Quality 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review on Bridging Industry 4.0 Technologies with Modern Quality Management Using the SPAR-4-SLR and TCCM Frameworks

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 3, 933 - 964, 18.12.2025

Sedat Belbağ

https://doi.org/10.26745/ahbvuibfd.1651864

Öz

This study examines the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies into quality management, defining Quality 4.0 as a key advancement in manufacturing. By combining traditional methods with Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, big data, and automation, Quality 4.0 enables proactive decision-making, efficiency, and sustainability. Beyond technology, it emphasizes people, processes, and innovation. The shift from traditional quality management to Quality 4.0 provides a transition from reactive defect control to data-driven quality assurance, optimizing processes and enhancing customer satisfaction. This study offers a thorough systematic review of the literature on Quality 4.0, using the theory, context, characteristics, and methodology (TCCM) framework. This study adhered to the SPAR-4-SLR protocol and analyzed 35 articles, retrieved from the Web of Science, that specifically address Quality 4.0. Our study examines the related literature under themes such as competence, governance, stakeholders, digitalization, and external factors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Quality 4.0 , Industry 4.0 , Systematic review , Digitalization , Technology

Kalite 4.0: SPAR-4-SLR ve TCCM Çerçevelerini Kullanarak Endüstri 4.0 Teknolojilerini Modern Kalite Yönetimi ile Entegre Etmeye İlişkin Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi

Öz

Bu çalışma, Endüstri 4.0 teknolojilerinin kalite yönetimine entegrasyonunu incelemekte ve Kalite 4.0’ı üretimde önemli bir ilerleme olarak tanımlamaktadır. Geleneksel yöntemleri nesnelerin interneti, yapay zeka, büyük veri ve otomasyonla birleştiren Kalite 4.0, proaktif karar alma, verimlilik ve sürdürülebilirliği mümkün kılmaktadır. Teknolojinin ötesinde, insanları, süreçleri ve inovasyonu vurgulamaktadır. Geleneksel kalite yönetiminden Kalite 4.0'a geçiş, reaktif hata kontrolünden veri odaklı kalite güvencesine geçişi, süreçleri optimize etmeyi ve müşteri memnuniyetini artırmayı sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, teori, bağlam, özellikler ve metodoloji (TCCM) çerçevesini kullanarak Kalite 4.0 hakkındaki literatürün kapsamlı bir sistematik incelemesini sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada SPAR-4-SLR protokolüne bağlı kalınmakta ve Web of Science'dan alınan ve özellikle Kalite 4.0'ı ele alan toplam 35 makale analiz edilmektedir. Bu çalışma, ilgili literatürü yetkinlik, yönetişim, paydaşlar, dijitalleşme ve dışsal faktörler gibi temalar altında incelemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kalite 4.0 , Endüstri 4.0 , Sistematik Literatür Taraması , Dijitalleşme , Teknoloji

Kaynakça

• Abd Hamid, M. S. R., Masrom, N. R., & Mazlan, N. A. B. (2022). The key factors of the industrial revolution 4.0 in the Malaysian smart manufacturing context. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), 13(2), 1-19.
• Ali, K., & Johl, S. K. (2023). Impact of total quality management on industry 4.0 readiness and practices: does firm size matter?. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 36(4), 567-589.
• Altshuller, G. (2002). 40 principles: TRIZ keys to technical innovation (Vol. 1). Technical Innovation Center, Inc.. American Society for Quality (2024), Learn about quality, https://asq.org/quality-resources/learn-about-quality. Accessed online: 15.06.2024.
• Antony, J., McDermott, O., & Sony, M. (2022). Quality 4.0 conceptualisation and theoretical understanding: a global exploratory qualitative study. The TQM Journal, 34(5), 1169-1188.
• Antony, J., McDermott, O., Sony, M., Toner, A., Bhat, S., Cudney, E. A., & Doulatabadi, M. (2023a). Benefits, challenges, critical success factors and motivations of Quality 4.0–A qualitative global study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(7-8), 827-846.
• Antony, J., Sony, M., McDermott, O., Jayaraman, R., & Flynn, D. (2023b). An exploration of organizational readiness factors for Quality 4.0: an intercontinental study and future research directions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(2), 582-606.
• Antony, J., Kaul, A., Bhat, S., Sony, M., Kaul, V., Zulfiqar, M., & McDermott, O. (2024a). Critical failure factors for Quality 4.0: an exploratory qualitative study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 41(4), 1044-1062.
• Antony, J., Swarnakar, V., Sony, M., McDermott, O., & Jayaraman, R. (2024b). How do organizational performances vary between early adopters and late adopters of Quality 4.0? An exploratory qualitative study. The TQM Journal, 36(8), 2338-2359.
• Avilés‐Sacoto, S. V., Velasco‐Tapia, K. C., Avilés‐Sacoto, E. C., & Argüello‐Herrera, J. I. (2024). Innovating for impact: Proposing quality 4.0 integration to achieve sustainable development goals in microenterprises. Business Strategy & Development, 7(2), e371.
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
• Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
• Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M., & Rosenberg, M. (2014). How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective. International journal of information and communication engineering, 8(1), 37-44.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
• Calvo-Mora, A., Pedro, E. D. M., & Suárez, E. (2024). Exploring barriers to Quality 4.0 implementation: a multivariate analysis. The TQM Journal.
• Calvo-Mora, A., Alves, H., & Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F. (2025). Quality 4.0 Key Dimensions and Implementation Profiles in Organizations of Excellence: A Cluster Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
• Cetindamar Kozanoglu, D., & Abedin, B. (2021). Understanding the role of employees in digital transformation: conceptualization of digital literacy of employees as a multi-dimensional organizational affordance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(6), 1649-1672.
• Chiarini, A., & Kumar, M. (2021). Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 integration for Operational Excellence: evidence from Italian manufacturing companies. Production planning & control, 32(13), 1084-1101.
• Deng, Y., Cai, C., He, Z., & Wang, H. (2025). How does Quality 4.0 affect innovation performance? An empirical study from the Yangtze River Delta region of China. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.
• Dias, A. M., Carvalho, A. M., & Sampaio, P. (2022). Quality 4.0: literature review analysis, definition and impacts of the digital transformation process on quality. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(6), 1312-1335.
• Dror, S. (2022). QFD for selecting key success factors in the implementation of quality 4.0. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 38(6), 3216-3232.
• Elnadi, M., & Gheith, M. H. (2024). Examining the determinants of quality 4.0 adoption: a behavioral reasoning theory perspective. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1-31.
• Escobar, C. A., McGovern, M. E., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2021). Quality 4.0: a review of big data challenges in manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32(8), 2319-2334.
• European Chamber Report. 2017. https://www.europeanchamber.com.cn/en/china-manufacturing-2025, online accessed: June 2024.
• Fadilasari, D. P., Roy Ghatak, R., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Joshi, R., & Kandasamy, J. (2024). Adopting quality management practices in the industry 4.0 era: an investigation into the challenges. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-26.
• Fonseca, L., Amaral, A., & Oliveira, J. (2021). Quality 4.0: the EFQM 2020 model and industry 4.0 relationships and implications. Sustainability, 13(6), 3107.
• Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., Naciti, V., & Paltrinieri, A. (2024). A PRISMA systematic review of greenwashing in the banking industry: A call for action. Research in International Business and Finance, 69, 102262.
• Ghatak, R. R., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2024). Investigating the barriers to Quality 4.0 adoption in the Indian manufacturing sector: insights and implications for industry and policy-making. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 41(6), 1623-1656.
• Glogovac, M., Ruso, J., & Maricic, M. (2022). ISO 9004 maturity model for quality in industry 4.0. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(5-6), 529-547.
• Glogovac, M., Ruso, J., Arsić, S., Rakić, A., & Milošević, I. (2023). Leadership for quality 4.0 improvement, learning, and innovation. Engineering Management Journal, 35(3), 313-329.
• Government of Japan, Public Relations Office, 2019, https://www8.cao.go.jp/ cstp/english/society5_0/index.html, Online accessed: June 2024.
• Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal, 26(2), 91-108.
• Hart, S.L. (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm, Academy of Management Review, 20, (4), 986–1014.
• Huang, Z., Shahzadi, A., & Khan, Y. D. (2022). Unfolding the impact of quality 4.0 practices on industry 4.0 and circular economy practices: a hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Sustainability, 14(23), 15495.
• Jacob, D. 2017. Quality 4.0 Impact and Strategy Handbook. Cambridge: LNS Research.
• Jänicke, M., & Jacob, K. (2009). A Third Industrial Revolution? Solutions to the crisis of resource-intensive growth. Solutions to the Crisis of Resource-Intensive Growth.
• Joshi, S., Sharma, M., Luthra, S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Anbanandam, R. (2024). An assessment framework to evaluate the critical success factors to Quality 4.0 transition in developing countries: a case experience of sustainable performance of Indian manufacturers. The TQM Journal.
• Joshi, S. and Sharma, M. (2021), “Digital technologies (DT) adoption in agri-food supply chains amidst COVID-19: an approach towards food security concerns in developing countries”, Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 262-282.
• Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion.
• Kannan, K. S. P., & Garad, A. (2021). Competencies of quality professionals in the era of industry 4.0: a case study of electronics manufacturer from Malaysia. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 38(3), 839-871.
• Khourshed, N., & Gohar, N. (2023). Developing a systematic and practical road map for implementing quality 4.0. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 27(2), 96-121.
• Küpper, D., Knizek, C., Ryeson, D., & Noecker, J. (2019). Quality 4.0 takes more than technology. Boston Consulting Group (BCG), 20.
• Machado, C. G., Winroth, M. P., & Ribeiro da Silva, E. H. D. (2020). Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: an emerging research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1462-1484.
• Maganga, D. P., & Taifa, I. W. (2023). The readiness of manufacturing industries to transit to Quality 4.0. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(7), 1729-1752.
• Maganga, D. P., & Taifa, I. W. (2022). Quality 4.0 conceptualisation: an emerging quality management concept for manufacturing industries. The TQM Journal, 35(2), 389-413.
• Mazzuto, G., & Ciarapica, F. E. (2019). A big data analytics approach to quality, reliability and risk management. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 36(1), 2-6.
• Mintzberg, H. and Gosling, J. (2002), “Educating managers beyond borders”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 64-76, doi: 10.5465/amle.2002.7373654.
• Mittal, A., Kumar, V., Verma, P., & Singh, A. (2024). Evaluation of organizational variables of quality 4.0 in digital transformation: the study of an Indian manufacturing company. The TQM Journal, 36(1), 178-207.
• Mittal, A., Sachan, S., Kumar, V., Vardhan, S., Verma, P., Kaswan, M. S., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2023). Essential organizational variables for the implementation of Quality 4.0: empirical evidence from the Indian furniture industry. The TQM Journal, (ahead-of-print).
• Nguyen, K., Akbari, M., Quang, H. T., McDonald, S., Hoang, T. H., Yap, T. L., & George, M. (2023). Navigating Environmental Challenges through Supply Chain Quality Management 4.0 in Circular Economy: A Comprehensive Review. Sustainability, 15(24), 16720.
• Nguyen, T. A. V., Tucek, D., Pham, N. T., & Nguyen, K. H. (2024). Quality 4.0 practices toward sustainable excellence in the manufacturing sector. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 35(13-14), 1593-1610.
• Nzumile, J. M. (2024). Quality 4.0: the need for Tanzania's service organisation transit to Quality 4.0. The TQM Journal.
• Nisha, G. R., & Ravi, V. (2024). Implementation of Quality 4.0 framework in the electronics sector using ANP and QFD methodologies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.
• Paul J, Criado AR (2020) The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? Int Bus Rev 29(4):1–7.
• Paul J, Lim WM, O’Cass A, Hao AW, Bresciani S (2021) Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). Int J Consum Stud 45(4):1–16.
• Paul J, Rosado-Serrano A (2019) Gradual internationalization vs born-global / international new venture models: A review and research agenda. Int Mark Rev 36(6):830–858.
• Raj, A., Dwivedi, G., Sharma, A., Lopes De Sousa Jabbour, A.B. and Rajak, S. (2020), “Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: an inter-country comparative perspective”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 224, 107546, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107546.
• Rico, J. P., Calvo-Mora, A., Medina-Molina, C., & Alves, H. (2024). Quality 4.0 social and strategic readiness factors: sufficient and Necessary Condition Analysis. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 35(5-6), 559-583.
• Ríos-Hernández, A., Mendoza-Gómez, J., & Valdez–de la Rosa, L. M. (2024). Emotional intelligence and analytical skill as human capital factors influencing competitiveness through analysis of Toyota Kata, Kaizen and Quality 4.0: empirical study conducted during COVID-19. The TQM Journal, 36(6), 1402-1419.
• Sader, S., Husti, I., & Daroczi, M. (2022). A review of quality 4.0: Definitions, features, technologies, applications, and challenges. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(9-10), 1164-1182.
• Sahu, M., Singh, V., & Kumar, S. (2025). Enhancing quality 4.0 adoption: integrative analysis using fuzzy-TOPSIS and fuzzy-DEMATEL for strategic dimension prioritization. The TQM Journal.
• Saldanha, T. J., John-Mariadoss, B., Wu, M. X., & Mithas, S. (2021). How information and communication technology shapes the influence of culture on innovation: a country-level analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(1), 108-139.
• Sharma, M., & Joshi, S. (2020). Digital supplier selection reinforcing supply chain quality management systems to enhance firm's performance. TQM J ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print).
• de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., Foropon, C., & Godinho Filho, M. (2018). When titans meet–Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 18-25.
• Sureshchandar, G. S. (2022). Quality 4.0–understanding the criticality of the dimensions using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(6), 1336-1367.
• Swarnakar, V., McDermott, O., Sony, M., Bhat, S., & Antony, J. (2025). Unveiling the path to sustainable quality 4.0 implementation in organisations: insights from an exploratory qualitative study. The TQM Journal, 37(2), 566-591.
• Sony, M., Antony, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2020). Essential ingredients for the implementation of Quality 4.0: a narrative review of literature and future directions for research. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 779-793.
• Sony, M., Antony, J., Douglas, J. A., & McDermott, O. (2021). Motivations, barriers and readiness factors for Quality 4.0 implementation: an exploratory study. The TQM Journal, 33(6), 1502-1515.
• Stevenson, William J., (2015). Operation Management Twelfth Edition. McGraw-Hill Education, New York. Sureshchandar, G. S. (2023). Quality 4.0–a measurement model using the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(1), 280-303.
• Sütőová, A., Šooš, Ľ., & Kóča, F. (2020). Learning needs determination for industry 4.0 maturity development in automotive organisations in Slovakia. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 24(3), 122-139.
• Sütőová, A., Vykydal, D., Vargova, S., Palacka, R., & Kočiško, R. (2025). Competence gap analysis of early-career Quality Engineers in the field of Quality 4.0. The TQM Journal.
• Thekkoote, R. (2022). Enabler toward successful implementation of Quality 4.0 in digital transformation era: a comprehensive review and future research agenda. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(6), 1368-1384.
• Trist, E., Bamforth, K., 1951. Some social and psychological consequences of the long wall method of goal getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38.
• Xu, J., Yu, Y., Zhang, M., & Zhang, J. Z. (2023). Impacts of digital transformation on eco-innovation and sustainable performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 393, 136278.
• Vinodh, S., Wankhede, V. A., & Muruganantham, G. (2024). Analysis of critical success factors of Quality 4.0 implementation in manufacturing SMEs using best–worst method. The TQM Journal.
• Virmani, N., Upadhyay, M., Luthra, S., Singh, S., & Upadhyay, A. (2024). Assessing solutions to overcome Quality 4.0 barriers: a decision-making framework. The TQM Journal, 36(6), 1460-1485.
• Westaby, J. D. (2005). Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 98(2), 97-120.
• Yadav, N., Shankar, R., & Singh, S. P. (2021). Critical success factors for lean six sigma in quality 4.0. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 13(1), 123-156.
• Yin, Y., Stecke, K. E., & Li, D. (2018). The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 848-861.
• Yuan, H., Peng, G., Song, C., Wang, L., & Lu, S. (2025). Enhancing digital economy: Optimizing export enterprise markup and resource allocation efficiency. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 4185-4220.
• Zhang, X., Balaji, M. S., & Jiang, Y. (2025). Charting the future of digital servitization using CIMO framework. International Studies of Management & Organization, 55(1), 112-139.
• Zheng, P., Wang, H., Sang, Z., Zhong, R. Y., Liu, Y., Liu, C., ... & Xu, X. (2018). Smart manufacturing systems for Industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 13, 137-150.
• Zonnenshain, A., & Kenett, R. S. (2020). Quality 4.0—the challenging future of quality engineering. Quality Engineering, 32(4), 614-626.
• Zu, X., Fredendall, L.D. and Douglas, T.J. (2008), “The evolving theory of quality management: the role of Six Sigma”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 630-650.
• Zulfiqar, M., Antony, J., Swarnakar, V., Sony, M., Jayaraman, R., & McDermott, O. (2023). A readiness assessment of Quality 4.0 in packaging companies: an empirical investigation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(11-12), 1334-1352.