Ekonomik Özgürlükler ve Gelir Eşitsizliği: KFK Sonrası Dönem için Ampirik Bir Not

Öz

Bu çalışma, 148 ülkede Küresel Finansal Kriz (KFK) sonrası döneme odaklanarak ekonomik özgürlükler ve gelir eşitsizliği arasındaki dinamik ilişkiyi incelemektedir. İçsellik problemini dikkate alarak Sistem-GMM metodolojisinin kullanıldığı çalışmada, hem gelimiş hem de gelişen piyasalardaki farklı dinamikler araştırılmaktadır. Analiz sonuçları, Ekonomik Özgürlükler Endeksi’nin ve tüm alt bileşenlerinin gelir eşitsizliği üzerinde negative ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Bulgular üç önemli çıkarım ortaya koymakradır. (i) Alt göstergelerin etkileri gelişen piyasalarda birbirine oldukça yakınken, gelişmiş ekonomilerde önemli ölçüde farklılık göstermektedir; bu da gelişmiş ülkelerdeki politika yapıcıların eşitsizlikleri azaltmaya yönelik politika uygularken bazı özgürlük alanlarına daha fazla dikkat etmeleri gerektiğini göstermektedir. (ii) Tüm paneller için, hükümet büyüklüğünün şaşırtıcı derecede düşük etkileri, hükümet harcamalarının eşitsizliği azaltmadaki zayıf rolünün altını çizmektedir. (iii) Düzenleyici etkinlik, gelir eşitsizliklerinin azaltılmasında kilit bir faktör olarak ortaya çıkmakta ve politika yapıcıları düzenleyici süreçlerin iyileştirilmesine öncelik vermeye teşvik etmektedir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma küresel gelir eşitsizliğinin ele alınmasında politika yapıcıların anlayışını zenginleştirmekte ve uygulanamaya dönük bilgiler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gelir Eşitsizliği
• Ekonomik Özgürlükler
• Gelişen Piyasalar
• Gelişmiş Ekonomiler
• Panel Veri Analizi

Economic Freedom and Income Inequality: An Empirical Note for the Post-GFC Period

Öz

This study examines the dynamic relationship between economic freedom and income inequality in 148 countries, focusing on the post-Global Financial Crisis (GFC) period. Utilizing the System-GMM estimation methodology to address endogeneity concerns, the research also reveals nuanced patterns in both developed and emerging markets. The analysis identifies a negative and statistically significant effect of the Economic Freedom Index (EFI) and all of its sub-components on income inequality. Our findings reveal three important implications: (i) The effects of sub-indicators are quite close to each other in emerging markets, but differ significantly in developed economies, suggesting that policymakers in developed countries should pay more attention to certain areas of freedom when implementing policies to reduce inequalities. (ii) For all panels, the surprisingly small effects of government size underscores the weak role of government spending in mitigating inequality. (iii) Regulatory efficiency emerges as a key factor in reducing income inequalities, urging policymakers to prioritize improvement in regulatory processes. Overall, this study enriches policiymakers’ understanding and offers actionable insights for addressing global income inequality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Income Inequality; Economic Freedom; Emerging Markets
• Developed countries
• Panel Data Analysis.

Kaynakça

1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 385-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3
2. Ahmad, M. (2017). Economic freedom and income inequality: does political regime matter?. Economies, 5(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies5020018
3. Ahmad, M., & Nayan, S. (2019). Income inequalıty and middle-income trap: A panel data analysis on the effects of economic freedom and democracy. International Journal of Business & Society, 20(2), 563-584.
4. Amendola, A., Easaw, J., & Savoia, A. (2013). Inequality in developing economies: the role of institutional development. Public Choice, 155, 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9838-3
5. Apergis, N., & Cooray, A. (2017). Economic freedom and income inequality: Evidence from a panel of global economies—a linear and a non‐linear long‐run analysis. The Manchester School, 85(1), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12137
6. Apergis, N., Dincer, O., & Payne, J. E. (2014). Economic freedom and income inequality revisited: Evidence from a panel error correction model. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2012.00343.x
7. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
8. Ashby, N. J., & Sobel, R. S. (2008). Income inequality and economic freedom in the US states. Public Choice, 134, 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9230-5

9. Batuo, M. E., & Asongu, S. A. (2015). The impact of liberalisation policies on income inequality in African countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 42(1), 68-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-05-2013-0065
10. Bennett, D. L. (2016). Subnational economic freedom and performance in the United States and Canada. Cato J., 36, 165.
11. Bennett, D. L., & Cebula, R. J. (2015). Misperceptions about capitalism, government and inequality. Economic behavior, economic freedom, and entrepreneurship (pp. 1-20). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718237.00007
12. Bennett, D. L., & Nikolaev, B. (2017). On the ambiguous economic freedom–inequality relationship. Empirical Economics, 53, 717-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1131-3
13. Bennett, D. L., & Vedder, R. K. (2013). A dynamic analysis of economic freedom and income inequality in the 50 US states: Empirical evidence of a parabolic relationship. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 43(1), 42-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2134650
14. Berggren, N. (1999). Economic freedom and equality: Friends or foes?. Public choice, 100, 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018343912743
15. Berggren, N., & Jordahl, H. (2005). Does free trade really reduce growth? Further testing using the economic freedom index. Public Choice, 122(1-2), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3994-2
16. Bergh, A., & Nilsson, T. (2010). Do liberalization and globalization increase income inequality?. European Journal of political economy, 26(4), 488-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.03.002
17. Blejer, M. I., & Guerrero, I. (1990). The impact of macroeconomic policies on income distribution: an empirical study of the Philippines. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 414-423. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109349
18. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
19. Brkić, I., Gradojević, N., & Ignjatijević, S. (2020). The impact of economic freedom on economic growth? New European dynamic panel evidence. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13020026
20. Carter, J. R. (2007). An empirical note on economic freedom and income inequality. Public Choice, 130(1-2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9078-0
21. Clark, J. R., & Lawson, R. A. (2008). The impact of economic growth, tax policy and economic freedom on income inequality. The Journal of Private Enterprise, 24(1), 23–31.
22. Compton, R. A., Giedeman, D. C., & Hoover, G. A. (2011). Panel evidence on economic freedom and growth in the United States. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(3), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.01.001
23. De Haan, J., & Sturm, J. E. (2000). On the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. European journal of political economy, 16(2), 215-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(99)00065-8
24. De Soysa, I., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2023). Free market capitalism and societal inequities: assessing the effects of economic freedom on income inequality and the equity of access to opportunity, 1990–2017. International Political Science Review, 44(4), 471-491.
25. Doucouliagos, C., & Ulubasoglu, M. A. (2006). Economic freedom and economic growth: Does specification make a difference?. European journal of political economy, 22(1), 60-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.06.003
26. Graafland, J., & Lous, B. (2018). Economic freedom, income inequality and life satisfaction in OECD countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(7), 2071-2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9905-7
27. Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1029-1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775
28. Huynh, C. M. (2022). Economic freedom, economic development and income inequality in Asia: an analysis from the Kuznets curve perspective. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 1-20.
29. Karakotsios, A., Katrakilidis, C., Dimitriadis, D., & Christoforidis, T. (2020). Examining the relationship between income inequality, taxation and economic freedom: A panel cointegration approach. Economics and Business Letters, 9(3), 206-215.
30. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
31. Law, C. H., & Soon, S. V. (2020). The impact of inflation on income inequality: the role of institutional quality. Applied Economics Letters, 27(21), 1735-1738. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1717425
32. MSCI Market Classification (2023). https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/indexes/market-classification. Accessed 2023.
33. Nazirou, S. C. M., Mousa, D. S. M., & Ahmed, A. T. (2022). The impact of economic freedom and democracy on ıncome ınequality: empirical evidence from sub-saharan african countries. Archives of Business Research, 10(3), 217-234.
34. Pérez-Moreno, S., & Angulo-Guerrero, M. J. (2016). Does economic freedom increase income inequality? Evidence from the EU countries. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 19(4), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2015.1128832
35. Rubin, A., & Segal, D. (2015). The effects of economic growth on income inequality in the US. Journal of Macroeconomics, 45, 258-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.05.007
36. Rutledge, I. (2018). The Relationship Between Economic Freedom and Income Inequality: A Panel Data Analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Faculty of Haverford College.
37. Scully, G. W. (2002). Economic freedom, government policy and the trade-off between equity and economic growth. Public choice, 113(1-2), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020308831424
38. Silber, J., & Zilderfarb, B. Z. (1995). The effect of anticipated and unanticipated inflation on income distribution: the Israeli case. Journal of income Distribution, 4(1), 3-3.
39. Sturm, J. E., & De Haan, J. (2015). Income inequality, capitalism, and ethno-linguistic fractionalization. American Economic Review, 105(5), 593-597. doi:10.1257/aer.p20151112
40. The Heritage Foundation. (2023). Economic Freedom Index. https://www.heritage.org/index/ [Data set]. Accessed 2023.
41. The World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators [Data set]. Accessed 2023.
42. Uzelac, O., Davidovic, M., & Mijatovic, M. D. (2020). Legal framework, political environment and economic freedom in central and Eastern Europe: do they matter for economic growth?. Post-Communist Economies, 32(6), 697-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2020.1722583
43. Wahiba, N. F., & El Weriemmi, M. (2014). The relationship between economic growth and income inequality. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(1), 135-143.
44. Webster, A. L. (2013). The relationship between economic freedom and income equality in the United States. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 12(5), 469-476.
45. Wiseman, T. (2017). Economic freedom and growth in US state‐level market incomes at the top and bottom. Contemporary Economic Policy, 35(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12173
46. World Inequality Database. (2023). https://wid.world/ [Data set]. Accessed 2023.
47. Yang, Y., & Greaney, T. M. (2017). Economic growth and income inequality in the Asia-Pacific region: A comparative study of China, Japan, South Korea, and the United States. Journal of Asian Economics, 48, 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2016.10.008