Protē (Kınalıada) Adası’na Sürgün Edilen “Türk” Asıllı Bir Strategos: Bardanes Tourkos

Öz

As many states in antiquity, the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire also practiced exile. While this punishment could be applied collectively to various peoples within the Roman borders, it was also applied to deposed emperors, empresses, family members, high-ranking officials, rebels and clergy. For these people, certain regions in Eastern Rome, especially the islands, were used as places of exile. One of the most important of these islands is undoubtedly Protē/Proti (Kınalıada), which is located in the Sea of Marmara today and was called Protē/Proti (Kınalıada) during the Eastern Roman period. The most important feature of this island is that it was the closest island to the capital Constantinople. Easily accessible from Constantinople by ship, Protē Island was an island of exile that was used effectively in the empire, especially between the IXth and XIth centuries. Those who were exiled to this island not only suffered the penalty of exile, but also encouraged the construction of monasteries by giving them various properties on the island. Therefore, those who were dismissed from their imperial duties preferred to retreat on this island. One of these people was Bardanes Tourkos, one of the most important figures in the administrative and military history of the empire in the IXth century, who wanted to be exiled to Protē Island after his rebellion. In this paper, the life of Bardanes Tourkos in Protē and his administrative and military importance in the empire will be explained through the written sources of the period and the information provided by the imperial lead seals called "Molybdobulla". In addition, the place of Protē Island in the history of both the Islands and the Eastern Roman Empire from the first half of the IXth century to the XIth century will be emphasized.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bizans
• Protē Adası
• Bardanes Tourkos
• I. Nikephoros
• Türk.

A Strategos of "Turk" Origin Exiled to The Island of Protē (Kınalıada): Bardanes Tourkos

Abstract

As many states in antiquity, the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire also practiced exile. While this punishment could be applied collectively to various peoples within the Roman borders, it was also applied to deposed emperors, empresses, family members, high-ranking officials, rebels and clergy. For these people, certain regions in Eastern Rome, especially the islands, were used as places of exile. One of the most important of these islands is undoubtedly Protē/Proti (Kınalıada), which is located in the Sea of Marmara today and was called Protē/Proti (Kınalıada) during the Eastern Roman period. The most important feature of this island is that it was the closest island to the capital Constantinople. Easily accessible from Constantinople by ship, Protē Island was an island of exile that was used effectively in the empire, especially between the IXth and XIth centuries. Those who were exiled to this island not only suffered the penalty of exile, but also encouraged the construction of monasteries by giving them various properties on the island. Therefore, those who were dismissed from their imperial duties preferred to retreat on this island. One of these people was Bardanes Tourkos, one of the most important figures in the administrative and military history of the empire in the IXth century, who wanted to be exiled to Protē Island after his rebellion. In this paper, the life of Bardanes Tourkos in Protē and his administrative and military importance in the empire will be explained through the written sources of the period and the information provided by the imperial lead seals called "Molybdobulla". In addition, the place of Protē Island in the history of both the Islands and the Eastern Roman Empire from the first half of the IXth century to the XIth century will be emphasized.

Keywords

• Byzantium
• Prote Island
• Bardanes Tourkos
• Nikephoros I
• Turk.

Kaynakça

1. Ayönü, Yusuf. “Bizans Ordusunda Ücretli Türk Askerler (XI-XII. Yüzyıllar)”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi. Sy. 25 (Aralık 2009): 53-69.
2. Blisidou, Basilike. “Θεμα Ανατολικον”. İçinde Η Μικρά Ασία των θεμάτων. Έρευνες πάνω στην γεωγραφική φυσιογνωμία και προσωπογραφία των βυζαντινών θεμάτων της Μικράς Ασίας (7ος-11ος αι.). 69-111. Athena: 1998.
3. Çelgin, Güler. Eski Yunanca-Türkçe Sözlük. İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi, 2011.
4. Foss, Clive. “Anatolikon”. İçinde The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Editör A. P. Kazhdan, Alice-Mary Maffry Talbot, Anthony Cutler, Timothy E. Gregory ve Nency Patterson Ševčenko. C.I. 89-90. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
5. Güneş, Cüneyt. “Bizans İmparatoru VI. Leo’nun Taktikası’nda Türkler ve Türk Anlatısının Askerî Eğitime Katkısı”. bitig MSKÜ Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 2. Sy. 3 (Haziran 2022):1-14.
6. Güneş, Cüneyt. “Bizans Kurşun Mühürleri’nde Artabasdos ve İsyanı (741)”. Uluslararası Beşeri Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi 6. Sy. 14 (Ekim 2020):624-643.
7. Güneş, Cüneyt. Bizans Anadolusu’nda Askerî ve İdarî Bir Sistem: Thema Sistemi. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay., 2021.
8. Güneş, Cüneyt. Bizans İmparatorluğu Kurumları ve Unvanları. İstanbul: Selenge Yayınları, 2021.

9. Herrin, Judith. Bizans-Bir Ortaçağ İmparatorluğunun Şaşırtıcı Yaşamı. Çeviren Uygur Kocabaşoğlu, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2010.
10. Herrin, Judith. Women in Purple-Rulers of Medieval Byzantion. London: Phoenix Press, 2002.
11. Hollingsworth, A. Paul ve Anthony Cutler. “Leo V the Armenian”. İçinde The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Editör A. P. Kazhdan, Alice-Mary Maffry Talbot, Anthony Cutler, Timothy E. Gregory ve Nency Patterson Ševčenko. C.I. 1209-1210. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
12. Iosephi Genesii Regum Libri Quattuor, İnceleyenler A. Lesmueller-Werner ve I. Thurn. Berlin: Apud Walter de Gruyter, 1978.
13. John Skylitzes. A Synopsis of Byzantine History 811-1057. Translater John Wortley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
14. Kaegi, E. Walter. Byzantine Military Unrest 471-843. Amsterdam: 1981.
15. Kaldellis, Anthony. Bizans-Roma Diyarında Etnisite ve İmparatorluk. Çeviren Deniz Türker. İstanbul: Karakarga Yayınları, 2020.
16. Keçiş, Murat. “Sakarya Boyunda Bizans-Türk Mücadelesinde Önemli Bir Geçit Malagina”. İçinde Uluslararası Kara Mürsel Alp ve Kocaeli Tarihi Sempozyumu-II. Editör Haluk Selvi, Ali Yeşildal ve Bilal Çelik. C. I. 105-113. Kocaeli: 2016.
17. Koçak, Talat. “İmparatoriçe İrene’nin Yasa Eklerine Göre Roma Hukukunda Kitab-I Mukaddes İzleri”. Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi 24. Sy. 2 (2020): 735-748.
18. Koçak, Talat. “Bizans (Doğu Roma) İmparatorluğu’nda Türk Kökenli Bir Komutan: Bardanes Turkos ve İsyanı”. History Studies 7. Sy.2 (2015):67-76.
19. Lilie, R. Johannes (Ed.). Prosopographie Der Mittelbyzantinischen Zeit. New York: 1999.
20. Niavis, E. Pavlos. The Reign of the Byzantine Emperor Nicephorus I. Athens: 1987.
21. Nicol, David. A Biographical Dictionary of the Byzantine Empire. London: 1991.
22. Stavrakos, “Sigillographic Evidence for the Tourkopouloi in the Byzantine Empire”. XVIII. Türk Tarih Kongresi Bildirileri, C. III. Hazırlayan Semiha Nurdan-Muhammed Özler, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları (2022), 261-271.
23. The History of Leo the Deacon: Byzantine Military Expansion in the Tenth Century. Translation Alice-Mary Talbot ve Denis F. Sullivan. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks, 2005. Theophanes Continuatus. Khronographia. Editör I. Bekker. Bonn: 1838.
24. Theophanes. Khronographia. Editör Ioannis Classeni. Bonn: 1839.
25. Treadgold, Warren. “The Missing Year in the Revolt of Artavasdos”. İçinde Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik. Editörler Herbert Hunger ve Wolfram Hörandner. C. 42. 87-93. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaftten, 1992.
26. Treadgold, Warren. The Byzantine Revival. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.
27. Zacos, Georgios ve Antonius Veglery. Byzantine Lead Seals. C.1-2. Basel: J.J. Augustin,1972.