ABAD’IN ACHMEA KARARI VE YATIRIMCI-DEVLET UYUŞMAZLIK ÇÖZÜMÜ AÇISINDAN YANSIMALARI

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 165 - 208, 31.01.2022

Mustafa Alper Ener

https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1066635

Öz

Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı’nın vermiş olduğu Achmea kararı sadece Avrupa Birliği için değil etkileri dolayısıyla anlaşmaya dayanan yatırımcı-devlet uyuşmazlıklarının çözümünde bir milat olarak kabul edilebilir. Bu kararın ne kadar doğru ne kadar yanlış olduğu yıllar geçtikçe ortaya çıkacak olsa da, çalışmamızda söz konusu karar özellikle Hukuk Sözcüsü Wathelet’in görüşü ile birlikte değerlendirilmektedir. Achmea kararının yansımalarını incelemeden önce Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı’nın yapısı, ön karar prosedürü, Achmea davasının arka planı, Achmea davasında görevlendirilen Hukuk Sözcüsü’nün görüşü ve son olarak Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı’nın verdiği yatırımcı-devlet uyuşmazlık çözümünü ilgilendiren en önemli kararlardan biri olan Achmea kararı incelenerek sonuç kısmında bu kararın doğurabileceği muhtemel sonuçlar ele alınmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Achmea, Ön Karar Prosedürü, Yatırımcı-Devlet Uyuşmazlık Çözümü, Gün Batımı Hükümleri, Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı

Kaynakça

• 2013/336/EU: Council Decision of 25 June 2013 Increasing the Number of Advocates-General of the Court of Justice of the European Union, OJ L 179, 29.6.2013.
• Agreement for the Termination of Bilateral Investment Treaties Between the Member States of the European Union, SN/4656/2019/INIT, OJ L 169, 29.5.2020.
• Aktoprak P, “Lizbon Antlaşması Sonrası Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı Bakımından Temel Hakların İncelenmesi”, 2017, 19(Özel Sayı), DEÜ Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Prof. Dr. Şeref Ertaş’a Armağan, s. 3025-3057.
• Alyanak S, “Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı’nın Teşkilatlanması”, 2014, 72(3), Ankara Barosu Dergisi, s. 253-281.
• Arsava F, Roma Antlaşmasında Ön Karar Prosedürü ve Bu Prosedür Çerçevesinde Doğan Sorunlar, Ankara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Araştırma Dizisi No: 31, Ankara, 2009.
• Baykal S, Göçmen İ, Avrupa Birliği Kurumsal Hukuku, 1. Baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2016.
• Brief of The European Commission on Behalf of The European Union as Amicus Curiae in Support of The Kingdom of Spain, United States District Court for The Southern District of New York, Foresight Luxembourg Solar 1 S.A.R.L. et. al. v. The Kingdom of Spain, 3 May 2019.
• Cameron P, International Energy Investment Law: The Pursuit of Stability, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010.
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012.
• Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union Protocols Annexes to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union Declarations annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 Tables of equivalences, OJ C 202, 7.6.2016.
• Council of the European Union Trade Policy Committee (Services and Investment), Intra-EU Investment Treaties Non-paper from Austria, Finland, France, Germany and the Netherlands, 7 April 2016.
• Damjanovic I, Quirico O, “Intra-EU Investment Dispute Settlement under the Energy Charter Treaty in Light of Achmea and Vattenfall: A Matter of Priority”, Fall 2019, 26 (1), Columbia Journal of European Law, s. 102-156.
• Declaration of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States on the Legal Consequences of the Judgement of the Court of Justice in Achmea and on Investment Protection in the European Union, 15 January 2019.
• Gaillard E, “The Myth of Harmony in International Arbitration”, 2019, 34(3), 2018 Lalive Lecture, ICSID Review, s. 553-568.
• Gillion F, Carpentieri L, “Construction Arbitration and BITs: Is There Still a Future for Intra-EU Investment Arbitration?”, 2018, Part 2, The International Construction Law Review, s. 167-181.
• Hoppe T, “The German Federal Court of Justice Marks a Possible Way for the CJEU's Preliminary Ruling: The Compatibility of Investment Arbitration Clauses in Intra-EU Bilateral Investment Treaties with European Union Law”, 2016, 59, German Yearbook of International Law, s. 615-624.
• Karacan P, “Avrupa Birliğinde “Achmea” Kararı ve “1/17 Sayılı Görüş” Işığında “Yatırımcı-Devlet” Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Mekanizmasının Geleceği”, 2020, 40(2), Public and Private International Law Bulletin, Prof. Dr. Cemal Şanlı’ya Armağan, s. 1507-1534.
• Lenz C, “The Role and Mechanism of the Preliminary Ruling Procedure”, 1994, 18(2), Fordham International Law Journal, s. 388-409.
• Observations Provided by the Commission to Other Courts, <https://ec.europa.eu/competition-policy/state-aid/national-courts/observations-other-courts_en> Erişim Tarihi 15.11.2021.
• Opinion 1/17 of the Court (Full Court) Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU, ECLI:EU:C:2019:341, 30 April 2019.
• Opinion 2/13 of the Court (Full Court) Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU, EU:C:2014:2454, 18 December 2014.
• Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet, Case C-284/16, Slowakische Republik v Achmea BV, ECLI:EU:C:2017:699, 19 September 2017.
• Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2016/1192 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 on the transfer to the General Court of jurisdiction at first instance in disputes between the European Union and its servants, OJ L 200, 26.7.2016.
• Sirmen K S, “The Concept of Public Policy in the Eco Swiss Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Its Impact on the Intra-EU Investment Treaty Arbitrations”, 2021, 12(2), Inonu University Law Review, s. 438-449.
• UNCITRAL, Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration, United Nations New York, 2014.
• UNCTAD, Investor-State Dispute Settlement Cases Pass the 1,000 Mark: Cases and Outcomes in 2019, IIA Issues Note, Issue 2, July 2020.
• UNCTAD, Investor-State Dispute Settlement Cases: Facts and Figures 2020, IIA Issue Note, Issue 4, September 2021.
• UNCTAD, Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Review of Developments in 2016, IIA Issues Note, Issue 1, May 2017.
• UNCTAD, Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Review of Developments in 2017, IIA Issues Note, Issue 2, June 2018.
• UNCTAD, Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Review of Developments in 2018, IIA Issues Note, Issue 2, May 2019.
• United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, Submission from the European Union and its Member States, Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform) Thirty-seventh Session New York, 1–5 April 2019, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.159/Add.1, 24 January 2019.
• United Nations, Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, Fiftieth Session (3-21 July 2017), General Assembly Official Records Seventy-second Session, Supplement No. 17, A/72/17, New York, 2017.
• Yusuf G, Tan G, Case Comment United Utilities (Tallinn) BV v Estonia, “ICSID Arbitration after Achmea: the Beginning of the End or the End of the Beginning?”, 2020, 35(1-2), ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, s. 1-14.
• Achmea B.V. (formerly known as Eureko B.V.) v. The Slovak Republic, Final Award, PCA Case No. 2008-13, 7 December 2012.
• Charanne B.V. and Construction Investments S.à.r.l. v .Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No 062/2012.
• Electrabel S.A. v. Hungary, ICSID Case No ARB/07/19.
• Eureko B.V. v. The Slovak Republic, Award on Jurisdiction, Arbitrability and Suspension, PCA Case No. 2008-13, 26 October 2010.
• Ioan Micula and Others v. Romania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/20.
• Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), Case C‑168/05, Elisa María Mostaza Claro v. Centro Móvil Milenium SL, ECLI:EU:C:2006:675, 26 October 2006.
• Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), Case C‑567/14, Genentech Inc. v. Hoechst GmbH and Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:2016:526, 7 July 2016.
• Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), Case C-125/04, Guy Denuit and Betty Cordenier v. Transorient - Mosaïque Voyages et Culture SA, ECLI:EU:C:2005:69, 27 January 2005.
• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), Case C-182/15, Aleksei Petruhhin, ECLI:EU:C:2016:630, 6 September 2016.
• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), Case C-196/09, Paul Miles and Others v. Écoles Européennes (European Schools), ECLI:EU:C:2011:388, 14 June 2011.
• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), Case C-284/16, Slowakische Republik (Slovak Republic) v. Achmea BV, ECLI:EU:C:2018:158, 6 March 2018.
• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), Case C-459/03, Commission of the European Communities v. Ireland, ECLI:EU:C:2006:345, 30 May 2006.
• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), Case C-741/19, Republic of Moldova v. Komstroy LLC (successor in law to the company Energoalians), ECLI:EU:C:2021:655, 2 September 2021.
• Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), Case C-377/13, Ascendi Beiras Litoral e Alta, Auto Estradas das Beiras Litoral e Alta SA v. Autoridade Tributaria e Aduneira, ECLI:EU:C:2014:1754, 12 June 2014.
• Judgment of the Court, Case 109/88, Handels- og Kontorfunktionærernes Forbund i Danmark (Union of Commercial and Clerical Employees, Denmark) v. Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening (Danish Employers’ Association), acting on behalf of Danfoss A/S, ECLI:EU:C:1989:383, 17 October 1989.
• Judgment of the Court, Case 186/87, Ian William Cowan v. Le Trésor public (Treasury), ECLI:EU:C:1989:47, 2 February 1989.
• Judgment of the Court, Case C-102/81, Nordsee Deutsche Hochseefischerei GmbH v. Reederei Mond Hochseefischerei Nordstern AG & Co. KG and Reederei Friedrich Busse Hochseefischerei Nordstern AG & Co. KG., ECLI:EU:C:1982:107, 23 March 1982.
• Judgment of the Court, Case C‑126/97, Eco Swiss China Time Ltd v. Benetton International NV, ECLI:EU:C:1999:269, 1 June 1999.
• Judgment of the Court, Case C-337/95, Parfums Christian Dior SA and Parfums Christian Dior BV v. Evora BV, ECLI:EU:C:1997:517, 4 November 1997.
• Judgment of the Court, Case C‑393/92, Gemeente (Municipality of) Almelo and others v. Energiebedrijf Ijsselmij NV, ECLI: EU:C:1994:171, 27 April 1994.
• Judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom [2020] UKSC 5 - 19 Feb 2020.
• Magyar Farming Company Ltd, Kintyre Kft and Inicia Zrt v. Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/27.
• Marfin Investment Group Holdings S.A., Alexandros Bakatselos and others v. Güney Kıbrıs Rum Yönetimi, ICSID Case No ARB/13/27.
• Memorandum Opinion and Judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia - 8 Nov 2021.
• Memorandum Opinion and Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia - 20 Nov 2020.
• Micula, Viorel Micula and others v. Romania (I), ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20.
• Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber), Case C-555/13, Merck Canada Inc. v. Accord Healthcare Ltd, Alter SA, Labochem Ltd, Synthon BV, Ranbaxy Portugal - Comercio e Desenvolvimento de Produtos Farmaceuticos, Unipessoal Lda, ECLI:EU:C:2014:92, 13 February 2014.
• RREEF Infrastructure (G.P.) Limited and RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Two Lux S.à.r.l. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No ARB/13/30.
• Theodoros Adamakopoulos and others v. Güney Kıbrıs Rum Yönetimi, ICSID Case No ARB/15/49.