAD/CAM Materyalinin Farklı Kalınlıklarda Translusensi Özelliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: İki farklı CAD/CAM restoratif materyalin 4 farklı kalınlıkta optik özelliklerini translusensi parametre değeri ile değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Lityum disilikat ile güçlendirilmiş cam seramik (IPS e.max® CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lihtenştayn) ve rezin nano-seramik (CERASMART™ CAD, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japonya) CAD/CAM restoratif materyallerin, yüksek translusensi (HT) özelliğine sahip A1 renk bloklarından 0.50, 1.00, 1.50 ve 2.00 mm kalınlıkta 80 adet (n=10) (14x12 mm) örnek elde edildi. Farklı kalınlıktaki test örneklerinin üst yüzeyleri grenli silikon karbid zımprası ile su soğutması altında zımparalandı, ultrasonik temizlemeyi takiben, test örneklerinin kalınlıkları dijital kumpas ile kontrol edildi. Lityum disilikat ile güçlendirilmiş cam seramik örnekleri dış yüzeylerine kristalizasyon ve glazür işlemi, rezin nano-seramik örneklerinin üst yüzeylerine ise silikon diskler ve polisaj patı ile polisaj işlemi gerçekleştirildi. Glazür ve polisaj işlemi tamamlanan örneklerin kalınlıkları tekrar kontrol edildikten sonra test örneklerinin renk ölçümleri klinik spektrofotometre cihazı (VITA Easyshade® V) ile gerçekleştirildi. CIE L*a*b* sistemine göre translusensi parametresinin (TP) ölçümlerinin ortalaması alındı.

Bulgular: Tüm değişkenlerde farklı kalınlıklar arasında TP ölçümü bakımından istatistiksel anlamlı fark saptandı (p<0.05). Tüm değişkenlerde farklı materyaller arasında TP ölçümü arasında istatistiksel anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0.05).

Sonuç: Kalınlık, bütün test örneklerinin TP değerlerini anlamlı oranda etkiledi. Örnek kalınlıkları arttıkça TP değerlerinde azalma gözlendi. Test edilen rezin-nano seramik (CERASMART) örnekleri, aynı kalınlık gruplarında lityum disilikat ile güçlendirilmiş cam seramik örneklerinden daha yüksek TP değerleri sergiledi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

CAD/CAM cam-seramik materyal, CAD/CAM rezin-seramik materyal, Spektrofotometre, Translusensi parametresi

Kaynakça

• 1. Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC, LeBeau D, Nunokawa G. Effect of abutment tooth color, cement color, and ceramic thickness on the resulting optical color of a CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced crown. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(2):83–90.
• 2. Wahba MM, Sherif AH, El-Etreby AS, Morsi TS. The effect of different surface treatments on color and translucency of bilayered translucent nano-crystalline zirconia before and after accelerated aging. Brazilian Dent Sci. 2019;22(2):203–12.
• 3. Hassan SZ, Fathelbab E, Shalaby MM. The effeCT Of LUTINg AgeNT ShADeS AND ThICkNeSS Of hybRID CeRAmICS ON The PeRCeIveD fINAL COLOR. Dent J. 2018;64(53):60.
• 4. Duarte S, Sartori N, Phark J-H. Ceramic-reinforced polymers: CAD/CAM hybrid restorative materials. Curr Oral Heal Reports. 2016;3(3):198–202.
• 5. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Ionescu AM, Cardona JC, Della Bona A, del Mar Pérez M. Optical behavior of dental zirconia and dentin analyzed by Kubelka–Munk theory. Dent Mater. 2015;31(1):60–7.
• 6. Hoorizad M, Valizadeh S, Heshmat H, Tabatabaei SF, Shakeri T. Influence of resin cement on color stability of ceramic veneers: in vitro study. Biomater Investig Dent. 2021;8(1):11–7.
• 7. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(1):71–5.
• 8. Drummond JL, King TJ, Bapna MS, Koperski RD. Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics. Dent Mater. 2000;16(3):226–33.
• 9. KÖKAT AM, KÖKAT AD. Monolithic CAD/CAM restorations–Esthetic Zone Applications. J Exp Clin Med. 2021;38(3s):180–7.
• 10. Nogueira AD, Della Bona A. The effect of a coupling medium on color and translucency of CAD–CAM ceramics. J Dent. 2013;41:e18–23.
• 11. Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. Color science: concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulas. 1982;
• 12. Bayindir F, Koseoglu M. The effect of restoration thickness and resin cement shade on the color and translucency of a high-translucency monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(1):149–54.
• 13. Erdemir U, Yıldız E, Eren MM. Effects of sports drinks on color stability of nanofilled and microhybrid composites after long-term immersion. J Dent. 2012;40:e55–63.
• 14. Lehmann KM, Igiel C, Schmidtmann I, Scheller H. Four color-measuring devices compared with a spectrophotometric reference system. J Dent [Internet]. 2010;38(SUPPL. 2):e65–70. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.006
• 15. Paul SJ, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N. Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(6):577.
• 16. Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, Vogel K, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. Am J Dent. 2004;17(4):262–6.
• 17. Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, El‐Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth color‐measuring devices. J Prosthodont. 2007;16(2):93–100.
• 18. Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(3):193–9.
• 19. Hasegawa A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S. Color and translucency of in vivo natural central incisors. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(4):418–23.
• 20. Saygili G, Şahmali S, Demirel F. Colour stability of porcelain repair materials with accelerated ageing. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(5):387–92.
• 21. Mirzaie M, Pahlavan A, Hooshmand T, Safaee H, Khalesi Tooyrekani R. Effect of Accelerated Aging on Color Stability of Two Silica-Based Ceramics with Leucite and Lithium-Disilicate Crystalline Phases After Glazing and Polishing. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2018;30(1):21–31.
• 22. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(4):412–7.
• 23. Niu E, Agustin M, Douglas RD. Color match of machinable lithium disilicate ceramics: Effects of cement color and thickness. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(1):42–50.
• 24. Barizon KTL, Bergeron C, Vargas MA, Qian F, Cobb DS, Gratton DG, et al. Ceramic materials for porcelain veneers: part II. Effect of material, shade, and thickness on translucency. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(4):864–70.
• 25. Wang F, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Translucency of dental ceramics with different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110(1):14–20.
• 26. Alayad AS, Alqhatani A, Alkatheeri MS, Alshehri M, AlQahtani MA, Osseil AE Bin, et al. Effects of CAD/CAM ceramics and thicknesses on translucency and color masking of substrates. Saudi Dent J. 2020;
• 27. Malkondu O, Tinastepe N, Kazazoglu E. Influence of type of cement on the color and translucency of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(6):902–8.
• 28. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Ritter A V, Vallittu PK, Närhi TO, et al. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater. 2015;31(10):1180–7.
• 29. Ryan E-A, Tam LE, McComb D. Comparative translucency of esthetic composite resin restorative materials. J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76:a84–a84.