Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür Analizi

Yıl 2022, , 102 - 117, 29.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.30803/adusobed.1090880

Öz

Uluslararası iktisat literatüründe ülkelerin dış ticaret örüntüsünün nedenlerini belirlenmesi önemli araştırma konularından biri olmuştur. Bu bağlamda gelişen klasik ve yeni uluslararası iktisat teorileri birbirlerinin ikame teorileri olmaktan ziyade farklı varsayımlara dayanan tamamlayıcı teorilerdir. Çekim modeli teorik altyapısı hem klasik hem de yeni gelişen uluslararası iktisat literatürüne dayanmaktadır. Diğer teorilere kıyasla daha kapsamlı olan bu modelin teorik alt yapısı, gelişmeler ve varsayımları bu analizde açıklanmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Aitken, N. D., (1973). “The Effect of EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis,” American Economic Review, volume 63, number 5, December, 881-892.
  • Adam, C., Cobham, D. (2007, August). Modelling multilateral trade resistance in a gravity model with exchange rate regimes. In Conference Paper No. CDMC07/02, CASTLECLIFFE, School of Economics & Finance, University of St. Andrews, UK.
  • Allen, T., Arkolakis, C. and Takahashi, Y. (2014). “Universal Gravity”, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No. 20787.
  • Anderson, J. E. (1979): “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation,” The American Review, vol. 69(1), 106-116.
  • Anderson J.E., Marcouiller D.W., (1999). “Trade, Insecurity, and Home Bias: An Empirical Investigation”, NBER Working Paper Series.
  • Anderson, J., Marcouiller, D. (2002). “Insecurity And The Pattern Of Trade: An Empirical Investigation”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002, vol. 84, issue 2, 342-352.
  • Anderson, J.E.,Wincoop E. V. (2003), “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 93, issue 1, pp. 170-192
  • Anderson, J. E., Yotov, Y. V. (2012). “Gold Standard Gravity”, Working Paper 17835, NBER.
  • Anderson, J. E., Larch, M. and Yotov, Y. V. (2015), “Growth and Trade With Frictions: a Structural Estimation Framework”, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No. 21377.
  • Anderson J. E., Yotov Y. (2016). “Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements, 1990–2002”, Journal of International Economics, 2016, vol. 99, issue C, 279-298.
  • Arkolakis, C. (2008). “Market Penetration and the New Consumers Margin in International Trade,” Working paper, Yale University.
  • Aron, J. (2000). “Growth and Institutions: A Review of the Evidence”, World Bank Research Observer, 2000, vol. 15, issue 1, 99-135.
  • Atkeson, A., Burstein A.T. (2010). “Innovation, Firm Dynamics, and International Trade”, Journal of Political Economy Vol. 118, No. 3, 433-484.
  • Augier P, Gasiorek M.(2003) The welfare implications of trade liberalization between the Southern Mediterranean and the EU. Appl Econ; 35(10): 1171-90.
  • Baier, S. L. ,Bergstrand, J. H. (2002). “On the Endogeneity of International Trade Flows and Free Trade Agreements,” American Economic Association annual meeting, August.
  • Baier, S. L., Bergstrand J.H. (2009a). “Bonus Vetus OLS: A Simple Method for Approximating International Trade-Cost Effects using the Gravity Equation,” Journal of International Economics, volume 77, number 1, February, 77-85.
  • Baier, S.L., Bergstrand J.H. (2009b). “Estimating the Effects of Free Trade Agreements on International Trade Flows using
  • Matching Econometrics,” Journal of International Economics, volume 77, number 1, February, 63-76.
  • Bacchetta, M. et al (2012). A practical guide to trade policy analysis. WTO and UNCTAD.
  • Baier, S., Bergstrand, J., (2009). Bonus vetus OLS: A simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation. Journal of International Economics 77 (1),77–85.
  • Baldwin, R.E., Taglioni D. (2005). “Trade Effects of the Euro: Evidence from Sectoral Data”, ECB Working Paper No. 446.
  • Barro, R.J. ‎(1996). “Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study”. NBER Working Paper No. 5698.
  • Bayer S.L., Bergstrand J.H. (2017). “Heterogenous economic integration agreements effects, gravity and welfare”, Working paper
  • Benedictis, L. and D., Taglioni (2011) “The Gravity Model in International Trade”, In: De Benedictis, L., Salvatici, L. (Eds.), “The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential Policies: An Analysis Through Gravity Models”. Springer, Ch. 4, pp. 55–90.
  • Berden, K., Bergstrand J.H. Van Etten E. (2014). “Governance and Globalisation”, The World Economy, Cilt: 37, Sayı: 3,353-386.
  • Bergstrand J.H., Egger P. (2013). “Gravity Equations and Economic Frictions in the World Economy”. In: Bernhofen D., Falvey R., Greenaway D., Kreickemeier U. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of International Trade. Palgrave Macmillan, London
  • Bergstrand J.H. (1985). “The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67(3), 474–481.
  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). “The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71(1), 143-153.
  • Bernard, A.B., Jensen J.B., Redding S.J., Schott P.K. (2009). “The Margins Of U.S. Trade”, Working Paper 14662, National Bureau Of Economıc Research.
  • Bernard, A.B., Jensen J.B., Redding S.J., Schott P.K.. (2007), “Firms in International Trade”, Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 21, Number 3, 105–130.
  • Bosker, M., Garretsen, H. (2010). “Trade costs, market access, and economic geography: Why the empirical specification of trade costs matters.” In P. A. G. van Bergeijk and S. Brakman (Ed.) The Gravity Model in International Trade: Advances and Applications, Cambridge University Press,193-223.
  • Caliendo, L., Fernando P., (2015). “Estimates of the trade and welfare effects of NAFTA”, Review of Economic Studies, 2015, 82 (1), 1-44. CEPII (2019). http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/cepii/cepii.asp Erişim tarihi:10.02.2018
  • Chaney, T. (2008) Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade, AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, VOL. 98, NO. 4, SEPTEMBER 2008, pp. 1707-21
  • Cheptea, A. (2007). “Trade liberalization and institutional reforms, Economics of Transition and Institutional Change”, Vol 15 Issue 2, 211-255.
  • Chor, D. (2010). “Unpacking sources of comparative advantage: A quantitative approach”, Journal of International Economics, 2010, vol. 82, issue 2, 152-167.
  • De Groot, H. L. F., Linders, G-J., Subramanian, U. (2004). “The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns”, International Review of Scial Sciences Volume57, Issue1, February 2004, 103-123.
  • De Jong, E., Bogmans C. (2011). “Does corruption discourage international trade?” European Journal of Political Economy, 2011, vol. 27, issue 2, 385-398.
  • Deardorff, A. V. (1984), “Testing Trade Theories and Predicting Trade Flows,” in R. W. Jones and P. Kenen, editors, Handbook of International Economics. Volume 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 467-517
  • Deardorff, A.V. (1998). “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? National Bureau of Economic Research. The Regionalization of the World Economy, January 1998, p. 7 – 32.
  • Doces J.A., Magee, C. (2015). “Trade and Democracy: A Factor Based Approach”, International Interactions 41(2):150407163012006.
  • Eaton, J., Kortum, S. (2001), “Technology, Trade, and Growth”, European Economic Review, 45: 742-755.
  • Eaton J., Kortum S. (2002). “Technology, Geography and Trade”, Econometrica, 70[5], 1741-1779
  • Eaton, J., Kortum, S., Neiman, B. and Romalis, J. (2016). “Trade and the Global Recession”, American Economic Review,
  • Egger, P., Larch M., Staub K.E, Winkelmann R. (2011). “The Trade Effects of Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements”, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy,3 (3): 113-43.
  • Fally, T., June 2012. Structural Gravity and Fixed Effects, university of Colorado note.
  • Falk, Martin, 2016. "A gravity model of foreign direct investment in the hospitality industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pp. 225-237.
  • Feenstra R.C. (2016). “Advanced International TradeTheory and Evidence” - Second Edition.
  • Feenstra, R. C. (2002). “Border Effects and the Gravity Equation: Consistent Methods for Estimation.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49.
  • Feenstra, R. C. (2003). “A homothetic utility function for monopolistic competition models, with out constant price elasticity”, Economics Letters 78 (1), 79–86.
  • Feenstra, R. C. (2004), “Advanced International Trade”, Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. Florensa L.M., Márquez-Ramos L., Recalde, M.L. (2015). “The effect of economic integration and institutional quality of trade agreements on trade margins: evidence for Latin America”, Review of World Economics 151(2):329-351.
  • Francois, J., Manchin, M. (2013). “Institutions, Infrastructure, and Trade”, World Development, 2013, vol. 46, issue C, 165-175. Frankel, J., Rose A. (2002). “An Estimate of the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade and Income”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, vol. 117, issue 2, 437-466.
  • Frankel, J., Stein, E., Wei, S., (1997). “Regional trading blocs in the world economic System”, Institute for International Economics (Washington, DC).
  • Goméz, E. H., & Milgram, J. B. (2009). “Are Estimation Techniques Neutral to Estimate Gravity Equations? An Application to the Impact of EMU on Third Countries”, Exports. Universidad de Granada.
  • Golovko,A.(2014) Avrasya Ülkelerinin Dış Ticaretlerinin Çekim Modeli Çerçevesinde Analizi, Ankara Üniversitesi Doktora Tezi,1-256
  • Gomez Herrera, E. (2013). “Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade”, Empirical Economics, June 2013, Volume 44, Issue 3,1087–1111
  • Head, K., Mayer, T. (2000). “Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU”, Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 2000, vol. 136, issue 2, 284-314.
  • Head, K. (2003). Gravity for Beginners. Vancouver: University of Columbia.http://faculty.arts.ubc.ca/nmalhotra/490/Articles/KHead%20on%20gravity.pdf.
  • Head, K., Mayer , T. (2013). “Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook, CEPII Working Paper Internationalisation of business investments in R&D and analysis of their economic impact, Project Commissioned by the European Commission, DG Research and Innovation
  • Helpman, E, Melitz, M., Rubinstein Y.(2008). “Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 123, no. 2: 441-487.
  • Helpman, E. (1987). “Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1987, vol. 1, issue 1, 62-81.
  • Helpman, E. (1999). “The Structure of Foreign Trade”, volume 13, issue 2, 121-144 of Journal of Economic Perspectives.
  • Helpman, E. (1987). “Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries.” Journal of the Japanese and International economies, 1.
  • Helpman, E., Krugman, P. R. (1985). “Market Structure and Foreign Trade”. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Helpman, E., Krugman, P.R. (1989).”Trade Policy and Market Structure”, Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press,
  • Helpman, E., Melitz M.J., Yeaple S.R. (2004). “Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms”, American Economic Review,94 (1): 300-316.
  • Helpman, E., Melitz M.J., Rubinstein, Y. (2008). “Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, volume 123, number 2, May.
  • Hummels, D. (1999). “Have International Transportation Costs Declined?” work paper, Purdue U.
  • Hummels, D. (2001). “Toward a Geography of Trade Costs”, Purdue University
  • Hummels, D.,Levinsohn, J. (1995). “Monopolistic Competition and International Trade”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 3, (Aug., 1995), pp. 799-836 Hummels, D., and Klenow,P.J. (2005) “The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Exports,” American Economic Review, 95, 704–719
  • Jakab, Z.M., Oszlay A., Mihaly, K. (2001). “How Far Has Trade Integration Advanced?: An Analysis of the Actual and Potential Trade of Three Central and Eastern European Countries”, Journal of Comparative Economics 29: 276-292.
  • Kareem, F.O., Kareem,O.I. (2014). “Specification and Estimation of Gravity Models: A Review of the Issues in the Literature”, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2014/74.
  • Keum, K. (2008), Tourism flows and trade theory: a panel data analysis with the gravity model, TheAnnals of Regional Science, 44 (3), pp. 541–557.
  • Krugman P.R. ,Obstfeld M., (2006). “International Economıcs Theory And Policy”, Pearson International Education.
  • Krugman, P, (1979). “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade,” Journal of International Economics, volume 9, 469-479.
  • Krugman, P. R. (1981). “Intra-industry Specialization and the Gains from Trade.” Journal of Political Economy,89.
  • Krugman, P.R. (1980). “Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade.” American Economic Review, 70(5): 950 –959.
  • Krugman, P.R. (1985). “Increasing Returns and the Theory of International Trade”, NBER Working Paper No. 1752.
  • Leamer, E., Levinsohn, J. (1995). “International trade theory: the evidence”, In: Handbook of international economics. Vol. 3. Elsevier, 1339–1394.
  • Linders G-J, (2004). “The Effect of Domestic Institutions on International Trade Flows: A sectoral analysis”,ERSA conference papers ersa 04, 357, European Regional Science Association.
  • Linnemann, H. (1966). “An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows”, Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
  • Liu X. (2009). “GATT/WTO promotes trade strongly: sample selection and model specification”, Review of In-ternational Economics 17(3), 428-446.
  • Lopez-Cordova, J.; Meissner, C. (2005). “The Globalization of Trade and Democracy, 1870-2000”, NBER Working Paper Series No. 11117.
  • Marquez-Ramos, L., Martínez-Zarzoso I. (2010). “The Effect of Technological Innovation on International Trade”, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment, E-Journal, Vol. 4.
  • Martínez-Zarzoso, I, Nowak-Lehmann, D.F., Horsewood, N. (2009). “Are regional trading agreements beneficial? Static and dynamic panel gravity models”. N Am J Econ Finance 20(1):46-65
  • McCallum, J. (1995). “National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns”, The American Economic Review 85 (3), 615–623.
  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica, 71(6): 1695– 1725.
  • Melitz, M.J. (2007). “North, South and distance in the gravity model”, European Economic Review vol. 54, issue 4, 971-991.
  • Montenegro C.E., Soloaga, I., (2006). “Nafta’s Trade Effects: New Evidence With A Gravity Model”, Nafta Estudios de Economia, Vol. 33, N1, 45-63.
  • Obstfeld, M., Rogoff, K. (2000). “The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause?” NBER Working Paper No. 7777.
  • Olivero M.P., Yotov, Y.V. (2012). “Dynamic gravity: endogenous country size and asset accumulation”, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d`Economique 45(1):64-92
  • Pöyhönen, P. (1963). “A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90, 93-100
  • Pulliainen, K. (1963). “A world trade study: an econometric model of the pattern of the commodity flows in international trade in 1948–1960”, Ekonomiska Samfundets Tidskirft, 16, 78–91.
  • Rose, A.K. (2000). “One money, one market: the effect of common currencies on trade”, Economic policy 15 (30), 7–46.
  • Rose A. K., Feenstra R.C., Markusen J.R. (2001). “Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 2001, vol. 34, issue 2, 430-447
  • Sapir, A. (1981). “Trade benefits under the EEC generalized system of preferences. Eur Econ Rev 15: 339–355
  • Shepherd, B. (2016). “The Gravity Model of International Trade: A User Guide (An updated version)”, ARTNeT Gravity Modeling Initiative, United Nations publication, 1-50.
  • Silva, J.M.C., Tenreyro, S. (2006). “The Log of Gravity.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4): 641–658.
  • Silva, J.M.C., Teneireo, S. (2013), “Trading Partners and Trading Volumes: Implementing the Helpman-Melitz-Rubinstein Model Empirically”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 77(1).
  • Soete, L. (1987). “The impact of technological innovation on international trade patterns: The evidence reconsidered”,· Research Policy, vol. 16, issue 2-4, 101-130.
  • Sunde, T., Chidoko, C., Zivanomoyo, J. (2009). “Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade between Zimbabwe and its Trading Partners in the Southern African Development Community Region (1990-2006)”, Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 16-21
  • Tayyabb, M., Tarar, A., Riaz, M. (2012). “Review of Gravity Model Derivations. Mathematical Theory and Modelling, Vol. 2, No. 9 , 82-96.
  • Tinbergen, J., (1962). “Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy”, Twentieth Century Fund, New-York.
  • Wakasugi R. (2007), “Vertical Intra-Industry Trade and Economic Integration in East Asia”, Asian Economic Papers 6(1):26-39.
  • Wei S.-J, (2000). “How Taxing is Corruption on International Investors?”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2000, vol. 82, issue 1, 1-11.
  • Yotov Y.V., Piermartini R., Monteiro J-A, Larch M. (2016). “ An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model”, WTO.
  • Yu, M. (2010). “Trade, democracy, and the gravity equation, Journal of Development Economics, 91, 289- 300.
Toplam 106 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Marina Tan Bu kişi benim 0000-0003-3121-8101

Sevcan Güneş 0000-0001-8367-8965

Filiz Akbaş-yeşilyurt 0000-0003-1629-4747

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Haziran 2022
Kabul Tarihi 4 Mayıs 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

APA Tan, M., Güneş, S., & Akbaş-yeşilyurt, F. (2022). Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür Analizi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.30803/adusobed.1090880
AMA Tan M, Güneş S, Akbaş-yeşilyurt F. Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür Analizi. ADUSOBIED. Haziran 2022;9(1):102-117. doi:10.30803/adusobed.1090880
Chicago Tan, Marina, Sevcan Güneş, ve Filiz Akbaş-yeşilyurt. “Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür Analizi”. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9, sy. 1 (Haziran 2022): 102-17. https://doi.org/10.30803/adusobed.1090880.
EndNote Tan M, Güneş S, Akbaş-yeşilyurt F (01 Haziran 2022) Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür Analizi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9 1 102–117.
IEEE M. Tan, S. Güneş, ve F. Akbaş-yeşilyurt, “Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür Analizi”, ADUSOBIED, c. 9, sy. 1, ss. 102–117, 2022, doi: 10.30803/adusobed.1090880.
ISNAD Tan, Marina vd. “Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür Analizi”. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9/1 (Haziran 2022), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.30803/adusobed.1090880.
JAMA Tan M, Güneş S, Akbaş-yeşilyurt F. Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür Analizi. ADUSOBIED. 2022;9:102–117.
MLA Tan, Marina vd. “Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür Analizi”. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 9, sy. 1, 2022, ss. 102-17, doi:10.30803/adusobed.1090880.
Vancouver Tan M, Güneş S, Akbaş-yeşilyurt F. Çekim Modeli Teorisi Literatür Analizi. ADUSOBIED. 2022;9(1):102-17.

Adnan Menderes University Institute of Social Sciences Journal’s main purpose is to contribute to the social sciences at national and international level, to create a respected academic ground where scientists working in dis field can share the unique and remarkable works.