Affective Mapping Approach to Adolescence and Parenting in the Digital Age: The Case of the Eighth Grade Film

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 12 Sayı: Aile Özel Sayısı, 134 - 153, 28.02.2026

Cansu Öksüz Karademir , Büşra Kırmızıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1805728

https://izlik.org/JA28MJ94NJ

Öz

The widespread adoption of digital technologies has significantly influenced family communication, perceptions of privacy, and the development of individual identity during adolescence. This study aims to examine the cinematic representations of adolescence and parenting in the digital age through Eighth Grade (2018), directed by Bo Burnham, focusing on the protagonist’s efforts to present herself on social media, her search for approval, and the communication gaps within her family. The film portrays the adolescent’s identity performances on digital platforms, their pursuit of social validation, and the disconnection in communication with their parents through an affective lens. In this context, the study is based on the affective mapping approach, which combines Sara Ahmed’s understanding of emotions attaching themselves to objects and spaces with Brian Massumi’s perspective of bodily and emotional intensity. The film analysis was conducted within the framework of themes identified in the study: digital identity and self-presentation, intra-family communication and silence, the fragility of privacy, affective conflicts, belonging and social acceptance, and self-integration and transformation. The findings reveal that adolescents’ self-performances on digital platforms are fragile and dependent on external approval, that family communication has become increasingly silent, and that privacy has been transformed into a constantly commodified space in the digital environment. Furthermore, the film illustrates that parental support plays a critical role in adolescents’ affective regulation and in maintaining a balance between digital and physical identity. By analyzing the effects of digitalization on the adolescent experience and family relationships from a cinematic standpoint, the study also underscores the importance of examining adolescents’ digital experiences and family interactions across different cultural contexts and media forms in future research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eighth Grade , affective mapping approach , digital parenting , family communication , digital identity.

Duygulanımsal Haritalama Yaklaşımıyla Dijital Çağda Ergenlik ve Ebeveynlik: Eighth Grade Filmi Örneği

https://izlik.org/JA28MJ94NJ

Öz

Dijital teknolojilerin yaygınlaşması, ergenlik döneminde aile içi iletişim, mahremiyet algısı ve bireysel kimlik gelişimi üzerinde belirgin etkiler yaratmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Bo Burnham’ın yönettiği, ana karakterin sosyal medyada kendini sunma çabalarını, onay arayışını ve aile içindeki iletişim boşluklarını merkezine alan Eighth Grade (2018) isimli film üzerinden, dijital çağda ergenlik ve ebeveynlik ilişkilerinin sinemasal temsillerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Film, ergen bireyin dijital platformlarda yürüttüğü kimlik performanslarını, sosyal onay arayışını ve ebeveyni ile kurduğu iletişimdeki kopuklukları duygu odaklı bir biçimde göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda araştırmada, Sara Ahmed’in duyguların nesnelere ve mekânlara yapışması anlayışı ile Brian Massumi’nin bedensel ve duygusal yoğunluk perspektifini birleştiren duygulanımsal haritalama yaklaşımı temel alınmıştır. Film çözümlemesi, analizlerde belirlenen dijital kimlik ve özsunum, aile içi iletişim ve sessizlik, mahremiyetin kırılganlığı, duygulanımsal çatışmalar, aidiyet ve sosyal kabul ile öz bütünleşme ve dönüşüm temaları çerçevesinde yürütülmüştür. Bulgular, dijital platformlarda ergenlerin kendilik performanslarının kırılgan ve dış onaya bağımlı olduğunu, aile içi iletişimin sessizleştiğini ve mahremiyetin dijital ortamda sürekli pazarlanan bir alana dönüştüğünü göstermektedir. Ayrıca film, ebeveyn desteğinin ergenin duygulanımsal regülasyonunda kritik bir rol oynadığını ve dijital ile fiziksel kimlik arasındaki dengeyi sağlamada önem taşıdığını ortaya koymaktadır. Dijitalleşmenin ergenlik deneyimi ve aile ilişkileri üzerindeki etkilerini sinemasal bir perspektiften analiz eden çalışma ayrıca, gelecekte yapılacak çeşitli kültürel bağlamlarda ve farklı medya türleri üzerinden ergenlerin dijital deneyimlerini ve aile içi etkileşimlerinin incelenmesi gerektiğinin de altını çizmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eighth Grade , duygulanımsal haritalama yaklaşımı , dijital ebeveynlik , aile içi iletişim , dijital benlik.

Kaynakça

• Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Archetti, C. (2022). When public relations can heal: An embodied theory of silence for public communication. Public Relations Inquiry, 11(1), 37-56.
• Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
• Bauman, Z. (2023). Akışkan modernite. S. O. Çavuş (Çev.), İstanbul: Tellekt.
• Bauman, Z. ve Raud, R. (2018). Benlik pratikleri. M. Ekinci (Çev.), İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age: Digital media and society series. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Benedetto, L. and Ingrassia, M. (2021). Digital parenting: Raising and protecting children in media world. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92579
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Bowlby, J. (1953). Child care and the growth of love. London: Penguin Books.
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Cieslik, M. and Simpson, D. (2013). Key concepts in youth studies. London: SAGE.
• Clark, L. S. (2013). The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and social order. New York: Scribner’s.
• Drouin, M., McDaniel, B. T., Pater, J. and Toscos, T. (2020). How parents and their children used social media and technology at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and associations with anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 23(11), 727-736. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.028
• Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. M.L. Gutman, H. Hutton (Ed.), içinde Technologies of The Self. London: Tavistock.
• Furedi, F. (2004). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertian age. London: Routledge.
• Goffman, E. (2018). Günlük yaşamda benliğin sunumu. B. Cezar (Çev.), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• Goodwin, K. (2019). Dijital dünyada çocuk büyütmek: Teknolojiyi doğru kullanmanın yolları. T. Er (Çev.), İstanbul: Aganta Kitap.
• Güran Yiğitbaşı, K. ve Çelik, S. (2023). Dijital dünyada mahremiyet, ebeveynlik ve çocuklar: Afyonkarahisar örneği. TRT Akademi, 8(19), 846-875. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1365718
• Hall, S. (1992). Cultural studies and its theoretical legacies. D. Held & H. Alexandro (Ed.), içinde Cultural theory: A critical introduction (ss. 277-294). New York and London: Routledge.
• Han, B. C. (2017). Şeffaflık toplumu. H. Barışcan (Çev.), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications.
• Jefferson, T. (2007). Youth subcultures: A critical review. P. E. Peterson and J. L. Seligman (Ed.) içinde Youth, education, and society (ss. 185-212). California: University of California Press.
• Jenkins, R. (2016). Bir kavramın anatomisi: Sosyal kimlik. G. Bostancı (Çev.), İstanbul: Everest Yayınları.
• Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., Dönmez, O., Yaman, F. ve Odabaşı, H. F. (2013). Dijital ebeveynlik ve değişen roller. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(4), 883-896.
• Kenny, C. (2011). The power of silence: Silent communication in daily life. London: Karnac Books.
• Kılıç, M. (2011). Aile ve serbest zaman ilişkisi: Düzce örneği. Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 27-49.
• LeBourgeois, M. K., Hale, L., Chang, A. M., Akacem, L. D., Montgomery-Downs, H. E. and Buxton, O. M. (2017). Digital media and sleep in childhood and adolescence. Pediatrics, 140(Suppl 2), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758J
• Livingstone, S. and Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396
• Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M. and Nandagiri, R. (2019). Children’s data and privacy online: Growing up in a digital age. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
• Livingstone, S. and Blum-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a digital future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children's lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lupton, D. and Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The data surveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society, 19(5), 780-794.
• Macionis, J. J. (2012). Sosyoloji (13. Basım). V. Akan (Çev.), Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
• Madianou, M. and Miller, D. (2012). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486
• Marwick, A. E. and Boyd, D. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051-1067.
• Mascheroni, G., Ponte, C. and Jorge, A. (2018). Dijital ebeveynlik: Dijital çağda ailelerin karşılaştığı zorluklar. Göteborg Üniversitesi.
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
• McDaniel, B. T. and Coyne, S. M. (2016). Technology interference in the parenting of young children: Implications for mothers' perceptions of coparenting. The Social Science Journal, 53(4), 435-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2016.04.010
• Milovidov, E. (2017). Parenting in the digital age. https://edoc.coe.int/en/children-s-rights/7513-parenting-in-the-digital-age-parental-guidance-for-the-online-protection-of-children-from-sexual-exploitation-and-sexual-abuse.html adresinden 28.09.2025 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Molgat, M. (2007). Do transitions and social structures matter? How ‘emerging adults’ define themselves as adult. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(5), 495-516.
• Ngai, S. (2005). Ugly feelings. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: Harvard University Press.
• Nikken, P. and Opree, S. J. (2018). Guiding young children’s digital media use: SES-differences in mediation concerns and competence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27, 1844-1857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1018-3
• Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Odabaşı, H. C., Tekgöz, N., Hafızoğlu, R. ve Aydın, S. (2024). Dijital çağda ailenin dönüşümü: Yeni nesil bağlar ve dinamikler. https://enstitusosyal.org/uploads/publications_module/file-17169685561438079447.pdf adresinden 15.10.2025 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Odgers, C. L. and Jensen, M. R. (2020). Annual research review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: Facts, fears, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13190
• O’Keeffe, G. S. and Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054
• Orben, A. and Przybylski, A. K. (2019). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1
• Palmer, S. (2017). Zehirlenen çocukluk: Modern dünyanın çocuklar üzerindeki zararlı etkileri. Ö. Ç. Aksoy (Çev.), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Pons-Salvador, G., Zubieta-Méndez, X. and Frias-Navarro, D. (2022). Parents’ digital competence in guiding and supervising young children's use of the internet. European Journal of Communication, 37(4), 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072669
• Rek, M. and Kovačič, A. (2018). Media and preschool children: The role of parents as role models and educators. Medijske Studije, 9(18), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.20901/ms.9.18.2
• Rode, J. (2009). Digital parenting: Designing children’s safety. https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2009.29 adresinden 15.10.2025 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
• Scharfstein, B. A. (2009). Art without borders: A philosophical exploration of art and humanity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Schmidt, M. K. (2020). Ekran çocukları. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
• Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Duke University Press.
• Selwyn, N. ve Odabaşı, H. F. (2017). Dijital yaşamda çocuk. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Shaviro, S. (2010). Post-cinematic affect. UK: Zero Books.
• Silverstone, R. and Hirsch, E. (1993). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge.
• Smahel, D., Machackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K., Livingstone, S. and Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. EU Kids Online. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo
• Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037039
• Steiner-Adair, C. (2013). The big disconnect: Protecting childhood and family relationships in the digital age. New York: HarperCollins.
• Steyer, J. P. (2014). Facebook çağında çocuk büyütmek. A. Birkan (Çev.), İstanbul: Doğan Kitap.
• The Independent. (2023). Families spend only six hours a week together, survey finds. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/family-limited-meal-time-communication-b2306531.html adresinden 01.10.2025 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
• Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood—and what that means for the rest of us. New York: Atria Books.
• Valkenburg, P. M., Meier, A. and Beyens, I. (2022). Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: An umbrella review of the evidence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.017
• Yağar, F. ve Dökme, S. (2018). Niteliksel araştırmaların planlanması: Araştırma soruları, örneklem seçimi, geçerlik ve güvenirlik. Gazi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3), 1-9.