Examining the Role of Academics’ Imposter Thoughts on Influence Management through Dressing Choices in the Workplace

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 3, 837 - 858, 18.12.2025

Alper Gürer , İbrahim Bozacı

https://doi.org/10.26745/ahbvuibfd.1744593

Öz

Imposter thoughts, or the belief that others are overly positive about an individual’s abilities, are a variable that has been shown to have negative effects on employees. On the other hand, evidence on the effects of imposter thoughts on workplace consumption decisions is limited. This research aims to reveal the possible impact of academics’ imposter thoughts on their influence management behaviours through their dressing choices at work. To this end, a convenience sampling online survey was conducted with academics. Structural validity, reliability, normal distribution, and influence analyses were conducted on the obtained data using IBM SPSS and AMOS programs. As a result, it was determined that academics' imposter thoughts positively affected their influence management through clothing choices at work. This finding is considered beneficial for better understanding employee behaviours in the workplace, identifying specific psychological problems at employees, and understanding consumer behaviour in an organizational context. Finally, the research findings were interpreted, and recommendations were developed for practitioners and researchers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Imposter syndrome , Imposter thoughts , Workplace clothing choice

Akademisyenlerin İmposter Düşüncelerinin, İşyerinde Giyim Tercihleriyle Etki Yönetimi Üzerindeki Rolünün İncelenmesi

Öz

İmposter düşünceleri veya bireyin becerileriyle ilgili diğerlerinin gereğinden fazla iyi değerlendirmelerde bulunduğuna yönelik düşünceleri, çalışanlara olumsuz etkileri olduğu görülen bir değişkendir. Diğer taraftan, imposter düşüncelerinin iş yerindeki tüketim kararlarına etkilerine yönelik bulgular kısıtlıdır. Bu araştırmada, akademisyenlerin imposter düşüncelerinin iş yerinde giyim tercihleri aracılığıyla etki yönetimi davranışlarına olası etkisini ortaya koymak amaçlanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, akademisyenlerle kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle online anket uygulaması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler üzerinde IBM SPSS ve AMOS programlarıyla; yapısal geçerlilik, güvenilirlik, normal dağılım ve etki analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Neticede akademisyenlerin imposter düşüncelerinin iş yerinde giyim tercihi aracılığıyla etki yönetimini pozitif yönlü etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Bu bulgunun, iş yerinde çalışan davranışlarının daha iyi anlaşılması, çalışanlarda belirli psikolojik sorunların tespit edilmesi ve örgütsel bağlamda tüketici davranışlarının anlaşılması bakımından yararlı olduğu değerlendirilmektedir. Son olarak araştırma bulguları yorumlanmış, uygulayıcı ve araştırmacılara yönelik öneriler geliştirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İmposter sendromu , İmposter düşünceleri , İş yerinde giyim tercihi

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Kaynakça

• Adler, A., & Wolfe, W. B. (1927). The feeling of inferiority and the striving for recognition. Proveedings of The Rolayl Society of Medicine, 1883, 25-30.
• Andrews, N. (2020). It's Not Imposter Syndrome: Resisting Self-Doubt as Normal for Library Workers. Gleeson Library Faculty and Staff Research and Scholarship, 41, https://repository.usfca.edu/librarian/41, 21.7.24.
• Aslani, F., Mehtari, M., & Rafiyan, N. (2023). The Effect of Impostor Syndrome on Job Involvement with Mediating Role of Structural Empowerment regarding the Employees of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Quarterly Journal of Management Strategies in Health System. 8(1), 77-90.
• Bagheri Sheykhangafshe, F., Tajbakhsh, K., Savabi Niri, V., Mikelani, N., Eghbali, F., & Fathi-Ashtiani, A. (2022). The effectiveness of schema therapy on self-efficacy, burnout, and perfectionism of employees with imposter syndrome. Health and Development Journal, 11(3), 140-148.
• Baumann, N., Faulk, C., Vanderlan, J., Chen, J., & Bhayani, R. K. (2020). Small-group discussion sessions on imposter syndrome. MedEdPORTAL, 16, 11004, 1-5.
• Baumgartner, H. & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: a review. International Journal of Research in Marketing 13(2), 139-161.
• Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). Academic Press.
• Bentler, P. M. & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
• Bravata, D. M., Watts, S. A., Keefer, A. L., Madhusudhan, D. K., Taylor, K. T., Clark, D. M., ... & Hagg, H. K. (2020). Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: a systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35, 1252-1275.
• Burke, Peter. J. 1980. The Self: Measurement Require- ments from an Interactionist Perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly 43:18-29.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin İstatistik: SPSS Uygulamalı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with AMOS Basic concepts, applications, and programming (Multivariate Applications Series), Routledge, New York.
• Campbell, C. (2021). The struggle is real: The imposter syndrome (Master of Social Work, California State University, Chico).
• Čekrlija, Đ., Đurić, D., & Mirković, B. (2017). Validation of Adlerian inferiority (COMPIN) and superiority (SUCOMP) complex shortened scales. Civitas, 7(2), 13-35.
• Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, research & practice, 15(3), 1-8.
• Çoşkun, R., Altunışık, R & Yıldırım, E. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma Yöntemleri: SPSS Uygulamaları. 10. Baskı. Sakarya Yayıncılık.
• Derin, S., & Şahin, E. S. (2024). Turkish Version of the Adlerian Inferiority and Superiority Complex Shortened Scales: Validity and Reliability. Psihologija, 57(1), 21-39.
• Doll, W.J., Xia, W. & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument, MIS Quarterly 18(4), 357-369.
• Fields, L. N., & Cunningham-Williams, R. M. (2021). Experiences with imposter syndrome and authenticity at research-intensive schools of social work: A case study on Black female faculty. Advances in Social Work, 21(2/3), 354-373.
• Freeman, J., & Peisah, C. (2022). Imposter syndrome in doctors beyond training: a narrative review. Australasian Psychiatry, 30(1), 49-54.
• Goldsmith, E. (2018). Do you feel like a fraud? How experiencing the impostor phenomenon influences consumption choices. (PhD Thesis, Graduate Faculty in Business, The City University of New York).
• Gresham-Dolby, C. (2022). Imposter syndrome: an opportunity to positively influence mentees. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 130-132.
• Grubb, W. L., & McDowell, W. C. (2012). The imposter phenomenon’s impact on citizenship behavior and employee commitment: flying under the radar. Journal of Business Issues, 2012(1), 1-10.
• Haar, J., & de Jong, K. (2024). Imposter phenomenon and employee mental health: what role do organizations play?. Personnel Review, 53(1), 211-227.
• Hair J.F, Tatham R.L, Anderson R.E ve Black W. (1998) Multivariate data analysis. (5. Basım), Prentice-Hall, London.
• Han, E. M. (2011). A pastoral approach to the problem of an inferiority complex for workers in the Korean context (Master Thesis, Practical Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of the Free State).
• Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social psychology quarterly, 255-269.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
• Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453.
• Hu, LT. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
• Karanika, K., & Hogg, M. K. (2016). Being kind to ourselves: Self-compassion, coping, and consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 760-769.
• KH, A., & Menon, P. (2022). Impostor syndrome: An integrative framework of its antecedents, consequences and moderating factors on sustainable leader behaviors. European journal of training and development, 46(9), 847-860.
• Khan, M. N. A., Miah, M. S. U., Shahjalal, M., Sarwar, T. B., & Rokon, M. S. (2022). Predicting young imposter syndrome using ensemble learning. Complexity, 2022(1), 8306473, 1-10.
• Kim, K., & Baker, M. A. (2022). Luxury branding in the hospitality industry: The impact of employee’s luxury appearance and elitism attitude. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 63(1), 5-18.
• Kim, S., & Gal, D. (2014). From compensatory consumption to adaptive consumption: The role of self-acceptance in resolving self-deficits. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 526-542.
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principle and practice of structural equation modelling (4. bs.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
• Koles, B., Wells, V., & Tadajewski, M. (2018). Compensatory consumption and consumer compromises: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(1-2), 96-133.
• Kolligian, J., Jr., & Sternberg, R. J. (1991). Perceived fraudulence in young adults: Is there an “Imposter Syndrome”? Journal of Personality Assessment, 56(2), 308–326.
• LaPalme, M., Luo, P., Cipriano, C., & Brackett, M. (2022). Imposter syndrome among pre-service educators and the importance of emotion regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 838575, 1-13.
• Laux, S. E. (2018). Experiencing the imposter syndrome in academia: women faculty members' perception of the tenure and promotion process (Doctoral dissertation, Graduate Faculty, Saint Louis University).
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J. & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 611-637.
• Marder, B., Javornik, A., Qi, K., Oliver, S., Lavertu, L., & Cowan, K. (2024). Does LinkedIn cause imposter syndrome? An empirical examination of well‐being and consumption‐related effects. Psychology & Marketing, 41(3), 492-511.
• Martinez, J., & Forrey, M. (2019). Overcoming imposter syndrome: The adventures of two new instruction librarians. Reference Services Review, 47(3), 331-342.
• McDowell, W. C., Grubb III, W. L., & Geho, P. R. (2015). The impact of self-efficacy and perceived organizational support on the imposter phenomenon. American Journal of Management, 15(3), 23-29.
• Özdemir, Y. A., Şahin, T. T. & Esin, A. (2015). Çözümlü örneklerle örnekleme yöntemlerine giriş (1.Baskı). Seçkin Kitabevi.
• Parker, J. S., Haskins, N., Coleman-Chatman, T., Duru, C., Ramirez, D., Chae, N., ... & Nortey, A. (2024). Dismantling the imposter syndrome: A case study of early career women of color in school mental health fields. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 49(1), 3-24.
• Peluchette, J. V., Karl, K., & Rust, K. (2006). Dressing to impress: Beliefs and attitudes regarding workplace attire. Journal of business and psychology, 21, 45-63.
• Rafaeli, A., Dutton, J., Harquail, C. V., & Mackie-Lewis, S. (1997). Navigating by attire: The use of dress by female administrative employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 9-45.
• Rakestraw, L. (2017). How to stop feeling like a phony in your library: Recognizing the causes of the imposter syndrome, and how to put a stop to the cycle. Law Libr. J., 109(3), 465-477.
• Reed II, A., Forehand, M. R., Puntoni, S., & Warlop, L. (2012). Identity-based consumer behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 310-321.
• Rohrmann, S., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Leonhardt, M. (2016). Validation of the impostor phenomenon among managers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 821, 1-11 .
• Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 257-267.
• Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of consumer research, 9(3), 287-300.
• Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893-98.
• Stets, J. E.,& Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social psychology quarterly, 224-237.
• Stryker, S. (1968). Identity Salience and Role Performance: The Importance of Symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research. Journal of Marriage and the Family 30, 558-64.
• Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6. bs.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Pearson Education Inc.
• Tewfik, B. A. (2022). The impostor phenomenon revisited: Examining the relationship between workplace impostor thoughts and interpersonal effectiveness at work. Academy of Management Journal, 65(3), 988-1018.
• Walters, C. G.(1974). Consumer Behavior Theory and Practice, Revised Edition, Richard Irwin, Homewood.
• Wang, K. T., Sheveleva, M. S., & Permyakova, T. M. (2019). Imposter syndrome among Russian students: The link between perfectionism and psychological distress. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 1-6.
• Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods ve Research, 16(1), 118-154.
• Wilkinson, C. (2020). Imposter syndrome and the accidental academic: An autoethnographic account. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(4), 363-374.
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y. ve Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.