Farklı Öğretmen Gruplarında Örgütsel Özdeşleşme

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, meslek liselerinde görev yapan meslek ve kültür dersi öğretmenlerinin örgütsel özdeşleşmelerini ele almak ve örgütsel özdeşleşme modellerine ne derece uyduklarını belirlemektir. Araştırma olgu bilim deseninde tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Giresun ilinde bir devlet meslek lisesinde görev yapan 6 kültür dersi ve 6 meslek dersi öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Katılımcılar araştırmacının görev yaptığı okuldan gönüllülük esasına göre kolay örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak seçilmiştir. Araştırmada öğretmenlerin örgütsel özdeşleşmeye ilişkin görüşlerini belirlemek amacıyla iki ayrı odak grup görüşmesi yapılmış ve sonucunda elde edilen bulgular MAXQDA veri analizi programında analiz edilerek sonuçlar yorumlanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda genel olarak tüm öğretmenlerin okullarıyla özdeşleştikleri, ancak meslek dersi öğretmenlerinin kültür dersi öğretmenlerine göre çalıştıkları kurumla daha fazla özdeşleştikleri tespit edilmiştir. Kültür dersi öğretmenleri arasında gerektiğinde verilen görevlere itiraz edebilecekleri görüşü yaygınken, meslek dersi öğretmenlerinin tamamı verilen görevlere gönüllü olarak katılabileceklerini belirtmiş ve kurumlarıyla daha fazla özdeşleştiklerini göstermişlerdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• örgütsel özdeşleşme
• meslek lisesi
• öğretmen
• farklılık

Organizational Identification in Diverse Groups of Teachers

Öz

The aim of this study is to address the organizational identification of vocational and culture course teachers working in vocational high schools and to determine the degree to which they fit with organizational identification models. The research was designed in phenomenology design. The research group consisted of 6 culture course and 6 vocational course teachers working in a public vocational high school in Giresun Province. The participants were selected from the school where the researcher worked on the basis of volunteerism by using the convenience sampling method. In this study, two separate focus group interviews were conducted to determine teachers' views on organizational identification, and the collected data were analyzed in the MAXQDA data analysis program, and the results were interpreted. As a result, it was determined that all teachers were identified with their schools in general, but vocational course teachers were more likely to identify with the institution for which they worked than were culture course teachers. While it was common among the cultural course teachers that they could object to assigned tasks, if necessary, all the vocational course teachers indicated that they could participate in assigned tasks voluntarily and showed that they identified more with their organizations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Organizational Identification
• Vocational high school
• Vocational course teacher
• Culture course teacher

Kaynakça

1. Agyeiwaah, E., Bangwayo-Skeete, P., & Opoku, E. K. (2024). The impact of migrant workers’ inclusion on subjective well-being, organizational identification, and organizational citizenship behavior. Tourism Review, 79(1), 250-265.
2. Akpınar, A. (2014). Okullardaki insan ilişkileri düzeyi ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki (Tez no:370468) [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uşak Üniversitesi] Yöktez.
3. Aksit, B.T. (1992). “Medikal arastırmalarda etik sorunlar”, Türk Tabipler Birliği Sağlık Kongresi. 8–11 Mart 1992. Shareton Oteli. Ankara
4. Aliyev, Y. (2004). Örgütsel sosyalleşme ile özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişki: Bir Araştırma [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi]
5. Ashforth, B.E., Schinoff, B.S. (2016) Identity under construction: How individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 3(1),111–137.
6. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189
7. Bakan, Ö. (2005). Kurumsal İmaj. Konya: Tablet Yayınevi
8. Balay, R. (2014). Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerde Örgütsel Bağlılık. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.

9. Başer, G., & Ehtiyar, R. (2019). The Understanding of Workplace Spirituality among a Group of Human Resource Managers: Meaning, Influencing Factors and Practices. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c.2s.9m
10. Brown, A. D. (2017). Identity work and organizational identification. International journal of management reviews, 19(3), 296-317.
11. Batool, S., Ibrahim, H. I., & Adeel, A. (2024). How responsible leadership pays off: Role of organizational identification and organizational culture for creative idea sharing. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 100057.
12. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (2), 239263. https://doi.org/10.2307/239325
13. Günbey, M. (2016). Yetenek yönetimi ile ilgili üniversite yönetici ve akademik personelinin görüşleri, (Tez No. 446036) [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi] Yöktez.
14. Güneş, S., & Bulut, S. (2024). Hemşirelerde Psikolojik Sermayenin Örgütsel Özdeşleşmeye Etkisi. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 27(1), 43-64.
15. Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Postmes, T., Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Webley, P. (2004). Sticking to our guns: Social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects. University of Exeter.
16. Jones, C., & Volpe, E. H. (2011). Organizational identification: Extending our understanding of social identities through social networks. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 413–434.
17. Kara, E., & Karadeniz Özbek, S. (2021). İşyerinde İntikamci Davranişlar ve Medea Sendromu. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 11(1), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.875025
18. Kreiner G. H. ve Ashforth B. E. (2004). Evidence Toward an Expanded Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1- 27.
19. Kurtulmuş, M., & Karabıyık, H. (2016). Algılanan Örgütsel Adaletin Öğretmenlerin Işe Yabancılaşma Düzeylerine Etkisi. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 5(2), 459-477. https://Doi.Org/10.14686/Buefad.V5i2.5000175962
20. Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive. In Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123–144). Springer.
21. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible. Translated by Alphonso Lingis, Northwestern University Press. Originally published as Le Visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.
22. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Mishra, V., Sharma, V., & Uppal, N. (2024). The curvilinear relationship between moral identity and unethical pro-organizational behavior: moderating role of organizational identification. International Journal of Manpower.
24. O’Reilly, C. (1989). Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31(4), 9–25.
25. Örücü, E.. (2003). Modern İşletmecilik. (3.Baskı). Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
26. Polat, S. (2009). Organizational citizenship behavior (ocb) display levels of the teachers at secondary schools according to the perceptions of the school administrators. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1591– 1596.
27. Reade, C. (2001). Antecedents of organizational identification in multinational corporations: Fostering psychological attachment to the local subsidiary and the global organization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(8), 1269-1291.
28. Riketta, M., and Van Dick, R. (2005). Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 490-510.
29. Scott, C. R., Corman, S. R. ve Cheney, G. (1998). Development of a structural model of Identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8(3), 298– 336.
30. Smidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1051–1062. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069448
31. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
32. Taşkın, A. M., & Bozkurt, F. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Canada (Ontario) and Turkey Social Studies Curriculum. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, (34). https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.34.899
33. Temel, N. N. Ç., & Çetiner, N. (2024). Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve İş Tatmininin Zaman Hırsızlığı Üzerindeki Etkileri. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 23(2), 742-762.
34. Tutar, H., Ozturk Baspinar, N. & Guler, S. (2021). A phenomenological study on the antecedents and consequences of organizational ostracism. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 28,331-350. doi: 10.14689/enad.28.14
35. Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201–246.
36. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
37. Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of psychology,58, 515–541 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
38. Şimşek, Y., & Altınkurt, Y. (2009). Endüstri meslek liselerinde görev yapan öğretmenlerin okul müdürlerinin iletişim becerilerine ilişkin görüşleri. Akademik Bakış, 17(1),16.
39. Zhongnan, J. (2024) Cross-level Effects of Diversity Climate on Employee Organizational Identification: Evidence from Law Enforcement Units, Public Performance & Management Review, 47(1), 56-88, doi: 10.1080/15309576.2023.2184401