Çin’in Uluslararası Kimlik Trilemması: Gelişmekte olan Ülke, Bölgesel Güç ya da Büyük Güç?

Öz

Çin dış politikasında sabit bir ülke kimliğinden ziyade aynı anda farklı birçok kimlik benimsemektedir. Çin Üçüncü Dünya ile ilişkilerinde hala gelişmekte olan ülke kimliğini kullanırken, periferisinde bölgesel güç rolünü oynamaktadır. Uluslararası alanda ise büyük güçlere atfedilen uluslararası sorumluluk prensibini üstlenmektedir. Bu bağlamda Çin’in gelişmekte olan ülke mi, bölgesel güç mü ya da küresel anlamda büyük güç mü olduğu konusunda kesinlik yoktur. Çin’in dış politikada birden çok kimliğe aynı anda bürünmesi, uluslararası ilişkiler akademisi tarafından tartışılan küresel kimliklerin bir ya da birkaçının benimsenmesi sonucudur. Uluslararası kimlik tartışmalarının odak noktası ise düşük profil stratejisinin temel taşlarından biri olan “juebu dangtou” yani asla “lider olma/liderlik yapma” prensibidir. Bu çalışma da, Çin akademisindeki uluslararası kimlik tartışmalarını, gelişmekte olan ülke, bölgesel güç ve büyük güç kimliği olarak üç kategoride ele alacağım. Çalışmanın temel önermesi, Xi Jinping’in “başarı için mücadele” stratejisinin şekillenmesinde akademideki kimlik tartışmalarının etkili olduğudur. Ayrıca bu tartışmalar Çin’in hangi siyasi coğrafya üzerinden etki alanı yaratmak isteyeceğini gözlemlemek için de oldukça yararlıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Asla Liderlik Yapma,Uluslararası Kimlik Tartışmaları,Çin Akademisi,Düşük Profil Stratejisi,Başarı için Mücadele

China’s International Identity Trilemma: Developing Country, Regional Power or Great Power?

Öz

China has adopted many different identities concurrently, rather than a fixed country identity in its foreign policy. China still uses the identity of being a developing country in its relations with the third world, while playing the role of being a regional power in its periphery. On the other hand, it assumes the principle of international responsibility that is attributed to the Great Powers in the international arena. In this context, there is no certainty whether China is a developing country, a regional power or a global power. China's simultaneous possession of multiple identities in foreign policy is the result of the adoption of one or more of the global identities discussed by the International Relations Academy. The focus of the International identity debate is the principle of “never take lead”, (juebu dangtou), which is one of the cornerstones of keeping low profile strategy. In this study, I will discuss the international identity debate in the Chinese Academy in three categories: developing country, regional power and great power. The main argument of the study is that the identity discussions at the Academy are effective in shaping Xi Jinping's “strive for achievement” strategy. These discussions are also very useful to observe which political geography China would like to create an impact on.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Never Take Lead,International Identity Debates,Chinese IR Academy,Keeping Low Profile,Strive for Achievement

Kaynakça

1. Bell, D. A. (2010). Reconciling socialism and Confucianism? reviving tradition in China. Dissent, 57(1), 91-99. doi: 10.1353/dss.0.0114
2. Callahan, W. A. (2015). History, tradition and the China Dream: socialist modernization in the world of great harmony. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(96), 983-1001. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2015.1030915
3. Chan, G. (2014). Capturing China’s international identity: social evolution and its missing links. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7(2), 261-281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pou030
4. Chen, Z. (2005). Nationalism, internationalism and Chinese foreign policy. Journal of Contemporary China, 14(42), 35-53. doi: 10.1080/1067056042000300772
5. China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development (CCICED) (2013). Important Speech of Xi Jinping at Peripheral Diplomacy Work Conference. Retrieved from http://www.cciced.net/cciceden/ NEWSCENTER/Latest EnvironmentalandDevelopmentNew s/201310/t20131030_82626.html., on March 5, 2018.
6. Xinhuanet (2015, April 12). China, Africa have always been community of common destiny. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-12/04/c1348 86013.htm.,on March 9, 2018.
7. Chu S., & Hong, J. (2013). Changing and unchanging elements in the global order and China's strategy. Contemporary International Relations, 3, 18-21.
8. Deng, X. (1994b). Seize the opportunity to develop the economy, 24 December 1990. In D. Xiaoping. Selected works of Deng Xiaoping, Vol. III. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.

9. Deng. X. (1994a). Deng Xiaoping wenhuan (Selected works of Deng Xiaoping) (Vol. 3). Beijing People Press.
10. Irvine, R. (2017). Nationalists or internationalists? China’s international relations experts debate the future. Journal of Contemporary China, 26(106), 586-600 doi: 10.1080/1067056042000300772
11. Jin, C. (2001). The US global strategy in the post-cold war era and its implications for China‐United States Relations: A Chinese perspective. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(27), 309-315. doi: 10.1080/10670560125619
12. Jin, C. (2017). Beijing, Washington jointly shape new order in Asia-Pacific region. Global Times. Retrieved from http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/10669 95.shtml., on September, 21, 2018.
13. Kawashima, S. (2011). The development of the debate over “hiding one's talents and biding one's time” (taoguan yanghui) China's foreign-policy doctrine. Asia-Pacific Review, 18(2), 14-36. doi: 10.1080/13439006.2011.641751
14. Leggett, J. A., Logan, J., & Mackey, A. (2008). China’s greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation policies congressional research service. CRS Report for Congress. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34659.pdf., on March 3, 2018.
15. Li, C., & Xu, L. (December 4, 2014). Chinese enthusiasm and American cynicism over the new type of great power relations. Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/chinese-enthusiasm-and-american-cynicism-over-the-new-type-of-great-power-relations/., on March 10, 2018.
16. Li, S. (2014). China’s dual-identity dilemma and its countermeasures. In S. Binhong (Ed.), The world in 2020 according to China: Chinese foreign policy elites discuss emerging trends in International Politics (pp. 51-68). Brill.
17. Niu, X. (2015). On China's international identity a horizontal analysis. Contemporary International Relations, 25(1), 39-65.
18. Pu, X. (2017). Controversial identity of a rising China. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 10(2), 131-149. doi: 10.1093/cjip/pox004
19. Qin, Y. (2010). International society as a process: institutions, identities, and China’s peaceful rise. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(2), 129-153. doi: 10.1093/cjip/poq007
20. Qin, Y. (2011). Chinese culture and its implications for foreign-policy making. China International Studies, 5, 45-65.
21. Qin, Y. (2014). Continuity through change: Background knowledge and China’s international strategy. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7(3), 285-314. doi: 10.1093/cjip/pou034
22. Ranade, J. (May, 2014). China’s new policy of peripheral diplomacy. CCAS. Retrieved from https://ccasindia.org/issue_policy.php?ipid=14., on March 6, 2017
23. Shambaugh, D. (2011). Coping with a conflicted China. The Washington Quarterly, 34(1), 7-27. doi: 10.1080/0163660X.2011.537974
24. Shambaugh, D. L. (2013). China goes global: the partial power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Shi, Y. (2014). China’s contemporary foreign strategy: ideology, basic platform, current challenges, and Chinese characteristics. In S. Binhong (Ed.), The world in 2020 according to China: Chinese foreign policy elites discuss emerging trends in International Politics. (pp. 34-51). Brill.
26. Sorensen, C. T. (2015). The significance of Xi Jinping’s Chinese dream for Chinese foreign policy: from tao guang yang hui to fen fa you wei. Journal of China and International Relations, 3(1), 66. doi: 10.5278/ojs.jcir.v3i1.1146
27. Tang, S. (2001). Zailun zhongguo de dazhanlue (On China’s grand strategy). Zhanlue yu Guanli (Strategy and Management), 4, 29-37.
28. Terhalle, M., & Depledge, J. (2013). Great-power politics, order transition, and climate governance: insights from international relations theory. Climate Policy, 13(5), 572-588. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.818849
29. Wang, J. (2011a). The International Positioning of China and the Strategic Principle of" Keeping a low profile but playing a due role. International Studies, 2, 4-20.
30. Wang, J. (2011b). China’s search for a grand strategy- a rising great power find its ways. Foreign Affairs, 90, 68-79.
31. -Watts, J. (March, 2009). Consuming nations should pay for carbon dioxide emissions, not manufacturing countries, says China. Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ 2009/mar/17/climate-change-china., on February 27, 2017.
32. Wei, L., & Qin, Y. (2008). Structures, processes, and the socialization of power: China and regional cooperation in East Asia. In R.S. Ross & Z. Feng (Eds.), China's ascent: power, security, and the future of international politics. (pp.115-138). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
33. Wu, X. (2001). Four contradictions constraining China's foreign policy behavior. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(27), 293-301. doi: 10.1080/10670560124142
34. Xi, J. (October, 2013). Let the sense of community of common destiny take deep root in neighbouring countries. October. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved from http://www.fmprc.gov.cn /mfa_eng/wjb _663304 /wjbz_663308/activities_663312/t1093870.shtml, on March 7, 2017.
35. Xu, J., & Du, Z. (2015). The dominant thinking sets in Chinese foreign policy research: a criticism. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 8(3), 251-279. doi: 10.1093/cjip/pov002
36. Yan, X. (2006). The rise of China and its power status. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 1(1), 5-33. doi: 10.1093/cjip/pol002
37. Yan, X. (2011). Ancient Chinese thought, modern Chinese power. Princeton University Press.
38. Yan, X. (2011). International leadership and norm evolution. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 4(3), 233-264. doi:10.1093/cjip/por013
39. Yan, X. (2014). From keeping a low profile to striving for achievement. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7(2), 153-184. doi: 10.1093/cjip/pou027
40. Yan, X. (2016). Political leadership and power redistribution. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9(1), 1-26. doi: 10.1093/cjip/pow002
41. Ye, Z. (2010). Inside China's grand strategy: the perspective from the People's Republic. University Press of Kentucky.
42. Zhang Y., & Tang S. (2005). China’s regional strategy. In D. L. Shambaugh (Ed.), Power shift: China and Asia’s new dynamics. (pp. 48-68). University of California Press.
43. Zhang, Y. (2011). Emerging force: China in the region and the world. Global Asia, 6(4), 18-21.
44. Zhang, Y. (2012). Role of regional institutions in East Asia. In Zhang, Y., F. Kimura and S. Oum (Eds.), Moving toward a new development model for East Asia- The role of domestic policy and regional cooperation. (pp. 337-365). ERIA Research Project Report 2011-10.
45. Zhao, T. (2006). Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’(Tian-xia,). Social Identities, 12(1), 29-41. doi: 10.1080/13504630600555559