Bibliometric analysis and visualization of the Journal of Management & Organization

Yıl 2024, , 393 - 426, 12.08.2024

Hasan Tutar , Canan Baysal

https://doi.org/10.26745/ahbvuibfd.1171181

Öz

Journal of management & organization (JMO), which started its publication life in 1995, publishes scientific studies in the field of management and organization. This research aims to make a bibliometric analysis of 780 documents published since 2007 when JMO first started indexing in WoS. Research data were taken from the Web of Science database in plaintext format. The journal's conceptual, intellectual, and social structure was revealed by applying techniques such as co-citation, co-authoring, and co-creation through the Vosviewer software. When the research results are examined, it is seen that there is an increasing trend in the number of citations after 2007, when JMO started to be indexed in the WoS database. Research findings show that 1516 authors contributed to the JMO, with "Tui Mckeown" being the most prolific author with fifteen documents. A total of 651 universities contributed to the JMO during the period under review. The top contributing university is Griffth University, with 38 papers. The country that has contributed the most to the JMO since 2007 is Australia, with 241 documents. "Leadership" is the most used keyword in the journal. "Academy of Management Journal" is the most used journal in the documents sent to the journal. The fact that the journal does not comply with Lotka's law and the studies with multiple authors are more than single studies means that the cooperation between the authors is strong.

Anahtar Kelimeler

JMO, bibliometric analysis, scientific mapping, publication performance, Vosviewer.

Journal of Management & Organization Dergisinin Bibliyometrik Analizi ve Görselleştirilmesi

Öz

1995 yılında yayın hayatına başlayan Journal of management & organization (JMO), yönetim ve organizasyon alanında bilimsel çalışmalar yayınlamaktadır. Bu araştırma, JMO'nun WoS'ta ilk indekslenmeye başladığı 2007 yılından bu yana yayınlanan 780 belgenin bibliyometrik analizini yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma verileri Web of Science veri tabanından plaintext. formatında alınmıştır. Derginin kavramsal, entelektüel ve sosyal yapısı Vosviewer yazılımı aracılığıyla birlikte atıf, ortak yazarlık ve eş oluşum gibi teknikler uygulanarak ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları incelendiğine, JMO’nun WoS veri tabanında indekslenmeye başladığı 2007 yılından sonra atıf sayısında artış eğilimi olduğu görülmektedir. Araştırma bulguları, 1516 yazarın JMO’ya katkıda bulunduğunu ve "Tui Mckeown" un on beş belgeyle en üretken yazar olduğunu göstermektedir. İncelenen dönemde toplam 651 üniversite JMO'ya katkıda bulunmuştur. En çok katkıda bulunan üniversite, 38 belgeyle Griffth Üniversitesi'dir. 2007'den bu yana JMO'ya en çok katkıda bulunan ülke 241 belgeyle Avustralya'dır. "Liderlik" dergide en çok kullanılan anahtar kelimedir. "Academy of Management Journal" dergiye gönderilen belgelerde en çok kullanılan dergidir.Derginin Lotka yasasına uymadığı ve çok yazarlı çalışmaların tek çalışmalardan fazla oluşu yazarlar arasında iş birliğinin kuvvetli olduğu anlamına gelmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

JMO, bibliyometrik analiz, bilimsel haritalama, yayın performansı, Vosviewer.

Kaynakça

• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of Social Indicators Research. Social indicators research, 149(3), 803-831. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3
• Ayoko, O. B., Caputo, A., & Mendy, J. (2021). Management research contributions to the COVID-19: a bibliometric literature review and analysis of the contributions from the Journal of Management & Organization. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-27.Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.70
• Biswas, B. C., Roy, A., & Sen, B. K. (2007). Economic Botany: a bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 12(1), 23-33.
• Block, J. H., & Fisch, C. (2020). Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research. Management Review Quarterly, 70(3), 307-312. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00188-4
• Bonilla, C. A., Merigó, J. M., & Torres-Abad, C. (2015). Economics in Latin America: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1239-1252. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1747-7
• Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 670-685. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22990
• Casillas, J., & Acedo, F. (2007). Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: A bibliometric study of FBR. Family Business Review, 20(2), 141-162. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00092.x
• Chai, K. H., & Xiao, X. (2012). Understanding design research: A bibliometric analysis of Design Studies (1996–2010). Design Studies, 33(1), 24-43. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.004
• Cobo, M. J., López‐Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011b). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (7), 1382-1402. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
• Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Vıedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011a). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
• Cunill, O. M., Salvá, A. S., Gonzalez, L. O., & Mulet-Forteza, C. (2019). Thirty-fifth Anniversary of the International Journal of Hospitality Management: A bibliometric overview. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, 89–101. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.10.013
• Di Guardo, M. C., & Harrigan, K. R. (2012). Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: a co-citation analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(6) 789-811. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9239-2
• Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2021). The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: A co-citation analysis in business journals. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 1007-1043. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00380-6
• Doleck, T., & Lajoie, S. (2018). Social networking and academic performance: A review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 435-465. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9612-3
• Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101-114. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
• Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194-220. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
• Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a Research Field a Course on Theory and Application of Bibliometric Indicators. Brazil: The Centro de Informatica da UFPE.
• Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M. Á., Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2018). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied Intelligence, 48(5), 1275-1287. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y
• Harnad, S. (2008). Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings. Ethics in science and environmental politics, 8(1), 103-107. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00088
• Horatio, R., De La Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 98, 14-38. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010
• Jena, K.L. (2006). A bibliometric analysis of the Journal Indian Journal of fibre and textile research, 1996-2004. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 53(1), 22-30.
• Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W., & Benckendorff, P. (2019). Bibliometric visualization: An application in tourism crisis and disaster management research. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(16), 1925-1957. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1408574
• Laengle, S., Merigó, J.M., Miranda, J., Słowiński, R., Bomze, I., Borgonovo, E., & Teunter, R. (2017). Forty Years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3), 803–816. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.027
• Lawani, S. M. (1981). Bibliometrics: Its theoretical foundations, methods and applications. Libri, 31(Jahresband), 294-315. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.294
• Locke, J., & Perera, H. (2001). The intellectual structure of international accounting in the early 1990s. The International Journal of Accounting, 32(2), 223-249. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7063(01)00095-4
• Low, M. & Siegel, D. (2019). A Bibliometric Analysis of employee-centered corporate social responsibility research in the 2000s. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(5), 691-717. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2018-0243
• Martino, F., & Spoto, A. (2006). Social Network Analysis: A brief theoretical review and further perspectives in the study of Information Technology. PsychNology Journal, 4(1), 53-86.
• Mas-Bleda, A., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014). Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?. Scientometrics, 101(1), 337-356. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1345-0
• McBurney, M. K., & Novak, P. L. (2002, September). What is bibliometrics, and why should you care?. In Proceedings. IEEE international professional communication conference (pp. 108-114). IEEE.
• Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48.Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004
• Merigó, J.M., Blanco-Mesa, F., Gil-Lafuente A.M., & Yager, R.R. (2017). Thirty years of the International Journal of Intelligent Systems: A Bibliometric review. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32(5), 526-554. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21859
• Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional de La Informacion, 29(1), 1–20. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
• Mulet-Forteza, C., Martorell-Cunill, O., Merigó, J. M., Genovart-Balaguer, J., & Mauleon-Mendez, E. (2018). Twenty-five years of the Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing: A bibliometric ranking. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(9), 1201-1221. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2018.1487368
• Oliveira, T. D. (2018, June). From Modelmania to Datanomics: The Top Journals and the Quest for Formalization. In STOREP 2018-Whatever Has Happened to Political Economy? Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of literature I, Libri, 46: 149-158. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1996.46.3.149
• Osca-Lluch, J., Velasco, E., López, M., & Haba, J. (2009). Co-authorship and citation networks in the Spanish history of science research. Scientometrics, 80(2), 373-383. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2089-5
• Öztürk, O. (2021). Bibliometric review of resource dependence theory literature: an overview. Management Review Quarterly, 71(3), 525-552. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00192-8
• Öztürk, O., & Gürler, G. (2021). Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz. Ankara: Nobel yayınevi.
• Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178-1195. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
• Pilkington, A., & Chai, K. H. (2008). Research themes, concepts and relationships. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 19(1), 83-110.
• Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25: 348-349.
• Rehn, R., & Kronman, U. (2006). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet: University Library Publications.
• Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1651-1655. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033
• Ronda‐Pupo, G. A., & Guerras‐Martin, L. Á. (2012). Dynamics of the evolution of the strategy concept 1962–2008: a co‐word analysis. Strategic management journal, 33(2), 162-188. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.948
• Rowlands, I. (2005, February). Emerald authorship data, Lotka's law and research productivity. In Aslib Proceedings. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Ruhanen, L., Weiler, B., Moyle, B. D., & McLennan, C. L. J. (2015).Trends and patterns in sustainable tourism research: A 25-year bibliometric analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(4),517-535. Retrieved from. doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.978790
• Sedighi, M. (2016). Application of word co-occurrence analysis method in mapping of the scientific fields (case study: The field of Informetrics). Library Review, 65(1/2), 52-64. Retrieved from https://doi.org/ 10.1108/LR-07-2015-0075
• Sengupta, I.N. (1992). Bibliometrics, Informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: an overview. Libri, 42(2): 75-98.Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1992.42.2.75
• Seyhan, M. (2021). Yönetsel Bağlamda Yeşil İnovasyonun Evriminin Bibliyometrik Analizi, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (2), 611-625. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.837114
• Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Noor, S., & Anjum, A. (2020). Research synthesis and new directions of presumption: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 31(1), 79-98. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.6186/IJIMS.202003 31(1).0005
• Shapiro, F.R. (1992). Origins of bibliometrics, citation indexing, and citation analysis: The neglected legal literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(5): 337-339. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199206)43:5<337::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-T
• Shiau, W. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Yang, H. S. (2017). Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks. International Journal of Information Management, 37(5), 390-399. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.04.007
• Smith, L.C. (1981), "Citation analysis," Library Trends, 30, 83-106.
• Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of information science, 34(4), 605- 621. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238
• Uttkarsh, P., & Sonkar, S. K. (2020). Knowledge Resources Heritage of India: A Webometric Analysis. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 10(3), 98–107.
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
• Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & Van Den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405-2416. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421
• Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize co-occurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for information science and technology, 60(8), 1635-1651. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21075
• Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice, Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), (pp. 285–320). Springer. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-813
• Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 426-446. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
• Walker, R. M., Chandra, Y., Zhang, J., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2019). Topic modeling the research‐practice gap in public administration. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 931-937. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13095
• Xu, Z., Yu, D., & Wang, X. (2019). A bibliometric overview of International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics between 2010 and 2017. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 10(9), 2375-2387. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0875-9
• Yu, D., Wang, W., Zhang, W., & Zhang, S. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of research on multiple criteria decision making. Current Science, 114, 747-758. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i04/747-758
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629