The Mediator Role of Boundaryless Career In The Relationship Between Core Self Evaluation And Career Success

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate the mediating role of boundaryless career in the relationship between career success and self-evaluation. In the research, the questionnaire application, one of the quantitative research methods, was applied to 180 employees. The data used in the study were obtained from employees working in public institutions and private sectors by using convenience sampling technique in November-December 2019. Correlation and regression analyzes were performed with IBM SPSS 24 program. According to the results of the analysis, it has been determined that self-evaluation has a positive effect on career success and boundaryless career, and there are strong positive relationships between them. In addition, it was determined that boundaryless career has a partial mediation effect between self-evaluation and career success. With this study, it is aimed to examine the relationship between self-assessment and career success in an intermediary model and to reveal how boundaryless career plays a role in this relationship and it is evaluated that it contributes to the literature

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Career success
• boundaryless career
• self assessment

Öz Değerlendirme ve Kariyer Başarısı Arasındaki İlişkide Sınırsız Kariyerin Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, kariyer başarısı ve öz değerlendirme arasındaki ilişkide sınırsız kariyerin aracı rolünü araştırmaktır. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden anket uygulaması 180 çalışana uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada kullanılan veriler, 2019 yılı Kasım Aralık ayları içinde kolayda örneklem tekniği kullanılarak kamu kurumunda ve özel sektörde görev yapan çalışandan elde edilmiştir. IBM SPSS 24 programı ile korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre öz değerlendirmenin, kariyer başarısı ve sınırsız kariyeri olumlu yönde etkilediği ve aralarında pozitif yönlü kuvvetli ilişkiler olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanında, sınırsız kariyerin öz değerlendirme ile kariyer başarısı arasında kısmi aracılık etkisine sahip olduğu saptanmıştır. Bu çalışma ile öz değerlendirme ve kariyer başarısı arasındaki ilişkiyi aracı bir model içerisinde inceleyerek sınırsız kariyerin bu ilişkide nasıl bir rol oynadığını ortaya koymak amaçlanmakta ve alanyazına katkı sağladığı değerlendirilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öz değerlendirme
• Kariyer Başarısı
• Sınırsız kariyer

Kaynakça

1. Kaynakça Ahmed, N. O. A. (2017). Career commitment: the role of self-efficacy, career satisfaction and organizational commitment. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, (justaccepted), DOI: 10.1108/WJEMSD-06- 2017-0038.
2. Arthur, M. (1994). The Boundaryless Career: A New Perspective for Organizational Inquiry. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 295-306.
3. Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). Career lexicon for the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 10(4), 28-39.
4. Arthur, M.B., Khapova, S.N. ve Wilderom C.P.M. (2005). Career success in a boundryless career world. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 177-202.
5. Avcı, U.,Turunç, Ö. (2012). Dönüşümcü liderlik ve örgüte güvenin kariyer memnuniyetine etkisi: Liderüye etkileşiminin aracılık rolü. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 4,2, 2012,s.45-55.
6. Barbezat, D. A., & Hughes, J. W. (2001). The effect of job mobility on academic salaries. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19(4), 409–423.
7. Ballout, H. I. (2009). Career commitment and career success: moderating role of self-efficacy. Career Development International, 14(7), 655-670.
8. Balak, D. (2013). Sınırsız kariyer perspektifinde iş-aile çatışması ve kariyer bağlılığının kariyer hareketliliği üzerindeki etkisi: Kayseri ilindeki imalat işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Nevşehir Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı, Nevşehir.

9. Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T. and DeMuth R. L .F. (2006). Protean and boundaryless careers: an empirical exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 30-47.
10. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986) . The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173–1182.
11. Bulut, B. ve Bacanlı, F. (2022). Mesleki olgunluğun yordayıcıları olarak aile etkisi, yaşam yönelimi ve kariyer kararı verme durumu. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AEÜSBED), 8(1), 239-256.
12. Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T., & DeMuth, R. L. F. (2006). Protean and boundaryless careers: An empirical exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 30–47.G
13. C. Çetin ve H. Mavisu, "Hedef Belirleme = Nesnel Kariyer Başarısı ," Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , no.20, pp.219-241, 2018 Clarke, M. (2009). Plodders, pragmatists, visionaries and opportunists: career patterns and employability. Career Development International, 14(1),
14. E. & Özer, S. (2012). İşgörenlerin Çok Yönlü ve Sınırsız Kariyer Tutumları: Hizmet Sektöründe Bir Araştırm . Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi , 7 (2) , 173-196 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/oguiibf/issue/5716/76518 8-28.
15. Erdoğmuş, N., & Aytekin, İ. (2012). Kültürün psikolojik hareketliliğe etkisi: Türk ve Kanadalı akademisyenlerin karşılaştırılmalı analizi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(4), 2521-2
16. Fu, J. R. (2011). Understanding career commitment of IT professionals: Perspectives of push–pull–mooring framework and investment model. International Journal of Information Management, 31(3), 279- 293.540.
17. Ganzach, Y., & Pazy, A. (2014). Does Core Self Evaluations predict career success? A reanalysis of Judge and Hurst (2008). Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 107–115
18. Gençer, E. Ö., Ekmekçioğlu, E. B., & Aydoğan, E. (2021). Temel Benlik Değerlendirmesi ile Öznel Kariyer Başarısı İlişkisinde Proaktif Davranışın Aracılık Rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(3), 2678-2695.
19. Gerli, F., Bonesso, S., & Pizzi, C. (2015). Boundaryless career and career success: the impact of emotional and social competencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1304.
20. Guan, Y., Arthur, M. B., Khapova, S. N., Hall, R. J., & Lord, R. G. (2019). Career boundarylessness and career success: A review, integration and guide to future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 390-402.
21. Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman S. ve Wormley, (1990). W.M. Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 64-86.
22. Hall, D.T. ve Chandler, D.E. (2005). Psychological success. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 26: 155-176.
23. Heslin, P.A. (2003). Self and other referant criteria of career success. Journal of Career Assesment, 11(3): 262-286.
24. Herrmann, A., Hirschi, A., & Baruch, Y. (2015). The protean career orientation as predictor ofcareer outcomes: Evaluation of incremental validity and mediation effects. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 205-214.
25. Hughes, E.C. (1937). Institutional Office and the person. American Journal of Sociology, 43, 404-414.
26. Inda, M., Rodríguez, C., & Peña, J. V.(2013). Gender differences in applying social cognitive career theory in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 346-355.
27. Judge, T.A., Cable, D.M., Boudreau, J.W. ve Bretz, R.D. Jr. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 20: 43- 65.
28. Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C. and Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 17- 34. Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A. and Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151- 188.
29. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., ve Thoresen, C. J. “The Core Self-Evaluations Scale: Development of A Measure. Personnel Psychology”, 56, 2003, 303–331.
30. Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2011). Implications of core self-evaluations for achanging organizational context. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 331-341.
31. Kilis, S. ve Yıldırım, Z. (2018).Sorgulayıcı öğrenme topluluğu üst biliş ölçeğininTürkçeye uyarlanması:Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması.Ahi Evran ÜniversitesiKırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 665-679.
32. Kisbu, Y. “Influences of Regulatory Focus, Core Self-Evaluations And Age On Biases in Perception And Choice”. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Koc University, 2006.
33. Lewkowicz, J. A., & Moon, J. (1985). Evaluation: A way of involving the learner. Lancaster practical papers in English language education, 6, 45-80
34. Logan, E. (2009). Self and peer assessment in action. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 3(1), 29-35.
35. McEvoy, G. M. and Cascio, W. F. (1989). Cumulative Evidence of the Relationship Between Employee Age and Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 11-17.
36. Nabi, G. R. (1999). An investigation into the differential profile of predictors of objective and subjective career success. Career Development International, 4(4), 212-225.
37. Naseer, M., Mahmood, A. ve Kanwal, S. (2015). Impact of career success on organizational performance: a study of health care sector. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science, 9(3): 742-760.
38. Nicholson, N., & de Waal‐Andrews, W. (2005). Playing to win: Biological imperatives, self‐regulation, and trade‐ offs in the game of career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(2), 137-154.
39. Otluoğlu, Ç., & Övgü, K. (2014). Kariyer olgusunun kavramsallaştırılmasında kullanılan metaforlar. Ege Akademik Bakış, 14(2), 221-230.
40. Pasha, A. T., Hamid, K. A., & Shahzad, A. (2017). Moderating effect of self- efficacy and impact of career development practices on career success under the mediating role of career commitment in the insurance sector of Pakistan. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 22(1), 1-22.
41. Pınarbaşı, F. & Erdoğmuş, N. (2017). Zihin Haritası Yöntemi ile Kariyerin Anlamlandırılması: İşletme Öğrencilerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma . İş'te Davranış Dergisi , 2 (2) , 11-37 . DOI: 10.25203/idd.319863
42. Rodrigues, R., Butler, C. L., & Guest, D. (2018). Antecedents of protean and boundaryless career orientations: The role of core self-evaluations, perceived employability and social capital. Journal of Vocational Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.003.
43. Savickas, M. L. (2002). Career construction a developmental theory of vocational behavior, (pp.149-205), in Brown, D. (Ed.). Career choice and development. John Wiley & Sons.
44. Segers, J., İnceoğlu, İ., Vloeberghs, D., Bartram, D. and Henderiickx, E. (2008). Protean and boundaryless careers: a study on potential motivators. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 212-230.
45. Scheuermann, T. S., Tokar, D. M., & Hall, R. J. (2014). An investigation of African-American women's prestige domain interests and choice goals using Social cognitive career theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(3), 273-282.
46. Sullivan, S. E. & Arthur, M. B. (2006), “The Evolution of The Boundaryless Career Concept: Examining Physical and Psychological Mobility”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 19–29.
47. Şimşek, B.(2016). 360 Derece Performans Değerlendirmeye İlişkin Çalışan Tutumlarının Belirlenmesi: Bir Araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi. SBE. İşletme ABD. İstanbul.
48. Thungjaroenkul, P., Cummings, G. G.,& Tate, K. (2016). Testing the social cognitive career theory in Thai nurses' interest to become nurse educators: A structural equation modeling analysis. Nurse Education Today, 44, 151-156.
49. Verbruggen, M. (2012). Psychological mobility and career success in the ‘new’career climate. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 289-297.
50. Zhou, W., Sun, J., Guan, Y., Li, Y. ve Pan, J. (2012). Criteria of career success among Chinese employees: developing a multidimensional scale with qualitative and quantitative approaches. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(2): 265-277.